Diamondbacks 6, Reds 9: Of Aaron and Errors
A good performance from Aaron Heilman this afternoon, and he could have all but sealed a spot in the Diamondbacks' rotation for next week. However, 12 of the first 16 batters Heilman faced reached base against him, and he was replaced by Kam Mickolio before having to face the Reds' leadoff batter for the third time, to open the third inning. With Heilman's spring ERA now sitting at 7.04, almost the same as Armando Galarraga (7.34), there is still no clear answer to our pitching dilemma.
Adopting the pattern displayed by the last two Diamondbacks starters, Barry Enright and Ian Kennedy, Heilman gave up three runs in the opening frame - indeed, he matched Enright, by allowing the Reds to score three runs before he had even retired a batter. The first inning was a tough one for Heilman, albeit one not helped by his defense, as both Gerardo Parra and Ryan Roberts committed errors behind him. Still, the four hits (including a home-run), walk and pair of stolen bases allowed were all Heilman, and he was fortunate to escape more damage, getting out of the inning with the bases loaded.
Roberts did somewhat redeem himself, coming up in the second with men on second and third, and driving them both in with a single - though he then re-blotted his copy-book by being caught stealing. Heilman himself singled, which is worth noting, since he is 1-for-46 lifetime in the majors, with that sole hit coming back in 2003. So, if he makes the rotation, do not expect Micah Owings or Dan Haren redux. That's still an "if", as the Reds sent nine more men to the plate against Aaron in the second, and scored five times - though two of those were unearned, thanks to another error, this one by Kelly Johnson.
That was the end of the day for Heilman, who allowed eight hits and two walks in two innings, with six of the eight runs that resulted, being earned by him. I don't think he'll be able to squeeze in another start before Opening Day, so let's line up the candidates for the remaining spot [Joe Saunders having been named as our #3], and see how their spring numbers now compare:
| IP | H | R | ER | HR | HBP | BB | K | ERA | |
| Armando Galarrago | 22.0 | 24 | 18 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 7.36 |
| Aaron Heilman | 24.1 | 30 | 23 | 19 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 7.04 |
Yuck. Based on these numbers, picking one of them would be something you'd like to avoid [unless we are sending out tentacles to see what Carlos Silva is doing...]. While the peripherals are similar for Galaragga and Heilman, save that HR rate, Galaragga's last start was his best. The obvious black mark against Heilman is that he has struggled when removed from the "comfort zone" of relief performances and forced to face a line-up more than once - that ERA becomes close to nine, if you cross off his early, short couple of appearances.
After Heilman's early exit, Kam Mickolio replaced him, and pitched well, facing the minimum in his two innings. He has been performing better, and has allowed only one run during his last six frames of work, on four hits and two hits, with five K's. Could be a sleeper candidate for a bullpen spot, or at least, putting himself high on the list in Reno. Bryan Shaw followed with two more scoreless frames, and yesterday's villain, Rafael Rodriguez allowed a home-run in the seventh - but it was unearned. That'd be a good trivia question: how can a HR be unearned? Answer: because of a dropped foul ball earlier in the at-bat. Daniel Stange finished things off, with a 1-2-3 eighth.
The offense actually outhit the Reds, 12-11. Stephen Drew and Willie Bloomquist each had a couple of hits, while Johnson and A.J. Pollock had a hit and a walk. Had it not been for the three unearned runs, which resulted from the four Arizona errors, this might have been tied at six, but instead, the Diamondbacks dropped to a preseason record of 11-24. A victory would actually have taken us off the bottom of the Cactus League standings, as the Astros have lost eight of their last nine, to sit at 11-22.
Tomorrow is the final game for us at Salt River Fields, with Daniel Hudson starting in his last pre-season warmup.
36 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Saunders
Was named into Diamondbacks rotation pitching the third game already by the way. So it’s ultimately up to only Galaragga and Heilman competing for that last spot.
Ah, missed that
Updated, with a link. :-)
"While Mrs. SnakePit watched one of the most highly acclaimed films of the year, I sat through a badly made schlock fest with absolutely no redeeming value. And it was awesome."
by Jim McLennan on Mar 27, 2011 7:59 PM EDT up reply actions
we won't need a 5 starter until mid april
maybe gibby needs to delay his decision & see how the candidates perform in real time.
by brian custer on Mar 27, 2011 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Actually, we need one for the Cubs series
On April 5.
"While Mrs. SnakePit watched one of the most highly acclaimed films of the year, I sat through a badly made schlock fest with absolutely no redeeming value. And it was awesome."
by Jim McLennan on Mar 27, 2011 8:24 PM EDT up reply actions
are u saying that gibby will've had had
to make adecision by then?
by brian custer on Mar 27, 2011 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Of one kind or another
Yes. It need not be the final one, but we will need a #5 starter. Then another one (or the same one!) during the opening home-stand too, as I recall the schedule.
"While Mrs. SnakePit watched one of the most highly acclaimed films of the year, I sat through a badly made schlock fest with absolutely no redeeming value. And it was awesome."
by Jim McLennan on Mar 27, 2011 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions
I think the decision to keep Galarraga
must be made this week, and today Heilman made that one a lot easier. They still could see if Heilman can be effective with a few regular season starts, keeping Galarraga in the pen as backup. Impossible to predict what happens next.
Since the damage was early this time, it reeks of a bad day, not the usual not enough endurance or third time around concerns. And the errors didn’t help.
The errors are annoying
Even if the pitcher gives up unearned runs, it’s hard to get through a five-out inning nonetheless.
http://hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/
by Dan Strittmatter on Mar 27, 2011 9:30 PM EDT up reply actions
And Roberts getting thrown out, taking away
the bunt. Really bad timing for him to get a hit.
heilman did nothing to help his cause
gibby has a tough decision
It's like Sophie's Choice
Gibby’s Choice
HEY, FRENCHY! STAR TREK OR STAR WARS?
by DbacksSkins on Mar 28, 2011 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions
I think Sophie loved both her children
Not so sure gibby is lovin these guys too much right now
The worst major leaguer is better at baseball than I'll ever be at anything I ever do in my life.
True.
Guess it’s sorta the opposite.
Rather than loving them both, Gibby prolly hates having to pitch one or the other of them.
HEY, FRENCHY! STAR TREK OR STAR WARS?
by DbacksSkins on Mar 28, 2011 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions
Saunders has to be given the opportunity because of what we've sunk into him (Dan Haren)
So between Armando and Aaron? I’m going to take Armando. Just feel more confident(?) in him to perform as a starter. If we were talking about the long relief spot give me Heilman but since we’re talking starters I want Galaraga.
-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.
- Follow me on the Twitter for worthless thoughts and IU updates.
At this point,
There is no bad choice. Particularly if the team is set on keeping both pitchers on the roster. I personally would cut loose Galarraga and allocate the $2MM to the draft, then deal with any struggles Heilman might have. But that’s a whole other subject.
http://hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/
by Dan Strittmatter on Mar 27, 2011 9:29 PM EDT reply actions
it's unfortunate...
i wish Duke were healthy. then cutting Galarraga would be the easy decision and we can slot Heilman in to fill up any injuries….
but since Duke is already injured…..
by blue bulldog on Mar 27, 2011 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Why does
Duke make that a question? Because otherwise, we’d have to burn a young guy’s option year?
HEY, FRENCHY! STAR TREK OR STAR WARS?
by DbacksSkins on Mar 28, 2011 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions
er...
i got confused by this….
sorry, what exactly is the question?
by blue bulldog on Mar 28, 2011 2:16 AM EDT up reply actions
Why does
Duke being injured mean we can’t just cut Galarraga?
HEY, FRENCHY! STAR TREK OR STAR WARS?
by DbacksSkins on Mar 28, 2011 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions
oh
i see…
cuz we don’t really have depth then? if we cut galarraga then the rotation is kennedy, hudson, saunders, enright, heilman and nobody behind them? i don’t want to rush miley to the majors. and parker is already slotted for when saunders leaves. i mean, i guess we can try to bank on nothing happening in the month before Duke gets back.
i wouldn’t even really mind if Galarraga got cut, and Heilman made the rotation. that being said, i think Galarraga is the better SP, and that Heilman would be more useful in the bullpen.
by blue bulldog on Mar 28, 2011 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions
Is
not having Collmenter or someone else start REALLY worth $2 million?
HEY, FRENCHY! STAR TREK OR STAR WARS?
Probably not
Particularly since Collmenter is the type of guy who can basically give you a year or so of back-end spot-starting before having to go to the ’pen when teams catch up to the delivery. Seems like a perfect time to have him eat innings until the mainstays get here.
But apparently Galarraga looked good in his last outing. At least, according to Nagy.
http://hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/
by Dan Strittmatter on Mar 28, 2011 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Collmenter
Collmenter got hit hard in his AAA starts last year. I don’t think he’s ready to be a Major League spot starter right now. I think Mulvey or Torra might be ahead of him until he shows better results in AAA.
Doesn't change my point at all.
Use Mulvey. This is his last chance. Or, use Torra, even though the franchise seems to have completely forgotten him.
HEY, FRENCHY! STAR TREK OR STAR WARS?
let the better pitcher win
at this point there is no clear evidence, aaron cannot say he was not given a fair chance. i think it mayn’t until be mid april b4 we know who “won” the 5 spot competition..
poor heilman
i feel bad for him because he’s not very good, and people don’t seem to like him … so now he’s my new favorite pitcher. naturally.
we want frenchy!
aaron's arm may have been torchede' by overuse in the bp
but gibby gave him a fair shot in ST this year; and who knows? he may still will have won it. unfortunatley we have low admission standards for the spot.. lol?
by brian custer on Mar 28, 2011 12:39 AM EDT up reply actions
Not buying the 'torched arm' canard
quite yet. Working out of the bullpen is more ‘by the seat of the pants’ pitching, while starting requires really knowing how hitters hit, the pitches they’re looking for and can handle, and so forth. I don’t know how much homework Aaron has been doing on hitters and their tendencies, but that’s gold for starting pitchers if they’ll take the time. Aaron’s a finesse pitcher with a decent fastball, so if he’s not getting people out but throwing okay, then he’s missing something in his approach. That’s my view, anyway.
by NASCARbernet on Mar 28, 2011 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Perhaps
his preparation skills are rusty after so many years of relieving?
HEY, FRENCHY! STAR TREK OR STAR WARS?
and like any other 30+ player is past his peak,
making it much more difficult than it would have been years ago with the Mets or even with the Cubs in 09.
He may have done better if he was given the job, with it being his to lose, rather than be in a small sample winner take all contest, but that’s irrevalent at this point.
It will be interesting to see how he is used this year, and if he gets another shot at starting down the road.
Somehow,
I doubt he would’ve done better if just given the job straight up.
I wonder if we’re gonna try using him as a long reliever to try keeping him stretched out for the inevitable moment when one of our starters is traded, injured, or ineffective.
HEY, FRENCHY! STAR TREK OR STAR WARS?
by DbacksSkins on Mar 29, 2011 12:14 AM EDT up reply actions
Beating a dead horse
I just read a wonderful expression that I think we can apply here in several situations: necro-equine sadism. Doesn’t that sound intellectual? It should, of course, be accompanied by the lovely visual that Jim often posts.
Well, you don't ever want to miss that.
Very intellectual, but
necro doesn’t sound like a fun word.

by 





















