Diamondbacks 7, Brewers 4: The Fails of Hoffman
Record: 44-69. Pace: 63-99. Change on 2004: +9; 2009: -7.
Hinch/Gibson: .392/.382
The Diamondbacks started their road-trip in Milwaukee, and some early wildness by Ian Kennedy threatened to cost the team this one. However, Arizona rallied for one run in the ninth and then took it to Trevor Hoffman in the tenth. The future Hall of Famer is now a shadow of his former self: he allowed three runs on three hits and a pair of walks, which provided the visitors with their margin of victory.
Details of this unexpected victory are in the usual post-jump location.
After we took the lead on a Miguel Montero single in the first, Kennedy immediately allowed three singles to tie things up, escaping with a double-play. This was followed ny a really ugly second inning, with such poor control, I thought he was injured. He hit a couple of batters, though in his defense, the Brewers did seem to be diving out over the plate - there's a reason Milwaukee leads the league in HBPs. He then threw a run-scoring wild pitch while walking Craig Counsell on four pitches to re-load the bases, but got the next man to swing at the first pitch, a hanging breaking ball. Fortunately, it went straight to Kelly Johnson, but it was the shape of things to come for him.
Chris Young's home-run in the third tied things up, and made him the first player in the majors to reach the 20/20 mark for homers and stolen-bases (the Rockies Carlos Gonzalez might be the next, currently two SB short). Hard to say how much further he might go, but only six Diamondbacks player have reached the mark before: Mark Reynolds and Justin Upton last year, Eric Byrnes (2006 + 2007), Young (2007) and Devon White (1998). However, the inning came to an unfortunate end with Johnson getting doubled off first, straying way too far off-base on what was just a routine fly to first. I thought Gibson had taken care of that kind of mental lapse?
More wildness from Kennedy followed, hitting Prince Fielder to lead things off - though the gravitational pull exerted by Planet Prince was involved, the ball having to make its way through the orbiting ring system to reach him. With the help of two more walks and a wild pitch, the Brewers scored two runs in the inning, with the only hit a single by their pitcher, which clanked off the glove of Stephen Drew. After three innings, he had allowed five hits, three walks, hit a trio of batters and thrown two wild pitches. The three HBP tied a franchise record, done five times previously, most recently in July 2008 by Micah Owings.
The Brewers "retaliated" in the fourth - though as such things go, this was a bit crap, simply throwing a pitch behind Rusty Ryal. Still, it was enough to get both benches warned by home-plate umpire CB Bucknor. Given there was absolutely no indication Kennedy's wildness was at all intentional, it was interesting to see how this would affect our starter. Curiously, it seemed to help him if anything, as Kennedy retired the next nine Brewers in order, including a nice strike-out of the Planet to finish the fourth. He even singled when hitting in the fifth, although Chris Young was robbed of extra bases by a leaping grab at the track in left.
Kennedy's final line: six innings, four earned runs - a lot better than it looked like it was going to be early on. Or as it's now known, "Pulling an Edwin Jackson." While he was still in the game, the Diamondbacks put men on the corners with no-one out in the sixth, and the run did score - but on a Reynolds double-play, making it a one-run game, yet killing the rally. Gerardo Parra was also robbed of extra-bases in the seventh, with a very nice running grab in left-center, and that was it for the Diamondbacks' hitting in regulation. However, Arizona tied it up in the ninth, on two walks, a bunt by Augie Ojeda and a Gerardo Parra ground-out.
[A quick aside. I don't know what Brewers' closer John Axford had on the bill of his cap, but it was pretty obvious, both its presence, and him grabbing it with his fingertips before each pitch. I was looking for a good picture to illustrate it, but haven't found one as yet. Didn't seem to help him too much, so I'm not inclined to make much fuss.]
Sam Demel pitched a scoreless ninth, and with one out, Kelly Johnson doubled off Trevor Hoffman. An Upton pop-out was followed by an intentional walk to Montero and an unintentional one to Reynolds loaded the bases. Drew then redeemed himself for his earlier gaffe, driving in two runs with a single back up the middle - he's 4-for-10 with two homers in his career against Hoffman, and Ryan Church added another run. Of course, the bullpen had to make it interesting, Aaron Heilman putting the tying run on base with one out. But a shallow pop-out and ground-out preserved the win, with the bullpen pitching four innings of scoreless work in relief of Kennedy.
The team managed just one more hit than Milwaukee. Montero had two hits and a walk, while Johnson, Drew, Upton and Reynolds each getting on base twice, in a variety of ways. However, Parra continues to struggle, being hitless in his last 18 at-bats. Seventeen of which ended in double-plays, I think. Though I didn't look that up, to be honest. It was only the second time this season that Arizona had rallied to win, after being down going into the ninth inning. The other game was when Manny Corpas of Colorado allowed two runs in the ninth on June 6th. It also was our first win in eight attempts over the Brewers.

[Click to enlarge, at fangraphs.com]
Master of his domain: Stephen Drew, +46.1%
Honorable mentions: Demel, +14.2; Montero, +11.5%
God-emperor of suck: Ian Kennedy, -16.2%
Dishonorable mention: Adam LaRoche, -12.2%
Almost 800 comments, with 'Skins, Jdub220 and justin1985 responsible for about half of those between them. Also present: unnamedDBacksfan, Clefo, DbacksSkins, piratedan7, BattleMoses, 4 Corners Fan, blank_38, kishi, ChrisHansen, marionette, emilylovesthedbacks, Jim McLennan, Rockkstarr12, Jack Cromwell, Sprankton, txzona, Wailord, asteroid, katers, AJforAZ, mrssoco and venomfan. Most red'd comment was the statement that fantasy talk in a GDT, during a one-run game, was just like doing the wave. But it was mine, so I have instead to go with:
We have a rally cat
We pet him backwards
End of game: 8:37. Full recap posted: 8:54. Any questions?
53 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
TWSS
err… but… err, not to me
Mr. Science Boy
by DbacksSkins on Aug 10, 2010 12:05 AM EDT up reply actions
Asked in the GDT
but didn’t realize you were ninja-quick on the recap. Can someone show me where to find contract for those that aren’t explicitly listed on Cot’s (looking for Dan Hudson in particular)? Wanna see what sorta deal he’s under with us.
contracts
B-R is starting to have this info but they haven’t updated it for Hudson yet.
Hudson’s info is indeed on Cot’s, on the Diamondbacks page, he had 0.032 years of service time before 2010 and it looks like he’s on a standard-issue major league minimum contract. iirc he’s got another 2 seasons at least before he hits being arbitration-eligible.
i'm not sure why this article says this
but http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/daniel-hudson/
claims we have hudson through 2016. which means arb years are 2014-2016
hudson at 400k per year for the next three years is very very exciting
by blue bulldog on Aug 10, 2010 1:18 AM EDT up reply actions
I might be wrong
But I believe a team has a minimum of 6 years of control after they purchase a player’s contract. Hudson’s contract was purchased from Charlotte in September of ’09, leaving him with a service timetable of 2010-2016.
I’m not too sure how the arbitration process works. I’m assuming a player’s arbitration begins after a certain amount of playing time. For example, Joe Saunders didn’t get his first arbitration until last year, six years and 95 GS into his career.
Wear your own fur.
by Marc Fournier on Aug 10, 2010 2:15 AM EDT up reply actions
Probably because they bought out his ARb years.
I am Angry and when BattleMoses is angry Mr. Bigglesworth is upset,and when Mr. Bigglesworth is upset people DIE!!!!!!!!!
Not exactly.
He wasn’t arbitration eligible until 2010 and then it was avoided as he signed a one year deal with the Angels. He’ll still have arbitration for the next two years unless he gets another contract.
Wear your own fur.
by Marc Fournier on Aug 10, 2010 4:05 AM EDT up reply actions
Don't forget
It’s not a strict six years of calendar time – it’s service time in the majors. In the first three seasons (2005-2007 for Saunders), a player can be optioned back down to the minors. When that happens, his service time clock stops. Over that time, Saunders looks to have had only about one year of actual service time – he made 33 starts. Hence 2008 and 2009’s full seasons were his second and third years of service time, and he was eligible for arbitration in 2010, his fourth year.
"It's not the despair, Laura. I can take the despair. It's the hope I can't stand." -- Brian Stimpson
by Jim McLennan on Aug 10, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions
Pretty great to be having this conversation. it speaks of how excited we all are about him. I sure am. He seems to have tremendous polish for such a young pitcher.
"Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good too. " ~Greg, age 8
Coolio
Thanks for clearing that up.
Wear your own fur.
by Marc Fournier on Aug 10, 2010 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Nah, it's fine
It’s only a big deal in the GDT. :) The size is good in instances like this!
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Aug 10, 2010 1:19 AM EDT up reply actions
Dude's
Got a creepy trucker stache, it’d be wrong for him not to cheat.
Wear your own fur.
by Marc Fournier on Aug 10, 2010 2:16 AM EDT up reply actions
That's messed up.
That’s like saying it’d be wrong for him not to abduct children, because he DEFINITELY looks like a chomo.
Mr. Science Boy
I refuse to believe
that The Jesus is a pedo.
Leads/ties blown by the Diamondbacks bullpen in '10: 34
hey, guys?
can I join the Diamondbacks bandwagon?
(also, yeah, I haven’t noticed anything with Axford’s cap before, but now that you and Wailord have pointed it out…oi it’s obvious. but, yeah, doesn’t help, dude still walks the ballpark)
parra's defense in left is really good
but yeah….unless he starts hitting at least a little better…we might need to explore different options
maybe allen at first and jeff bailey in left? or allen in left and bailey at first?
Or Allen in left,
and keep LaRoche.
Maybe we can finish the year strong and be next year’s Padres.
/crazyoptimism
Leads/ties blown by the Diamondbacks bullpen in '10: 34
I can't imagine
The D-Backs shelling out the $7.5M to keep LaRoche next year.
Also, interestingly, I just noticed that this clause is in his contract….
2011 option increases to $9.5M if traded.
I’m not sure if anyone ever brought that up prior to the trading deadline, but that could play a major role in why he hasn’t been traded. His new team could still drop him for the $1.5M, though, so maybe it wasn’t really a factor at all.
/shrugs/
Wear your own fur.
by Marc Fournier on Aug 10, 2010 2:24 AM EDT up reply actions
LaRoche is a mutual option, right?
Those rarely go through, if memory serves. Seems like most of the time either the player doesn’t live up to the team’s hopes and the team doesn’t pick it up, or the player does live up to the team’s hopes and thinks he can get a better deal somewhere else.
"It's a fez. I'm wearing a fez now. Fezes are cool."
Makes sense
And I wouldn’t be surprised if either scenario were to occur. I didn’t even know mutual options were a big thing until I read this.
Wear your own fur.
by Marc Fournier on Aug 10, 2010 2:44 AM EDT up reply actions
$7.5M is a pretty darn good deal for LaRoche. The only reason not to sign him is if the FO really has to crank down the budget to an unprecedented low number. My hunch is that we offer LaRoche the option and that LaRoche declines it (both because he can get paid more and also because he’ll want to win). That’s a win-win as we’ll get a compensation pick (probably A level if LaRoche continues his hot second half). Even if LaRoche also agrees to the option, I think it’s nice for us as we’ll have a great trading piece again at a reasonable price.
"Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good too. " ~Greg, age 8
I don't think LaRoche gets to Type A.
He’s just below B right now.
Leads/ties blown by the Diamondbacks bullpen in '10: 34
I’m counting on a typical LaRoche final six weeks.
"Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good too. " ~Greg, age 8
by njjohn on Aug 11, 2010 12:14 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I do doubt that he makes it to Type A, though.
I’ve sorta assumed that by the end of the year, he’d be Type B.
Mr. Science Boy
Isn’t Allen supposed to be a bit of a butcher in LF? I mean, with Young and J-Up out there, I guess we could live with that… but it’d be nice if we could put Allen at his natural position.
"Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good too. " ~Greg, age 8
I haven't heard anything
good or bad about his defense.
But you gotta do what you gotta do to put good bats in the lineup.
Leads/ties blown by the Diamondbacks bullpen in '10: 34
His defense put him around Carlos Pena defense wise.
I am Angry and when BattleMoses is angry Mr. Bigglesworth is upset,and when Mr. Bigglesworth is upset people DIE!!!!!!!!!
Biggest Hoffman fail
since Ishtar.
No Gutierrez, Sherlock!
by Reynolds rapper on Aug 10, 2010 3:07 AM EDT reply actions
Hoffman- what a difference 2009 to 2010
last season he was so dominant I began to think he was never going to hit the end of the road…then 2010 comes and who could have figured he would havea total collapse. I hope he retires…kind of hope he gets 4 more saves for #600
7-4 over last 11, maybe Kirk is hitting his stride
the team is playing better than any other part of the season..maybe they have turned the corner
A proposed 'real measure' for effectiveness
would be the Diamondbacks record against teams in a pennant race down the stretch. This is because those teams would be presumably extra motivated to win.
Give me the ball.
by NASCARbernet on Aug 10, 2010 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions
It helps
8 of those 11 games were against teams who currently have losing records. Don’t think that happened in any other part of the season.
Still, let’s start with beating bad teams, and then hopefully progress to beating good ones!
"It's not the despair, Laura. I can take the despair. It's the hope I can't stand." -- Brian Stimpson
by Jim McLennan on Aug 10, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions
However, Parra continues to struggle, being hitless in his last 18 at-bats. Seventeen of which ended in double-plays, I think. Though I didn’t look that up, to be honest.
Very funny. It really seems like that, though, doesn’ it?
"Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good too. " ~Greg, age 8
He's become excruciating
to watch, unfortunately.
by ZonaBacks10 on Aug 10, 2010 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions

by 





















