AZ Snakepit: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Want to help build SB Nation? We're hiring! Bar-right-arrows



Tuesday Randomness

I was just working on my top ten films for 2007: not a great year for cinema, shall we say. That much became apparent when I discovered that Balls of Fury is going to qualify for an Honorable Mention on the list. What can I say? I'm a mark for anything involving Christopher Walken. How he didn't get a Best Supporting Oscar award for his role there I don't know - though Javier Bardem is such a shoo-in for that one, for No Country for Old Men, he might as well open the champagne now. Here's to nothing for Juno, and if Viggo Mortensen wins for Eastern Promises...well, I imagine a trend in naked fight scenes will inevitably follow. [Just saw the film, and really didn't like it at all, even though I've been a Cronenberg fan for more than two decades]

Anyway. Not much to report on the Diamondbacks front. We are apparently looking hard at Keith Foulke, the veteran left-handed reliever. It's another case where we have an edge in that the player lives locally, but Arizona will likely be hamstrung by their self-imposed reluctance to offer incentive-based contracts. Foulke didn't pitch at all in the majors last year, and had surgery on his elbow in September; he'd seem a prime candidate for an innings-related sliding-scale, and that would likely be the more profitable way for him to go. Mind you, in some ways this hardly counts as news, since Josh Byrnes said, "I think we would have to look into it. We're always looking for good players at good value," when asked about Foulke, all the way back in November 2006.

What it does perhaps indicate, is a serious questionmark over the availability of Doug Slaten to go as the bullpen lefty on Opening Day. With little fanfare, he followed Chad Tracy to the operating table for microfracture surgery, on the pitcher's right knee - since that's the one on which he lands after throwing, I suspect rehabilitation to full strength might take longer than for a position player. This would certainly help explain our interest in a replacement, though as Foulpole pointed out, Foulke is not a lefty. There are not very many free-agent southpaws left out there; Trever Miller and Ron Villone are the only ones who come to mind, though since the latter was name-checked in the Mitchell Report, we might want to steer clear of that particular option.

Miller might not be bad: trivia fans might want to note he smashed the record of most appearances in a season without recording a decision. He appeared in 76 games last season while posting an 0-0 record, destroying the old mark of 48. We may just go internal, with someone like Bill Murphy - his K:BB ratio will need to be a great deal better than the 2:7 he showed in his ten-game stint last year. His chances are likely improved, since the other lefties who pitched for us last year were Dana Eveland (now with the A's), Joe Kennedy (now dead) and Randy Choate (now signed by the Brewers, for some inexplicable reason).

Speaking of our injured soldiers, we have an Tracy and Johnson, as they come back from their close encounters of the surgical kind. The Big Unit is "fairly close" to throwing off the mound, according to Melvin, with the aim being to get him there before the start of Spring Training. Bob adds, "Just watching him play catch with his arm, it's unbelievable. He's got the arm of a 25-year-old." I bet the 25-year old in question is very upset about that: thought we hadn't heard anything from Micah Owings in a few months... :-)

Assuming he is ready for Opening Day, it looks like he will initially be slotted in behind Webb in the rotation, with Haren third, then Davis and Owings. The aim of that is mostly to break up the left-handers, Johnson and Davis, so opposing teams don't get comfortable facing southpaws. It's s aomewhat odd opening schedule: we start on Monday, March 31st in Cincinnati, but have an off day on Tuesday, before two more game there, part of a stretch of eight games in eight days. The toughest stretch appears to be right at the end, when we have 23 games in 24 days, including seventeen straight to finish the year.

Some progress for Chad Tracy too, who has begun taking batting practice. However, he hasn't started running yet, and that will be a key step towards deciding whether or not he is going to be ready for Opening Day. As with Slaten, the team are apparently kicking the tyres on potential backups, though I've heard nothing more about the offer allegedly made to Eric Hinske last week. He's likely just one possibility, though as with left-handed relief pitchers, the options for left-handed players who can play both first and third are slim.

The set of projections for the coming season has largely been completed now with the release of ZIPS. The pitching expectations seem generally in line with the three other main systems [James, Chone and Marcel], but it is much more pessimistic regarding the hitters. For Drew and Snyder, for example, the ZIPS figure for OPS is 20 points or more lower than any other projection, and for Upton, the gap is even greater. ZIPS has him at .717, while the other three go for.758 [Marcel], .762 [Chone] and .849 [James]. I'm hoping Bill James proves all-knowing there. On the plus side, ZIPS has finally decided Webb is a good pitcher, with a 3.01 ERA figure expected for him in 2008 - matching his 2007 season. ZIPS was well off last year, having been wrong by 0.84 runs, with its prediction of 3.85.

With this, we can start working towards the Community Projections. I think we are still probably a couple of weeks away, but I imagine you want to put a bit of thought into them. Or you can just find an AI chatbot for a cheap post if you like. :-) But for those with a somewhat more rigorous approach, you might want to start here, at Fangraphs.com. That gives the 2007 stats for the team, and if you click on each player, you'll get to see the Chone, Marcel and James predictions for each player. No ZIPS as yet, but maybe they'll follow in due course. That'll give you a baseline from which to start, and you can apply your own hunches and gut feelings on those.

Beyond the Box Score published their Diamondbacks' preview, though will win no friends with this bold opening statement: "The Diamondbacks were extremely lucky last year and probably shouldn't have won 90 games." However, I'm not entirely convinced by the accuracy of some of the claims made therein. I mean, "Micah Owings will pitch in between playing first base"? I would say a few appearances at DH and PH are much more likely, not least because of the injury risk. Speaking of which, "When injury or bad performance strikes, new acquisition Billy Buckner would be the first in line to take the rubber." This must comes as something of a surprise to, say, Yusmeiro Petit, who made ten starts last year with an ERA+ above 100, and also Edgar Gonzalez.

Finally, a couple of random links. I know people enjoyed the Hardball Times quirky rules article from a while back, so I'm pleased to announce a second helping. My favorite in this batch was Brendan Ryan earning the W in an game for the Orioles, without throwing a pitch. And finally, if you want to be a Rallyback, the Diamondbacks are still hiring. Looks like the advert I reposted here 2-3 weeks back, didn't quite fill the positions. Whaddyamean, hanging out with D.Baxter isn't your choice of career?

A very entertaining bout of smack talk is going on in the diaries, courtesy of Silverblood. Please feel free to step on over and show the Rockies that their ongoing streak of...what is it now, zero division titles in franchise history, will not be broken in 2008. And with that, I'm off to live-blog tonight's Impact Zone Wrestling show at The Sets. Call it some early practice for the Gameday Threads!

0 recs | Comment 24 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Foulke...
...is a RHP. We would still be without a lefty in the pen if he did sign on.

by foulpole on Jan 30, 2008 5:59 AM EST   0 recs

bad year for films?
This has nothing to do with baseball, but I have to disagree that it was a bad year for movies. I mean we had Transformers, RAMBO, Cloverfield.....ugh.

Actually I think there were several good movies though, "Before the Devil Knows you're Dead" solidifies PSH as a great actor and THere will be Blood was great in all aspects.

Back to baseball....it is amazing how far Foulke has fallen in terms of value. Just a few years ago he was a prized closer.

by peeklay on Jan 30, 2008 6:49 PM EST   0 recs

There were some good films in 2007
but overall it wasn't that great.  I'm pretty much the easiest person to sell a movie to and if there's a weekend I'm not going to the theaters, someone in marketing didn't do their job.  Sure, I may not be the gold standard, but there were a lot of weeks in 2007 I just didn't want to see any movie out.  This January is the same so far (only seen Atonement, Cloverfield and Meet The Spartans) and the last was definately a stretch.      The next time a movie comes out that I want to see?  February 14th, Jumper.  

Luckily there a lot of heavy hitters this year that shouldn't suck: The Dark Knight, Iron Man, Quantum of Solace, the new Indiana Jones, Get Smart, WALL-E, Star Trek XI, never mind a ton of other movies that probably won't be big hits but that I definately want to see.  Sounds good to me.

Stay grindy, my friends.

by soco on Jan 30, 2008 7:37 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

I Am Legend
Just ruined my film year :( Transformers was good though and Superbad had me laughing my arse off, truth be told I'd go to the cinema more if it didn't cost £6 (about $11?) a seat at the local multiplex.

So now if I do watch a film it's usually on DVD or streamed.

by Wimb on Jan 31, 2008 8:23 AM EST   0 recs

when
do we get to start talking about the snakepit fantasy league again? will we even have one? i just want to make sure i get a team in. last year was the first time i ever played, and thought it was so much fun.

i'm ready to rank my players for the draft! hah

by leemellon on Jan 31, 2008 11:10 AM EST   0 recs

Glad to see enthusiasm :-)
Yes, it'll certainly be happening. And I really must get round to sending Otacon his prize for last year. :-) Expect registration to be open at the start of Spring Training, so in about four weeks. Priority (say, for the first week) will initially be given to those who played last year; then they'll be opened to other participants. Live draft [which was a lot of fun last year] will probably take place Sunday March 23rd.

by Jim McLennan on Jan 31, 2008 1:50 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Jim, if you need an advisor
feel free to contact me. It seems unsightly for the proprietor of this fine establishment to be bringing up the rear.   ;)

by shoewizard on Jan 31, 2008 3:04 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

LOL
I appreciate the offer: you might be seconded to sub for me on Draft Day. :-) However, IIRC, I finished 19th of 20 last time or therebout, so wasn't quite last, I believe...

by Jim McLennan on Jan 31, 2008 4:41 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Count me in
once again. Do you plan on doing the weekly lineup settings again or daily?

by AZSEAfan on Jan 31, 2008 3:19 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Weekly
I do not have enough time to spare for setting my lineup on a daily basis. 8-P

by Jim McLennan on Jan 31, 2008 4:46 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

March 23!
That'd be Easter!  Oy... that's going to be hard to explain to the wife...

by johngordonma on Jan 31, 2008 7:49 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Yeah...
I second the reservations on that date. Maybe the 22nd or something? I just don't want to auto-draft Ray Durham again. The nightmares, oh, the nightmares.
The artist formerly known as azdb7.

by Azreous on Jan 31, 2008 9:47 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

If people prefer the Saturday
That's fine by me. I am a cheerful agnostic, to whom Easter is simply an excuse to eat large quantities of chocolate, but am happy to respect the wishes of those, less condemned than me to eternal damnation. :-) A weekend definitely makes sense, and the following week wouldn't allow much time for roster moves before Opening Day.

by Jim McLennan on Jan 31, 2008 11:01 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

lmaonade
Totally forgot about my prize. :P And you know I'll be back.

And I liked the weekly lineups. I still prefer the daily movements but with weekly there's more of a strategy (especially in this 20 team league) and that's makes it fun.

by Otacon on Feb 3, 2008 1:56 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Um....
what?
Stay grindy, my friends.

by soco on Feb 1, 2008 1:24 AM EST   0 recs

Spam comment
They're getting cleverer. Now, rather than just posting a crap link, they post something which "looks" like a comment - but obviously isn't - and then add the spam link to it. He will not be troubling us any further.

by Jim McLennan on Feb 1, 2008 11:06 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

You'd think he would
have at least made it about baseball.  Making it about football, especially of all blogs as this one, is a terrible purple flag.
Stay grindy, my friends.

by soco on Feb 3, 2008 5:29 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Arizona bullpen...
The Diamondbacks could use a good lefty in the bullpen, or heck any good pitcher in the bullpen.

NL West Bullpen Rankings

vr, Xei

Dodger Sims 2008 NL West Rankings.

by Xeifrank on Feb 4, 2008 2:38 AM EST   0 recs

Interesting, but...
Let's just see how well ZIPS fared in predicting our bullpen ERA last year?
  • Cruz - ZIPS 4.50, Reality 3.10
  • Lyon - ZIPS 4.68, Reality 2.68
  • Peña - ZIPS 4.97, Reality 3.27
  • Slaten - ZIPS 4.22, Reality 2.72
  • Valverde - ZIPS 4.21, Reality 2.66
Now, obviously it's harder to predict relievers, with a smaller amount of innings, but when the results are wrong by such a huge amount (between 1.4 and two runs!) and consistently in the same direction, I am very, very skeptical of the 2008 projections. Naturally, if you'd run the same projection before the 2007 season with the 2007 projections, you'd have been wide of the mark. So here's a suggestion: re-run the projection with the actual 2007 performances. How do we fare then?

by Jim McLennan on Feb 4, 2008 7:22 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

got to be kidding me
we had one of the most underrated pens in the league last year and we'll do the same this year.  Your top two (Saito and Broxton) are obviously superior arms to our top two (Lyon and Pena), but after that there is a precipitous drop off for you while we just keeping coming with good arms.  Look at the ERA+ for the bottom of our heap last year (age in brackets):
Chad Qualls (29) 144
Juan Cruz (29) 152
Doug Slaten (28) 172
Brandon Medders (28) 109
Yusmeiro Petit (23) 103
Edgar Gonzalez (25) 94
Dustin Nippert (26) 85

I don't see a dearth of good pitchers, but rather bunch of guys on the upside of their career who are pretty a pretty talented.  Especially when you factor in the likes of Max Scherzer.

by johngordonma on Feb 4, 2008 9:43 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Reality?
Well...our relief staff was the fortunate recipient of excellent defense and some good fortune.  I wonder if their ERA's reflected reality as to how they actually pitched.

Check out the xFIP numbers for these guys:

Cruz-ZIPS 4.50, 2007 xFIP 3.55
Lyon-ZIPS 4.68, 2007 xFIP 4.78
Pena-ZIPS 4.97, 2007 xFIP 4.53
Slaten-ZIPS-4.22, 2007 xFIP 4.72
Valverde- ZIPS 4.21, 2007 xFIP 3.78

So in actuallity, ZIPS didn't do a bad job at all at predicting those things that were more directly under the control of the pitchers.  

Our bullpen was pretty lucky last year, and is primed for a sizable regression to the mean.

I'd also add that calling into question the viability of an entire projection system on the basis of a handful of projections is probably not the best way to evaluate said system.

That said...it probably is a good idea to take reliever ERA projections with a grain of salt.  Pitching is more difficult to project in the first place. The best projection systems, of which ZIPS is one of , still only get the pitching "right" about 45% of the time. The sample sizes are too small with reliever to be able to predict with any accuracy.

BTW, the hitter projections are usually better than 67% accurate.

Here is the review of the 2006 projections:

http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/files/newsstand/discussion/2006_projection_results/

And BP did this review of the 2007 hitter projections, but I didn't see the review of the pitcher projections.

by shoewizard on Feb 4, 2008 9:54 PM EST   0 recs

Just a few thoughts
1) I didn't think our defense was all that amazing last year: Arizona's DER [Defensive Efficiency Ratio - basically, the percentage of balls in play converted into outs] was =7th in the NL. A quick scan of Fielding Runs Above Average reveals a mix of players better and worse; overall, a little better than average, but not apparently enough to make such a huge difference as we see here.

2) But if that is the case, and ZIPS is not taking defense into account, that has got to be a huge gap in its armor. After all, it's predicting ERA, not dERA or xFIP, and defense is an obvious component there. The direction [almost all higher] and significant scope of the differences in Arizona between reality and predicted values leads me to suspect something flawed in the underlying methodology.

3) I'm not inclined to discount ZIPS completely; obviously, no system will ever be anywhere near perfect. But for whatever reason [overstimating park factors, defensive indifference?], it made a bad fist of predicting results for the 2007 Diamondbacks pitching staff: That, reasonably enough, simply causes me to look with suspicion on their 2008 predictions.

by Jim McLennan on Feb 5, 2008 7:36 PM EST   0 recs

About Team Defense and Projections
1.) DER may not truly capture what was happening with our team defense.  The Fielding Bible had the D Backs with the 5th best team defense in the majors last year, 3rd best in the NL

http://actasports.com/sow.php?id=151

2.) You make a good point about questioning just what ZIPS is trying to predict. He lists ERA, but I believe that what he shows in the ERA column is more or less a FIP or DIPS based number. I could be wrong about that.  I don't know if he is trying to show a neutral defense support  number for ERA, or a number that reflects the projected quality of the defense.  I plan to contact Dan and get further clarification.

FYI, in MY projections posted over at DBBP, I attempt to account for this. In fact my projections have the team at a 4.05 ERA but a 4.23 FIP. But compared to the professionals, my methods, while more likely intuitively correct when it comes to the D Backs, are somewhat crude by comparison, and would not stand up on a league wide basis in a comparison to those other systems.  

3.) Here is what CHONE projected for the D Backs pitchers last year.

Cruz 3.87
Lyon 4.48
Valverde 3.34
Pena 4.47
Slaten 3.86

And  here is Pecota

Cruz 4.41
Lyon 4.23
Valverde 3.82
Pena 4.10
Slaten 4.76

So as you can see, the D Backs bullpen ERA's beating the projections was hardly a phenomenon relegated to ZIPS.  I don't think there is any way that the amount of good fortune the D Backs bullpen received can be fore casted.

Keep in mind, all the projection systems tend to show a much tighter range of projected ERA than actually occurs in the real world. That's simply because the factors that lead to extremes in ERA, on either the low or the high end are impossible to predict. What the projection systems can do is project the quality of the things the pitcher can control, and therefore the projections seem to always more closely reflect FIP and DIPS than actual ERA

Summary:

When it comes to pitching, you are correct to have a large dose of skepticism when it comes to the ability to accurately predict ERA.  In the case of pitching, and with relievers in particular, the motto should be

SHIT HAPPENS   ;)

by shoewizard on Feb 6, 2008 1:27 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the AZ SnakePit, the SB Nation blog about the Arizona Diamondbacks. Summer in Phoenix: "Would you like to sit on the porch? Or would you rather live?" -- Eddie Izzard.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Some interesting pitching stats in 2008
P1010701_small
MLB Network
P1_dbacks_small
The Big Unit...a Giant.
John_elway_small
Chris Snyder's contract extended....almost
Mia2_small
MLB Network Is On
Supermanningbros_small
Attention all Brits ( or soccer enthusiasts)
Desktop-bigf_small
Felipe Lopez worth more to the Diamondbacks than Randy Johnson?
Small
Did Diamondhacks get booted?
Mia2_small
Baseball's Glass Ceiling; or, Why Not Women?
Small
roster

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Manager

Mrsnakepit_small Jim McLennan

Bench coaches

Me_-_sp_studio_small snakecharmer

Napoleon3_small DbacksSkins

Players

Drhorrible_16_small kishi

Meow2_small Azreous

Mia2_small soco

Hpim3057_small Zephon

Mlp_small dahlian

ad

Site Meter