Diamondbacks 5, Mets 3: Marquis de Sad
Record: 68-53. Pace: 91-71. Change on last year: +21
Well,this was a little unexpected.
Jason Marquis started for the D'backs and I can safely say confidence was not high. He was decidedly shaky in his previous two starts but I felt once a rapport developed between him and the infield, all would be well.
His groundball appeared to be working to get Turner out in the first, but Wright got a hit off him and advanced to second when Upton fluffed the ball. Still, it didn't seem to faze him and he got the next two batters out. In return, Willie Bloomquist was seen of with a change up, and Collin Cowgill flew out. Justin Upton whanged one over Angel Pagan's head for a double.The ball must look like a beachball to him right now, but Chris Young could not capitalise on it.
Marquis then seemed to be getting into his stride with 3 easy groundball outs. Ryan Roberts popped out, Sean Burroughs did his bread and butter thing and ground out and Paul Goldschmidt struck out, but looked like he could launch one sooner or later.
In the third, CY held a catch, a broken bat helped Roberts do the same but Marquis decided to play footy to let Pagan on base, who stole 2nd but was held off third by nifty work from CY. Bloomquist helped him finish off the side and he wasn't looking too shabby.
Chris Capuano gave up a single to Henry Blanco, but Marquis could not claim himself to be a fully fledged Dbacks pitcher because he couldn't move him over.
Willie singled but Blanco couldn't run fast enough to get to third. Then Capuano finished off Cowgill and JUp, so the D'backs threatened and it looked like Jason was going to get the run support he needed sooner or later.
Then the top of the fourth got tricky. Duda got a hit ,catching a good sinker just right. Bay was quickly out with an impatient at bat.
Marquis then plunked Thole but both of them fell down.Thole got up and took first but Marquis remained down with what would prove to be a broken right leg. Sadly, just as he seemed to be getting a feel for Chase Field and his team mates, that was his season over.
Zach Duke took over but I felt too sad to launch all the nobility jokes I had lined up.
However, the team had to get on with the game. A broken bat stopped Pridie from going anywhere, then he struck out with the fresh one. Tejada drew a walk,and Capuano lofted one which looked dangerous as Cowgill and Young converged on it, but Collin curtseyed out of the way to let CY catch it. It looked like we needed runs in the worst way.
CY had an inconspicuous at bat, but good old Tatman singled to light the spark. Burroughs got on base with a comedy at bat then Goldie smashed a ground rule double to get Ryro home from third, a wild pitch scored Burroughs but that was it for the bats.
My notes for the top of the 5th are problematical;they consist of a blob of burger grease, a cat's pawprint in relish and something about the Mets managing to score a couple of runs off Turner and Duda's bats, also scribbled in a margin,"Cowgill and CY Need to C-O-M-M-U-N-I-C-A-T-E "
The rest of the page was a smear too, but the words JUp HR could just be distinguished. So the score was 3-3 and it could have been much worse. Neither the cat or burger were hurt in the incident.
Probably because Dan posted Miley Cyrus links, Duke started to look wobbly but Goldie picked off Pridie stealing, yeah, the kid with no glove, right ? That let Duke regroup and get the next two to ground out.
In the bottom of the 6th, Ryro struck out, Burroughs gave a ball a ride but Pagan was there, so Goldschmidt slammed his second two bagger just to show the Mets he was serious about this game. Blanco got him home, Parra the came in for Duke but could do nothing.
Micah came in, as he so often does to mop up innings and held the score at 4-3, though it seemed to be a bit shaky with Pagan doubling, getting to third, Duda intentionally walked, but he knew what he was doing and held the Mets scoreless. Though Willie got a walk, to start the bottom of the 7th, no one could get anything done so that was that.
Shaw came in for the 8th,and was helped out by great grabs from Goldie and Ryro making it all look simple.
Igarishi came in and hit Roberts because everyone was bored with hitting JUp, Burroughs walked then Goldie pounced on a pitch like a cat on a juicy mouse to load the bases. Blanco walked in a run and that was it for Ishigaro.
Byrdak came in to face Overbay, in for Micah who hit it hard but not far enough. Beato the came in to face Bloomquist and managed a nice double play. More runs would have been nice but there it is.
Hernandez, he of the everlasting arm, had to come in for the 9th but the scratch squad of pitchers has give him a lead to work with. He got Pagan and Hairston to hit the ball to Cowgill and then Turner flew out to Willie B.
So sad to see Marquis probably get his mojo going then get a season ending injury, Duke did his best, Micah did his part and Hernandez did what he does.
via www.fangraphs.com
What's Happening: Paul Goldschmidt (+20%)
Good Times: Henry Blanco (+17.6%), Sean Burroughs (!!) (+13.3%), Bryan Shaw (+12.6%)
Some other sitcom no one liked: Collin Cowgill (-11.9%)
A nice thread for a Sunday afternoon, running almost but not quite to 900 comments. Craig from Az led everyone,in posts, just shy of triple digits, with NASCARbernet and Rockkstarr12 in second and third. Also stopping by were kishi, njjohn, TimLincecumIsGod, AZDBACKR, JoeStock, Dan Strittmatter, hotclaws, iheartdbacks, imstillhungry95, SongBird, luckycc, txzona, GuruB, parrauptonfan, Britback, Skii, Jim McLennan, Brian MacKinney, The so-called Beautiful, Sabean's_Folly, Husk, asteroid, Aztiramtempe, rfffr, TinySarabia, Shane Yeo, Wailord, Stile4aly, BulldogsNotZags, iTalk2Cornfields, Jdub220, emilylovesthedbacks, YoungCardsFanatic, dback4life, marionette, and Turambar.
Award for COTD goes to Dan Strittmatter for this mention:
Sean Burroughs walked
I know it happened a while back, but…. holy crap, Sean Burroughs walked!!!
Founder and Chairman of the Hire A Body Double For David Hernandez's Right Arm Commission. A non-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Aug 14, 2011 7:08 PM EDT reply actions 3 recs
Dan is also awarded the anti-COTD for the Miley Cyrus links. We're watching you.
We win, 4-3,sweep the Mets, then go to an off day to sort out the pitching rotation AGAIN. Well, at least Diamondbacks baseball is interesting.
134 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yes, a good general rule of thumb
If all you have to say about a piece is to point out a typo… Don’t say it at all.
Daron "...the D. Baxter fan-club"
Mark: "A non-profit organization."
by Jim McLennan on Aug 15, 2011 2:26 AM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
It's actually "Hear, hear".
Hee, had to be a little corrective in this thread.
Feel free to correct me on any mistakes I make.
It's the stuff that dreams are made of
It's the slow and steady fire
by 4 Corners Fan on Aug 15, 2011 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions
I should be known as the Queen Of All Things Typo in that case LOL
"I didn't mean to hit the umpire with the dirt, but I did mean to hit that bastard in the stands." -Babe Ruth
by Rockkstarr12 on Aug 15, 2011 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions
And rec'd.
"The wise writer, I think, writes for the youth of his own generation, the critic of the next and the schoolmasters of ever afterward." F. Scott Fitzgerald.
by NASCARbernet on Aug 15, 2011 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions
Agreed!
No need to be a Typo Nazi
"I didn't mean to hit the umpire with the dirt, but I did mean to hit that bastard in the stands." -Babe Ruth
by Rockkstarr12 on Aug 15, 2011 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions
Or if you want to comment on
grammar and such, give the compliment first.
It's the stuff that dreams are made of
It's the slow and steady fire
by 4 Corners Fan on Aug 15, 2011 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions
Amen, sister!
"I didn't mean to hit the umpire with the dirt, but I did mean to hit that bastard in the stands." -Babe Ruth
by Rockkstarr12 on Aug 15, 2011 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions
A strangely pedestrian win, all things considered
but sad about Marquis. He was pitching well and looked like he had regained his form and composure. Pity.
"The wise writer, I think, writes for the youth of his own generation, the critic of the next and the schoolmasters of ever afterward." F. Scott Fitzgerald.
Poor Jason :(
"I didn't mean to hit the umpire with the dirt, but I did mean to hit that bastard in the stands." -Babe Ruth
by Rockkstarr12 on Aug 14, 2011 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions
By pedestrian you mean there were a lot of walks, right?
"It feels awesome. Feels like when you were a kid and every guy gets a chance to be a hero, then you eat orange slices and kool-aid after the game. Except we’re nailing champagne right now." —Brian Wilson
"He just threw me a fastball in and I just put a good swing on the ball, and you know when you put a good swing on the ball, the ball go out."
-Egdar Renteria commenting on his solo home run in the 5th inning of Game 2.
by Sabean's_Folly on Aug 15, 2011 1:35 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Must have been
How else would Burroughs get one? Oh wait, there were only 3? To Burroughs, Blanco and Bloomquist. Ha ha ha ha. I’m sure this says something.
Only about the Mets pitcher
DROOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! WHHYYYYYYYYY!!!!
by imstillhungry95 on Aug 15, 2011 2:21 AM EDT up reply actions
i think
the above post bay Sabean’s_Folly was meant to be a play on words
by blue bulldog on Aug 15, 2011 8:34 AM EDT up reply actions
Yes, and a pretty good one at that.
"The wise writer, I think, writes for the youth of his own generation, the critic of the next and the schoolmasters of ever afterward." F. Scott Fitzgerald.
by NASCARbernet on Aug 15, 2011 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions
Someone hit RYRO?
UH OH…whose arse do I need to go kick? I missed that when I was out taking care of my laundry!
"I didn't mean to hit the umpire with the dirt, but I did mean to hit that bastard in the stands." -Babe Ruth
I told my Dad
that RyRo was probably the last baseball player I would want to HBP. If he didn’t take a baseball bat to my head, you would!
DROOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! WHHYYYYYYYYY!!!!
by imstillhungry95 on Aug 14, 2011 11:47 PM EDT up reply actions
LOL!
I’d defend him, Joe, IPK, and Miggy anytime!
"I didn't mean to hit the umpire with the dirt, but I did mean to hit that bastard in the stands." -Babe Ruth
by Rockkstarr12 on Aug 15, 2011 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions
Igarishi.
jinnah already has dibs on Carrasco for hitting Willie B Saturday night.
Goldschmidt happens.
Okay
Igarishi it is!
"I didn't mean to hit the umpire with the dirt, but I did mean to hit that bastard in the stands." -Babe Ruth
by Rockkstarr12 on Aug 15, 2011 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Love the recap, Hannah :)
"I didn't mean to hit the umpire with the dirt, but I did mean to hit that bastard in the stands." -Babe Ruth
I can't believe we won, honestly
We had a mish-mash of pitchers, Duke got the W, and the lineup featured Cowgill, Blanco and Burroughs. Baffling. Well, Gibby, it worked this time. But, let’s not try this against the Phillies and Braves, okay?
And Burroughs was our 3rd best player? LOL! Still can’t believe he walked.
the opposing pitcher
was a lefty with very mediocre stuff
which means that Upton and Goldschmidt were bound to tee off
this offense is going to need to be carried by Upton down the stretch. if Upton slumps, i’m pretty sure we’ll be looking at 1-2 runs scored type games. i’m so glad he’s hot right now….just destroying the ball
by blue bulldog on Aug 14, 2011 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Chris Capuano
Former DBack
"I didn't mean to hit the umpire with the dirt, but I did mean to hit that bastard in the stands." -Babe Ruth
by Rockkstarr12 on Aug 15, 2011 12:29 AM EDT up reply actions
i don't want to sound mean
but i got lost during this recap at my count, 5 times. i’m sorry. i have failed you.
"We’re going to turn this team around 360 degrees." –Jason Kidd
by blank_38 on Aug 14, 2011 10:54 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I sure like seeing
‘91’ in that ‘pace’ line.
"Baseball fans are junkies, and their heroin is the statistic." Robert S. Wieder
Wade Miley
According to Southeastern LA baseballs twitter Wade Miley has been called up. Not sure if this is news or everyone already knew that.
http://twitter.com/#!/Lions_Baseball
I had not
heard that from any of my news sources, but I’m not really surprized. Gibby seems to really like the bullpen the way it is, so that rules out Owings and the Duke. That really only leaves Miley.
DROOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! WHHYYYYYYYYY!!!!
by imstillhungry95 on Aug 14, 2011 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions
If that report is accurate
then they’ll keep Duke and Owings in the pen, unless Miley has difficulties getting batters out. You know, that jump to the big leagues thing I’m always sqawking about…
"The wise writer, I think, writes for the youth of his own generation, the critic of the next and the schoolmasters of ever afterward." F. Scott Fitzgerald.
by NASCARbernet on Aug 14, 2011 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, it seems like you’re the only one who sees that jump. Everyone else told me he’s already better than Owings. I guess we’ll see…..
people need to realize
life is just a set of probabilistic events, and baseball is no different
by blue bulldog on Aug 15, 2011 12:06 AM EDT up reply actions
Uh, no...
God does not play dice, et cetera.
"The wise writer, I think, writes for the youth of his own generation, the critic of the next and the schoolmasters of ever afterward." F. Scott Fitzgerald.
by NASCARbernet on Aug 15, 2011 2:25 AM EDT up reply actions
Quantum physics
has many flaws
DROOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! WHHYYYYYYYYY!!!!
by imstillhungry95 on Aug 15, 2011 2:34 AM EDT up reply actions
Now look
What you’ve done…

Wear your own fur.
by Marc Fournier on Aug 15, 2011 2:37 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Here's the problem
if one embraces a probabilistic universe, you have to reject causality, period. The two are logically incompatible.
If one is willing to reject causality, then one has to likewise reject science. This is because science assumes a foundational principle that a causal relationship exists between events, and that this relationship is observable and repeatable.
Reject science, and probabilistic physical explanatory systems are not constrained by to the Laws of Science and become mere metaphysics.
Do you really wish to reject science in order to embrace the idea that we live in a probabilistic universe?
"The wise writer, I think, writes for the youth of his own generation, the critic of the next and the schoolmasters of ever afterward." F. Scott Fitzgerald.
by NASCARbernet on Aug 15, 2011 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions
But what about Probabilistic Causation?
The idea that event A raises the probability of event B happening? For example, if clouds are gathering, it raises the probability that it will rain. It is not necessarily going to rain, but the probability is higher. I don’t see why the two are mutually exclusive.
"First of all, Life Sucks. Alright? Period. Done deal. You got it? There's your lesson. Enjoy it."-Coach McGuirk, Home Movies.
by BulldogsNotZags on Aug 15, 2011 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions
What are the odds that on a fair surfaced pool table
a cue ball is struck by a cue solidly, and the cue ball in turn solidly strikes a free standing 5 ball, but the 5 ball simply does not react to the collision?
Someone will try to say “Well, its possible!” No, actually, it’s not.
The problem with trying to equivocate probabilities is that one will make decisions based on the possibility that the impossible will happen, which leads to exceedingly bad ideas about nature.
"The wise writer, I think, writes for the youth of his own generation, the critic of the next and the schoolmasters of ever afterward." F. Scott Fitzgerald.
by NASCARbernet on Aug 15, 2011 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions
Well, of course there are no odds for impossible events.
Impossible events are not open to probability. At least, I don’t think they are. There are many impossible events that one can think of, and none of those are even worth examining through probability. I don’t think blue bulldog was saying that every event that could possibly be dreamed up is open to probability, or even that every event that does take place is the result of probability. Just that a lion’s share of events in life are.
"First of all, Life Sucks. Alright? Period. Done deal. You got it? There's your lesson. Enjoy it."-Coach McGuirk, Home Movies.
by BulldogsNotZags on Aug 15, 2011 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Thank you....
someone here has read David Hume
by blue bulldog on Aug 15, 2011 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions
For the record
I’ve never read David Hume
by blue bulldog on Aug 16, 2011 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Sure.
But that’s like saying that, “What are the odds that Micah Owings throws exactly three pitches, the hitter swings and misses three times, but the umpire inexplicably calls a walk instead of a strikeout?” It’s exceedingly unlikely.
Is it impossible? Given that everything else stays exactly the same, and the laws of physics don’t suddenly change at the last picosecond, yes.
But nobody’s arguing that. We’re talking about systems MUCH more complex than a pool shot where you’ve already set all the major variables. A better question to ask in terms of baseball is, “If DbacksSkins, with his fairly lousy pool skills tries to hit said 5 ball with said cue ball, what are the odds that the 5 ball will be hit and react as desired?”
Goldschmidt happens.
I'm gonna say those odds are about......
150-1. Is that a conservative estimate? I think with my incredibly lousy pool skills, the odds would be even longer.
"First of all, Life Sucks. Alright? Period. Done deal. You got it? There's your lesson. Enjoy it."-Coach McGuirk, Home Movies.
by BulldogsNotZags on Aug 15, 2011 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Ouch.
Yeah, gimme a LITTLE more credit than that.
But, again, there are plenty of other variables. Are those the only 2 balls on the table? How far apart are they? Am I solids? Have I been consuming beer? etc.
Goldschmidt happens.
C-c-c-c-combo Breaker
Strawman assassinated.
Nobody’s endorsing the idea of an entirely probabilistic universe. (At least, I don’t THINK blue bulldog is) EVERYTHING has causation — and without any sort of causation, probability would be worthless and impossible to even estimate.
Probability just describes our inability to necessarily KNOW or UNDERSTAND absolutely everything that goes into that causation.
The problem is in developing an ability to accurately predict future events. If you reject probability, you’d have to be able to predict the flow of every single possible variation in order to predict any single future action.
Goldschmidt happens.
wow
thank you so much
today was the first day of school orientation and i didn’t get a chance to write a response to this thread, but you were able to explain everything i wanted to explain succinctly
to be fair, whether you believe causation exists for everything was not the point of my argument, which seems to be where this thread had been headed. it was the point that unless you are an omniscient being who not only knows about all the variable at play, and also can control those variables, then any lack of relevant information creates variances in outcomes that you would like to predict.
by blue bulldog on Aug 15, 2011 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions
I think you have a misperception of science
Science rarely tries to prove causality. Instead, it’s about determining correlation.
Most scientific experiments conclude along the lines of “Based on the sample size of my data, the probability that A and B are not correlated is X probability.”
by blue bulldog on Aug 15, 2011 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Well,
ultimately, I think most scientists would admit that their goal is isolating causality, but with the standard of scientific “proof”, that’s virtually impossible in most cases and with finite time and resources.
Determining correlation is a means to that end.
Goldschmidt happens.
Quantum Physics...
“What is curve-fitting for 500?”
"The wise writer, I think, writes for the youth of his own generation, the critic of the next and the schoolmasters of ever afterward." F. Scott Fitzgerald.
by NASCARbernet on Aug 15, 2011 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions
Well, this is definitely true about baseball.
Founder and Chairman of the Hire A Body Double For David Hernandez's Right Arm Commission. A non-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Aug 15, 2011 4:15 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah.
Whether or not you agree about the rest of the universe, I think you have to admit that God DOES roll dice in baseball.
Otherwise the Yankees wouldn’t win every year.
Goldschmidt happens.
by DbacksSkins on Aug 15, 2011 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Come on, man.
You like Owings a lot, we get it, but you can’t just keep discrediting Wade Miley like he’s a nobody.
The whole “Miley versus Owings” debate gets old really fast anyway. Trying to compare a groundball pitcher to a flyball pitcher – a player with two years of service time to a prospect – a power pitcher with a finesse pitcher…
Miley is easily a top 15 prospect with a higher ceiling than Micah Owings currently has or ever will have. He has two plus-pitches, an ever improving walk rate, and he’s a LHP. Miley deserves this opportunity no less than Owings does.
Wear your own fur.
by Marc Fournier on Aug 15, 2011 2:13 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I have him eighth in the system, FWIW.
Founder and Chairman of the Hire A Body Double For David Hernandez's Right Arm Commission. A non-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Aug 15, 2011 4:17 AM EDT up reply actions
he doesn't really have two plus pitches
but i mean, the rest of this i agree with
by blue bulldog on Aug 15, 2011 8:35 AM EDT up reply actions
One plus, two above-average
Change-up is very good.
Founder and Chairman of the Hire A Body Double For David Hernandez's Right Arm Commission. A non-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Aug 15, 2011 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Isn't his fastball
Considered a plus?
Wear your own fur.
by Marc Fournier on Aug 15, 2011 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions
probably not
to be honest, i don’t really know. but put a different way…..there aren’t two many pitchers in the minor leagues that someone like Baseball America would consider to own two plus pitches. in fact, if Miley had two plus pitches, Baseball America would probably rank him in the top 100 prospects.
but i mean, this is largely a definitions problem.
it’s possible that the fastball flashes plus, but doesn’t consistently stay plus.
by blue bulldog on Aug 15, 2011 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Well...
for that matter, BA ranked Micah our 6th best prospect back in 2007.
Miley’s never been ranked that highly. But we have the benefit of 4 years of evidence of Micah.
Goldschmidt happens.
Ummmm...
At the end of last year Sickels/BA/BP had him 5/8/7 in the system.
Founder and Chairman of the Hire A Body Double For David Hernandez's Right Arm Commission. A non-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Aug 15, 2011 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Hmmm...
I stand corrected.
I was mostly taking issue with this:
Miley is easily a top 15 prospect with a higher ceiling than Micah Owings currently has or ever will have.
Goldschmidt happens.
Fair enough.
Dude is good.
Founder and Chairman of the Hire A Body Double For David Hernandez's Right Arm Commission. A non-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Aug 15, 2011 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Issue taken
DENIED.
But, yeah, you’re right…
Wear your own fur.
by Marc Fournier on Aug 15, 2011 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions
It's a question
of whether or not you’d rather take a chance with a higher-ceiling young guy or go with what you know you have (an average-ish, mediocre pitcher) in Owings.
Goldschmidt happens.
I have not seen that anywhere else on Twitter...yet
"I didn't mean to hit the umpire with the dirt, but I did mean to hit that bastard in the stands." -Babe Ruth
by Rockkstarr12 on Aug 15, 2011 12:29 AM EDT up reply actions
Actually I'm wrong.
His AVG is STILL higher than his OBP. LOL.
by CaptainCanuck on Aug 15, 2011 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I'm sad now
I just realized that there isn’t a Dbacks game tommorow. Guess there’s still the Gnats game
DROOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! WHHYYYYYYYYY!!!!
by imstillhungry95 on Aug 15, 2011 12:01 AM EDT reply actions
Yep
It will pain me, but not as much as it did when I had to route for the Dodgers
DROOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! WHHYYYYYYYYY!!!!
by imstillhungry95 on Aug 15, 2011 12:19 AM EDT up reply actions
I hate the Braves
I don’t really have a good reason for that, I just do. I really hate all but two teams in MLB: the Dbacks and the Rays. The only reason that I don’t hate the Rays is because they are really the only ones who can keep the Red Sox and Yankees out of the playoffs
DROOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! WHHYYYYYYYYY!!!!
by imstillhungry95 on Aug 15, 2011 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions
They're easy to hate
What with that STUPID CHOP CHANT THAT THEY BREAKOUT EVERY 20 MINUTES OF THE GAME.
Wear your own fur.
by Marc Fournier on Aug 15, 2011 2:17 AM EDT up reply actions
Hmm, I think I'm alone here on this one
I love the Braves.
by CaptainCanuck on Aug 15, 2011 5:49 AM EDT up reply actions
Naw
Heyward’s one of my players, and I guess I’m just a sucker for a team with that much young talent.
by CaptainCanuck on Aug 15, 2011 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions
I love whatever team is playing the Giants next!
Today…..I love the Braves.
by markaz on Aug 15, 2011 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
This
"I didn't mean to hit the umpire with the dirt, but I did mean to hit that bastard in the stands." -Babe Ruth
by Rockkstarr12 on Aug 15, 2011 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Better
having to root for other teams to help your team down the stretch than just root against everyone because your team’s out of it. ;-)
Goldschmidt happens.
replyFAIL?
DROOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! WHHYYYYYYYYY!!!!
by imstillhungry95 on Aug 15, 2011 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions
Here's a quote from Amazin' Ave
The Mets’ lead didn’t last very long because Justin Upton is in absolute beast mode this year.
I love that sentance
DROOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! WHHYYYYYYYYY!!!!
by imstillhungry95 on Aug 15, 2011 12:36 AM EDT reply actions
2/3 vs Philly on national tv
MLBN Tues and ESPN on Wed
WOOHOO!
DROOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! WHHYYYYYYYYY!!!!
by imstillhungry95 on Aug 15, 2011 1:27 AM EDT up reply actions
and Thurs it’s the ‘backup’ game on MLBN
Professional Lurker... if you see this, there may be a problem..
Hey DBacks?
This would be an excellent way to get the attention of the east-coast loving sports media. Go in and beat the Phillies in these two games on national television. Really, even winning one would be worth a lot.
National TV or not,
winning games on the road is hard, winning games against the Phillies is hard, and winning road games against the Phillies will be quite hard.
Goldschmidt happens.
Oh yeah
As I said, I would consider 1 win in this series to be a huge victory. I am kind of expecting to get swept. Lucky for me, I am at work during all three games. So, if they are really ugly at least I won’t have to watch. LOL. Hoping they aren’t ugly though. Would really love the DBacks to shock us and win a couple.
Let's get those pesky Phillies and stomp them like we did the Mets
"I didn't mean to hit the umpire with the dirt, but I did mean to hit that bastard in the stands." -Babe Ruth
Amen, sister!
I would love to crush the Phillies!
DROOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! WHHYYYYYYYYY!!!!
by imstillhungry95 on Aug 15, 2011 2:20 AM EDT up reply actions
Oh, wait, one more thing
We are up to +21 on last season! We started to talk about this in the GDT, but exactly how much of this +21 is due to the bullpen NOT blowing leads?
No stats on it
because I’m too lazy to look it up, but isn’t it nice this year that we don’t automatically have a sinking feeling when the bullpen comes in?
It's the stuff that dreams are made of
It's the slow and steady fire
by 4 Corners Fan on Aug 15, 2011 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions
One stat I remember seeing:
52-5 when leading at the start of the seventh inning, 62-0 when ahead at the start of the ninth.
Those records were 53-15 and 60-5 last year, respectively. A rudimentary stat, but a relevant one nonetheless.
Yeah, that's right.
Doing the whole newspaper gig, that must’ve been where I saw it before I decided to look into it a bit. It seemed surprising at the time.
Daron "...the D. Baxter fan-club"
Mark: "A non-profit organization."
by Jim McLennan on Aug 15, 2011 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions
More waveage today.
Ugh
Even "Out of the Park" Wagner Mateo K's a ton.
by Reynolds rapper on Aug 15, 2011 3:35 AM EDT reply actions
The wave sucks
And the fans who started it on Saturday did it when the DBACKS were batting…all of us ’Pitters wanted to choke those fans!
"I didn't mean to hit the umpire with the dirt, but I did mean to hit that bastard in the stands." -Babe Ruth
by Rockkstarr12 on Aug 15, 2011 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Really.
If you have to be obnoxious and do the wave, you DON’T DO IT WHEN YOUR TEAM IS UP TO BAT! Pay attention.
It's the stuff that dreams are made of
It's the slow and steady fire
by 4 Corners Fan on Aug 15, 2011 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions
This!
"I didn't mean to hit the umpire with the dirt, but I did mean to hit that bastard in the stands." -Babe Ruth
by Rockkstarr12 on Aug 15, 2011 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions
That was the one that really got to me
but Sunday’s was just as bad.
Even "Out of the Park" Wagner Mateo K's a ton.
by Reynolds rapper on Aug 16, 2011 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions
I bet
"I didn't mean to hit the umpire with the dirt, but I did mean to hit that bastard in the stands." -Babe Ruth
by Rockkstarr12 on Aug 16, 2011 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions
Lotta called strike 3s yesterday.
Big zone, I guess, but it did seem to be relatively consistent. The low part of the zone was definitely getting called.
Goldschmidt happens.
You know, I think I like it better when the higher/lower zones are getting called.
As opposed to the outside/inside zones. It seems like a hitter can still make good contact with a low or high strike, but it’s harder to make good contact with an outside or inside pitch. With the way some of these umps call the outside/inside pitches, it might be hard to make any contact at all.
"First of all, Life Sucks. Alright? Period. Done deal. You got it? There's your lesson. Enjoy it."-Coach McGuirk, Home Movies.
by BulldogsNotZags on Aug 15, 2011 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions
I dunno that that's universally true.
Plenty of hitters can hit inside and outside but not high and low.
Or…more realistically, plenty of hitters can hit EITHER inside or outside and EITHER high or low. A lot of it depends on how closely a given hitter stands to the plate.
Goldschmidt happens.
Igarishi came in and hit Roberts because everyone was bored with hitting JUp, Burroughs walked then Goldie pounced on a pitch like a cat on a juicy mouse to load the bases.
Still think RyRo could’ve made it home, but Burroughs probably couldn’t have made it to 3rd.
A nice thread for a Sunday afternoon, running almost but not quite to 900 comments. Craig from Az led everyone,in posts, just shy of triple digits, with NASCARbernet and Rockkstarr12 in second and third. Also stopping by were kishi, njjohn, TimLincecumIsGod, AZDBACKR, JoeStock, Dan Strittmatter, hotclaws, iheartdbacks, imstillhungry95, SongBird, luckycc, txzona, GuruB, parrauptonfan, Britback, Skii, Jim McLennan, Brian MacKinney, The so-called Beautiful, Sabean’s_Folly, Husk, asteroid, Aztiramtempe, rfffr, TinySarabia, Shane Yeo, Wailord, Stile4aly, BulldogsNotZags, iTalk2Cornfields, Jdub220, emilylovesthedbacks, YoungCardsFanatic, dback4life, marionette, and Turambar.
Wasn’t there but did post a few comments from AZDBACKR’s iPAD.
Goldschmidt happens.
Sorry
I’m not asking for those to be moved to your post-count. :-)
Daron "...the D. Baxter fan-club"
Mark: "A non-profit organization."
by Jim McLennan on Aug 15, 2011 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions
I demand
immediate annexation of any and all of my comments posted under AZDBACKR’s name.
In response, I yield the Series Preview and the last recap posted under my name to jinnah.
Goldschmidt happens.
So AZDBACKR lives in Tucson too then?
"I didn't mean to hit the umpire with the dirt, but I did mean to hit that bastard in the stands." -Babe Ruth
by Rockkstarr12 on Aug 15, 2011 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Ohhhh ok
Sunday’s game or Saturday’s?
"I didn't mean to hit the umpire with the dirt, but I did mean to hit that bastard in the stands." -Babe Ruth
by Rockkstarr12 on Aug 15, 2011 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions
The game
featured in this recap?
Goldschmidt happens.
by DbacksSkins on Aug 16, 2011 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions
That's what I thought...didn't realize you went to both games till reading the posts
"I didn't mean to hit the umpire with the dirt, but I did mean to hit that bastard in the stands." -Babe Ruth
by Rockkstarr12 on Aug 16, 2011 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions

by 






















