What's Up With...? Ian Kennedy
"I respect the way he pitches. He knows what he's doing. He's a guy I wouldn't mind having. I don't know if I'd call him finesse. He's 88 to 90, and he attacks with his fastball, which is what you want to do. It's impressive. I'd still put him in as a fourth starter, but he'll be a steady guy, a Rick Reed type."
-- a scout discusses Ian Kennedy
In a season where our pitching staff has, almost without exception, disappointed to some degree, Ian Kennedy has been a very pleasant surprise. He has performed far better than expected, when he was traded to Arizona as part of the three-way deal with Detroit: at that point, he had one win in twelve starts with the Yankees, and a career ERA in the majors above six. But after seven outings for the Diamondbacks, he is the only starting pitcher on the club with an ERA below four (3.48), and it is looking increasingly like New York's loss is Arizona's gain.
So, we ask the time-old question: what's up with Ian Kennedy?
Ian Kennedy has been compared to Greg Maddux for almost his entire career, because both men are right-handers who don't have overpowering stuff, but instead use good command and control, along with movement and a baseball brain, to out-think batters when they can't necessarily out-pitch them. And like Maddux, Kennedy struggled during his early encounters with major-league hitter - though the future HoF made the big show a good deal earlier, being called up at age 20. But if you're going to be compared to anyone, we'll settle for the Mad Dog.
Kennedy went to USC, and at one point was talked about as a potential top ten draft pick. However, he had a bad couple of last months before the draft in 2006, with his velocity - and more importantly, his command - falling away, which had some speculating he would be picked in the forties.In the end, he went at #21 to the Yankees, and blazed through their system, reaching the majors barely a year after signing. A scouting report from December 2006 says, "Sometimes you cannot explain a pitcher's performance by the plus marks next to his pitches or the radar gun readings. Sometimes something is just there - and Kennedy has that something."
However, Kennedy had a bad 2008: he seemed to start nibbling and got hit hard as a result - New York was also unimpressed with his reaction to bad outings, something Kennedy now regrets. 2009 was, if anything worse: May saw Kennedy leave a game with numbness in his middle-finger, and he was diagnosed with an aneurysm - an abnormal bulging of a blood-vessel - in his armpit. He returned to the majors as a September call-up, but the Yankees seemed to have given up on him, and as the team reached a deal with Andy Pettitte, Ian was sent back to Arizona [he had appeared here in the AFL, posting a 4.25 ERA, with a K:BB ratio of 28:5 in 29.2 IP].
His spring 2010 numbers were impressive, five shutout innings against the Padres leading AJ Hinch to enthuse, "That was a great outing, one of the best outings - if not the best outing - in the spring by a starter." There were also reports at the time that he was developing a sinking fastball, but as we'll see, that doesn't seem to have come into play much - or at least, hasn't significantly impacted his numbers. Kennedy finished the Cactus League with a 2.88 ERA , securing his spot as the #3 in our Opening Day rotation - from there, his stock has probably only climbed.
It's a little harder to analyze Kennedy's improvement, than with previous entries in the WUW? series, because we have a great deal shorter major-league track record prior to this season. We're talking about less than sixty innings, spread over parts of three seasons since the native of Huntington Beach, CA made his debut against the Rays on September 1st, 2007. However, there are some obvious differences between the results he obtained in the Bronx, and those we are now seeing in Arizona.
Firstly, he has been walking a lot less people. In 44 innings, Kennedy has allowed only 11 bases on balls, a rate of 2.25 per nine IP. It's less than half that posted with New York - 5.58 - but is roughly in line with, though still somewhat better than, his minor-league numbers. His walk-rate at Triple-A, for instance, was 2.49 BB/9 IP, and his overall number across all levels was below three. This is likely connected to Kennedy's improved first-strike capability: he has thrown strike one 66% of the time, well above both his previous career number (59%) and NL average (58%), putting Ian in the top 10% of starters.
There are a couple of peripheral numbers which bear some investigation: both are extreme, so should regress to more normal levels, but I suspect they may well cancel each other out in terms of impact on his overall numbers. Kennedy's BABIP is .244, which is ranked sixth among 60 qualifying pitchers in the NL to date [Jon Garland and Barry Zito are among those above him], so I would expect that number to head towards league average, around .300, in due course. However, Kennedy's HR/FB rate is 11.4%, eighth-highest and significantly above NL average (7.5%). Some of that may be pitching in Chase, but I'd still expect him to give up fewer home-runs going forward.
Kennedy remains a pitcher who does give up more fly-balls than average, with about three fly-balls for every two ones hit on the ground [MLB average is around 5:4]. This may partly explain why his double-play rate is so low, though it's bordering on the freakish: he is the only pitcher in the majors to have thrown forty innings without getting a single DP. Normally. pitchers will expect to get a double-play about ten percent of the time the chance arises, but Kennedy. is just 2-for-74 in his career, with the last twin-killing all the way back in May 2008. He's 0-for-23 in the situation this year, so the Kennedy two-seamer that can generate groundballs appears a mythical beast thus far.
However, batters are swinging more and making less contact this season, especially on pitches out of the zone. There, the swing percentage has increased to 25.5%, compared to only 15.3% a couple of years ago, and the percentage of swinging strikes he has got this season is almost 9%, also sharply up on the 2008 figure. [As he only pitched one major-league inning in 2009, I am ignoring those numbers] The contact percentage when they swing at Kennedy's pitches is now below league average, both in (85.7% vs. 88.2%) and out (61.2% vs. 65.0%) of the strikezone.
Ian is also making a lot more use of his off-speed pitches. In 2008, his curveball and change-up comprised a total of 25.5% of his pitches; this season, that has jumped to 35.5%. And it's the change-up that has been really effective this year. Fangraphs also has a metric which measures the value of each pitch-type for a player: for Ian Kennedy, what it shows is that while most of his pitches are slightly-below league-average, his change-up is effective. Very effective. As in, the 4th-most productive change-up in the NL, behind only Tim Lincecum, Ubaldo Jimenez and Carlos Silva. Not bad for a guy with less then twenty major-league starts under his belt. [There's also a good piece on the change-ups in general and its status here. Hat-tip to 'Skins for that one]
There's two ways things can go. It's possible major-league hitters will work out how to spot and deal with Kennedy's change-up. Should that occur, we'll see how far guile takes him, because when all your pitches are merely average, you need to make up for it in smarts. The other possibility - the one I want, naturally - is that Kennedy continues to develop as a pitcher. This effective change-up was, apparently, a new addition to his arsenal; perhaps we can look forward to the sinker? Said Ian, "I talk to Webby a lot. He's usually in the training room, and I've asked him a lot of questions so far about pitching, trying to pick his brain on how he can throw that great of a two-seamer."
Let's hope the answers come to fruition in the desert, because few things in baseball taste sweeter than making the Yankees regret a trade.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great Review
I’ve said (multiple times) that Kennedy was the hidden gem in the trade.
I don’t expect him to be a “super ace” (Santana, Timmeh, or Ubaldo), but I do think that he can be a very effective pitcher (Garland/Davis) for us. Heck, so far he’s the best pitcher in the trade.
Key to the game: Score More
I think
he can be a LOT better than either Garland or Davis…
Letting our bullpen pitch is like playing Russian Roulette...
...with an automatic.
I'd be inclined to agree
Although Davis did have some mighty good years here. But if the kid can hone that 2-seamer, then absolutely.
http://xkcd.com/290/ (caution: profane)
by Dan Strittmatter on May 14, 2010 2:36 AM EDT up reply actions
The one bright spot on this team (besides Kelly)
"Yeah I could have been king, but maybe I already am king. Hail to the king baby." Ash from Army of Darkness
+1
BABIP is highish, but I’ve got to believe that the guy’s new approach has got to be part of the reason why. He’s hitting fewer ground balls than in the past (’07, ’08), and his fly balls are getting out of the infield unlike ’09.
http://xkcd.com/290/ (caution: profane)
by Dan Strittmatter on May 14, 2010 12:19 AM EDT up reply actions
Fantastic write-up, Jim
I’ve developed quite the Ian Kennedy obsession. Something tells me that if I’m writing something about IPK this summer for work, I may have to link this up. :-P
http://xkcd.com/290/ (caution: profane)
by Dan Strittmatter on May 14, 2010 12:16 AM EDT reply actions
...purely coincidentally, of course...
;-)
Letting our bullpen pitch is like playing Russian Roulette...
...with an automatic.
Oh, of course.
Not like I’ve ever written here. ;-)
Actually, I don’t think I necessarily need to mask the fact that I’ve written here…
http://xkcd.com/290/ (caution: profane)
by Dan Strittmatter on May 14, 2010 2:36 AM EDT up reply actions
Don't worry though
I’ll give him a percentage of my salary as compensation. :-)
http://xkcd.com/290/ (caution: profane)
by Dan Strittmatter on May 14, 2010 7:14 PM EDT up reply actions
really, really good piece
I love what Kennedy has given us thus far, and I think it will continue. A change of scenery and the upper hand on a job I think has made him completely change his attitude and become a better pitcher.
Question
Why do our beat reporters, Gilbert and Piecoro, absolutely FAIL when it comes to rumors and breaking information on this team?? Gilbert’s only recent blog entry is on Ernie Harwell and Nick at least tries, but doesn’t seem to get that inside info.
I want information on what this team is going to do to get better. And, I am in LA, I can’t listen to Gambo and Ash. They always seem to have the best info, at least when I was still in the Valley.
PS, love Ian Kennedy and his bulldog attitude.
Gilbert
has to walk a fine line because he’s indirectly employed by the team..
Letting our bullpen pitch is like playing Russian Roulette...
...with an automatic.
by DbacksSkins on May 14, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions
Kennedy looks like a great throw in from the trade
he was kind of an after thougght on most of the TV shows but has proven to be a very nice pickup. I hope he becomes a mainstay for the club.
I like to credit it
to our awesome scouting, rather than Ian being a throw in..
Letting our bullpen pitch is like playing Russian Roulette...
...with an automatic.
Ian was hardly a throw-in I'd say
Ever since the initial press conference for the trade it was clear that we really wanted Ian Kennedy.
http://xkcd.com/290/ (caution: profane)
by Dan Strittmatter on May 14, 2010 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions
It’s true. Listening to Baseball Today the other day and they said; “Clearly the Tigers have gotten the best of the three way deal thus far.” Eh???? Actually, clearly the Diamondbacks have gotten the best of the deal.
"Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good too. " ~Greg, age 8
Wow, they're complete morons catering to the big names of the AL.
What else is new? Both now and long-term it looks like we destroyed that trade, despite being crucified at its original conception. IPK’s rates actually look good enough for him to build on being a mid-rotation starter, and EJ appears mildly on track (Verducci Rule still worries me, but he looked mighty crisp against L.A.).
Meanwhile, Scherzer imploded his way to AAA because of the Verducci Rule, Austin Jackson’s BABIP is .459, with a 28.7% K-Rate and just one homer, and Daniel Schlereth is still proving nothing in AAA Toledo with his 16 walks in 20 innings pitched (frankly, his 26 strikeouts there are largely irrelevant – we know he can strike minor-league hitters out, but can he refrain from walking major league ones? So far, probably not). And Phil Coke’s 15:9 K:BB is gonna catch up to him too.
Tigers probably got the worst end of this long-term. Just an opinion (if admittedly a possible over-reaction).
What’s that? Curtis Granderson has an OPS of .686? Oh, never mind then, the Yankees did. (though, to be fair, he’s been worth 2.4 UZR defensively already this year)
Get this: Ian Kennedy has been worth as much as Curtis Granderson in terms of WAR. WOW.
http://xkcd.com/290/ (caution: profane)
by Dan Strittmatter on May 16, 2010 5:07 AM EDT up reply actions

by 




















