2011 Diamondbacks Report Card: David Hernandez

Name: David Hernandez
Age on opening day: 25
Salary: $423,500
2011 stats: 5-3, 3.38 ERA, 77K, 30BB, 69.1 IP, 11 Saves, 23 Holds, 1.139 WHIP, 117 ERA+,
2010 stats: 8-8, 4.31 ERA, 72K, 42BB, 79.1 IP, 2 Saves, 2 Holds, 1.437 WHIP, 97 ERA+
David Hernandez arrived in Arizona during the 2010-2011 offseason as part of the Mark Reynolds trade, and played a pivotal role in strengthening a bullpen that posted an abysmally bad 5.74 ERA in relief during the 2010 season. Though Kam Mickolio, the other return in that trade contributed little to Arizona's NL West-winning 2011, both tangible production along with intangibles such as confidence and stability in the latter innings combine to make that trade, in my mind, a win for Arizona.
Deets, as always, after the jump.
Hernandez grew up in the Sacramento area and played baseball for Cosumnes River College, a Sacramento-area juco that also boasts alumnus Jermaine Dye. Drafted in the 16th round of the 2005 Rule 4 player draft by the Baltimore Orioles, the 483rd overall pick spent nearly his entire minor league career as a starting pitcher, relieving exactly 6 professional games out of 127 pitched before 2010. The righty throws a fastball, curveball, and changeup mix.
Replacing a homegrown hero in Mark Reynolds, who hammered 121 homers as a Dback and swiped 42 bags, is no easy task. I don't think I was the only person who expressed this sentiment when, last December, upon hearing the details of the trade, I angrily tweeted, "You don't trade an everyday position player for two middling relievers." Though Hernandez' walk rate fluctuated from year to year while in the minors, his strikeout rate progressed each season bar one in the minors, and has progressed each season in the majors. Still, there was probably no real way we could've known what kind of season Hernandez was going to have, especially given that many people still thought Kevin Towers was bringing in Hernandez to compete for a rotation spot. FanGraphs' Fan Projections showed Hernandez pitching 95 innings (reflecting his history as a starter) with a 4.28 FIP and 4.14 ERA, good enough for 0.8 fWAR.
David, however, did well enough to put up half a win higher than that, according to FanGraphs, over 25 fewer innings. Hernandez pitched Opening Day and three of the Diamondbacks' first four games, not giving up a run until the 19th of April, in his 8th game. Taking the 8th inning and running with it, as the primary setup man, Hernandez ran up a total of 23 holds this season. Now, the hold may be a dumb stat, but only Brandon Lyon, Tony Pena, and Luis Vizcaino have pitched Dbacks seasons with more or equal holds. When Hernandez pitched, the team went 54-20. He added 1.57 wins this season by WPA in aggreggate, and exactly half of the time (37 outings in 74) when he came in, it was a high leverage situation. After normal closer JJ Putz went to the DL, Hernandez went from setup work to closing out Dbacks games and was largely successful. After blowing a save on the 26th of June, Hernandez went on a 7 game save streak wherein he only allowed a single baserunner (a walk) over 6.1 IP in save situations. Upon returning to his 8th inning role on July 27th, Hernandez continued his streak without blowing a lead or a tie and finished with a combined 28 straight games in that category. He had a season ERA as low as 1.65 on June 4th, and below 2.80 before imploding and allowing 5 runs on September 6th. He struck out 10 batters per 9 innings on the season and, even with Chase Field as his home park, only allowed 4 home runs. His allowed OPS of .561 was lowest on the team for anyone with 21 IP or more (only Brad Ziegler was better), and his opponents' BA of .193 was the absolute lowest -- he barely pipped Putz in both categories.
If Achilles had a heel, though, it was inherited runners -- 38% scored, which isn't an awful number, but still a bit higher than you'd like. Then, there were the walks. His nice 1.139 WHIP belied a walk rate of 3.9 per 9 innings. It was his lowest walk rate of his major league career, and it'd be nice to continue to see improvement there.
Diamondbacks fans will be hoping for even bigger and better things from David in 2012. To start, Hernandez isn't even arbitration eligible until 2013, though he's due for a raise to $480,000 at least, thanks to the new collective bargaining agreement. Short of injury, Hernandez should continue to easily outperform what he's paid (by nearly 14x in 2011 according to FanGraphs -- WAR value of $5.9 million against a $423,500 salary!).
Injury is always a concern, however, especially for a 26 year old pitcher. As anyone who was around the Snakepit during the 2011 season will know, Dan and I particularly worried about Hernandez's workload. 69.1 IP was the most relief innings of anyone on the team (11 more than Putz), but, perhaps more significantly, Hernandez came in to pitch on consecutive days 20 times in 2011, second-most on the team to LOOGY Joe Paterson, who only faced an average of slightly over 2 batters an outing. Hernandez also pitched in 74 games. Paterson was 2nd at 62 with Putz 3rd at 60, and those don't include games where Hernandez warmed up and did not pitch. Put the odds that Hernandez spends time on the DL in 2012 somewhere around an arbitrary 45%, with significant time (35+ days) at 15-20%.
Hernandez probably won't keep only 4% of his flyballs from leaving the park in 2012, and he's unlikely to hold opponents to a batting average below the Uecker Line again. Bill James has Hernandez regressing some in 2012, projecting a 4.03 ERA up from 3.38 in 2011, about the same IP, but a FIP of 4.26 vs. 2.94, and worse HR (1.21/9IP vs. 0.52/9IP), K (9/9IP vs. 10/9IP) and BB (4.03/9IP vs. 3.89/9IP) rates. I personally don't think his K rate will regress quite that sharply, if at all, and I think his BB rate will improve. Call him another solid reliever in 2012, with the potential to be a really good one again. My guess for next season? Maybe 54 IP, 3.50 ERA, 3.25 FIP, with a K rate nearly as good at 9.8K/9IP and an improved BB rate of 3.60ish per 9IP. Depending on the rest of the league, that might be about 1.1 fWAR -- not too shabby for a reliever, as relievers are traditionally overpenalized through WAR.
Incidentally, hopefully, in a few years we'll also be able to write hopeful reports on David Hernandez's little brother Raymond, who was drafted in the 48th round this year out of Cal State Fullerton. Ray Hernandez posted a 4.29 ERA over 10 starts and 70.1 innings for the AZL Diamondbacks and Missoula.
Final Grade: B+
Summary David Hernandez was a pleasant surprise in 2011 that helped significantly improve the weakest part of the 2010 team.
Snakepitter Grades
Kishi: A
Okay, I’ll admit, I was not thrilled when we traded Mark Reynolds. I know, I know, you’re shocked. So I probably came in with a bit of a bias against David Hernandez. I mean, while a 4.31 ERA in 2010 might have been pretty good if you were pitching out of the Diamondbacks bullpen, it’s not really the sort of numbers you look for when one of your favorite players gets traded. Buuuut.... You look at the 2011 bullpen and he was a huge part of why they improved. He pitched in, roughly, 127% of our games this season- seriously, check the numbers- and was pretty good when we really needed it. Especially when J.J. Putz went to the DL for a while, and Hernandez stepped in as closer. Look at his numbers in July and August- 25 appearances, nine saves, nine holds, and an ERA of 1.19. The guy was a really solid piece out of our bullpen, and after suffering through 2010, you can’t appreciate those enough.
Jim: B+
I was a little surprised to see Hernandez's ERA as high as 3.38. It seemed an awful lot lower than that. However, that was inflated by three really bad outings: 0.2 IP, 14 ER. Over his other 71 appearances, Hernandez’s ERA was 1.57, and that gives you a better idea of Hernandez's true level of performance. Put another way, in 2011, NL relievers were scored upon in 20.5% of one-inning outings. DH was basically half that, just six of 58 (10.3%). His 55 scoreless outings of an inning or more, ranked him 8th in he majors last season. Basically, despite Dan being reduced to whimpering in a corner, thanks to Hernandez warming up in the eighth just about every night, he seemed to bear the usage without ill-effect (yet), and was a vital part of the bullpen in the eighth inning. Of the 90 occasions we came in to that frame with a lead or tied, we left it trailing only three times, with one more lead becoming a tie. That's a heck of a protection rate, and if J.J. Putz departs for the big-budget closer bucks after next year, I think we have his immediate replacement already present in the bullpen.
Dan: A-
I’m, sadly, incredibly busy lately, but have a moment to at least say that Hernandez’s performance in 2011 was ridiculously above my expectations, and was a godsend given the need for a solid set-up man who is capable of closing for the short DL stint that J.J. Putz was likely to need. He did those things, and the fans rejoiced. Now, sadly, it’s back to work.
ZM: A
Like most of us, I couldn’t stand the Reynolds trade at the time. It made me angry on both a sabermetric level (NEVER trade valuable position players for relievers) and an emotional one (Because it sucked to see Reynolds leave). However, you really can’t argue with the results. Hernandez was the second-best pitcher in the bullpen by almost any metric you want to use, and he easily out-fWAR’d Reynolds. It’s even more amazing when you consider that just a season before, he managed to fail out of Baltimore’s rotation, which Brian Matusz demonstrated is almost impossible to do. The walks are a concern, but you really can’t argue with a K/9 of 10, and he’s only 26. I expect more good things from Hernandez in 2012.
33 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The word "roughly"
It certainly seemed like he pitched that often. :)
"Barry's Puffin has gone red and is hiding under a pirate hat!"
by Jim McLennan on Dec 2, 2011 10:51 AM EST up reply actions
Gibby borrowed a time-turner from Professor McGonagall.
"Never ignore a coincidence. Unless you're busy, in which case always ignore a coincidence."
by kishi on Dec 2, 2011 10:56 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
That would explain
why it seemed that he appeared in 127% of the games
Have you been good this year? I hope so, because Gibby. Is. Watching.
by imstillhungry95 on Dec 2, 2011 11:21 AM EST up reply actions
The awe inspiring power of hyperbole
Founder of the 'Foundation for the Advancement of Clefoing' a 501C3
"I'm like if it fits in the oven, play ball." - soco
Promised Colin Cowgill fifteen sandwiches on 7/6/2011
A+
he was the complete opposite from the Bullpen in 2010, and that was something we badly needed this year. I give him this grade for many reasons, but mostly for restoring the moral of the team and the fans in the later innings
Have you been good this year? I hope so, because Gibby. Is. Watching.
by imstillhungry95 on Dec 2, 2011 11:22 AM EST reply actions
Love DH
I loved the times when everybody in the stadium knew DH was gonna throw a fastball, and then just uncorks a knee-buckler. His fist pumps after those big strikeouts always fired me up.
A- for 2011
Given his performance and cost-effectiveness/team control, DH has made the Reynolds trade look good for AZ in 2011.
That said, the danger of this trade turning against AZ remains because relievers are notoriously volatile. DH looks like the type to be a consistent bullpen arm, but so do a lot of relievers after a good year.
Honestly, I don't see how the trade turns against us
Unless Hernandez contributes below-replacement-level value. Reynolds is pretty overpaid and really bad at defense.
Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Dec 2, 2011 3:36 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Solid A
As important as JJ was to turning the pen around, David was the rock all year.
I just hope a full year of Bryan Shaw means David doesn’t have to throw nearly as many innings as last year.
A-
Gas!
He was almost as important as Putz. When Putz went down Hernandez came up huge. He could easily be the closer in 2013.
More important than Putz
I actually think he was more important. I know the closer is a more glamorous position than the set-up guy, so Putz got a lot more attention. I think David was more important, though, for a number of reasons. Not only were his stats (slightly) better, but he’s far more durable. That’s the most important reason, IMO. Yes, he was overused. The point is that he could be overused. Putz, due to his age, had to be treated much more delicately.
by azshadowwalker on Dec 2, 2011 3:03 PM EST up reply actions
A-
I think everyone’s on the right track. Despite overuse, David prevented earned runs in 61 of 74 appearances, and as the team’s least hittable pitcher, didnt merely record outs but often discouraged opposing lineups, which matters.
Shares initials with gobs of club notables, incl Derrick Hall and Diamondhacks.
The "shutdowns" stat
Has far more psychological value than given credit for. This is a solid point I hadn’t thought of enough.
Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Dec 2, 2011 3:38 PM EST up reply actions
+1
Hernandez had 35 SD this year, good for 10th in the NL (Putz also had 35). Only 8 MD is not a bad ratio either.
...and shutdowns are a function of win probability
right? Which doesnt truly capture the particular quality of hitters Hernandez faced in the 24 base/out (and score) states.
A perception of Hernandez is that he was brought in at the start of the eighth to protect leads, but he only met those entrance requirements in 27 of 74 appearances. I think Gibson saw DH as his ace in the hole, and chose to match him up against more dangerous hitters (not just more critical base/out/score situations). Especially before Shaw established himself and Hernandez faded late, at which time DH took on a more default eighth inning setup role.
by Diamondhacks on Dec 3, 2011 10:04 AM EST up reply actions
According to the chart at the bottom of this page:
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/gl.cgi?id=hernada01&t=p&year=2011
Of David’s 74 appearances, the great majority (48) were in the 8th inning, with 21 in the 9th (and about half of those were when he was closing with Putz on the DL). Of those 48, 32 were with a lead, and another 13 were when the game was tied or we were down by one – which is a important part of the job, especially given our fondness for scoring late,
I think his usage is pretty consistent with a “default 8th inning set-up role”. For instance, compare him to Johnny Venters of the Braves, who didn’t have the spell as a closer, but of his 68 eighth-inning appearances, 43 were with a lead. That 63.2% is almost the same as DH’s 66.7% ratio.
"Barry's Puffin has gone red and is hiding under a pirate hat!"
by Jim McLennan on Dec 3, 2011 11:13 AM EST up reply actions
When Kimbrel was out,
Venters had five ninth inning (or later) saves himself, so while it’s not a wash with Hernandez, it’s a little misleading to suggest DH had a closer spell and Venters did not.
Appearances…Venters……Hernandez
Total ………………85……………74
non 8th inn………17……………26
up 4 or more…….8……………..11
down 2 or more…2………………8
Whether we define default setup guy as starting the eighth with a lead (as I did), or include tie scores and down one (as you did), Hernandez was used less conventionally than Venters, at least in terms of entrance inning and game score. Gibson had him all over the place, relatively speaking.
Granted, DH wasnt floating around independent of inning, like some ‘sabers’ espouse. Sure, he’s still an “eighth inning guy”, but “eighth inning guy” isnt exclusive of “ace in the hole”, which was the case I was making, and something which applies to both Hernandez and Venters, despite their somewhat dissimilar usage.
A
he’s next years closer for sure. anything close to this production next year and i’ll be happy.
"We’re going to turn this team around 360 degrees." –Jason Kidd
A+ as I thought David did a great job :)
And the Reynolds trade didn’t bother me as much like it did others…it opened up the door for my boy RyRo to play more. I can’t be upset about that.
I got sprayed by Ryan Roberts!!!
I didn't have huge problems with the trade, either
My “irrational” rooting interest is Parra—where I’ll defend him when he probably shouldn’t be defended—so I get where you’re coming from with Roberts. However, that wasn’t my reason for being indifferent to the Reynolds trade. I thought Reynolds was too all-or-nothing, both on offense and defense, so he wasn’t one of my favorite players. I didn’t actively dislike him; I just didn’t see him as a star. With the horror that was Arizona’s 2010 bullpen, moving Reynolds in favor of pitching didn’t seem like a bad move to me. Of course, David did better than I expected, so that was just gravy. Happy he’s a Diamondback.
by azshadowwalker on Dec 2, 2011 3:00 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I second your motion, azshadowwalker
I totally agree with what you’re saying
I got sprayed by Ryan Roberts!!!
A-
‘cause there’s always some room for improvement. Otherwise, pretty darned stellar.
Is it mid-February yet?
One thing
That doesn’t get mentioned enough in regards to the Hernandez trade is how important Ryan Roberts was in our perception of it. If he doesn’t play as well at third as he did, or if (::shudder::) Melvin Mora had started for the entire season and posted a WAR of 0, I doubt we would be nearly as happy about trading Reynolds, no matter how well Hernandez had pitched.
What's one more comeback, anyway?
by Zavada's Moustache on Dec 2, 2011 5:35 PM EST reply actions
Good point
When looking at the Reynolds for Hernandez swap you also have to include Roberts and the production he put up in 2011.
A
As it was mentioned before, you take away the 3 bad outings he had, he was probably the best reliever in the NL. Only reliever that had a double double and thats 21 holds and 11 saves, the only reliever in the ML to accomplish that. He is the ONLY player in #MLB history with < 3 yrs. service time, to record at least 10 holds & saves in a season. I see him as our future closer.
This isn't to say he wasn't stellar, because he was
But you cod take away the three worst outings from a ton of relievers and have them look like ace closers. I vaguely recall Esmerling Vasquez in 2010 having that kind of year.
Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Dec 3, 2011 2:49 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
MVP
For the team considering in 2010 our BP sucked. Hernandez filled a much needed void and was stellar.
When JJ went down, he was dominant as a closer!
Just my opinion. I know we could have won more games in 2010 we were in holding a lead just to watch anyone of our guys blow the lead and the game.
by Augdogs on Dec 3, 2011 9:54 AM EST via mobile reply actions
A
I cannot overstate how happy it made me to have him in the bullpen. Bullpen 2010 took a psychological toll on me. He is close to the team MVP for me. Partly due to that psychological value, I must confess. It was so nice not to panic when we took out IPK or Huddy.
Hopefully we didn’t overwork him last season.
Overworked
he was, if it’s not reduced this year he’ll be lucky if his A only drops to a C.
"The kingdoms of Experience, In the precious wind they rot, While paupers change possessions, Each one wishing for what the other has got, And the princess and the prince, Discuss what's real and what is not, It doesn't matter inside the Gates of Eden." B. Dylan

by 























