AZ 2, Angels 8 - A Walk in the Field
Record: 36-38. Change on last season: -1
As William K noted, at least we outhit the opposition this time, ten to nine. After a game like this, you are simply left to try and extract comfort where you can, because right from the top of the first inning, it was painfully obvious that this wasn't Arizona's night. Starter Enrique Gonzalez - who came in with just six walks in 25 innings of work - walked four Angels hitters in the first frame, including two with the bases loaded.
We were three runs down before coming to bat, and have now been outscored 27-4 in the first innings of games since June 5th. Diamondback fandom, collectively, slumped in their seats and pulled their caps down over their eyes, knowing instinctively what was going to unfold. "Oh, no - not again," we thought, like a bowl of petunias crashing to earth alongside a very surprised sperm whale. And that's pretty much what came to pass: variations on a theme called "Defeat", as played by your 2006 Arizona Diamondbacks. Once more, with feeling.
We had our chances; we had one or more hit in every inning bar the first, and averaged a walk per frame from Santana too. But we left 12 men on base, hit into two double plays in the first three innings, and by that stage, we were 5-0 down. Even after we loaded the bases with one out in the sixth, and Santana then walked Jackson in, putting the tying run on base, Shawn Green popped the ball up, hacking at a 2-0 pitch when Santana was at his wildest, and the chance went begging.
After his hideous first inning, EnGon settled down a bit, though only lasted four frames - largely because it took him more than 40 pitches to get through the opener. He allowed five hits, in addition to the four first-inning walks, but two of those were home runs. [They included a shot up to Friday's Front Row patio by Mike Napoli, measured at approximately 470 feet, the third-longest in ballpark history.] Greg Aquino relieved EnGon, and Vlad Guerrero greeted him with a homer to left too, but he pitched the rest of the fifth and sixth without further incident.
Valverde's return to form hit a nasty bump, with three runs scoring on two hits and two walks during the seventh, before Medders and Choate posted zeroes thereafter. Poor Choate can't get work even when left in for a whole inning: it only took him eight pitches to get through the ninth. In the past ten days, he's appeared in seven games, but has yet to throw more than fifteen pitches in any of them.
The offense only scored two runs, on a solo homer by Tracy, and the aforementioned based-loaded walk to Jackson. Conor did, at least, reach safely four times, on two hits and two free passes - that's his first multi-walk game since April 8. Gonzalez and Estrada also had two hits apiece, while DaVanon drew two more walks, and improved his OBP lead over Counsell to forty points.
At the moment, it seems that we can't even buy a win, and we now find ourselves behind the 2005 pace for the first time since May 23rd. Thanks to Devin, IndyDback and William K for showing up - which is really much more than the Diamondbacks did for the first game in the homestand. Though nobody even noticed that I'd left the Tampa Bay logo up for the gameday thread... It's fixed now. :-)
[Morning update]
Your daily dose of yummy Fangraphs goodness
[Click pic to see full version in new window]
Today: Snakes Talk, Angels Walk

6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Did the Dbacks notice the change of teams?
Since you lacked detail on the game thread showing the TBDR, the Dbacks showed the same lack of detail with their performance against the Angels. Same performance; same venue; just a different cast of successful characters.
I was at this misery of a game. The umpires tried to spur the momentum to the Dbacks when they took a clear homerun away from Vlad. The third base umpire was clearly on the call when the ball hit the top of the yellow section in the crevace where the Left field wall diverts to meet the bullpen wall. A discussion ensued between the 4 umpires who then reversed the call and gave Vlad a ground rule double. It didn't change the game a bit. What it did show is that Mike Scoscia can still has some hustle when he actually sprinted from the dugout to the baseline between second and third bases.
I was also impressed that eventhough Enrique was floundering at the mound, he actually hustled to first base on a bang bang play involving ConJerk, Hudson, and himself. He actually was given a putout for his hustle.
There is also a conspiracy item floating on the various blogs about how the Dbacks have decided to intentionally, unintentionally work a slow down. Like a sick out only showing up to work and not showing much production. This will continue until the Jgrim saga is finally resolved and he gets his jack for non-performance and lack of true performance while on enhanced medication! Could there be any validity to this idea? Looking back on the whole sorted afair, circumstantial evidence might actually side up to this interesting theory!
Now for less contentious thought, we were told during the off season that this year was strictly transition. We would be somewhat competitive but not anywhere near contention. The Dbacks gave us some taste of what it felt like to be on top of the division and playing fundamentally sound baseball. Obviously now, it was just a taste. Now we are looking for the spoon full of sugar to help the bad medicine go down. It is in the most dissatisfying way!
Intentionally losing
Appreciate the report
However, I don't believe they're actively tanking it, or even unintentionally. The Grim Reaper was only in the clubhouse for a couple of months, hardly enough time to become the kind of icon players would sell out for. Not least because too many on this team are playing for contracts next year [Easley, Counsell, Byrnes, Batista, Gonzalez] - they'd like to get re-signed. No, I *like* to think this is simply a brutal regression to expected level of performance - we're now on pace for 79 wins, which is still about four above what I expected. However, if this slump goes on much longer, it could become a death-spiral.
by Jim McLennan on Jun 24, 2006 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions
We already have too many wins
And isn't it pathetic to be asking that question of a team that's just two games under .500?
100 losses
If they don't end up somewhere between 90 and 100 losses, it may be because of the other unpredictable teams in the NL West.
JGrim took his coffee saucier recipes with him?
JGrim was a island of a journeyman. What if he was your favorite friend who brings goodies, doesn't show up with his stash? Who do you go to? Or do you start to dry out? Or do you try to concoct new formed recipes?

by 


















