AZ Snakepit: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Interview With UMD Athletic Director, Dr. Debbie Yow

The aftermath of the Mitchell Report

The schedule suggests I should post the next part of the look back at the community projections today - specifically, covering the outfielders. However, I think it's probably best to leave this day entirely to the Mitchell report and its aftermath, and return to our regularly scheduled ranting tomorrow. So, instead, here are a few thoughts on what it contained.

Though a number of Diamondbacks were listed in the report, most of them were minor bit players, such as Ron Villone, who made fifteen relief appearances for the Tucson Sidewinders in 2003. But it certainly puts Alex Cabrera's rapid departure for Japan in an interesting light. We were there at the BOB [on the balcony at Friday's Front Row Grill, actually] when he homered in his first major-league at bat, though that now takes on more of a bitter taste than a celebratory one. Stephen Randolph's presence was definitely a surprise: in 2004 he walked 76 hitters faster (81.2 innings) than any pitcher in baseball history, bar Ken Wright (82 BB, 80.2 IP, 1973), which goes to show that PEDs won't help if you can't pitch worth a damn

Matt Williams is probably the biggest D-backs name mentioned, but there isn't anything significantly new in the allegations. Ditto Troy Glaus, where the report largely recounts the Sports Illustrated piece on him, without adding much new to report. Looking at the names, it's clear that steroid use was as much for those at the bottom of the heap, seeking to break into or stay in the major-leagues as at the top. Despite having more than half a roster's worth mentioned by name, the team's response to the report was, inevitably, bland:

We are in full support of Senator Mitchell's findings and of the Commissioner's recommendations. We look forward to the industry putting this chapter behind us, as we turn the page towards a bright future. We are pleased to learn that our testing measures have been effective, and are hopeful that this will allow us to continue the education and prevention process that is so important for all sports and all youth.

Outside of Arizona, the apparently utterly damning evidence against Roger Clemens leaves us with the sad situation that the best hitter and, arguably, best pitcher of this era are both frauds and cheats. The parallels between the two are obvious: both were immensely talented athletes, who would probably have made it to the Hall of Fame on their own merits. But that wasn't enough for them. They chose to consider themselves above the rules and opted to prolong their careers, instead of accepting the inevitable decline of age.

I did look in to seeing who came out on top when the Ultimate PED Hitter faced the Ultimate PED Pitcher. But I was surprised to find Bonds came to the plate a mere eight times against Clemens in their 21 seasons together in the majors. That seems freakishly low - to put it into context, it's the same number as Doug Davis. But in case you were wondering, Bonds never put the ball in play off the Rocket: two K's, five walks and an HBP. To paraphrase a baseball cliche, it looks like juiced pitching can probably beat juiced hitting.

It's important to note that this is likely not a full accounting. Mitchell never requested the names of players implicated in the ongoing investigation of the illegal distribution of steroids by Signature Pharmacy down in Florida. And that's also excluding all the players who, in the words of Yahoo's Jeff Passan, "happened to choose dealers who weren't stupid enough to get caught by the government." So this will continue to rumble on, but this is about the first time that any official source has named names, so it's a start to the cleansing process at least. Mitchell does come up with some recommendations, but I can't say I'm impressed. I mean. "Prominently Display Posters About Performance Enhancing Substance Use Prevention"? The demand for independent, transparent, year-round, unannounced testing is good...but then it appears Barry Bonds was warned of drug tests in advance.

Where do we go from here? We'll see. Is the game cleaner now? Hard to say. But I notice that this year, there were on 4,957 homers hit during the regular season, a drop of 10% from six seasons ago, when Bonds hit 71 and there were 5,458 all told. This year, only six men hit more than 35 homers; in 2001, there were twenty-three - including Rich Aurilia (37 - next best season, 23), Luis Gonzalez (57/31) and Barry Bonds (73/46). I guess this suggests that whatever drugs are being taken, they do not appear to be increasing home-run totals in quite the same way. On a day like today, I'll take my comfort wherever I can find it, thank you very much.

0 recs  |  Comment 17 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Depressed.....
Hey, there! As a hardcore fun of baseball, I can't say how much I am depressed by the facts exposed from Mitchell report. More and more names are listed and catch into folk's sight. Recently I have learnt that Roger Clemens is among the name list. More information could be found here:
http://www.newsday.com/sports/baseball/ny-spmitch1213,0,7080212.story?coll=ny_news_local_xpromo
Can't you imagine How surpriced I am! Now Clemens' Hall of Fame status has to be in serious doubt. I can't help flashing back his outstanding records. His career is from his high school days, and in Boston, Toronto, New York, and Houston, even in his near quarter century of major-league service, his illustrious performance build up his great success step by step. Without a doubt, he is one of the biggest in recent history baseball player. In November, I got a book - The Rocket: Baseball Legend Roger Clemens from http://www.dealstudio.com/searchdeals.php?deal_id=72946  It makes me more familiar with him. He is not only a great player, but also a dedicated family man. He is a good example of devoted work ethic and responsibility to team and fan and family. But, just see what happens now. It's a sharp contrast. Maybe a man who has succesful career doesn't mean he has a perfect personality. We folks may reflect what we should idolize of superstars.  

by ppuukkcute on Dec 14, 2007 7:07 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Never
believed any of the hagiography around Clemens.  Always thought of him as twice as arrogant, spoiled, and selfish than two Yankees who were crucified for those crimes: A-Rod and the Unit.

by johngordonma on Dec 14, 2007 9:57 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Is this just a plug?
Are you trying to sell us something? Did you write this book? That looks and sounds quite scripted. I've never seen you around here before. I think you're trying to sell me something.
Tippecanoe and Pena too! (let's hope pena doesn't die after 30 days in office)

by seton hall snake pit on Dec 14, 2007 10:04 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, I don't doubt it. :-)
But I admire the way the spam was plugged in to a genuine post, which actually did have something decent to say. Believe you me, having deleted literally hundreds of far less pleasant comments, I find this one very refreshing. :-)

It's actually a very interesting point. While Nonds is, by most reports, an arrogant toe-rag with few redeeming features, Clemens is perhaps closer to Shakesperean tragedy; a hero with a fatal flaw, whose pride, ambition or whatever leads to his downfall. Of course, no-one can take away the wins and K's, but his reputation is toast.

by Jim McLennan on Dec 14, 2007 11:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

A large body
of evidence confirms that Barry Bonds is singularly unpleasant, even before he reached the big leagues, so your first distinction is fair - that Bonds is a bigger horse's ass than Clemens.

But to distance Roger from Barry by painting Clemens as  a "hero with a fatal flaw" vs Barry as more predictably driven to PEDs by a darker soul, is off base, I think. Both superlative players, making very similar decisions about PEDs, seeking similar grails. Money, perhaps. Certainly athletic pre-eminence. The similarities here seem quite evident, and more relevant to PED use and motivation, than are moral distinctions loosely based on the generally accepted notion that Barry happens to be more disagreeable.  

Of course, no-one can take away the wins and K's

Then, to be consistent, do you feel no one can take away Bonds' stats either? Unless his shittier personality is one's motivating force for doing so?

by Diamondhacks on Dec 14, 2007 1:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

OT: Callaspo Traded
Traded Callaspo to the Royals for pitching prospect Billy Buckner.

"Buckner, a labrum surgery survivor, has a plus curveball according to Baseball Prospectus' Kevin Goldstein.  Goldstein adds that he's able to get groundballs and projects as a fourth starter.  Throw him in the NL, maybe he could even become a #3."

I like the move, but maybe thats because I dont like Callaspo. Good riddance.

by pepperdinedevil on Dec 14, 2007 3:13 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

trades
got haren but let go of valverde!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by trevjohnson on Dec 14, 2007 6:35 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

The Mitchell report...
...was a waste of time and money. What good came out of it? and it did not come close to exposing all PED users or mention what or when Bud knew about his players using.

Is anyone sure that many other players were not using as well or even certain that the players named are guilty?

Just shameful.

by foulpole on Dec 15, 2007 4:36 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

totally disagree
Got to start somewhere foulpole, and indications are there will be plenty more who be exposed in the months to come.  From the response of those named it seems to me that Mitchell pretty nailed everyone who was listed.  You've got a whole lot of admissions, so those who are still denying the allegations look more and more suspicious.  Especially a guy like Clemens who had nearly 9 pages of evidence devoted to him.

I think what we have in the Mitchell report is a very good start.  Not a panacea, obviously, but a very good start.

by johngordonma on Dec 16, 2007 1:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

"From the response of those named it...
...seems to me that Mitchell pretty nailed everyone who was listed.  You've got a whole lot of admissions, so those who are still denying the allegations look more and more suspicious."

In America, we have a criminal justices system that assumes innocence until proven guilty in a court of law and we still get convictions wrong under those circumstances.  

This is just a witch hunt against the players that is being played out in the press.

How many articles have you read that breaks down the FOs, GMs, and Owners that had the suspected users on their clubs?

Sounds to me that The A's, Rangers, Giants, Mets, Bluejays, Marlins,  etc. etc. FOs should be under  scrutiny. No?

by foulpole on Dec 17, 2007 6:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

huh?
First you call it a witch hunt and then you want to try to hunt down a half dozen FOs to dig up more dirt?  How does that makes sense?

by johngordonma on Dec 18, 2007 10:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What I said was...
...that "This is just a witch hunt against the players..."

And if there is truly an interest in exposing this issue then why shouldn't the FOs and the commissioner be scrutinized?

Do you think that Billy Beane or Bud et. al. didn't know what was going on in the clubhouse for all those years?

by foulpole on Dec 20, 2007 7:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The obvious implication
of naming a bunch of players is that they were bad apples, but there's a counterintuitive implication, as well. When you throw 97 names into the ring, based on few leads and very limited cooperation, it becomes clearer what a structural, systemic problem this was - rather than the amoral endgame of a few  superstar athletes.  

An analogy might be when two kids in a class fail a test, you basically blame the kids, but if 10 or 12 or 14 kids fail, blame naturally gravitates towards the teacher,administration,etc.

I also would've liked to see more explicit scrutiny of the comissioner and FOs (there was some, to be fair), but by dramatically widening the perceived scope of use, the Mitchell Report is implicitly indicting the system and lack of controls even more than the players, IMO, and I think that's a healthy development.

by Diamondhacks on Dec 20, 2007 8:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Penalize teams when players use steroids
 "All of this nonsense reminded me of a recent conversation with a team general manager. While discussing the impending report, he made a point that Mitchell did not: Franchises take next to no responsibility in keeping performance-enhancing drugs out of the game. Whether Mitchell glossed over this because he felt collective-bargaining issues would negate his suggestions, or he soft-pedaled the owners because they're the ones who commissioned the report, isn't important. Mitchell's failure to pose an important question is.

"Why don't teams get penalized when their players test positive?" the GM asked."

"This is too much," one AL executive said about the proposed penalties. "You're talking largely about (the past). Why have a radical reaction now?"

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=ArY5ADm39Gq0hFY7FFNxMqwd0bYF?slug=jp-mlbdrugs121907&prov=y hoo&type=lgns

by foulpole on Dec 20, 2007 8:16 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the AZ SnakePit, the SB Nation blog about the Arizona Diamondbacks. Summer in Phoenix: "Would you like to sit on the porch? Or would you rather live?" -- Eddie Izzard.
Start posting about the Diamondbacks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Bmurph_small
Spring Fest 2010 - Buy Tickets!
Square-watermelon_small
Best Highlight Clips
39135485-59af19dbb26654095f910f34176af094_4ae8a81e-scaled_small
Predictions Group
Mrsnakepit_small
[OT]: Oscar nominations
Square-watermelon_small
Dana Eveland DFAed
Beachrosei_small
Eric Byrnes a Mariner
Up_small
All Dbacks SGA bobbleheads
Cimg0181_small
How do you mend a broken sports heart?
Small
In-Depth Scouting Report (pitchers)
Ilikemony_small
I'm going through baseball withdrawls... and it's a month till pitchers and catchers report...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

Mrsnakepit_small Jim McLennan

Bench coaches

Me_-_sp_studio_small snakecharmer

Gadsden_small DbacksSkins

Players

82283_small kishi

Meow2_small Azreous

Bmurph_small soco

Ilikemony_small Zephon

Keith_haring2_small Sprankton

Golden_dome_small IHateSouthBend