Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Week In Worst: When Baseball Goes Wrong

Diamondbacks Off Season Priorities: Steady As She Goes?

PHOENIX - SEPTEMBER 22:  (L-R) President & Chief Executive Officer Derrick Hall Executive Vice President & General Manager Kevin Towers and Managing General Partner Ken Kendrick of the Arizona Diamondbacks attend the Major League Baseball game against the Colorado Rockies at Chase Field on September 22 2010 in Phoenix Arizona.  (Photo by Christian Petersen/Getty Images)

The Diamondbacks enter the 2011-12 winter as reigning champions of the National League West, as position they've only enjoyed once since 2002. With most of the starters, both around the diamond and in the rotation, set to come back next year, it appears there's not much to do for Kevin Towers and his crew. Is that quite the case? Let's take a look at the 25 spots on the roster and see what we have, and where the team might be looking to upgrade.

Star-divide

Starters

Second-base is the obvious question-mark, with the team declining Aaron Hill's $8 million option. However, the general view seems to be that Hill likes it here and will be re-signed in Arizona, at a lower rate. However, there may be some negotiation required over the term, with Towers apparently "not necessarily" prepared to sign Hill to a multi-year contract. "I don’t want to get too crazy about six weeks (of production). There’s a reason [Toronto] moved him." Harsh, but probably fair, given that Hill has posted only a 77 OPS+ since the start of 2010. While there's no obvious immediate replacement in the farm system, overpaying still wouldn't be a good thing.

There's another area of some doubt on the other side of the middle infield, where we await Drew's return from his ankle injury. Will he be 100% fit, and able to play one of the most demanding defensive positions in the game? That's something we likely won't know for sure until we see him in action next spring training; I hope the team's contingency plan does not involve Bloomquist as an everyday starter again. 3B might also see the team kicking a few tires. While Roberts' overall numbers (108 OPS+) were good, that was largely powered by a blistering start: after mid-May, RyRo hit .239, though his power kept the OPS thereafter above league-average for the position.

The outfield should require little tweaking, thanks to the rise of Gerardo Parra, who did a "reverse Roberts", by catching fire after a slow start - Parra batted .302 from May 17 on, as he became comfortable with his role as an everyday starter. A previous area of weakness, his issues against left-handed pitchers, seemed to be addressed, with Gerardo batting .277, and delivering an OPS almost identical to that facing RHP. His Gold Glove-level defense (whether rewarded with a Gold Glove or not) gives Arizona their first winter without an apparent issue in left-field since the days of...Eric Byrnes. Ok. Moving rapidly on...

Starting pitching

  1. Ian Kennedy
  2. Daniel Hudson
  3. Joe Saunders
  4. Josh Collmenter

The blank at the end is not an indication of an area that needs to be addresses, more uncertainly about which of the possible contenders for the #5 spot will fill it. Possible contenders include Jarrod Parker, Trevor Bauer, Archie Bradley, Tyler Skaggs, Wade Miley and Barry Enright, so it's more an embarrassment of riches than a problem. This does assume Saunders is tendered, but that seems very likely - at the very least, he'll provide a pair of suspenders in case our pants-load of young pitching prospects looks likely to fall down to our ankles for some reason.

Bench

This is probably the area with the most scope, as only half the spots appear locked down at time of writing. That said, Towers stuck with Burroughs after his first 42 games resulted in a .435 OPS, so one imagines he'll be back in 2012 [there'll be more about him on Friday, as he's the next upcoming Diamondbacks report-card]. Cowgill didn't exactly lock down a spot, batting .239 in 100 PAs, and one wonders if the Pocket Rocket, Adam Eaton, might make a push for the roster early in spring training, or at least, be near the front of the line in Reno. He hit .318 at High-A and Double-A, and is doing well in the AFL as well.

The other need would be a first-baseman, probably a left-handed hitting one, to spell Goldie there. It's a role that Overbay filled at the end of the season, and did well there, with a .286 average and .840 OPS in 49 PAs. However, Lyle hasn't had an OPS that high for an entire season since 2006 (his overall figure this year, even after that late surge, was only .670), and he'll be 35 by the time pitchers and catchers report. See Towers' comments above about "six weeks of production," and approach with the appropriate caution.

Bullpenj

The front of the bullpen appears particularly locked-down, following the stellar performances of Putz and Hernandez during 2011. However, the worst ERA of the first six-named in the last campaign was Owings' 3.57, and even he went 8-0, so we've got to re-sign him. :-) I think one interesting thing next year might be how Shaw progresses, and what happens as the season proceeds. Random speculation: might we trade Putz, even if we're in contention? AZ have what appear a ready-made replacement in Hernandez, with Shaw as the set-up guy, and if Putz has another 40-save season, he'd be too expensive to re-sign for 2013. Or do we take the type A pick after he signs elsewhere?

Depth

One things to remember is that no team will get through the season with 25 players. The fewest in semi-recent history was the 1976 Reds, who used 29, and it's usually a lot more. This year, the numbers in the National League ranged from 42 (Cubs, Reds and Phillies) to 55 (Rockies), so you're basically looking at close to an entire "shadow roster", with twenty or more players who will see playing time, beyond the 25-man core. That's significant. For instance, if you cross off the 13 position players with most at-bats and 12 pitchers with most innings for Arizona, the "shadow roster" behind them combined for 716 plate appearances and 210.1 IP.

This year, those names included the likes of Wily Mo Pena, Cody Ransom and Russell Branyan on the hitting front, with Alberto Castillo and Yhency Brazoban on the mound, and we can expect Towers to conduct a sweep through the pool of low-end free agents, to be stashed away in Reno for whenever the need arises. Odds are there won't be any particular gems much above replacement-level, but one never knows.

Poll
What is the D-backs priority this winter?
Infield
173 votes
Outfield
6 votes
Bench
34 votes
Rotation depth
58 votes
Bullpen
21 votes

292 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 119 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Infield

I think the Dbacks are in a great position right now with many different options available to them.

For 2nd base, the obvious is to re-sign Aaron Hill. My suggestion would be to sign him to a 1 yr/$6mil with a 2nd yr team option for $6mil w/ a $1mil buyout or a 2 yr/$10mil deal. He’s entering his age 30 yr, will benefit from a full season in the NL west, especially hitting at Chase Field for 81 games. Keith Law mentioned that if Hill tweaks his swing a little and doesn’t try to pull everything and go back to the hitter he was before his 36 HR season, he sees a 15 HR, 40 2B guy with a solid OBP.

If they can’t re-sign Hill, I know there’s been talk of moving Ryan Roberts to 2nd. If that’s the case, I don’t think that’s a bad idea as Ryan Wheeler may be ready to contribute in the majors with Blum and Bloomquist (I know, not great options) to help out.

I also think a solid 2nd base free agent option may be Omar Infante. Not a lot of pop in his bat, but a good defensive player (at least according to WAR).

by shibum78 on Oct 25, 2011 12:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Infante already signed an extension with Florida.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

i just don't see

Ryan Wheeler being able to contribute by next year

there still seem to be question marks in his game imo

by blue bulldog on Oct 25, 2011 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Like him not being a third baseman.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

if not 3rd...

then he probably doesn’t hit well enough to have a regular spot anywhere else on the diamond…

by shibum78 on Oct 25, 2011 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

That’s the problem. Bench dude, would love to see him become an Eric Hinske like player. But that’s about it.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Starting Pitching

I don’t think we need to be concerned with the starting pitching at all.

I actually see the following:

Kennedy
Hudson
Saunders

then the final two spots be a battle between:

Collmenter
Miley
Bauer
Parker
Skaggs

Long-term, I still don’t see Collmenter as a regular starter. I think Bauer, Parker, and Skaggs will all see time as starters this year, but with their work load closely monitored. I could see Parker pitching about 150-160 innings and Bauer and Skaggs pitching about 180 innings (between the majors and minors).

I also wouldn’t mind the Dbacks giving Hudson and Kennedy the occasional long rest in-between starts to keep their arms healthy for the whole year and future.

Hudson pitched 189 innings in 2010 and 227 innings this year (pretty big jump)
Kennedy pitched 194 innings in 2010 and 235 innings this year (again, pretty big jump)

How about the following:

Kennedy, Hudson, Saunders – 200 innings each
Parker – 150 innings
Bauer and Skaggs – 125 innings each

That gives us 1000 innings out of our starters (last year, we got 1004 innings from the starters, 2nd most in the NL.

by shibum78 on Oct 25, 2011 12:55 PM EDT reply actions  

This guy I agree with

especially the whole Collmenter not lasting as a starter.

"It was a good death"

by txzona on Oct 25, 2011 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's all well and good,

But Collmenter has earned the right to open the season with a starting job, unless he performs absolutely horribly in ST. If he struggles, then fine, move him to the bullpen. But his ERA was under 3.5 last year, and his FIP was a not-unreasonable 3.8. He should have first dibs on a starting slot.

What's one more comeback, anyway?

by Zavada's Moustache on Oct 25, 2011 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes with out a doubt he has earned a spot.

I’m not going to argue that one bit. But just assuming that he’s going to be this anchor behind Kennedy and Hudson is risky. The guy throws one good pitch along with a 86 mhp fastball.

"It was a good death"

by txzona on Oct 25, 2011 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

No riskier...

than assuming that Joe Saunders will be. Saunders has had one good year—back when he made the AS team. Other than that, he’s nothing special as a pitcher. I don’t think Collmenter’s all that, but I don’t see him being some huge risk that isn’t also presented by Saunders.

by azshadowwalker on Oct 26, 2011 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, that Collmenter, he sucks as a starter

maybe Russ Ortiz is available?

Collmenter is a solid number three starter, period.

Is it mid-February yet?

by NASCARbernet on Oct 25, 2011 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd feel 100% confident in him if he refined his curve a bit more

But at this point, he has earned at least two months’ worth of starts to begin next year. I think he’ll end up getting much more than two months’ worth.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

A number 3 starter?

I think that’s a stretch long term. All he has going for him is deception( crazy good deception I might add) and above average command. You don’t think he is going to be able to maintain a 1.6 BB/9 do you? His strikeouts will probably go up once he start using his curve more, but his walk per 9 are probably going to double. I think he is going to get lit up when the league adjusts to him. I do think he will end up as a good back end starter though.

"It was a good death"

by txzona on Oct 25, 2011 9:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

With how well he locates his fastball and his mentality to throw strikes

I see no reason why he can’t keep refraining from walking people, particularly if Montero is behind the plate (Montero is good at framing pitches).

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

i never thought about it that way

but it probably does explain why Kennedy/Hudson/Collmenter all have absurdly low walk rates. in particular, it may explain why Collmenter’s walk rate was so much lower than expected.

by blue bulldog on Oct 26, 2011 2:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

you could also

split Saunders’s 200 innings, by giving 25 each more to Parker, Bauer, and Skaggs, and giving the remainder to some combo of Collmenter, Miley, and the bullpen

by blue bulldog on Oct 25, 2011 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bullpen for me

Right now, we have Putz, Hernandez, Ziegler, Paterson, and Shaw as locks for relief spots. As epically solid as our bullpen seems, that’s not a lot of known commodities. Other than those five, we have to pick out a pair of extras from the enormous 40-man roster pool of Mike Zagurski, Ryan Cook, Sam Demel, Yonata Ortega, Barry Enright, Zach Kroenke, and Kam Mickolio, or from a non-40-man prospect pool of Evan Marshall and Kevin Munson.

Sure, we could re-sign Micah Owings (I think he’ll get some guaranteed money from someone) or move Wade Miley into the bullpen, but I don’t see either of those things happening. I’d like to add one more quality reliever, a guy with a track record of giving his teams 60 good ’pen innings each year. Sure, the guy could collapse, but it gives us an extra arm with a solid chance of giving us good value. Someone like Takashi Saito, Frank Francisco, or Brad Lidge, all of whom should be available on the free market. A one- or two-year deal only.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 1:08 PM EDT reply actions  

And, yes,

I know Brad Lidge doesn’t fit the mold of giving his team 60 good innings. But he’s darned good.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

money

I can’t see Towers committing the money that it would take to acquire guys like Saito, Francisco, and Lidge.

by shibum78 on Oct 25, 2011 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

How much is any of those guys going to cost?

Can’t be any more than Putz last year (2/10). If it’s 1/5 or 2/8 for Frank Francisco, I’ll be perfectly okay with it.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

the only reason we got putz so cheap is cuz of his recovering from injury, which I guess is the category Lidge falls under. Saito’s going to be 42 and I think it’d be great to sign Francisco, but guys like him were getting 3-4 year deals for $15-$18mil last year (Joaquin Benoit, Scott Downs)

by shibum78 on Oct 25, 2011 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

2012 budget

I wonder how much of our budget is affected by the playoff games and Josh Byrnes getting the GM job in SD…

by shibum78 on Oct 25, 2011 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Those Benoit and Downs contracts were horrible

Sure, the market could go bananas like that again, but I highly doubt it.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

why do you think

the market won’t pay high for relievers again this year?

my impression is that the market constantly pays high for relievers, unless they are old/injury concerns. and frankly, i don’t particularly like relievers that are old/injury concerns.

by blue bulldog on Oct 25, 2011 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Because those three-year deals were actually pretty unprecedented for non-closers

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

And old/injury concern relievers

Are actually a pretty nice target IMO. We have prospects, but it’s a matter of waiting part of the year to see who is ready in time. If we get half of a good year from Saito before he breaks down, we can replace him with one of the Marshall/Ortega/Cook/Munson group and be fine.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

2B

Is there a better FA on the market than Hill?

Kelly Johnson?

by Augdogs on Oct 25, 2011 1:10 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Those are pretty much the two main guys

So if we don’t keep Hill, Roberts is a mortal lock to head to second base.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

2B and 3B are the issues

1 is solved based on where the tatman plays

New England Patriots: 5-1 against the Dolphins, Chargers, Bills, Raiders, Jets, and Cowboys

by freeland1787 on Oct 25, 2011 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also depends on Drew.

I really really think we should simply sign a shortstop and not “wait and see” what happens with Drew. Keeping Hill and hoping Drew can play shortstop is incredibly risky. Drew’s bat is plenty good to play at either second or third base (I’d put Drew at third and Roberts at second), so if there’s serious concern that he won’t be a shortstop going forward, then make sure that hole is plugged now, while there are still free agent options who can be snatched up and used to fill that slot, rather than relying on some team being willing to give up an everyday-caliber shortstop in Spring Training.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

this

been a proponent of this all along

i actually think the smartest (while also realistic) move for us is to try to acquire a SS this winter, either via FA or 2B. we don’t want to be in a position where we figure out Drew can’t play SS after a month into the season, and no legit starting options to replace him. this isn’t like with starting pitchers, where our system’s depth is sufficient where we can afford to have a starting pitcher’s production disappear (which is why i’m also okay with trading or even just letting Saunders go). we have nobody in the farm who i feel is even reasonably capable of backing up Drew at SS for next year.

by blue bulldog on Oct 25, 2011 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

ss options

I agree, but who is a viable shortstop option? I see a list of guys like ronny cedeno, alex gonzalez, and jack wilson. Doubt we’d go after Reyes, Furcal (even tho I think he may be an interesting option for a 2 year deal), or Rollins.

by shibum78 on Oct 25, 2011 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Those three? Barmes? Carroll?

There are a surprising number of options for such a premium position.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just out of curiousity,

Why move RyRo to a position where he’s weaker, just to have Drew play a position he’s never played before?

I was thinking we sign a shortstop, move Drew to second, and keep Roberts at third.

What's one more comeback, anyway?

by Zavada's Moustache on Oct 25, 2011 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

...Or

I could have scrolled down a little farther. Carry on.

What's one more comeback, anyway?

by Zavada's Moustache on Oct 25, 2011 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

RyRo is pretty good at second, actually

His arm isn’t particularly strong, so he has to one-hop a lot of throws. I remember him being quite adequate up-the-middle at second.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Archie Bradley competing for the 5th spot next year? You cannot be serious.

If I had it my way- Trade for David Wright( for Patrick Corbin,Matt Davidson, and David Nick), move Roberts to second, and extend Montero 4 years 35 million. SHAZAM! NL WEST CHAMPS REPEAT!

"It was a good death"

by txzona on Oct 25, 2011 2:19 PM EDT reply actions  

this seems

like an overpay to me for one year of Wright

i also just want to avoid moving Matt Davidson right now as much as possible

by blue bulldog on Oct 25, 2011 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Massive overpay for Wright.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's a gamble, but not an overpay.

We give up our # 5 prospect- Davidson,#6-7prospect-Corbin, and a top 20 prospect- David Nick. I think it’s comparable to what the Red Sox- Padres did with the AGON. The Red Sox only did it because they knew they had a chance to extend him. If we felt like we could extend him then they would do it in a heartbeat(trust me THEY WOULD). If he doesn’t want to talk about an extension or picking up his 2013 option( The Mets could probably do that in certain circumstances) then they take a way Corbin or possibly Davidson.
The reason why I prefer this to say trading Skaggs or Parker for Wright is that those players have much lower upside. To be honest with you I don’t think the Mets would even do that trade anyway. If they give up their franchise guy then they’re going to want a big name guy like Skaggs or Parker( see Beltran for LOLWHEELER!)

Plus I think David Wright would absolutely rake at Chase. It would give us two MVP caliber players on our team. It could be so epic.

"It was a good death"

by txzona on Oct 25, 2011 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

And in what post-2008 universe

Is David Wright worth as much as Adrian Gonzalez?

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Casey Kelly,Anythony Rizzo, and Reymond Fuentes>>> Davidson, Corbin, and Nick

Plus I was just talking about 1 year contracts…..

"It was a good death"

by txzona on Oct 25, 2011 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Really?

I’d probably take the former group slightly, but back when the trade was made, Kelly was a guy with good stuff who had command issues and never put up numbers, Rizzo was a first baseman who had put up a .334 OBP in Double-A (ARL and all, that’s underwhelming for a 1B prospect), and Fuentes was a good defender who might never hit.

Davidson and Kelly are awfully similar, I’d take Corbin over Rizzo, and I’d take Fuentes over Nick. Very similar packages. Certainly not a “>>>” difference.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

you're either overrating our prospects

or underrating the industry consensus on how valuable Kelly/Rizzo were at the time of the trade (which, as i was saying at the time, was a heavy overvaluation)

Kelly sucks. but at the time, he was much much better regarded than what Davidson is now. Prior to 2010, BA had Kelly at #24. Prior to 2011, BA had Kelly at #31. Admittedly, Sickels had Kelly a lot lower in his book, and actually where I would have probably had him. On the other hand, Davidson will be lucky to sneak into the back-end of BA’s Top 100 this year.

In addition, Rizzo was #75 prior to 2011.

No way Davidson/Corbin right now come close to comparing to how the industry at large valued Kelly/Rizzo at the time of the trade.

by blue bulldog on Oct 25, 2011 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

The latter

Kelly I get, but those Rizzo rankings were bananas. Still doesn’t make that package any less of an overpay.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 7:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

it's an overpay

because Wheeler for Beltran was an overpay (i don’t think anyone on this site disagreed with this premise at the time the trade happened) and i’d definitely take the package of Davidson/Corbin/Nick over Wheeler

you also have to realize, that Beltran was being sold high. if Wright gets sold during winter, he’ll be sold low. look at their recent history of production.

the other thing is that by selling Beltran in the middle of the year, there’s a lot more volatility in terms of overpaying, underpaying in trades. in winter, where the market is a lot more fluid (more buyers and more sellers) it’s far more likely for a trade to occur closer to market value.

by blue bulldog on Oct 25, 2011 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't want to give up Davidson

Imho, he’s the only decent 3B prospect we have — every other legit hitting prospect who can play 3B does not appear to be a long term option defensively.

by eel on Oct 26, 2011 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think

that it’s a toss up between the infield and the bench for this offseason. We don’t have any big issues in the outfield, bullpen, and definately not the starting rotation. I have a feeling that KT is going to shore up the bullpen a little more this offseason, just becasue he’s the bullpen god, so we should improve there.

We have a couple of question marks, though, in the infield. If Hill comes back, we should be set for 2nd base, but we still have SS, with Drew possibly not being able to play there, and also 3rd. I like RyRo, but I’m afraid that last season was a one time deal. I hope he proves me wrong, but it is a spot of concern for me.

Then there’s the bench. That is nothing but question marks really. Do we really want Burroughs, Cowgil, and Overbay making up half of our bench players? I feel comfortable with Blanco, Bloomquist, and Blum (Only included because he has another year on his contract). After that though…

Oh where oh where have my Dbacks gone? Oh where oh where could they be!

by imstillhungry95 on Oct 25, 2011 4:18 PM EDT reply actions  

In general

I like the ballclub’s make up right now, on paper at least.

Now, that said, there are a couple of things I’ve noticed: one, CY responds to competition. When there’s someone threatening to move into centerfield, he suddenly gets hot. I say we threaten to move Cowgill to starting centerfield and let the chips fall where they may (Cowgill is a good ballplayer, and should be on the ballclub roster in 2012).

The left side of the infield is a bit of a question mark (provided that Hill re-signs), especially since we don’t know what Drew’s range will be, although Dread Pirate has to be considered the incumbent at 3rd.

I don’t see anyone wresting away right field from Upton, or First base from Goldie.

Last year, I wanted to see improvement at catcher, and by Jove, we got it (big time).

The pitching competition is going to be fun, period.

Is it February yet?

Is it mid-February yet?

by NASCARbernet on Oct 25, 2011 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ehhh, that's obvious smoke and mirrors

CY is going to start at center next year. I don’t think anybody in their right mind would want Cowgill out there everyday. Good player, but a fourth outfielder.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Smoke and mirrors work, darnit...

without them we wouldn’t have any reason to have a news media!

Is it mid-February yet?

by NASCARbernet on Oct 25, 2011 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not following...

when did CY “get hot” because “someone [was] threatening to move into centerfield?” CY, like most hitters, is inconsistent. I don’t think he suddenly started hitting well in the postseason because there was a legitimate threat to his job. Everyone knew he was the starter and he would continue to be. He just got hot at the right time.

Cowgill should never, ever take over one of the starting OF spots, IMO. He’s solid, but not better than the guys ahead of him.

by azshadowwalker on Oct 26, 2011 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cowgill has skilled that elude your awareness...

also, you take the post way too seriously.

Is it mid-February yet?

by NASCARbernet on Oct 26, 2011 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Reyes

If anyone FA worth spending money, it should be Jose Reyes not David Wright. Shift Drew to 3B and Roberts to 2B.

Now we have a solid threat at lead off (sorry Bloomquist) and infield solved.

by Augdogs on Oct 25, 2011 4:26 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

id rather have drew play 2B

but im not sure the team can afford jose reyes- esp with the injury history

New England Patriots: 5-1 against the Dolphins, Chargers, Bills, Raiders, Jets, and Cowboys

by freeland1787 on Oct 25, 2011 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Drew at 2B would be a good defensive move too but with Reyes’ injuries, where ever he goes I am sure he’ll be happy playing on any other team than the Mets who are doomed never to win their division (plus the mess they got in house). With him playing for a contender, I bet his recovery time would be greater.

by Augdogs on Oct 25, 2011 4:39 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Yeah, but...

Drew’s arm is too strong for 2nd base. It would not be the most efficient use of his abilities.

Is it mid-February yet?

by NASCARbernet on Oct 25, 2011 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yea but

I don’t think his bat plays at 3b…

"It was a good death"

by txzona on Oct 25, 2011 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know

I saw him hit a pretty nice grandslam, but you’re right, he was in the batter’s box when he hit it, and not standing at 3rd wearing his fielder’s mit…

Is it mid-February yet?

by NASCARbernet on Oct 25, 2011 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

It certainly does.

Particularly since he’d be a phenomenal defender there. He’d be like a super-Jack Hannahan. His arm is stellar and it would put Roberts’ one-hoppers at second base where they belong.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Or the most efficient protection

For his ankle.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

arm is too good imo to have Drew play 2B. and you could protect that ankle.

that’d be a pretty damn good left-side of the infield defensively.

by blue bulldog on Oct 25, 2011 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Second base

The place where fielders get their legs taken out from underneath them all the time? For someone whose ankle was recently completely displaced, this Drew-to-second thing is kind of confusing to me.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Would rather have Rollins

Would be cheaper and on a shorter contract. Probably won’t bite though, as I imagine he’d prefer to play closer to home in San Francisco. Even above Rollins, I’d prefer Rafael Furcal. Looking good in the post-season, and I see no reason why, now that he’s healthy, his BABIP won’t return to normalcy (or at least close to .300). If St. Louis declines his option (an option I would probably exercise), I’d go after him as a cheaper alternative to the two guys being talked about as the supposed “top two” guys. My infield shopping list is as follows:

Rafael Furcal
Jimmy Rollins
Jamey Carroll
Clint Barmes
Jose Reyes
Everyone Else
Yuniesky Betancourt (I had to)

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd love to have Clint Barmes here

Not just a good field presence in the form of shortstop or 2B, but also a good clubhouse guy, easy to get along with, and he always signs for fans. He’s a “give back to the fans” kind of guy like Ryro is.

I got sprayed by Ryan Roberts!!!

by Rockkstarr12 on Oct 25, 2011 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

because Furcal is old

and he’s probably lost a step in terms of speed (rough estimate through SB counts) which probably explains the BABIP drop.

i don’t feel comfortable projecting a BABIP over 280 next year, and he’s also got injury concerns

by blue bulldog on Oct 25, 2011 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

There is nothing that can possibly "explain"

A .098 drop in BABIP. Ninety-eight points!!!

Career is .313, and if he was fast enough to post a .338 BABIP in ‘10, he’s got to still have at least some speed left. He’s looked great in the WS. Sure, he’s injury-prone, but he’s a good player when healthy. Just make sure you have a capable backup (Willie qualifies, I guess).

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wright over Reyes

Big time. The years and cash that Reyes will get could absolutely cripple this team should anything bad happen. Guys with so much of their value coming from their speed scare me; even minor injuries can turn them into average players.

Wright on the other hand is short term, reasonably priced, and being sold at rock bottom prices. Imagine if he resurrected his game to pre-CitiField days in Arizona. Add on a post-season trip and he might just decide he likes it here. Otherwise we are flush with 3b prospects getting closer to the majors. Perfect fit IMO.

by Counsellmember on Oct 25, 2011 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

since when was $15 million reasonably priced?

of course id love for wright to come over and play for us, but I just dont know if he can revert back to his pre-CitiField days and thats one big if for $15 million. I’d much spend the bulk of that money shoring up the bullpen, infiled, and bench.

by superwong18 on Oct 25, 2011 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

It would be a great price

for a nuclear aircraft carrier.

Is it mid-February yet?

by NASCARbernet on Oct 25, 2011 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

nuclear aircraft carrier?

id love the idea of one of those hitting behind miggy and jUp

by superwong18 on Oct 25, 2011 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

David Wright is a pretty popular player.

I could see a lot of people taking interest in the team, it could bring in more profit. They could trade Saunders and save 8 million. We have a relatively small payroll and if they felt there was more interest they might be willing to spend more.

They might just look at it as a chance to get better. Kendrick was talking about expanding the payroll to sign Konerko just a short while ago. They saw it as a chance to get immediately better, and I think we all can agree that David Wright would make this team better.

"It was a good death"

by txzona on Oct 25, 2011 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

But the issue isn't how much better Wright makes us

It’s whether or not it’s worth it to give up that $15MM plus prospects (something not involved in a Konerko signing) to get Wright. If those prospects are any good (like your package), it isn’t.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

A single prospect who is a B- guy at best

Is a year away from joining the club, and will require a signing bonus, or three prospects – one B, one B-, and one C+ – who are already in the system and don’t have to be paid a dime.

C’mon, now.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 9:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

So it wouldn't have been the third overall pick?

I think we have plenty of pitching(-Corbin. We have Wheeler(-Davidson) and then David Nick is a meh…

"It was a good death"

by txzona on Oct 25, 2011 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wheeler isn't an everyday third baseman

He doesn’t have the glove for it. He’s a bench guy – although a potentially darn good one – unless he manages to hit well enough to be an everyday first baseman (hint: he won’t). Not a guy who is enough of insurance at third to think giving up Davidson won’t hurt the club.

David Nick is a potential everyday second baseman. Guys who play up the middle and have the offensive potential to do so on an everyday basis are not “meh” prospects.

And see below about the #3 pick.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

still think you're overvaluing Nick

but this is probably something we will have to just agree to disagree on

honestly, i’d be okay with giving up Corbin and Nick for Wright

by blue bulldog on Oct 26, 2011 2:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Also

Even that’s not true. We would have given up our second-round pick to the White Sox for Konerko. Our first-rounder was in the top-15 (#3), so it would have been protected from being sent to Chicago as compensation. The supplemental round pick would have been created from nothing, so that wouldn’t have affected us (unless you really want to get nit-picky and count the difference in value from seeing each of our picks drop literally one slot – like everyone else’s, mind you). It would have basically cost us Anthony Meo, who I have behind both Davidson and Corbin in the system.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Me Gusta Meo

low mid 90’s fastball, decent to good sinker, decent change up yeah id like to keep him

Teenager looking for refuge in Arizona. Will cook, clean, or do pretty much anything. Just please get me out of "Red Sox Nation"

by superwong18 on Oct 25, 2011 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

You guys want to keep everybody don't ya?!

You get what you give people!

"It was a good death"

by txzona on Oct 25, 2011 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

ok

fine…but can we just keep meo?

Teenager looking for refuge in Arizona. Will cook, clean, or do pretty much anything. Just please get me out of "Red Sox Nation"

by superwong18 on Oct 25, 2011 10:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Meo's good

He’s probably a reliever, and he doesn’t have a decent change-up. He has a plus fastball, a plus slider he needs to command better, and a well below-average change-up with a high-effort delivery.

I’ll certainly take the other three in a New York minute.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

oh

so i guess your not a believer of high-effort=high potential…i kid i kid, but i like him because we got him in the 2nd round and to get a pitcher with two plus pitchers in the 2nd round is nice. and ive heard he has a cutter too? any idea of if its any good?

Teenager looking for refuge in Arizona. Will cook, clean, or do pretty much anything. Just please get me out of "Red Sox Nation"

by superwong18 on Oct 25, 2011 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

If he has a cutter

It’s likely just a slight adjustment on his fastball grip to get some extra movement at the cost of a tick or two of velocity. Not a dramatically different pitch, I imagine. Could be wrong though.

Definitely a nice find for the second round, though.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

15M reasonable for a 6+ War player

The whole debate about this is what kind of player Wright is going to be in 2012 when he is a) a year away from free agency, b) out of Citi and c) presumably fully healthy. Obviously, I see a great chance that he would do well in AZ, making 15M for 1 year a gamble worth taking. This is the guy who in his 4 seasons before Citi-Field and some injuries put up FanGraph Wars of 6.2, 5.2, 8.9 and 7.1. Granted, these were some of his prime years, but I am not calling for an 8 year contract; we are speaking of his age 30 season in which I would not be surprised to see an easy 6 War in Chase.

The other remaining issue is the prospects we give up. I think the packages being thrown about are way, way too high. For all his pluses, the Mets would be selling low on him this off-season…even in the event of a bidding war (which I fully expect). He’s been injured, he’s been bad on defense, his production has been lower (though still fairly high by recent 3b standards) and the Mets are entering a rebuilding phase and would probably like to get rid of that payroll (2 years worth for them, I believe). It will be interesting to see what other teams get into the mix (rumors of CO) and what they’ll offer. But I think the Mets are over a barrel and would accept a pretty modest package back. Personally, I would feel that Borchering by himself (who seems expendable to me) would be bordering on too much.

by Counsellmember on Oct 26, 2011 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

exactly

Wright, if sold, would be sold low

and if the Mets want us to overpay, then we should just say no

by blue bulldog on Oct 26, 2011 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

An easy 6 fWAR?

C’mon now, the numbers are park-adjusted, so it’s not like the ballpark was the sole reason for his collapse. Is it not entirely possible that his back issues have sapped some of his physical ability? Calling a jump of over 4 fWAR “easy” because of a ballpark change is completely absurd. He’d hit well here, but I doubt he’d be a star and he’d have a lot of risk attached.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 26, 2011 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're right

There is nothing “easy” about a 6 War season. And I seem to have spaced that the figure is already park adjusted….you’ve got me there too.

But I disagree with the notion that aquiring Wright would have “a lot” of risk attached. Or at least any more risk than other significant allocations of that kind of money. Sure, we could spead it out over a couple bench player or middle relievers and put 3M more into the draft, but that doesn’t get us as close to the WS next year, which is where I want to be. The time to take some risks is now, and a one year contract is a pretty acceptable one, I think.

And really, every knock someone makes on Wright just means the price to trade for him is that much lower. The question worth asking is how significant an improvement would he be to the Dbacks? Frankly, I see almost no one on the FA list or the obvious trade market that could make such an impact outside of guys that would come with much much more risk attached…like 8 years and 9 figures.

by Counsellmember on Oct 28, 2011 2:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

i agree somewhat

while the 6 WAR season was an exaggeration

i definitely consider acquiring Wright to be a medium-risk, buy-low transaction that could turn up high rewards

i actually view trading for Wright in much the same light as picking up KJ in 2010. of course, if the Mets are obstinate and refuse to trade Wright unless for a ransom, then that’s fine, we don’t have to make the trade.

by blue bulldog on Oct 28, 2011 2:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

That's a great picture, btw

Mr. Kendrick looks pretty content there…

Is it mid-February yet?

by NASCARbernet on Oct 25, 2011 4:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Is Royce Clayton available?

We need protection at SS if Drew doesn’t heal (please heal Stephen) and Willie B is not that guy as we all saw. My guy would be Brendan Ryan, he would give us excellent coverage at SS and easily could play anywhere.
Otherwise my list is
Jimmy Rollins
Rafael Furcal
Adam Rosales (Buy Low candidate)
Sean Rodriguez
One of the Angels stud infielders (Aybar or Izturis)

In the bullpen get ready to see MIchael Wuertz. He was just released from the A’s.

"We’re going to turn this team around 360 degrees." –Jason Kidd

by blank_38 on Oct 25, 2011 6:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Marco Scutaro anyone?

If we tender Saunders, maybe a package of Saunders and some fringe OF prospect for Scutaro. Gives us a reliable shortstop that could play decently for 1 or 2 more years while we wait for owings.

by superwong18 on Oct 25, 2011 7:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Thought a lot about signing Scutaro, never thought of trading for Scutaro

I’d be down. It’d be a one-year deal (his option), which would keep us from devoting multiple years from a speedster who could see injuries completely deflate his value.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 7:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

my thoughts exactly

and it would benefit the sox quite a bit also. Gives them a 4 or 5 starter who has proven he can fare relatively well in the AL. Gives them an outfielder (Gillespie or Cowgill maybe?) who could compete for a platoon in RF

by superwong18 on Oct 25, 2011 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

really?

you really think the Sox would pick up Scutaro’s option, then be willing to trade Scutaro for Saunders and some fringe OF prospects?

if they are okay with doing that, why wouldn’t they just drop the option, let Lowrie play SS, and then pick up a better SP for whatever Scutaro + Saunders salary would have cost?

and i’m saying this from the perspective that the Sox are going to pick up Scutaro’s option (from everything i’ve read anyway)

by blue bulldog on Oct 26, 2011 2:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

if anything

i think if the Sox pick up Scutaro’s option (which i think they will) we should try to trade for Lowrie

by blue bulldog on Oct 26, 2011 2:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

because

much like us they know that there is value in picking up scutaro’s option and they would ahve to overpay for someone equal to saunders in the free agent market. And as far as Lowrie, after watching him play for 2 years i dont see him being much more than a super utility guy with an slightly below average bat and a below average glove

Teenager looking for refuge in Arizona. Will cook, clean, or do pretty much anything. Just please get me out of "Red Sox Nation"

by superwong18 on Oct 26, 2011 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

i think

you’re probably overrating Saunders. it seems fairly reasonable to assume that Saunders will be worth $2 million surplus value at most (and likely less). see Dan’s post on this, which makes intuitive sense. so that means, you’d be saving less than $2 million by trading for Saunders vs. picking up a SP at market value in free agency. you really think the Red Sox care about that drop in the bucket? while taking into account loss of surplus value in trading Scutaro? as well as extra transaction costs in shopping Scutaro and negotiating a trade?

the only way a trade would work, is if the prospect we give back is actually worth something. Gillespie and Cowgill are worth zero to the Red Sox. they don’t care about depth. they have plenty of prospects who are probably as good as Cowgill. what they want are star players that can maximize the amount of production in a single given position.

this is why, regardless of whether they would otherwise use Lowrie or get a stopgap, it makes no sense for the Sox to trade Scutaro after picking up his option. they will either pick up his option, and keep Scutaro, because they value the surplus value Scutaro provides over his option. or if they don’t believe Scutaro will provide that much surplus value over his option, they will not pick up the option, save the money, and go pick up someone who has real value in free agency.

by blue bulldog on Oct 26, 2011 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah

I understand your point. But i guess what my reasoning is that the Red Sox at this point are overvaluing pitching because of the meltdown that just occured. Also, I’m not sure that depth or Cowgill or Gillespie are worth zero to them. As Cherrington said, the majority of their talent in the minors is stuck in the lower levels. Cowgill or Gillespie would give them another body in AAA that could merit some playing time in the bigs.

Teenager looking for refuge in Arizona. Will cook, clean, or do pretty much anything. Just please get me out of "Red Sox Nation"

by superwong18 on Oct 26, 2011 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

and

for the first time in a long time, theres actually some depth at shortstop in free agency so if they trade scutaro, they could easily get a stopgap for a year while they wait for iglesias to be ready.

Teenager looking for refuge in Arizona. Will cook, clean, or do pretty much anything. Just please get me out of "Red Sox Nation"

by superwong18 on Oct 26, 2011 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

You REALLY want a 36 year old infielder?

You guys whine about Blum, then want Scutaro who isn’t that much younger?

I got sprayed by Ryan Roberts!!!

by Rockkstarr12 on Oct 25, 2011 9:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

We whine about Blum

Because he just played 23 games this season, hasn’t been a league-average hitter since 2002, and doesn’t play shortstop. Scutaro played 113 games this year, has been better than league-average offensively in two of the last three seasons, and plays shortstop.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Scutaro>Blum

Blum has never accumulated more than 1.2 WAR in a season. Scutaro has grossed 2.9, 4.5, 2.4, 2.9 WAR over the last four. Nuff’ said.

Teenager looking for refuge in Arizona. Will cook, clean, or do pretty much anything. Just please get me out of "Red Sox Nation"

by superwong18 on Oct 25, 2011 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Every time somebody with a Boston accent says MAACO SCUUUTARO

I just want to punch something. I’d have to come to terms with that.

"It was a good death"

by txzona on Oct 25, 2011 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Youll learn to deal

I have for the last two years lol

Teenager looking for refuge in Arizona. Will cook, clean, or do pretty much anything. Just please get me out of "Red Sox Nation"

by superwong18 on Oct 25, 2011 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rockies will overpay for Wright IMO

Drew was walking around fairly easily during the playoffs and Opening Day is more than 5 months away. I’m not a doctor and didn’t stay at a Holliday Inn but he should at least be 90% by then right. Bloomy can fill in once or twice a week to help him out.

Love the Brad Lidge idea…

by Husk on Oct 26, 2011 6:10 AM EDT via mobile reply actions   1 recs

haha loved that commercial

but in the end, walking around fairly easily and chasing a ball hit up the middle and throwing to first from the hole is much different. Shortstop is one of the most demanding positions on field and from past experiences with ankle injuries and playing with them, there are just some days where you dont have the range you usually do.

Teenager looking for refuge in Arizona. Will cook, clean, or do pretty much anything. Just please get me out of "Red Sox Nation"

by superwong18 on Oct 26, 2011 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

rec

"It was a good death"

by txzona on Oct 26, 2011 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Apparently the fact that Toronto was moved has upset some people, but, the priorities of the coach are what are important. There may be an important reason that some players are switched around and given more care, reasons that the general public is not aware of.

by Kelly Doyle on Oct 27, 2011 12:34 AM EDT reply actions  

Ryan Roberts is a Super Two

Which means he has another year of arbitration. Anyone have a guess as to whether or not we will buy him out or just go through arb with him?

"We’re going to turn this team around 360 degrees." –Jason Kidd

by blank_38 on Oct 27, 2011 11:04 PM EDT reply actions  

Definitely a year-to-year guy.

Hasn’t had an established track record of success, an extension would be pretty risky.

Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.

by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 28, 2011 1:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

what can we expect contract-wise next season?

and Michael Young, What’s your opinion of him as an option for us at 3b/SS? Could the Dbacks realistically go for him and should they? And what would the Rangers ask for in return?

"We’re going to turn this team around 360 degrees." –Jason Kidd

by blank_38 on Oct 29, 2011 2:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the AZ SnakePit, the SB Nation blog about the Arizona Diamondbacks. "When you think about the past all the time, when you get to the present day you are thinking about the past so it becomes your future again." -- Kirk Gibson.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Jon-stewart-painting_small
"Leading the League in Love"

Recent FanPosts

Me___drums_small
OT: The (Literally) Thankless Job of a Hitting Coach
Hl_small
Recommendations
Small
In which I dispense some amateurish medical advice to Trevor Bauer
Basshat3_small
SNAKEPITFEST TUCSON EDITION....?
Small
My thoughts on Justin Upton
Small
Thoughts on the D-Backs Season So Far
200234_1969418916472_1272934884_2352102_4759893_n_small
D'Hall E-mailed me back!
Small
Hey Gibson ... heard of bunts?
227177_10150583458835315_663770314_18513970_7717573_n_small
Diamondbacks 1, Mets 3: R.A Dickey's Knuckle Sandwich KO

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Manager

Lucha_small Jim McLennan

Bench coaches

Madmen_icon_small snakecharmer

My-little-pony-friendship-is-magic-brony-not-the-element-of-efficiency_small kishi

Scarlett_small soco

Me___drums_small Dan Strittmatter

Players

Wailord_by_xous54_small Wailord

Wolfwood_small BattleMoses

Avogadro_small Zavada's Moustache

Basshat3_small Clefo