Diamondbacks 3, Dodgers 6: More Like Edlose
During the broadcast of Wednesday night's game, Daron Sutton stumbled a bit trying to get across a certain bit of information about the past that Arizona was trying to avoid -- namely, that the Diamondbacks hadn't been this terrible in a homestand since the dreaded 2004 season. They lost 11 straight in one homestand that year en route to 111 losses, as most D-back fans can painfully recollect on their own. They'd been swept in three-game series since then, but back-to-back series at home? Nope. Not in six years.
Of course, that's just what they did tonight, getting outscored 52-15 in the process. That kind of margin makes it pretty easy to spread the blame around to just about everyone. And we'll do just that after the jump.
Not much to talk about in the first three innings. Both pitchers faced just one batter over the minimum; Conor Jackson led off the first with a walk against Hideki Kuroda, but was stranded at second, and Edwin worked around a leadoff single by Blake DeWitt in the third. It looked like Good Jackson was here to stick around from his previous start (7 IP, 3 ER) and not Crap Jackson from the two before (6.1 IP, 18 ER). Unfortunately, that was not the case, although Edwin wasn't the only person at fault for that. More on that later.
In the fourth, the Dodgers struck for two runs rather quickly, pairing an Ethier single with a Kemp home run to take an abrupt lead. Jackson battled back to strike out the side, but the damage had been done. The Diamondbacks fought back in the bottom half, though, using singles by Drew and Reynolds and a helpful error by Blake to plate two runs on a double by Adam LaRoche. Like the first, though, Arizona wasted two chances with RISP to do more damage.
Jackson gave up another run in the fifth thanks to a stolen base by Carroll, which put him in position to score on a base hit by Moldy Playdoh Hair. Yahoo does a nice job of pretending our offense isn't as bad as it is, as shown by their description of the inning:
Bottom 5th: Arizona
- C. Jackson singled to shallow left
- S. Drew grounded out to second
0 runs, 1 hits, 0 errors
Of course, there were already two quick outs before Conor pulled his base hit, but it's much more fun to pretend that didn't happen.
Edwin breezed through the sixth, striking out two more batters. Sitting at 99 pitches through six, Hinch sent him back out for the seventh. There's a lot of different ways you can go on what happened next:
He walked Carroll on six pitches. Two more pitches got him an out thanks to a sac bunt by Kuroda. Martin followed with a base hit after three pitches. He struck out Kemp on four pitches (all sliders, and the last one was a beaut) but Martin stole second. He threw four straight outside to load the bases on an intentional walk to Ethier. Two fastballs to Manny got him an 0-2 count, one pitch from being out of the inning...but the third was driven to straight away center, which turned the bases from loaded to unloaded, a winnable game to an unwinnable game, and a quality start to a....unquality start.
Before: 6 IP, 5 H, 3 ER, 2 BB, 7 K
After: 6.2 IP, 7 H, 6 ER, 4 BB, 8 K
Amazing how quickly things can change. Should Edwin have been pulled before the inning started? (Probably not.) After a leadoff walk? (Maybe.) With the bases loaded and Manny up? (Probably, considering he was at 119 pitches by then.) Should we have intentionally walked somebody to get to Manny, when there were already two outs? (Personally, I don't think so.) It's hard to blame Hinch for not trusting his bullpen, given the past five weeks of sample data, but it seems like Jackson got hung out to dry in this spot.
The Diamondbacks only threatened one other time. In the eighth, Arizona got the bases loaded with one out, thanks to a single by Conor, a walk by Upton and a HBP for Reynolds. But all we could muster was a sac fly by LaRoche, meaning we were treated to a Jonathon Broxton appearance in the ninth. The D-backs did get the tying run to the plate after a base hit by Abreu and a nicely drawn walk by Gillespie, who laid off two pretty tough pitches outside, but Jackson and Drew struck out and that was that. A winless homestand, six straight, seven of eight, and we're buried in the NL West cellar.

Master of his Domain: Mark Reynolds, +11.1%
God-Emperor of Suck: Edwin Jackson, -27.1%
Dishonorable Mention: Chris Young, -10.2%
You'd think more people would show up on the bad side of the ledger here, but really that only happens in either a back-and-forth game or a big-time collapse. This game was neither -- other than the two runs in the fourth, the Diamondbacks fell behind and never seriously threatened much the rest of the way. LaRoche had two hits and drove in all three of our runs. Jackson had two hits and a walk in the leadoff spot. Reynolds had a knock and a base on balls. And that's about it. Every starter struck out at least once, continuing our horrific K trend from the past week or so. On the bright side...um, Heilman and Qualls pitched 2 1/3 scoreless innings? Yeah, I got nothing.
In the Gameday Thread, things were talkative and light despite an overarching sense of impending doom (which was something of a self-fulfilling prophecy). No epic bullpen collapse meant the language had to be restrained to its usual levels. We still made it past 1,000 comments, with soco leading the way (200+) and BattleMoses also cracking the century mark. The list: BattleMoses, soco, justin1985, LoveMyDbacks, unnamedDBacksfan, 4 Corners Fan, DbacksSkins, kishi, Rockkstarr12, hotclaws, pygalgia, katers, Wailord, Clefo, SeanMillerSavior, snakecharmer, Sprankton, Fiona, Turambar, IHateSouthBend, rdf8585, Azreous, Dallas D'Back Fan, jonny-yuma.
It's a day off tomorrow, the first since April 22 (and only one until May 24). I can't imagine that long stretch has helped the club, but then again, there are way too many problems with this team right now to try to pin it on something that simple. Besides, the bullpen hasn't been able to stay in games long enough to get fatigued. On Friday, it's the start of a quick five-game road trip with three games against the Braves. Good luck.
29 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Personally, I think that you've gotta feel bad for EJ tonight
Guy clearly tried to gut it out for a team that just didn’t have anywhere else to turn, but he was just absolutely gassed on that 121st pitch, and missed his spot because of it. If he keeps that pitch high, it could have been a completely different ballgame. Heilman comes in and shuts down everyone, we still batter the Dodgers’ A ‘pen for a run, it’s tied going into the ninth and we don’t have to deal with Broxton.
In other words, UGH and FAIL.
http://xkcd.com/290/ (caution: profane)
by Dan Strittmatter on May 13, 2010 2:57 AM EDT reply actions
We may
have still had to deal with Broxton, although I’d doubt it too.
Letting our bullpen pitch is like playing Russian Roulette...
...with an automatic.
by DbacksSkins on May 13, 2010 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions
I am not sure how much more I can take. There has to be a difference between being loyal and being a masochist, right? I barely hung on in 2004. Basically, that season I just decided to become a stats geek and get super interested in every detail of the stats all the young players were putting up. If I turned the whole thing into math, it didn’t feel as cruddy. Though, I do have to admit that I may have checked out entirely for a month in the middle there.
Maybe I need a break. Should I become a Suns fan for a while? What are my chances of seeing success there? LOL.
On second thought, I’d rather watch the DBacks suck than watch basketball. I’ll find some way to get through this.
Ouch... haha!
Me too.
Letting our bullpen pitch is like playing Russian Roulette...
...with an automatic.
by DbacksSkins on May 13, 2010 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions
Depends
on when Chris did the roll call.
Letting our bullpen pitch is like playing Russian Roulette...
...with an automatic.
by DbacksSkins on May 13, 2010 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions
He obviously does not
Since the roll call says justin had 100+ and BattleMoses was in fourth place with 73 posts.
"I'm always insistent, Wodehouse. But I'm not to be trusted, am I?"
Glad it's not just me
I was beginning to think I was some kind of jinx, but upon reviewing the evidence, it clear the Diamondbacks just suck right now.
Instead, I accumulated some martyr points by watching Julie + Julia [it wasn’t as bad as I feared, though it was another “Meryl Streep does a funny voice” flick – the most amusing thing was seeing Chloe from 24 as the heroine’s best friend]. I then wasted them by playing Bejewelled until 2am.
Oh, well. At least we can’t lose today…
"We defy augury" -- Hamlet
I got
my Mom that for her birthday…
Letting our bullpen pitch is like playing Russian Roulette...
...with an automatic.
by DbacksSkins on May 13, 2010 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions
the book
was pretty good, haven’t seen the movie yet.
Downloaded bejeweled for my phone…it’s super addictive.
What's your name? Sandwich. What's your first name? TUNA.
by emilylovesthedbacks on May 13, 2010 12:44 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I loved Meryl Streep
in that role because she reminded me SO much of my Aunt Jacqueline. Also, it seems to be that “Chloe” is really limited in her acting skills. I saw her in “Sunshine Cleaning” and it was like “Chloe when she’s not at work.”
If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant's life, she will choose to save the infant's life without even considering if there are men on base. ~Dave Barry
by 4 Corners Fan on May 13, 2010 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions
I could
have sworn I saw Mary Lynn Rajskub in something before Sunshine Cleaning (or Little Miss Sunshine, but I don’t remember her in that) but now I can’t figure out what it was. All I remember is being excited because Cleaning was going to have Emily Blunt, Amy Adams, and Mary Lynn Rajskub all in one film, but damned if I can’t remember what it was.
We fell asleep in the middle of the fury.
Did you get a chance to see "Sunshine Cleaning"?
If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant's life, she will choose to save the infant's life without even considering if there are men on base. ~Dave Barry
by 4 Corners Fan on May 13, 2010 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions
I did
I was so excited, too. I had been waiting for a year to see it, since it debuted at Sundance and then essentially wasn’t picked up by a distributor for a while. Finally it did and was at a local art-house theater and I was like yesssssssss and dragged the wife along.
Disappointment.
We fell asleep in the middle of the fury.
Very disappoint!
I was excited to see it because I like Amy Adams and it was filmed in my hometown and it was advertised as a wacky comedy. Well, Amy Adams was cute, my hometown looked good (the car repair shop toward the end is just near my mom’s apt.) but the story was SO not a wacky comedy. Much more a disfunctional family drama. Did not like.
If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant's life, she will choose to save the infant's life without even considering if there are men on base. ~Dave Barry
by 4 Corners Fan on May 13, 2010 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions
No
not that, and not Punch Drunk Love. There was something I saw her in that I thought she was pretty fantastic in, but now I can’t remember or figure it out. Maybe it was Punch Drunk Love, I haven’t seen that in years.
We fell asleep in the middle of the fury.
How
many recent films has Meryl Streep done that are a “[her doing] a funny voice flick”? Devil Wears Prada? Nope. Doubt? Nope. Mamma Mia!? Nope. Fantastic Mr. Fox? Nope. It’s Complicated? Nope. Star Wars: the Clone Wars? Nope.
Okay, maybe she didn’t do that last one, but her MO isn’t exactly “do funny voices and pass it off as acting.” That’s more a Johnny Depp thing.
We fell asleep in the middle of the fury.
Meryl Streep will always be defined for me by
“Ah deen-guh’s gawt mah BAY-bee…”
"We defy augury" -- Hamlet
by Jim McLennan on May 13, 2010 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Fair
enough, I just can’t equate her as an actor with just funny voices.
We fell asleep in the middle of the fury.
Oh, it's probably completely unfair
She was easily the best thing in the Manchurian Candidate remake, for example. But I just seem to bump into more of her funny voice roles: Julie and Julia was like listening to a foghorn for two hours.
Out of Africa. That was another one.
"We defy augury" -- Hamlet
by Jim McLennan on May 13, 2010 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions
We do what we have to do.
If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant's life, she will choose to save the infant's life without even considering if there are men on base. ~Dave Barry
by 4 Corners Fan on May 13, 2010 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions
A lot
of movie snobs here, so it’s about par for the course. I mean, Jim is pretty heavily involved with the horror movie scene so it’s kind of expected now.
We fell asleep in the middle of the fury.
Yeah, I'm gonna combine my two loves
In an upcoming remake of that old grindhouse classic, I Spit On Your Bullpen
"We defy augury" -- Hamlet
by Jim McLennan on May 13, 2010 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions

by 

























