Diamondbacks 1, Giants 4: Escape To LA
Record: 64-95. Pace: 65-97. Change on 2009: -4
Hinch/Gibson Win %: .392/.412.
The Arizona Diamondbacks certainly had their chances today, liberally scattered through the front five innings. But our hitters failed to come through in the clutch, going 0-for-9 with runners in scoring position, the sole tally which resulted, being Barry Enright's bases-loaded sacrifice fly in the fourth. Arizona actually out-hit San Francisco 7-6; the difference wasn't so much that the Giants got knocks with runners in scoring position, more that half of their hits left AT&T Park, as Enright's struggle with the long-ball continued.
We leave the city by the bay with our offensive tails between our legs, swept, and having managed only four runs over the three games. We head down the California coast to Los Angeles, and hopefully easier prey.
Diamondbacks totals for the series. 20 hits in 96 at-bats - that's a .208 clip. As noted, four runs scored, mostly because the team were 2-for-21 with runners in scoring position. 11 walks. And 37 strikeouts, one short of our record of 38 in a three-game set in Colorado, earlier this month. We've struck out 272 times in 26 September contests: I can't say for sure, but I've a sneaking feeling it's the first time ever a team has averaged more than ten strikeouts per contest over a full calendar month.
Overall, the rate there has increased under Gibson to 9.64 per game, from the 9.16 rate under Hinch. However, that hasn't had much impact on the offensive numbers, with the OPS dropping from .752 under Hinch, to .738 coming into today's contest. But the runs per game scored have dropped, from 4.56 to 4.26. This is probably down to what we saw today: a lack of 'clutchiness'. Particularly painful were Adam LaRoche's leadoff double in the second - he might as well have pitched a tent there, because he wasn't going anywhere - and loading the bases with one out in the fourth, and managing only Enright's sacrifice fly.
We also had two on with one out in the fifth, and nothing happened there either, Mark Reynolds going down swinging and LaRoche grounding out. Reynolds was 0-for-3 with two K''s, and has had a truly-wretched spell at the plate. Since September 3, he is batting .053. That's not a misprint. In his last 57 at-bats, Reynolds has just three hits - his last came on the 18th - with 26 strikeouts. Fourteen of the last fifteen Arizona batters to come to the plate were retired, the sole exception Kelly Johnson, who walked with two outs in the seventh. He had two hits and a walk, and escapes the criticism justifiably aimed at the rest of the offense.
Today, especially after the Giants took a three-run lead, it seems like we gave up. Admittedly, one can hardly blame the hitters for giving up after that fourth run, because the last time the Giants allowed more than two runs at AT&T was more than a month ago, all the way back in August 29th. Admittedly, that was also against the Diamondbacks, but our offense seemed to have all hope beaten out of them in the past couple of nights. Seems like the team that crushed Colorado and dispatched the Dodgers, opted not to leave town, apparently having made other plans.
By some measures, Enright didn't pitch badly - five hits in five innings. However, three of those five didn't come back, including a splash hit into McCovey Cove by FlashinthePanda. That made Barry only the fifth pitcher over the last three seasons to give up a trio of long-balls to the Giants in San Francisco. He finishes his rookie season posting a decent 3.91 ERA - however, Enright also allowed twenty home-runs in 99 innings, basically half a season's work. Given the major-league leader (team-mate, Rodrigo Lopez) has allowed 36 this year, that's not a rate that bodes well for Enright's future.
About the only positive to be taken away was three solid innings from the B-Bullpen. Blaine Boyer, Carlos Rosa and Leo Rosales combining to face one batter over the minimum down the stretch. However, the way the offense hit, our relievers would have needed to allow a negative number of runs to get us back into this one, and sterling effort though it was, they fell short of that goal.

[Click to enlarge, at Fangraphs.com]
Master of his domain: Cole Gillespie, +2.3%
God-emperor of suck: Barry Enright, -20.5%
Only 219 comments: a day game, not on television, is never an easy sell and the wind was entirely taken out of the sails by the third Giant homer. DbacksSkins was the only man to get past 25, so I'm not even going to dignify the runners-up with a mention. Also present: Clefo, Bcawz, unnamedDBacksfan, IHateSouthBend, jinnah, soco, BattleMoses, AJforAZ, kishi, Jim McLennan, 4 Corners Fan, Azreous, snakecharmer, venomfan, justin1985 and piratedan7. An accurate summary of feelings can be obtained from the Comment of the Night:
I don't think many of us will argue with the sentiment so nice, 'Skins expressed it twice. I'd hoped for better the last time I picked up my recapping pen this season, but you can't have everything, I guess. It will hopefully be up to someone else to document the final win of 2010.
32 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Cubs Win!!
Giants only need to win 1 of the next 3 to win the West. Padres must sweep AND win the playoff game.
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
Eh, yeah
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Sep 30, 2010 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions
So, here's a question then
What happens if all 3 teams end up tied?
- SF must play SD for the West title (in San Diego on Monday)
- Does that 163rd game for whomever loses by default put them 1/2 game behind Atlanta, or does the loser then play Atlanta for the wildcard spot? (I assume it’s B because didn’t we have this situation a few years ago?)
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Sep 30, 2010 10:03 PM EDT up reply actions
If all three teams are tied
I think SD would win the NL West, because they have the best head-to-head record, with SF and ATL then playing off for the wild-card spot.
"It's not the despair, Laura. I can take the despair. It's the hope I can't stand." -- Brian Stimpson
by Jim McLennan on Sep 30, 2010 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions
No, i don't think so
The only way the head-to-head record comes into play is if it’s placement – who gets west vs who gets wildcard. If a tie needs to be broken to determine who’s in or out, then they play a play-in game.
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Sep 30, 2010 10:14 PM EDT up reply actions
Looks like you're right
Scenario #5: If three Clubs in a League are tied with identical winning percentages at the end of the championship season and two of those tied Clubs are from the same Division and are also tied for first place in that Division and the third tied Club has the highest winning percentage among the second-place Clubs in the remaining two Divisions, the Division Champion shall first be determined by a one-game playoff on Monday. Any playoff games played to determine a Division champion shall not count in determining which Clubs are deemed tied for a Wild Card designation. Clubs that were originally tied with a Club or Clubs for a Wild Card designation shall still be considered tied.
So the Padres would host the Giants, with the winner being the NL West Champion and the loser taking on the Braves for the wild-card.
"It's not the despair, Laura. I can take the despair. It's the hope I can't stand." -- Brian Stimpson
by Jim McLennan on Sep 30, 2010 10:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Yay. I like being right. :)
I knew the first part because fans/security staffers were talking about the extra game and how they won’t have to work for it (SD won the coin toss).
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Sep 30, 2010 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions
WHEW! SO GLAD somebody took a photo of that :D
I knew about the costumes but they went out the back door and I didn’t get to see any of them in person. Boo. :(
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
My last night of picking up the recap pen
involved an incredibly dominant performance and a win, so nyeh.
Also, awesome pic. Completely missed the game today, though.
My value over a replacement poster is approximately 10.5 runs.
Next year
Is going to be an unpleasant surprise for those who expect Barry Enright to be a dependable back-end starter, not to mention a middle-of-the-rotation guy. His HR/FB won’t stay this bad, but, unfortunately, his FB-Rate will.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMMxIAn_76g - NSFW - "Now my blood feels like it's a bubble bath and you guys look like you're made out of cotton candy and this guy's a hippo!"
by Dan Strittmatter on Sep 30, 2010 9:56 PM EDT reply actions
i unfortunately think you're right
but still….those first 10 or so starts….really makes me want to believe that this is fatigue related and that he’ll be fine for the most part next year as a back-end starter
by blue bulldog on Sep 30, 2010 11:53 PM EDT up reply actions
Damnit, Jim!
I meant to tell you something else. Come back online after your “lunch.” :)
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
It's pretty funny
how everyone in that picture looks so uncomfortable, except for Allen, who is like, “Yeah, I’m a grown man wearing a Speedo, what of it?”
Leads/ties blown by the Diamondbacks bullpen in '10: 41
I soooooo wanted to see
that in person, lemme tell ya……………
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Sep 30, 2010 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Brandon looks like he's loving it
Now Zach Kroenke doesn’t look bad in a speedo…but boy does Barry need some SUN!
"In the book of life, the answers aren't in the back." ~Charles M Schulz
by Rockkstarr12 on Sep 30, 2010 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions
The only one
I was kinda afraid of seeing was Konrad ;) The rest of em have great bodies! (Not that Kondrad is BAD, he’s just…. not as skinny…)
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Sep 30, 2010 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't know why it is
But Konrad scares me…he’s sort of…creepy….
"In the book of life, the answers aren't in the back." ~Charles M Schulz
by Rockkstarr12 on Sep 30, 2010 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions
It's the mustache :)
He’s a good kid tho.
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Sep 30, 2010 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions
He seems really nice too
My friend had him sign something for her at the last game. Said he was very polite
"In the book of life, the answers aren't in the back." ~Charles M Schulz
by Rockkstarr12 on Oct 1, 2010 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions
now I understand Enright's tweet about tanning
Ah, redheads. But he’ll just get pink, not brown, which is not optimal either. :)
I don't recognize those guys without their clothes.
Wait. What?
If I'm going to be accused of being a mythical figure, I'd much rather be a leprechaun, thank you very much.
I don't either! Well, kind of.
That’s LaRoche in the sunglasses (and clothes), Hudson right of him (from our POV), then Enright, Schmidt and Allen. Gillespie is carrying the laptop bag.
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Sep 30, 2010 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions
From that POV,
Gillespie looks like he forgot his Speedo.
If I'm going to be accused of being a mythical figure, I'd much rather be a leprechaun, thank you very much.
by 4 Corners Fan on Oct 1, 2010 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions
LOL!
"In the book of life, the answers aren't in the back." ~Charles M Schulz
by Rockkstarr12 on Oct 1, 2010 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions
LaRoche is just sitting there
waiting for the idiots to get on the bus. Latextmessage.
I'm feeling fiery, fiery, I tells ya! Who cares if I lose 10 in a row?
by Reynolds rapper on Oct 1, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Players in picture
Is that Kennedy in the foreground (front left)? Hard to recognize the players with swimming caps.
by diamondintherough on Oct 1, 2010 7:27 AM EDT reply actions
Yep
I believe that is our lovely IPK :)
"In the book of life, the answers aren't in the back." ~Charles M Schulz
by Rockkstarr12 on Oct 1, 2010 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't know who that is
that’s the one I saw in person and I couldn’t tell even then. I guess it could be…
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
Wes and I think
Whatchoo talkin about? I brought this from home! It’s my favorite!
I should have a mfin theme song.
by emilylovesthedbacks on Oct 1, 2010 11:42 PM EDT reply actions
Wow, SBN
take out like half of my post.
Should say that we think he should be Brandon “Speedo” Allen
And the last line is what I think he’d say about that suit, because he’s totally owning it.
I should have a mfin theme song.
by emilylovesthedbacks on Oct 1, 2010 11:43 PM EDT up reply actions

by 

























This Dbacks game
is unsatisfying. I am unsatisfied with this Dbacks game.
Mr. Science Boy
by DbacksSkins on Sep 30, 2010 2:57 PM MST reply actions 3 recs