2011 'Pitties: Pitcher of the Year
Ryan Roberts won Unsung Hero for the second time in three years - he also took home that 'Pittie in 2009, by coincidence winning exactly the same percentage of the vote, 47%, on each occasion. Chris Young and Micah Owings also received a solid number of votes, so receive honorable mentions. We now head to the mound, and the award for Pitcher of the Year. Here are the stats for the five nominees - more details of each are after the jump.
| W | L | G | GS | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | SO | WP | |||||||||
| Josh Collmenter | 10 | 10 | 3.38 | 31 | 24 | 0 | 154.1 | 137 | 61 | 58 | 17 | 28 | 100 | 1 | 117 | 1.069 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 5.8 | 3.57 |
| David Hernandez | 5 | 3 | 3.38 | 74 | 0 | 11 | 69.1 | 49 | 27 | 26 | 4 | 30 | 77 | 7 | 117 | 1.139 | 6.4 | 0.5 | 3.9 | 10.0 | 2.57 |
| Daniel Hudson | 16 | 12 | 3.49 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 222.0 | 217 | 98 | 86 | 17 | 50 | 169 | 4 | 113 | 1.203 | 8.8 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 6.9 | 3.38 |
| Ian Kennedy | 21 | 4 | 2.88 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 222.0 | 186 | 73 | 71 | 19 | 55 | 198 | 11 | 137 | 1.086 | 7.5 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 8.0 | 3.60 |
| J.J. Putz | 2 | 2 | 2.17 | 60 | 0 | 45 | 58.0 | 41 | 15 | 14 | 4 | 12 | 61 | 2 | 182 | 0.914 | 6.4 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 9.5 | 5.08 |
Josh Collmenter
He's already won Rookie of the Year, and I'm tempted to copy and paste what I wrote there. But let's give you something new instead: his bWAR was the best for a first-season player in the NL this year or last, and trails only Brandon Webb's 2003 in franchise history. The man who, lore has it, developed his unusual overhand delivery by hurling tomahawks while growing up, proved an unexpected and stalwart addition to the Diamondbacks rotation, and was also the only Diamondbacks starter to beat the Brewers in the NL Division Series, allowing one run over seven innings in Game Three. Here's the highlights of that game.
David Hernandez
Hernandez easily the busiest of any pitcher for the 2011 Diamondbacks, his 74 appearances a dozen more than the next man. He thew 69.1 frames, and became the first Arizona pitcher to strike out ten per 9 IP over that many innings, since Randy Johnson in 2004. His three blown eighth-inning saves, covering a mere two outs, were responsible for more than half his earned runs. Over the other 71, covering 68.2 innings, he had a 1.57 ERA, and he was a perfect 11-for-11 in ninth-inning save opportunities. David particularly stepped it up when replacing Putz: over 12 July games, he allowed two hits in 11.1 innings, with a 0.82 ERA. Here's a sample of his 8th-inning prowess, retiring all three batters faced to protect a one-run lead from May 1st against the Cubs
Daniel Hudson
Daniel Hudson now has a 23-13 record and a 3.01 ERA for the Diamondbacks. His 133 ERA+ in the National League ranks him fourth among active pitchers with 300+ IP there through age 24, behind only Oswalt, Lincecum and Kershaw. In his first full season, Hudson showed no signs of fatigue, with an Aug-Sep ERA of 2.85, covering his last eleven starts and, if not that relevant here, won the Silver Slugger by batting .277, with a better RBI per AB ratio than Xavier Nady. He threw two complete games, allowing one run against both the White Sox on June 17, then the Dodgers, exactly one month later. Here's the latter: he had two hits, homered and drove in three runs as well.
Ian Kennedy
Like Hudson, Kennedy got better as the year went on, posting a second-half ERA of 2.11 in 14 starts, anchoring the team's rotation to the NL West title. Kennedy's .840 win percentage was fifth-highest in National League history (min. 30 starts) - and it wasn't just run support, as Arizona scored four runs or less in 13 of his wins and two-thirds of his appearances overall. His April 25th shutout of the Phillies - the day after his wife gave birth - was already voted single-game performance of the year. Matching it in Game Score (at 91, among the ten best starts ever by a D-back) was this one against the Pirates on Sep 19: 8 IP, 1 H, 1 BB, 12 K (including the last six batters faced!), 0 R.
J.J. Putz
It's no stretch to think that, without his DL stint at the All-Star break (during which time Hernandez notched seven saves), Putz would almost certainly have led the league in saves, and probably been the first Diamondback to reach fifty in a season. Instead, he had to 'settle' for 45, including a franchise record 24 opportunities converted in a row after his return at the end of July - during those 23.1 innings, he had a 0.77 ERA and a K:BB ratio of 28:3. It was the most innings Putz had worked since 2007, and he held all opposing batters to a minuscule .195 average, along with a .566 OPS. Here's him striking out the Nationals on June 5.
43 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I went with IPK
but, again, I was torn. In the end, he was probably the most consistently good pitcher on the team this year. Can’t wait to see him pitch again on Opening Day
isitspringtrainingyet.com
by imstillhungry95 on Jan 5, 2012 12:10 PM EST reply actions
Ian by a large margin
Each pitcher above should be lauded for one reason or another, but simply none was as important or dominant as IPK, who seemed to have his best stuff against the toughest competition all year. Also, holy wild pitches Ian. I don’t remember those last year.
Where have you gone, Greg Colbrunn?
My favorite stat
is Collmenter’s BB/9 of 1.6! To have a guy with below average “stuff” refuse to walk batters and still come away with the line he did…well, I’m impressed. The whole deception thing only goes so far to explain it, especially since one of his best performances (linked above) was his third time pitching against the Brewers (IIRC).
Ian Kennedy
I love him.
"Clearly the Brewers didn't realize that going into Beast Mode raised their testosterone levels."
by tcyoung
IPK
Hard not to vote for him….He was fun to watch pitch doing his stomp every time he struck somebody out. Can’t wait for next season see him pitch again.
IPK
But I kinda hate to give it to just one guy. They all deserve it in their own right. After the ‘pen debacle of 2010, Putz and Hernandez really gave my blood pressure a nice drop, since I no longer had to worry about late inning melt-downs on a consistent basis. Huddy could quite possibly become one of the best #2 pitchers in the game if he continues his improvement and also contributes with his bat like he did last year. What more can one say about Collmenter? There was a time when each and everyone of us (for the most part) thought he was going to drop-off and no longer be effective, but that time really didn’t come. He gave the rotation a solid #4 throughout a large chunk of the season, and really came from nowehere since he was pitching in the minors when the season began. But when it is all said and done, how do you not give the award to IPK? Who really thought IPK would turn in a performance that would put him in the race for the Cy Young? He really left his mark this year and I can’t wait for his trademark stomp to average 10 times a game next year;)
by Gildo on Jan 5, 2012 3:06 PM EST reply actions 2 recs
Hudson was a nice surprise this year.
Not that I expected him to be a mediocre pitcher this season, but I definitely expected regression from his video game-quality numbers with us in 2010. That he was able to deliver another very strong season bodes well for our hopes that he can be a #2 starter for years to come. Assuming Bauer and Skaggs don’t knock him down to #4 (which would be a good problem…)
The bird is struggling out of the egg. The egg is the world. Whoever wants to be born, must first destroy a world.
by Stupendous Man on Jan 5, 2012 3:39 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Ian Kennedy.
He’s simply the obvious choice.
The bird is struggling out of the egg. The egg is the world. Whoever wants to be born, must first destroy a world.
JJ Putz
the anchor.
sententia Platonis semper in ore illius fuit, florere civitates si aut philosophi imperarent aut imperantes philosopharentur
IPK
This poll reminds me of a Posnanski HoF article where he notes that 11 sportswriters did not vote for Babe Ruth, and as many did not vote for Willie Mays. All the pitchers nominated had good years, but (IMO) none even close to the year IPK had. He obviously had the best year for a starter, and who would take even an awesome closer over an ace pitcher?
How can this not be unanimous ?
222 excellent IP trumps 58 excellent IP, no matter how much weight or leverage bump you want to give to a closer.
The worst major leaguer is better at baseball than I'll ever be at anything I ever do in my life.
Probably
drive by votes. I personally would have voted for either Hudson or Collmenter before I voted for Putz. He was great for us last season, but as you point out 222 amazing IP is a lot more than 58
isitspringtrainingyet.com
by imstillhungry95 on Jan 5, 2012 6:40 PM EST up reply actions
Its not unanimous
because JJ Putz changed the culture. I do not subscribe to techn-group think, either,
sententia Platonis semper in ore illius fuit, florere civitates si aut philosophi imperarent aut imperantes philosopharentur
Oh....my bad
I thought it was for pitcher of the year, not clown of the year.
Since I know how much you like Wikipedia, here is a cultural reference for you. ;)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CultureClubColourByNumbersAlbumcover.jpg
The worst major leaguer is better at baseball than I'll ever be at anything I ever do in my life.
by shoewizard on Jan 6, 2012 12:10 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Sorry that there is someone doesn't drink from the same elixir
that colors your opinions. You’ll learn someday that there are people who do not go along with the crowd. I know Mr. Mao used to kill those types, but somehow he missed me.
sententia Platonis semper in ore illius fuit, florere civitates si aut philosophi imperarent aut imperantes philosopharentur
by NASCARbernet on Jan 6, 2012 12:42 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
So much for my attempt at levity
My initial question was rhetorical in nature, and more or less was an opening to discuss the relative value of closers. I certainly didn’t intend to put a kaibosh on discussion.
FWIW, a line I have often used when debating my “Sabr Brethren” who are too orthodox in their thinking on closers , is that “closers are overrated…….until you don’t have one.”
I am much more open than most “statheads” to the intangible value ot a good to great closer and the stabilizing influence he has on the entire pitching staff, beyond his own value produced in his innings pitched.
So your vote is duly noted and acknowledged.
But the pranks and culture part…..meh…..if Putz pitched poorly, that stuff wouldn’t help one bit, and would even be resented and counter productive.
The worst major leaguer is better at baseball than I'll ever be at anything I ever do in my life.
closers
and relievers in general are just a weird animal
yeah, they are easily replaceable in the sense that lots of random relievers come out of nowhere and can be good to dominating
but the problem is it can be really difficult actually finding relievers (see Dbacks circa 2010)
i think that’s why WAR is troublesome to use to evaluate relievers. in the strictest sense of value above replacement, it might be correct (or at least close to correct). but it just seems like actually identifying good relievers year-in and year-out is not that easy. also, maybe it doesn’t take into account searching costs.
i also think a lot of prospect rankings undervalue how valuable a dominating cheap relief prospect is.
WPA actually not a bad stat to reference when looking at relievers
but of course, there is selection bias, as if managers won’t put a guy in high leverage situations, then he can’t get much positive WPA.
The worst major leaguer is better at baseball than I'll ever be at anything I ever do in my life.
Sorry Shoe
I missed it completely. I’ll try better next time.
sententia Platonis semper in ore illius fuit, florere civitates si aut philosophi imperarent aut imperantes philosopharentur
by NASCARbernet on Jan 6, 2012 11:39 PM EST up reply actions
I'll try to be funnier too
I suck at clever sometimes.
The worst major leaguer is better at baseball than I'll ever be at anything I ever do in my life.
Putz deserves great recognition
but there’s no way of debating that Putz had a better year than Kennedy.
"Clearly the Brewers didn't realize that going into Beast Mode raised their testosterone levels."
by tcyoung
Why have a poll?
The entire purpose of a poll is for people to express different opinions. This would be a boring website indeed if there was but one idea shared by all.
by Counsellmember on Jan 6, 2012 12:46 PM EST up reply actions
I want to vote for Ian Kennedy
But the guy didn’t even make the All-Starr team sooooo…
Wear your own fur.
Obviously
Not good enough!
isitspringtrainingyet.com
by imstillhungry95 on Jan 5, 2012 6:44 PM EST up reply actions
Kennedy
This one’s black and white
Reporters asked the Phillies' skipper how a pitcher had managed to injure himself in his sleep. "I don’t know," Manuel said. "I didn’t sleep with him."
Hated not to give it to Hernandez...
because of the sheer number of times he was called upon. Still had to be Ian.
Exactly.
I should have a mfin theme song.
by emilylovesthedbacks on Jan 6, 2012 12:45 AM EST up reply actions
Not so clear-cut for me
but I went with Putz, not just for closing, but being an interim bullpen coach and the pranks- a triple-threat!
Yeah, what NASCARbernet said...
I like your sig...
of course it wasn’t clear cut – that was a first rate staff last season. I chose Putz because he brought an anchor to one of the worst bullpens in baseball history, a staff that had drifted aimlessly for quite sometime.
sententia Platonis semper in ore illius fuit, florere civitates si aut philosophi imperarent aut imperantes philosopharentur
by NASCARbernet on Jan 6, 2012 12:43 AM EST up reply actions
Now
why would you like that sig?
isitspringtrainingyet.com
by imstillhungry95 on Jan 6, 2012 10:40 AM EST up reply actions
Because
its pithy, clever, insightful, and relevant to the world at large. In a word, brilliant.
sententia Platonis semper in ore illius fuit, florere civitates si aut philosophi imperarent aut imperantes philosopharentur
LOL
this made me laugh. Thanks
isitspringtrainingyet.com
by imstillhungry95 on Jan 6, 2012 5:26 PM EST up reply actions
IPKhands down
☣ "I like to keep a bottle of stimulant handy in case I see a snake, which I also keep handy." ☣
DO IT FOR DREW
IPK, of course
Can’t remember the last time I have so blended in with the crowd. I am so used to being the weirdo. How strange.
Anyway, these guys were all great last season. I am very grateful for everything they did. I give a strong honorable mention to both Hernandez and Putz. What surprisingly wonderful performances they gave. And, as I have said before, the psychological impact alone of knowing that the bullpen wasn’t going to meltdown every game was invaluable.
But IPK was fantastic. Loved watching him all season. Looking forward to seeing him next season.
Wow, it is so great to have the problem of feeling bad that I can’t vote for so many good pitchers.
So much Kennedy
Here’s how I thought of it. Subtract Putz’s 58 innings from IPK’s 222 and you get 164. Subtract Putz’s 14 earned runs allowed from IPK’s 74 and you get 57. A pitcher who allows 57 runs in 164 innings has a 3.12 ERA. Are Putz’s leverage value and cute clubhouse pranks as valuable as 164 innings of 3.12 ERA – #1 starter caliber – pitching? Sorry, this absolutely has to be Kennedy.
Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Jan 8, 2012 11:33 AM EST via iPhone app reply actions
Man, this is like sabermetrics
on steroids.
sententia Platonis semper in ore illius fuit, florere civitates si aut philosophi imperarent aut imperantes philosopharentur
Not really
I’m not quoting anybody’s FIP or tRA or wOBA against, I’m using basic ERA figures here. Seems pretty standard to me.
Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Jan 9, 2012 2:40 PM EST up reply actions
Man, this answer, wow
its like an answer on steroids.
This steroid thing is going to dog you for quite some time, I’m afraid.
sententia Platonis semper in ore illius fuit, florere civitates si aut philosophi imperarent aut imperantes philosopharentur
Well from you anyway
We don’t subscribe to groupthink ;) :P
Founder of the 'Foundation for the Advancement of Clefoing' a 501C3
Heh
I’m okay with that. I stand by my arguments.
Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Jan 10, 2012 5:15 PM EST up reply actions

by 























