2011 Diamondbacks Report Card: Geoff Blum
Name: Geoff Blum
Age on Opening Day: 37
Salary: $1,350,000
2011 Stats: 23 games, 55 PAs, .224/.309/.408, 2 HR, 10 RBI
2010 Stats: 93 games, 218 PAs, .267/.321/.356, 2 HR, 22 RBI
The next player to be called into the principal's office for review of his performance in the Diamondbacks' 2011 season is Geoff Blum. No lie, it's hard to examine a guy who only played in 23 games. Ironically, Blum's biggest contribution may have been getting injured in Spring Training, which opened up a roster spot for Ryan Roberts, who ended up being one of the team's biggest contributors. Blum was injured in mid-March, had knee surgery five weeks later, and didn't return until after the All-Star break. He appeared in seven games, fractured his right pinky on a grounder to third, and missed another seven weeks.
Regardless of his limited playing time in 2011, Blum made the post-season roster and is signed with the team for next year as well, so let's look back on his year with the Diamondbacks.
2011 Expectations
Geoff Blum was signed to a two-year, $2.7million contract last November. He was one of Kevin Towers's first signings, and it showed he was putting money where his mouth was in shoring up the bench with veteran presence. Blum played with Towers's San Diego Padres in 2005-2007, and although he was traded to the Chicago White Sox mid-season (and won a World Series with them), he returned to San Diego. He then spent 2008-2010 with the Houston Astros in a similar role as he was expected here, which is super-utility/third baseman/veteran bench player. As a pinch hitter in 2010, he had 44 PAs, a line of .333/.364/.405 with 11 RBI, which is quite impressive. He also has a decent walk % and his glove isn't considered a liability.
Our expectations were low. With two 38 year-old third basemen in Blum and Melvin Mora, we were just hoping that wouldn't become the Vortex of Suck. Blum was expected to split time with Mora and be available off the bench as a pinch hitter or to go in on defense as well (he's played every offensive position except catcher and center fielder). He hit a respectable .269 in limited spring training action before injuring his knee. If memory serves, it was a general cleanup and cartilage issue, not a microfracture, which at the time seemed like something they could've been aware of after his physical exam in the winter, but ç'est la vie. By the time he got back in July, Mora was gone and Roberts was the starting third baseman, but Blum still fit the same role. When he returned again (re-returned?) in September, we'd kind of gotten used to seeing Sean Burroughs as a pinch hitter.
2011 Performance
Keep in mind that 23 regular-season games is an incredibly small sample size. Even for a veteran like Blum, who I'm sure wouldn't use lack of playing time as an excuse for low numbers, it must be hard to get into any sort of offensive rhythm in only 55 plate appearances. That said, he wasn't really able to fill the role the team needed him to do. He hit .238/.273/.429 in 12 games as a starter, and was only 1-for-7 plus three walks as a pinch hitter. His biggest WPA at-bats were, not surprisingly, his two home runs, a two-run shot in July and solo HR in September. His biggest game of the year was that September 5th start in Colorado where he went 3-for-5 including the home run.
We'd hoped his avowed pinch hitting skills would help in the playoffs. Blum had a pinch-hit go-ahead home run in the 14th inning of Game 3 of the 2005 World Series for the White Sox, only his second at-bat of that post-season. Similarly, he only got two appearances in the 2011 NLDS, this time striking out with men on the corners to end the 8th inning in Game 2 and striking out with nobody on in Game 5.
It's nearly impossible to judge the defensive skills of a player who only got 28 chances to field his position, though it's always nice to note that a player had a 1.000% fielding percentage in those opportunities, however few they were. Blum's zone rating was .714, his UZR was 0.9 and UZR/150 was 10.1, and someone with better knowledge of fielding statistics can explain those. He helped turn three double plays and did not appear in any way to be a liability at third base, which is more than we can say for others who manned the hot corner this season.
Despite Geoff's injuries, he seemed like a great teammate in the clubhouse and off the field. He remained upbeat about his return from injury, and during rehab he had chances to spend time with other injured and minor league Diamondbacks players and he was often seen on the bench while he was injured the second time. I'm sure Geoff did provide some positive veteran presence even in his limited time on the active roster.
2012 Expectations
As we go into next season, we are confident that Blum will remain on the roster in the second year of his contract. The Diamondbacks will need a reserve third baseman whether or not Ryan Roberts gets the starting nod, and the team still hasn't found that veteran bat off the bench no matter how hard they tried last year with the likes of Russell Branyan and Wily Mo Peña. I don't expect him to hit .333 as a pinch hitter like he did in 2010, and older veterans aren't expected to be superstars, but pinch hitting is a trouble spot for the Diamondbacks, and the team needs more out of Blum than a .143 average! Even with Geoff's past playing for Kevin Towers, KT has shown he'll part with those who under-perform. I hope Geoff can hit at least .250 and stay with the team.
Snakecharmer's Grade: C-
It's hard to fault a man for being injured, especially when one of those injuries was a freak ground ball accident. Nonetheless, he was brought on to be a pinch hitter and was below average at the role even in limited playing time.
Snakepitters' Grades
Dan: D
23 games and 0.3 fWAR can't be considered anything but disappointing from someone who was supposed to be the lefty part of a third base platoon. Blum wasn't all that bad when he was on the field, I guess - an 88 wRC+ is useful from a reserve player - but you don't want to see a guy's late-30's knees giving out in the first year of a two-year contract. Without the "two-year contract" tag keeping him safe in 2012, he needs to perform or he could have a short leash with the twin Ryans, Roberts and Wheeler, trying to take as much time from Blum as possible.
Sprankton: D-
See me after class.
Jim: D+
I'm agonizing over whether or not injury should factor into the grade. I think, on balance it should, at least somewhat, even if it's outside a player's control. Because, if you sign a 38-year old who injured himself getting dressed last year, you can't be too surprised when he misses time. However, Blum had averaged 119 games per year from 2000-10, so the extent of his absence was unfortunate. His production when present (OPS+ 93) was okay, though small sample-size applies - his career numbers are significantly lower (OPS+ 82), and if it hadn't been for the surprising rise of Ryan Roberts, one wonders how the team might have coped. The two-year deal currently looks dubious, but with Blum better from the left-hand side, he will give us a bit of flexibility in 2012, and it's not as if he's expensive.
ZM: D
Of all the questionable moves made by Towers this offseason, perhaps the weirdest was giving a two-year deal to Blum, a 38-year-old utility player. The injury was obviously not his fault, and his OPS, OPS+ and wRC+ were all slightly above his career averages, but that doesn't change the fact that he simply did not have a particularly large impact on the 2010 Diamondbacks. He had a grand total of 11 hits on the season in 55 Plate Appearances, good for 0.3 fWAR. So, in short, he didn't play much, and when he did, he played like Geoff Blum. Can't go any higher than a D.
31 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I wouldn't give him below a C just because he was a hurt a majority of the season!
I’d at least give him the C at worst, but definitely not a D or D-
Safe to say I am glad you guys weren’t my professors while I was in college!
I got sprayed by Ryan Roberts!!!
clubhouse
I’m surprised to see only Charmer mention Blum’s contribution to the clubhouse in 2011. Isn’t that what was thrown around when the signing first happened? The only way to justify the 2 year deal in my mind was to plant a leader type guy onto the bench, one who would be around for awhile, and it’s been exactly this kind of mental/professional/attitudinal turn-around that was one of the biggest stories of the year.
Now certainly, I am a believer that winning creates good chemistry on a team, but Gibson and the coaching staff preached this new attitude for the players from day 1, and I think they are getting a lot of accolades for this new mindset. Why not Blum too?
I’ll give the Blum the benefit of the doubt and say that they brought him aboard to help (in part) change the clubhouse chemistry, and that is the result we got, whether it was him or some other factor.
Grade C+ (he still stunk as a pinch hitter)
Except
Did he spend any time with the team for the first half of the season? I don’t remember seeing him in the dugout.
Wear your own fur.
by Marc Fournier on Oct 24, 2011 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions
He was at home recooping from his knee surgery
I got sprayed by Ryan Roberts!!!
by Rockkstarr12 on Oct 24, 2011 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Ahh
I wasn’t sure about that, but thought someone, somewhere had mentioned he was always on the bench. Now I see that Charmer said that about the second half, which pretty much blows my argument out of the water.
Though, maybe Blum is a big Skyper.
by Counsellmember on Oct 24, 2011 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions
I know he loves to Tweet ;)
I got sprayed by Ryan Roberts!!!
by Rockkstarr12 on Oct 24, 2011 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah I only recall seeing him
on the bench when his pinky was injured, not his knee. Much harder to hobble in on crutches, even Drew only did it a few times.
I stopped reading. Now I just write sarcastic, angry comments.. -- soco
They're not even cooking the ice! -- kishi
by snakecharmer on Oct 24, 2011 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions
From what Geoff told me following the return from his pinky injury
He was only at the park after knee surgery a few times. The rest was spent between home and rehab at SRF, so yes, Dan is right about that ;)
I got sprayed by Ryan Roberts!!!
by Rockkstarr12 on Oct 24, 2011 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions
It's hard to be a clubhouse leader
When you’re spending most of your time rehabbing at Salt River Fields.
Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 24, 2011 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Modern technology.
I’m sure a proven winner like Blum delivers all of his motivational speeches via FaceTime…
What's one more comeback, anyway?
by Zavada's Moustache on Oct 24, 2011 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions
I give Geoff an A for his clubhouse chemistry
But I give him the benefit of the doubt since he was injured a good deal of the year…C for pinch hitting. I think his PH wasn’t there due mostly to the injuries, especially coming back from both knee surgery and then a broken pinky. As someone who has gone through the broken pinky problem before, it is hard to get total dexterity back, as the pinky is the most sensitive finger on the hand and when you break it, you have to work at getting it all back to full use.
I got sprayed by Ryan Roberts!!!
lolz.
Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 24, 2011 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Hah. Thanks. ;)
I stopped reading. Now I just write sarcastic, angry comments.. -- soco
They're not even cooking the ice! -- kishi
by snakecharmer on Oct 24, 2011 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions
The correct answer is C+
/McLaughlin mode.
"Hey, why don't you people watch the game?"-my mom after viewing a wave going around Chase Field.
by Reynolds rapper on Oct 24, 2011 9:14 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Now for the Non-McLaughlin mode.
His power numbers (yes I know,small sample size) reflect a rate much higher than 2010 and his current HR numbers matched his 2010 totals. So I guess that’s something.
He was oft injured (some were freak injuries, some age related) and was largely irrelevant to what is going on.
This gets the “ehh, don’t really care one way or the other” C with the upward adjustment for the HR/RBI rates.
"Hey, why don't you people watch the game?"-my mom after viewing a wave going around Chase Field.
by Reynolds rapper on Oct 24, 2011 9:20 PM EDT reply actions
He gets a D or worse
simply because he was hurt all year. Zero contribution to the 2011 squad gets you a low grade in my book. And when he finally came back at the end of the year he was not good at all, got zero pinch hits, etc. D-
Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
by sonic barracuda on Oct 24, 2011 9:41 PM EDT reply actions
C
The thing I love about Blum is he doesnt pretend to do what he cant do. He doesnt go up to Kirk Gibson and say “I can play shortstop.” Or “I can steal 20 bases”. Or “I can play left field.”
No. He says stuff like, "I’m old and my knee ligaments are but gossamer tendrils. Get one of the young bucks, like Roberts there, to man my post while I “get ready”. Oh, and I will need five months.
I imagine if Gibson asked Blummer to lead off, Geoff wouldnt say “Anywhere you need me, skip”. He’d say the intelligent, team oriented thing.
“No”.
Replacement level player, more or less as advertised.
I give him an A+.
“Why on God’s green earth?!?!?!” I hear you asking. Simple. If he hadn’t been injured Roberts, who was one of the more valuble players on the team this year, wouldn’t have been on the team. If Blum is the starting third baseman this year, I don’t see the team making the playoffs. Therefore, his injuries get him an A+
Oh where oh where have my Dbacks gone? Oh where oh where could they be!
by imstillhungry95 on Oct 25, 2011 12:17 AM EDT reply actions
Enjoying an advantage
Because of a player’s injury? THAT’S PREPOSTEROUS.
Wear your own fur.
by Marc Fournier on Oct 25, 2011 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions
I know
I’m going to hell for even suggesting it
Oh where oh where have my Dbacks gone? Oh where oh where could they be!
by imstillhungry95 on Oct 25, 2011 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions
If there were a provision in Blum's contract
That said we didn’t have to pay him whenever he had to be on the DL, then I’d give him a C. Sadly, we still were cutting checks to him while we were also busy paying to treat and rehab his injuries. I don’t see how people can/should overlook the fact that he was paid (handsomely) to cost us money to treat him so he could eventually play.
The D-range grades still seem right to me.
Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 25, 2011 7:43 PM EDT reply actions
Blum and Bloomquist
have established careers as replacement level players. According to fangraphs, both earned 0.3 WAR in 2011. So, how do you justify grading Bloomquist a B and Blum a D? Those are pretty disparate grades, for guys who werent expected to contribute much and who objectively didnt.
On one hand, you’re pretty eager to absolve Willie for his poor play in left – games he actually played – yet now you’re dinging Blum for games he didnt play, due to injury? Would you prefer he play hobbled and be as bad as Willie Bloomquist across eighty starts? Or even worse? Is that how he earns a B? By “saving” the org a million dollars?
Towers probably overpaid some for Blum, but I dont think that’s Geoff’s fault or changes the kind of player he is, was or can reasonably be. These arent stars, highly paid or otherwise, driving team success or hurting the team financially or competitively with an extended absence. They’re marginal players, paid marginally by MLB standards. Blum earned his paltry WAR in one sixth the opportunities Bloomquist was afforded, opening up third to a more capable player.
Which happens a lot to replacement level players. John MacDonald, yet another aging role player, eventually did the same thing to Willie, earning more WAR in a fraction of the starts.
by Diamondhacks on Oct 25, 2011 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions
For one,
I had lower expectations for Bloomquist. For two, I was absolving Willie for being not valuable in left field because he shouldn’t have been there – it was the manager’s choice for him to be there, and I consider that a misuse on the part of Gibson. Blum being inactive because of injury isn’t something that anybody’s fault except Blum’s. I also was willing to admit being slightly revisionist in completely overlooking the time Bloomquist spent in left field.
I would have preferred if Blum were healthy and played the way he did across eighty games (although expecting him to show that kind of power over a prolonged stretch would have been folly), like I think the team expected him to when they signed him to a two-year contract. Additionally, I bumped up Bloomquist’s grade because of his quality post-season play, while Blum looked over-matched in his couple of post-season PA’s, and while that’s arguably unfair to be critical of a pair of PA’s in the playoffs, he was acquired because he could pinch-hit and was blown away twice.
Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 26, 2011 12:03 AM EDT up reply actions
Different expectations for similar players
You rated Bloomquist’s regular season B minus. Blum at or near D. Despite identical WAR. So, any WB playoff bump from B- to B is really a red herring. Such a grading chasm between objectively similar players doesnt reflect performance , I dont think, nearly so much as unrealistically low expectations for Bloomie – and for Blummie, unrealistically high, perhaps based on KT’s contract.
Career bWAR, prior to 2011
Willie 1.9
Geoff 0.1
by Diamondhacks on Oct 26, 2011 2:16 AM EDT up reply actions
Probably some combination
Of distinction from different usage patterns, skewed expectations from contract discrepancies, and expected roles/playing time for each player.
Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 26, 2011 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Overpaying
Towers probably overpaid some for Blum, but I dont think that’s Geoff’s fault
While it’s on the GM for offering, it’s not like someone forced Blum to sign the deal. Eric Byrnes gets plenty of hate for doing nothing more than signing the contract that a dumb FO put in front of him.
by azshadowwalker on Oct 26, 2011 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Byrnes wasnt really hated
for signing a contract. He was disparaged for spectacularly failing to play up to his established level of performance. Despite Blum’s 2011 injury, the somewhat counterintuitive fact is that a failure to play up to established valuations doesnt really apply to Blum.
by Diamondhacks on Oct 27, 2011 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions
Ehhhh, I think it's unfair to blame a guy
For signing a contract that will overpay them. You wouldn’t pass on that opportunity at your job, either.
Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 27, 2011 1:20 AM EDT up reply actions

























