Diamondbacks 5, Padres 3: Kelly Makes Us the Padres' Daddy
Record: 2-1. Pace: 108-54. Change on 2009: +1
Arizona came into tonight’s game looking to win its first series of the newborn season. Sure, their 162-0 year had been ruined, but there was still a lot to play for, right? I mean, with 160 games left, I guess there’s playoffs and wild cards and other things to consider that might be worthwhile.
After the jump, a sudden outburst of offense for one player who’d been hitless, and another bad luck outing for a starter. What’s different in 2010 so far? We won despite that luck…
Welcome to the Diamondbacks, Kelly Johnson! Mr. Johnson established himself in a big way tonight, going from 0-for-7 with a walk in the first two games to nigh unstoppable. Kelly led off the bottom of the first with a bomb to center field. The offense stalled from there, wasting a lone baserunner in each of the next three frames, including a one-out single by Johnson in the third.
On the mound, Ian Kennedy made his first start for the Diamondbacks tonight, and got off to a rousing start. Working around a David Eckstein double, he struck out the side in the first, including Adrian Gonzalez. His only patch of trouble was in the second, where the first three Padres reached on two base hits and a Scott Hairston home run to put the D-backs in a 3-0 hole. At this point, I feel like we should petition the league to stop Hairston from playing against us. And Randy Winn.
Kennedy settled down after what was essentially his only mistake in the second, working out of trouble in the fourth and setting down the side in the fifth. At 94 pitches, he was pinch hit for in the fifth, which ended up working out – more on that in a minute. Personally, I’m okay with the move, since stretching Kennedy past 100 pitches in his first start seems a little iffy. Opinions varied in the GDT.
Kennedy ended up getting just enough run support not to lose (what’s known around these parts as "being an Arizona Diamondback"), thanks to those runs in the bottom of the fifth. His line was very respectable, certainly something we could get used to seeing out of our No. 4 pitcher – and yes, hope springs eternal that Brandon Webb will return to the living at some point – 5 IP, 6 H, 3 ER, 0 BB, 8 K.
Meanwhile, the Diamondbacks tied things up in the bottom of the fifth thanks once again to Kelly Johnson. With one out, Rusty Ryal pinch hit for Kennedy and reached on a base hit. Johnson promptly deposited a Kevin Correia pitch into the pool area for his second homer of the game. Supposedly, his two jacks combined for at least 800 feet or so – without the benefit of a video feed here in Arizona, I’m going to assume that at least one of them bounced off the moon. You can’t tell me otherwise.
Chris Young was one of the heroes in this one. His homer in the bottom of the sixth proved to be the difference, and CY has gotten off to a pretty good start so far. Justin Upton added an insurance run in the eighth with a bomb of his own.
Arizona’s bullpen locked things down from there for the win. The combination of Norberto, Boyer, Heilman, Gutierrez and Qualls (the worst law firm ever) held the Padres to just two baserunners over the final four innings – a walk by Gutierrez in the eighth, and a hit given up by Qualls in the ninth that he quickly erased with a game-ending double play. And just like that, the Diamondbacks had won the series and were on pace for a 108-win season instead of a 54-win one. Yay, small sample size!
Honorable Mention: Chris Young, +17.3%, Juan Gutierrez, +12.8%, Aaron Heilman, +10.0%
God-Emperor of Suck: Stephen Drew, -9.3%
Despite having just nine hits and one walk, a combination of long balls and good pitching was enough to get the win tonight. For the Diamondbacks, Johnson had three hits and added a walk to reach in all of his plate appearances, and Young added a pair of knocks. On the down side, Reynolds and LaRoche were both 0-for-4 with two strikeouts. Hairston had a pair of hits for the Padres, and Gonzalez added a hit and a base on balls. Boyer picked up the win thanks to Kennedy’s bad timing, and Qualls got the save.
A robust GameDay Thread, with nearly 1,200 comments, a number that will probably be surpassed by the time I post this. It will not surprise you to learn that soco, DbackSkins and snakecharmer hit the triple-digit mark, or that we needed an overflow thread for the third straight game. Present and accounted for: Wailord, BattleMoses, DbacksSkins, snakecharmer, kishi, JoeStock, Pyromnc, NASCARbernet, unnamedDBacksfan, soco, hotclaws, pygalgia, AJforAZ, IHateSouthBend, Turambar, PhxRanger, Zephon, Fiona, brian custer, piratedan7, eel, Wimb, Azreous, mrssoco, venomfan, GuruB, emilylovesthedbacks, SenSurround and DKuon.
It’s a day off tomorrow before welcoming in the Pirates for a three-game set. One would certainly hope that the weekend series could be the start of a series-winning streak. Rodrigo Lopez will get his first start in the opener. So far, it's been a pretty good first week of the season.
61 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Okay
So we’ve got Kelly to show up.
Mr. LaRoche? Your turn. (Come on, I REALLY want to like you.)
My sig is a silent protest against the lack of hot on our team right now. Lame, Diamondbacks. Lame.
Just wait until after the All-Star break.
You will eventually like him. He just takes a while to get loosened up… like half of a season.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Apr 8, 2010 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions
The Adam Laroche Reality
Pirates fan here. When we got Adam LaRoche from the Braves three years ago, several Braves fans came on Pirates blogs and said that his numbers were better than the reality, and that we would be disappointed. Were they ever right. This guy gets hot as a pistol for 4 to 6 weeks in the summer, and the rest of the time he is a complete BUM! Last year he was hittiing .218, 5 HR’s and 18 RBI’s through the end of May. Just take a look at his game log, he’s never hit higher than .242 through the end of May. June usually isn’t any better. But even those bad numbers don’t really give the full flavor of how awful he truly is. He is the master of coming up with the bases loaded and 1 out and hitting into a DP or striking out, then in the next at bat rattling a double off the wall with nobody on base and two out. Last year when I checked the stats in June, he had the lowest RISP batting average of any regular in the major leagues. So it is no surprise to me that he has started the season 0-12 with 6 strikeouts. He will be flirting with the Mendoza Line for months. There’s a reason the D’Backs were able to sign him cheap.
ZOMGLaRocheISTEHUNCLUTCH!!!!!!
I keep trying to reset my password to "penis", but it keeps telling me "too short".
We were able to sign him cheap
Because he didn’t want the gobs of money that San Fran threw at him. And probably because of some of this. Though it should be no secret or surprise that LaRoche is a poor first-half player.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Apr 9, 2010 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions
Is it true
That Adam’s ADD always got him in trouble ith his manager too? I heard that was a BIG problem between him and Bobby Cox
"AUGIE AUGIE AUGIE...OY OY OY!"
by Rockkstarr12 on Apr 9, 2010 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Not True
Cox and LaRoche had a fine relationship. There was one famous episode where LaRoche didn’t cover 1st in time, and Cox benched him for a game. But LaRoche immediately apologized, and Cox said "He’s a great kid. If he was a dog, it’d be a different story. It’s just, every once in a while, things like that happen."
Here is the full article: http://bit.ly/8XteMz
I figured as much...
That the media would make more of it than it truly was. I just remember reading something years ago about players and controlling things like ADD/ADHD, and asthma while on the field
"AUGIE AUGIE AUGIE...OY OY OY!"
2009 Season
I think LaRoche is more streaky rather than a pure 2nd half hitter. He actually had a .916 OPS with 5 HR in April in 2009, but then fell to a .650 OPS in May, and then was back to .983 in June and down to .502 in July.
That would make sense, too.
He’s consistently inconsistent.
I keep trying to reset my password to "penis", but it keeps telling me "too short".
Ich bin ein Dback!
My wife had great seats to the Suns vs. Spurs game (amazing game btw), but I was scoreboard watching.
Nice to see 8 k’s and no BB’s from Kennedy! Too bad we couldn’t get him a win.
various comments...
1) 8 k’s in 5 innings!!! i guess ian kennedy never got the memo that he’s supposed to be a flyball pitcher….let’s hope it stays that way….
2) i feel like just from the glimpses we’ve seen so far in these three games, the dbacks’ defense have improved quite a bit….
3) padres are REALLY good at working counts…noticed it a lot yesterday when i felt like edwin threw a ton of nasty sliders that they just didn’t bite on…and i think it probably accounts for a lot of why kennedy only went 5 despite, what i assume, is nasty stuff since he was striking out everyone…i think our pitchers will be able to go deeper in the future…or at least i’m hoping that the padres are just abnormally patient
4) perhaps we should seriously consider moving laroche down a spot or two in the lineup? at least until he turns into pujols when august starts?
5) max scherzer rocked the kc royals today (though without the flashy k numbers). i definitely think that the trade is for the better (i hope my confidence that ian kennedy will be a number 3 level starter is wellfounded) since we got two starting pitchers back for a starting pitcher and a reliever…however, definitely sad that max had to go, and glad he did well in his debut today
won our first series!!
Max's line is definitely deceiving...
Take this into consideration:
Pitcher A – 5 IP, 5 K, 1 BB, 4 GB, 6 FB.
Pitcher B – 6 IP, 3 K, 2 BB, 6 GB, 9 FB.
Which outing do you take? I take pitcher A. Pitcher A is Edwin Jackson against the Padres (3 ER, L). Pitcher B is Max Scherzer (0 ER, ND) against the Royals. Shame. It’s what makes this sport so great.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Apr 8, 2010 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions
agreed
assuming we’re under a veil of ignorance of the win-loss…because at the end of the day i will take the win regardless of the peripherals haha (though i guess that is misleading to a certain extent as well, since peripherals may be more indicative of future performance?)
i mean, i definitely think the trade was good for us, and even if we want to do individual comparisons for this year, i’d bet that jackson will put up better numbers over the course of the year than scherzer (if we just look at ERA+….or i guess FIP? some comparative stat….)
just wanted to give a shoutout to max. i actually think regardless of the peripherals, the fact that detroit was able to win, and he gave up no runs, is a really good thing from a perception standpoint, because it’s his debut start for a new team
That was the point I was trying to make
That the future performance indicators are actually looking up if you’re looking at those two performances as the ultimate indicators of future performance (which, obviously, they are not), despite looking bad at first glance.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Apr 8, 2010 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Trifecta tonight for the home teams, everyone won
Coyotes – 17136
Suns – 18422
DBacks – 17673
Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin.
by unnamedDBacksfan on Apr 8, 2010 4:20 AM EDT reply actions
Attendance.
Which is pretty sad for the Diamondbacks.
Yes, it’s a very different part of the season. But still.
yeah I'd say with them all being in town last night
its going to kill the 3rd game of the baseball season draw.
insert signature here
Greetings from Scotland
Good to wake up to see an Arizona victory, and Kennedy getting in his licks. Connectivity from here will be limited. While we can get a wifi connection, the walls in our house (built in 1815) are three-feet thick, so you have to be by a window to get it to work!
So, seems like both Kennedy and Jackson pitched better than their numbers would appear. Is that the case? If so, that’s hopeful. On to the Pirates next!
"We defy augury" -- Hamlet
Indeed
On EJ and Kennedy.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Apr 8, 2010 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah,
I saw that on Yahoo
I keep trying to reset my password to "penis", but it keeps telling me "too short".
I Am SO Offended
not only do my beloved Giants have the insult to baseball that is Eugenio Velez, but to endure the miss-spelling…
Maybe they can spell “Fresno” on his next uniform.
Key to the game: Score More
That is harsh.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Apr 8, 2010 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions
But I think it's wonderful
that the Giants saw fit to sign one of the prawns from District 9. Now THAT’S diversity.
I keep trying to reset my password to "penis", but it keeps telling me "too short".
Hell yeah
Glad the dbacks are showing off their guns. I hope they stay consistent with the offense
by DKuon on Apr 8, 2010 9:27 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Weekend hosting the Pirates
who have smashed the Dodgers thus far.
What are the chances DBAX can win 2/3 from Pitt?
I would say pretty good
Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin.
by unnamedDBacksfan on Apr 8, 2010 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions
and the Pirates?
I like our chances for game 1 and 3.
Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin.
by unnamedDBacksfan on Apr 8, 2010 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions
amend that, I like our chances period.
Coming up: Projected starting pitchers
Thursday: off
Friday: At Chase Field, 6:40 p.m. RHP Rodrigo Lopez (3-1, 5.70)* vs. Pirates RHP Charlie Morton (5-8, 4.55)*
Saturday: At Chase Field, 5:10 p.m. RHP Dan Haren (1-0, 1.29) vs. Pirates RHP Daniel McCutchen (1-2, 4.21)*
Sunday: At Chase Field, 1:10 p.m. RHP Edwin Jackson (0-1, 5.40) vs. Pirates LHP Zach Duke (1-0, 3.60)
- - Statistics are from 2009.
Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin.
by unnamedDBacksfan on Apr 8, 2010 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions
been watching the pirates/dodgers games....
and i feel like it’s just garrett jones, the seven dwarves, and good pitching
if we can get to their pitchers, i don’t think their bats can compete
McCutchen?
Is he not doing anything significant so far?
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Apr 8, 2010 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions
They put up 11
on opening day.
Do they just look offensive in the box score?
You’ve been watching, thoughts?
i've never thought padilla was that good
and perhaps i’m being too harsh on their bats, because in game two they faced kershaw, and it’s not like we really hit kershaw terribly well either….
still, they didn’t seem very patient to me against kershaw, and i feel like after being rattled for three runs to start off the game, kershaw could have been due for a much worse day that just never happened. granted, pirates stranded a ton of runners, so maybe they just got unlucky?
for some reason, instinctively, i just feel confident that our pitching can handle their bats…..i know…terrible justification…..but i still hope i’m not proven wrong
don't speak too soon.....
watch the pirates storm back with a 10 run 8th inning!!
oh wait….does that only happen against us?
Lopez, Haren, EJ.
We have a day off, so Haren and EJ are still on 5-days rest.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Apr 8, 2010 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Oy, Marketing FAIL
Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin.
by unnamedDBacksfan on Apr 8, 2010 11:10 AM EDT reply actions
well its good to hear they sold out immediately for opening day
did we do that?
insert signature here
but the cost in public relations....
I know how I’d feel if that ever happened here for any team
Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin.
by unnamedDBacksfan on Apr 8, 2010 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions
yeah I think it was a disaster
but I was just trying to be a glass half full guy
insert signature here
good way to look at things
Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin.
by unnamedDBacksfan on Apr 8, 2010 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions
Fun fact
Question: What feat did the Diamondbacks achieve yesterday that they didn’t do at all last season?
(Answer: They had a winning record past the second game of the season.)
"Do we hug?" "I think we're too manly."
Depressing.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Apr 8, 2010 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions

by 





















