Diamondbacks Report Card: Henry Blanco
Name: Henry Blanco
Age on Opening Day: 39
Salary: $1,000,000
2011 stats: 37 games, 112 PAs, .250/.330/.540, 8 HR, 12 RBI
2010 stats: 50 games, 144 PAs, .215/.271/.300, 2 HR, 8 RBI
"One of these things is not like the other, one of these things just doesn't belong..." Ted Williams, Richie Sexson, Mark McGwire... And Henry Blanco? But they do have one thing in common. What that is, can be found at the end of this piece.
2011 Expectations. The Diamondbacks were in the market for a back-up to Miguel Montero, almost as soon as the trade of Chris Snyder went through. John Hester, who filled in the rest of the year, was never given serious consideration, and it was no surprise when the team inked Blanco to a one-year deal with a mutual option in mid-December. In Blanco, the team got someone who knew his role was as a back-up, having averaged only 49 games per year from 2007-10, and was comfortable doing it. Blanco said, "In the beginning, it was kind of tough to take it. But over the years, I've been able to understand it more and more."
At the time Nick Piecoro wrote that Blanco was "known for being a strong defensive catcher...and for being a coach-on-the-field type player who can be a mentor to young teammates.:" That would be Montero, like Henry a native of Caracas, Vanezuela, and a player whose offensive development had generally been perceived as exceeding the other aspects of his game. This was also a role Blanco had filled previously on several teams, helping to bring on Geovany Soto (Cubs), Nick Hundley (Padres, also under Kevin Towers - at the time, Paul DePodesta reported Blanco as having an 87.2 Mentor Rating!) and Josh Thole, last year with the Mets.
Offense. Blanco's playing time was always going to be limited by his role, and the truth is, the less he played, the better for Arizona, as that would indicate Montero being the everyday catcher anticipated. That wasn't certain - due to injury Montero only appeared in 85 games last year, and had only once passed that number in his career [as a yardstick, the average front-line catcher in 2010 played 110 games]. However, Miggy hit the ground running, and never really let up thereafter. As a result, Blanco appeared only five times in April for Arizona, mustering just 11 plate-appearances in our first 27 games, without a hit.
That changed in May - there weren't many more games, but Blanco became known as "Homerin' Henry", after four of his first six hits left the park. That included a two-homer game against the Padres on May 16th, the fourth multi-homer game of Blanco's career, and the first since April 2009. That matched his total for all of 2010, though his performance that day was overshadowed by a D-backs defeat, and Armando Galarraga's post-game media meltdown. "I just got pitches to hit, but every time you lose, I don't think anything counts," said Blanco afterward.
Blanco's biggest contribution to a game came on August 14th, when he added 17.6% to our win probability, as the D-backs defeated the Mets However, Blanco's performance was again overshadowed, as that was the games where Jason Marquis broke his leg, endiing his season. Even Blanco hitting his first triple since 2006, as he did September 24th against the Giants, didn't even merit a mention in the official recap, due to the Chase Field power outage which also took place. Jarrod Parker empathizes, I'm sure. We at the 'Pit, however, would like to give due credit to only the second triple hit by a catcher in his forties during the past 20 years.
Defense.
Something I didn't realize about Blanco was that he wasn't originally a catcher. He was signed as a third-baseman originally, and though he made his debut in 1990, didn't work significantly behind the plate until 1996. During his major-league debut the following season, he played only first and third, and started at first-base as recently in his career as 2007. But he has a very solid defensive reputation, and it's one he has earned. In 2,458 innings with a mask on since the start of the 2005 season, Blanco had made just seven errors, and had one with Arizona this campaign.
Overall, the team ERA with Blanco catching was more than a run higher than with Montero, at 4.63. However, that's probably as much to do with who Henry was catching as anything. Only 6 of his 37 appearances saw him act as a battery-mate with Daniel Hudson or Ian Kennedy, the two staff aces. Blanco's reputation is for calling a good game, and I didn't see much this year, albeit in limited time, to damage that.
However, it's his gunning down of base-stealers which has made him legendary. As a yardstick, the NL average thrown-out rate this year was 28%. Blanco has nailed over 43% of attempted thieves in his career. and a 2007 study ranked Henry's career number at that point, among the top twenty all-time. For the D-backs, he nailed 11 of 24 altogether, including three of four trying to take third-base. Witness this delicious throw from June 8th, as Blanco nails Jose Tabata after he attempts just that: Pretty much all the defender had to do, was drop his arm a few inches, and wait for the runner to arrive.
Intangibles
There's little doubt about the positive effect Blanco had on Montero, who started off the season on a woeful streak of errors - mostly involving the ball sailing into the outfield - but ended the year among the best in the majors at nailing base-stealers. Bullpen coach Glenn Sherlock was full of praise for Blanco: "I think it’s a perfect situation. I think Henry’s like a big brother to him, somebody that has the experience and has done what Henry has done in the game, and he can share those things with Miggy."
Kirk Gibson agreed, saying in spring training, that Montero has "a guy in Henry this year who can really help him out. When we sent 'Schmitty' (catcher Konrad Schmidt) down, he couldn't say enough about how much Henry taught him." You only need to see how Miguel improved over the course of the season: though his 11 errors tied for second in the majors, his last was on June 23, giving him an ongoing 74-game errorless streak at the end of the season. In August, Montero said, "I've been working a lot with Sherlock and Henry, and both have been helping me a lot. I think that's the biggest difference this year."
2012 Expectations
Montero and Blanco will probably be teaming-up again next year, as the Diamondbacks confirmed that the mutual option with Blanco for 2012 is likely to be exercised. While it'd be nice if Blanco could repeat his 2011 power-surge - Jason Varitek was the only other back-iup catcher in the majors with as many home-runs - it's not something I'd rely upon, given Henry has averaged one home-run every 13.2 games in his career. But he wasn't signed for his bat, and as long as he continues to be a good Montero mentoro [as it were!], and gives Miggy a day off once a week or so, that will be perfectly fine with the Diamondbacks.
Summary
Blanco was likely the only 'veteran presence' position player who truly worked out for Kevin Towers this season, overperforming expectations. While the others ranged from awful (Melvin Mora) to meh (Willie Bloomquist), or were hampered by injury (Geoff Blum, Xavier Nady), Blanco did exactly what was desired, and has to be credited for a palpable improvement in our front-line catcher's defense. Henry even produced more than we thought at the plate, though due to his limited number of appearances, the actual value created there was relatively slight. However, I've no complaints at all about Blanco in 2011, nor any qualms about his presence on the 2012 roster.
Overall grade: B+
Snakepitters' Grades
Dan Strittmatter: B.
Fun fact 1: Blanco played in 37 games, yet posted more fWAR than Miguel Olivo, who played in 130 games for the Mariners and finished the first year of a two-year, $7MM contract. Fun Fact 2: Blanco played in fewer games this year than all but two seasons of his career - his first cup of coffee in which he played in three games and 2007 with the Cubs, when he played in 22 games. However, Blanco's eight home runs this year was the second-highest total of his career, trailing his 2004 total of 10 with the Twins, when he layed in 114 games.
Sprankton: A-
Considering the super low expectation I had of Blanco when the season started, I'm pretty damn happy with what he did. He was ready to go when Gibby called his name and he helped morph Montero into one of the league's better defensive catchers. Not only that, but I can't really think of a single moment during the season that I was disappointed or unhappy with the way he was playing. He was utilized perfectly by the team.
soco: C+/B-
I like the home runs, but I think it's unsustainable. It's hard for me to grade his impact on Miggy because I can't look into the clubhouse and see the evidence. Montero got better with defense as the season went on, but is that really directly caused by Blanco? So he was about average as a backup catcher, to me. He didn't throw away games, but he didn't seem to be a gamechanger.
Kishi: B
As a backup catcher, you don't really need a whole lot out of Blanco to make me happy. He put up some solid numbers, didn't take away too much time from Miguel Montero, and contributed when we needed him. A guy who has 100 at-bats on the season isn't going to make a massive impact, but 8 home runs is a pretty nice return. Will he keep that up? No, probably not. It certainly seems like he helped Miggy improve, but of course it's hard to prove causation there. But Blanco fit in pretty well with what made this team successful- he may not have been a flashy name, he may not have drawn attention to himself, but he showed up, did his job, and helped the team when they needed him.
Next up: Thursday sees Dan Strittmatter discuss Willie Bloomquist. That should be interesting...
[Oh, yeah: what does Blanco have in common with Ted Williams, Mark McGwire and Richie Sexson? They're four of seven players in major-league history to have 100 ABs or less in a season and still hit 8+ homers.]
38 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The correct answer is B.
/ McLaughlin mode
"Hey, why don't you people watch the game?"-my mom after viewing a wave going around Chase Field.
by Reynolds rapper on Oct 17, 2011 12:13 PM EDT reply actions
My answer that I wrote after the 9pm deadline whoops ;)
snakecharmer: B
Well, he only appeared in 37 games, which means Miggy didn’t give Gibby (hah, that rhymes) many reasons for a day off! The home runs were nice, and maybe the early power (4 of the 8 runs were in May) provided a bit of a scare factor for pitchers, but it was pretty rare. He played the role of backup catcher well, but he wasn’t as great of a pinch hitter as I was hoping for after the early power. (We didn’t really have a power bat off the bench this season.) Going 1 for 3 or 1 for 4 or sometimes 2 for 4 was a nice treat.
I stopped reading. Now I just write sarcastic, angry comments.. -- soco
They're not even cooking the ice! -- kishi
Blanco gets an A-
The only knock is that his homeruns come when the game is almost irrelevant
New England Patriots: 4-1 against the Dolphins, Chargers, Bills, Raiders, and Jets
A-
He did what he was asked to do and more, plus under Blanco’s tutelage, this is the year that Montero became a real catcher.
Is it mid-February yet?
I have to go
with a solid B+/A-. It seems from a far that he really helped Miggy with his defense. Another point in his favor, I never really minded when he was in the lineup. I don’t remember him having a game that I would truely call ‘bad’. He was a great backup backstop.
RIP Dan Wheldon. Once again, racers and fans alike have been reminded of the dangers of auto racing
by imstillhungry95 on Oct 17, 2011 1:11 PM EDT reply actions
Also
that CS up there was beautiful
RIP Dan Wheldon. Once again, racers and fans alike have been reminded of the dangers of auto racing
by imstillhungry95 on Oct 17, 2011 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions
I'd give Blanco a B for 2011
But would like a catcher that can take a little more of the load off of Miggy. Not sure a catcher that will turn 41 during the next season is up to that.
May 16th game
I was one of two people who got one of the two bombs Henry hit that night…I remember that game fondly for that reason, as it was A. Henry that hit those and B. My first-ever home run ball! As a fan of Henry’s since the Rockies had him in the late 90’s, I’m glad we have him here and feel he has been a great mentor for Miggy and I hope he continues this in 2012.
I got sprayed by Ryan Roberts!!!
Jim, an important point about Blanco catcher ERA
See this table
http://bbref.com/pi/shareit/6zdOF
tOPS+ in the table measures the OPS+ against of that pitcher against his normal OPS+ against when Blanco was behind the plate.
Kennedy and Hudson did much much worse when caught by blanco. (172 & 155 tOPS+ when caught by Blanco!) Pretty much so did every other pitcher with 30 or more PA’s with Blanco catching, with the lone exception of Aaron Heilman.
Yes, he caught Saunders more than any other pitcher. But Saunders tOPS+ with Blanco behind the plate was 119.
I think the issue was framing. I think that Montero does a great job of framing pitches, and from what I got to see of Blanco, he does this poorly.
I looked at this a couple weeks at the Bullpen. It’s not straight chalk. Over the 3 season PREVIOUS to 2011, he had one year similar to this year where pitchers in general did much worse, one year it was a push, and last year he actually did BETTER than the other catchers on the team. So I’m not sure how predictive this is, and I could be wrong about the framing issue. And maybe it’s not fair to comapre him to Montero, who it turns out is a much much better defenisve catcher than any of us would have imagined.
But what is not debatable is that not only did our pitchers do worse THIS year when Blanco was behind the plate, but ALL OUR STARTERS did worse when Blanco was behind the plate compared to when caught by Montero.
The worst major leaguer is better at baseball than I'll ever be at anything I ever do in my life.
Seems like my boy Saunders does better with Miguel behind the plate
And I am not saying that in any way to slam Henry. It just seems like Joe and Miggy are more on sync together than Joe and Henry are.
I got sprayed by Ryan Roberts!!!
by Rockkstarr12 on Oct 17, 2011 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions
And that's a distinct
possiblity. I can’t remember who it was, but one of our pitchers recently (ie last year or the year before) really was only able to perform with a certain catcher behind the plate
RIP Dan Wheldon. Once again, racers and fans alike have been reminded of the dangers of auto racing
by imstillhungry95 on Oct 17, 2011 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah and I can see why
When you have the same catcher, you tend to develop a rapport with them and they know exactly what you like to throw and don’t like to throw. They become in tune of your thoughts and wants as far as what to deliver to the batter. When you have a different catcher, they aren’t quite in tune with you just yet and it’s not the same.
I got sprayed by Ryan Roberts!!!
by Rockkstarr12 on Oct 18, 2011 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions
Couple thoughts
1. Control for venue and opponents’ baseline offense. Montero started 81% of games, Blanco the remaining 19%, but they didnt play under identical conditions. I noticed six venues where Miggy got all the starts, and five of them played as pitchers’ parks. Montero started all nine games at Petco, and all fifteen at Turner, Citi, Kauffman and Wrigley (which played dead this year). (He also started all three at Miller Park.) Starts in remaining venues were split to varying degrees, with Montero characteristically assuming more starts in each.
2. I understand you’re not asserting anything predictive, but am confused as to why you’re even seeking that here when we wouldnt dream of seeking it from Blanco’s “superior” thirty one games of offense (132 ops+ vs Miggy’s 121). These are tiny, and I think, unrepresentative samples. You mentioned 30 PAs, presumably as a point of passing interest or significance, yet workhorse IPK had a puny 53 PAs with Blanco. How can that be significant, other than the fact Miggy (847 PAs) was advantaged to catch the staff’s best pitcher 94% of the time? Or Hudson 88%? Or Zach Duke 49%? There’s just all sorts of noise here.
3. I do think the part about ALL THE STARTERS is interesting, however. I wonder if starters lose a psychological edge knowing the #1 backstop (and in our case, cleanup hitter) is sitting. When Montero sits, is Gibson apt to sit other starters as well? Or bring in different (lesser) pitchers? Does it feel like a “B” game? That sort of thing.
by Diamondhacks on Oct 18, 2011 2:12 AM EDT up reply actions
i agree with this
there’s likely way too much noise (without having confirmed it through exhaustive research of course) for the samples to be meaningful at all
by blue bulldog on Oct 18, 2011 2:28 AM EDT up reply actions
My reasoning
I brought up the batting against, (tOPS+) in response to Jim’s point about Blanco’s higher catcher ERA and him saying " However, that’s probably as much to do with who Henry was catching as anything"
I didn’t feel like this was very accurate way to evaluate this because regardless of who he caught, they did worse with Blanco catching than they did with Montero catching.
The 30 PA breakoff was simply a number thrown out there to simulate approximately 9 innings, more or less. (Usually it’s actually closer to 35-38 I guess.)
Anyway, this was just a point brought up to fill in some blanks on the DEFENSE portion of Blanco’s report card for 2011, and not intended to be either predictive, OR an overriding point about his overall value. However the results for THIS PAST SEASON are what they are. a tOPS+ of 119 is pretty high, and should be taken into account when grading how he did taking care of the pitching staff on his days to catch.
I agree the team got their money’s worth however, and I have no problem with the team picking up his option, in fact I think they should.
The worst major leaguer is better at baseball than I'll ever be at anything I ever do in my life.
Thx for clarification
If you’re gonna pull custom reports and stuff to temper, challenge or otherwise diminish something Jim wrote, I guess I’m okay with that… ;-)
More seriously, as long as you’re open to the possibility that these tOPS+ samples may reveal little or nothing about Blanco’s true defensive value as I am open to pitch framing and the likelihood a 40 year old catcher may be losing his edge, I think we’re fine.
The interesting aspect, again, is ALL THE STARTERS, who not only pitch better collectively with Montero, but as you noted, pitched better individually, to a man. I’m not convinced it’s Blanco’s “fault”, but having all eight starters pitch better with one backstop hardly seems random either.
Something that may not be clear to people reading your table is that relievers collectively performed better under Blanco. Not to the same extent, and of course RPs throw half as many innings as SPs, so Henry reflects rather poorly here overall. But if we assumed that the relative “tOPS+ against” of a really old backstop might reasonably diminish as a contest’s innings wear on, the samples appear to suggest just the opposite.
Every starter pitched “better” with Montero. RP results, after the games are well underway, are quite mixed, slightly favoring Henry. I’m not sure that reveals as much about who can generally call a game or work with “pitchers” as it might tell us about the relative opening circumstances of games each catcher was required by Gibson to start.
We know HB’s pitchers didnt get to start in as many pitchers’ parks as Miggy. We know MM’s starters played a slightly disproportionate number of games against the weak hitting NLW (which is really weak after removing AZ) and Hank caught a bit “more” (ie more than 19%) against the NLC and AL. I’m not trying to say the games Henry started were lost causes, or that he’s a better catcher than Montero, but I suspect his starters may’ve been otherwise circumstantially disadvantaged, before Henry beautifully framed his first (and only) pitch.
by Diamondhacks on Oct 19, 2011 3:41 AM EDT up reply actions
For what it's worth
Mike Fast’s piece on catcher framing values at BP ranked Montero as one of the best catchers in baseball at framing extra strikes. Can’t exactly blame Blanco for not living up to that, no?
Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 19, 2011 3:05 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Impressive
and poised to be influential line of research, for sure.
I dont subscribe to BP and wasnt aware of it, so thanks.
by Diamondhacks on Oct 19, 2011 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Of course
If you can’t see the data, Montero created 33 runs with his framing from ’07 to ’11, good for seventh in baseball. The top-two of Jose Molina and Russell Martin were exceptional (more than twice the amount of runs as Montero), and then there was a big drop to the crowd of #3-#7, which are separated by just eight runs.
Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 19, 2011 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions
A
Several new inputs (pitching coach, different pitchers, Montero’s natural evolution) might help explain how the catching corps (and Montero specifically) transformed from one of the poorer throwing NL units to one of the best, in a matter of months, but I think it strains credulity to believe Henry wasnt instrumental in that game changing development.
Beyond that, Blanco’s segregated value (fwar, bwar) per inning was right up there with MLB’s best starting catchers, like Avila and Posey. He cost a million dollars. Everyone likes him. At the time, I thought this was KT’s wisest offseason acquisition – and Blanco handily exceeded those expectations.
I give him a B, but...
I don’t believe Blanco is good enough to fill in on any full-time basis and that’s what worries me about him the most. We were very fortunate that Miggy was healthy all year. What are we going to do if Miggy gets hurt for any extended period of time? Do what the Giants did and pack in the season? I feel we need a MUCH better backup catcher and I think some additional dollars should be dedicated to this. The team is structured to be able to weather any other injury on the roster. But an injury to Miggy would be a potential season killer. I’d like to see someone better there next year who could play for 25 out of 30 days without the production falling off a cliff. Blanco’s stats are meaningless since he only played 20 games. If he was such a reliable and quality hitter Gibby might have bunted in that 9th inning against Ax knowing Blanco was going to have to be the hitter to get the job done with bases loaded and 1 out. Blanco was good for what we asked of him (which wasn’t much) but nobody better plan on asking for much more.
Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
by sonic barracuda on Oct 18, 2011 2:03 AM EDT reply actions
eh
losing Upton and his 6+ WAR of production is a season killer, so i wouldn’t go so far as to say we could weather any other injury on the roster. while losing Miggy has the potential of being a season killer, i think the effect is a lot lower.
by blue bulldog on Oct 18, 2011 2:30 AM EDT up reply actions
Okay
So we can’t afford t lose Upton, can’t argue with that. But my point remains I think we need a better backup catcher.
Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
by sonic barracuda on Oct 18, 2011 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions
Bleh, sorry about missing this.
I was in Canada all weekend. I think B+ is a pretty fair grade, overall. He did pretty much what we were all hoping he would do (be an effective backup, provide a good clubhouse presance, and play moderately well when he did start). The added home runs were just surplus value, and they push the grade from a B to a B+. He didn’t play enough to warrant an A from me, though.
What's one more comeback, anyway?
by Zavada's Moustache on Oct 18, 2011 2:32 AM EDT reply actions
I think his ERA is higher because of Hudson
those two did not work well together. Plus the guy had to catch Galaragga in a game where the pitcher allowed 8 runs
Random observation
I didn’t know where to post this, so here is just as good a place as any. Anyway, there’s a photo of Cardinals’ pitcher Motte preparing to throw a four seam pitch. Yikes. The ball is deep in his hand, and his thumb is somewhat wrapped underneath. I really hope that’s his change up grip, because that grip will kill movement and increase drag on a fastball.
I couldn’t get a link to the photo, sorry, but it’s up on Yahoo.
Is it mid-February yet?
the guy still manages to be an elite pitcher though
and his fastball sits like 95-96 mph
i don’t think it’s a changeup (pretty sure he only throws one pitch), but i guess this is just a case where the Cardinals probably don’t want to fix something that seems to be working well for him
by blue bulldog on Oct 18, 2011 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions
That's probably a good point
but if that’s his fastball grip…yikes. He’s going to blow his arm out before too long.
Is it mid-February yet?
by NASCARbernet on Oct 18, 2011 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Add the delivery in the equation, too
And things get scary. His ETA to Dr. James Andrews’ operating table is sometime in 2012 or 2013 at the latest, I imagine.
Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Oct 18, 2011 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Paging Dr. Andrews...
STAT!
Is it mid-February yet?
by NASCARbernet on Oct 18, 2011 9:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Just doing his job would be a B-
he did his job extremely well
New England Patriots: 5-1 against the Dolphins, Chargers, Bills, Raiders, Jets, and Cowboys
by freeland1787 on Oct 18, 2011 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions
I'd say
simply doing his job would be a C. C’s are average, so anything else means he performed above average.
Tomorrow is another day.

by 





















