Diamondbacks 8, Phillies 6: Reynolds Wraps It Up
Record: 8-10. Pace: 72-90. Change on last season: +1
A nice showing at the plate by the Diamondbacks made up for some sketchy starting pitching, and the bullpen gave us three scoreless innings, as they put together enough runs to win the series from the defending NL Champions and split the home stand. All in all, not a bad way to spend a spring afternoon.
Neither starter was particularly impressive on the mound this afternoon, as evidenced in the fact that both put up an ERA of 9.00 on the day. Rodrigo Lopez's problems started early- well, immediately, I suppose, as he started off the game giving up a single and a home run. After that, however, the Green Lantern did settle down for a while- he allowed one more single in the first, but he only allowed one more base runner until the fifth inning. But in the fifth, he ran into trouble, pretty much of his own making. The Phillies started off the inning with a bunt, but Lopez threw the ball away, and the runner eventually came around to score to put the Phillies up 3-0.
Meanwhile, the Diamondbacks hadn't had too much luck at the plate. They threatened in the second, but couldn't manage anything else, and they looked to be having another quiet day on offense up until then. But then the bottom of the fifth started.
Lopez started it off with a single to make up for his error in the top half of the inning, and then Kelly Johnson launched his seventh home run of the season to cut the lead to one. Stephen Drew hit a towering fly deep to center that got dropped by Jayson "Unabomber" Werth, Justin Upton walked, and then Mark Reynolds launched his seventh home run of the season.
There was some concern around here- Upton's at-bat included him fouling a pitch off his shin, and he was pulled from the game after the inning. Early reports are that he's got a contusion on his shin, and he is day-to-day at the moment. [Thanks to rockkstarr12 for the update.] He was replaced in right field by Cole Gillespie.
The Phillies fought back to regain the lead in the sixth, with Werth hit a sacrifice fly for a run and then a two-run double by Carlos Ruiz giving them a 6-5 lead. That was the end of Lopez's day, and after an attempt to score in the bottom of the sixth failed, he looked to be in line for the loss.
Or was he? After a scoreless inning from Esmerling Vasquez, the Diamondbacks again put the tying run on third, but couldn't close the deal. Leo Rosales gave us a tense eighth inning that was, ultimately, harmless, and we set forth to try again in the eighth inning.
A single to Drew led it off. Cole Gillespie stepped up and smacked a double, only to see Drew gunned down at the plate on a good throw. However, not all was lost, as Mark Reynolds came up next and hit a double deep to right field allowing Gillespie to tie it up. An intentional walk to Adam LaRoche backfired for the Phillies, as Chris Young stepped up to bring in Reynolds and LaRoche.
There we found outselves, two run lead, going into the ninth inning- and Chad Qualls comes in to close. As we all reached for our antacids, Qualls handled it well. Ground ball, strike out, strike out, and the Diamondbacks had won the game and the series. Not without some worry and concern, of course, but a win is a win.
So, a good game from our offense- fifteen hits and six walks, with every starter except Upton with a hit. The bullpen gave us three scoreless innings, and that's just what we needed. Leo Rosales picked up the win for his nerve-wracking eighth, and Chad Qualls got his fourth save on the season. It was noted that Qualls seemed to be keeping his pitches down in the zone better, so maybe we've got room to be optimistic about him.
Brightest Day: Mark Reynolds, +38.9%
Emerald Allies: John Hester, 19.3%, Chris Young 14.3%
Darkest Night: Rodrigo Lopez, -41.6%
Sinestro Corps: Parra -9.9%; Gillespie, -8.3%
Well, despite my misgivings, we did break 1000 on the day, thanks to a, ahem, generous policy on the post-game count. snakecharmer led everyone at 172 comments, with myself, justin1985, and Dallas D'Back Fan also passing triple digits. Also making a stop by were Jim McLennan, luckycc, hotclaws, katers, AJforAZ, emilylovesthedbacks, 4 Corners Fan, Wailord, Wimb, Rockkstarr12, NASCARbernet, downtownbaxfan, DbacksSkins, IHateSouthBend, BattleMoses, SongBird, and Turambar.
So, a good end to a somewhat disappointing home stand, and we're on the road promptly. An eleven game road trip looms, and we'll start that off tomorrow against the Rockies.
84 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Chad Qualls
actually received his fourth save. :)
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
So you do this to everybody huh?
Watching you is the only drug I need.
by Dallas D'Back Fan on Apr 25, 2010 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions
LOL
Well I was going to log in and fix it but I didn’t want to overwrite any edits he was still making.
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Apr 25, 2010 8:35 PM EDT up reply actions
I am not
this much of a pain in the ass in real life, I swear. :)
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Apr 25, 2010 8:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Time will tell I guess...
Watching you is the only drug I need.
by Dallas D'Back Fan on Apr 25, 2010 8:37 PM EDT up reply actions
It is appreciated
I’m always likely to screw up something, and I wanted to add in the note about Upton anyway. Thanks!
"I'm always insistent, Wodehouse. But I'm not to be trusted, am I?"
by kishi on Apr 25, 2010 8:38 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
And I know
we writers would rather our mistakes be fixed than left to fester.
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Apr 25, 2010 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions
We writers?
What else do you write?
Watching you is the only drug I need.
by Dallas D'Back Fan on Apr 25, 2010 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Oh, not much else
I write recaps and stories sometimes and some interviews (I interviewed Sutton last fall – check out the right sidebar). I have fictional story ideas running around my head, but that’s all they do, run around my head and not paper. Mainly, I’m a programmer.
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Apr 25, 2010 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Very true! Taking something
that exists only as an idea and making it real….
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Apr 25, 2010 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Actually, I was being sarcastic
as in “the program will interface with your current database seamlessly”, which is never true.
Key to the game: Score More
Hah....
Well… that’s a good point too.
But MY programs don’t do that. ;)
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Apr 25, 2010 9:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Interview w/ Daron Sutton
Part 1: http://www.azsnakepit.com/2009/10/7/1075440/the-good-the-bad-and-the-hopeful-a
Part 2: http://www.azsnakepit.com/2009/10/9/1076005/the-good-the-bad-and-the-hopeful-a
It came out after the season ended and the season ended on a bad note, so if anyone missed it, there’s your chance to catch it. :)
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Apr 25, 2010 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Hey programmer....
How do I post a picture if it’s not online?
Watching you is the only drug I need.
by Dallas D'Back Fan on Apr 25, 2010 9:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Does Not Compute
Sorry, has to be online. :) Once it’s on flickr or photobucket, you can get their “share this image” HTML snippet and use that.
I don’t think non-editors have Upload To SnakePit Assets powers….?
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Apr 25, 2010 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Bummer
Watching you is the only drug I need.
by Dallas D'Back Fan on Apr 25, 2010 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions
But flickr and photobucket are both free
and pretty easy to use to upload it from your computer.
::is curious now::
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Apr 25, 2010 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Here
Watching you is the only drug I need.
by Dallas D'Back Fan on Apr 25, 2010 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Fail!
Watching you is the only drug I need.
by Dallas D'Back Fan on Apr 25, 2010 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions
That's a cute comic strip
I like it! I don’t “read” it regularly but maybe I should.
I miss Foxtrot. :(
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Apr 25, 2010 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions
Calvin and Hobbes
All time greatest
Watching you is the only drug I need.
by Dallas D'Back Fan on Apr 25, 2010 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions
OK, now I'm curious
how about from Blogger, Google Images, or other sources.
Key to the game: Score More
it doesn't matter as long as it has its own individual html
that it be found. Anything like this
http://www.animalpictures1.com/data/media/59/eel-7.jpg
insert signature here
Sure, probably
Anything where you can grab a http:/www.url.com/some/site/image.jpg can be inputted into the little popup when you click the “image” icon. Even that comic didn’t end in .jpg/gif/png but it was an image so it showed up.
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Apr 25, 2010 9:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Close...
You just need access to the image file directly – like anything ending in jpg – and then you can reference it inside an img tag (which is what the lil’ icon generates for you – it generates html) and then it will appear on the page.
… does that make sense?
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Apr 25, 2010 9:23 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah I understand
just wasn’t sure how to put it. You did so ever more eloquently. :-)
insert signature here
ZOMG! Phillies lost a series!

Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin.
by unnamedDBacksfan on Apr 25, 2010 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions
A word
of warning about images:
Never hotlink an image (that is, not re-host an image and instead use the original .jpg link). It saps someone else’s hard earned bandwidth and isn’t very nice.
If you want to use an image you should re-host it on Photobucket or any of the other image hosting sites.
Life is not a flower.
by soco on Apr 25, 2010 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yes, good point
I was realizing that Snakepit’s bandwidth is probably monstrous, so I shouldn’t have hotlinked the comics! I’ll go back and delete them if I can.
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Apr 25, 2010 11:42 PM EDT up reply actions
I probably
should add that to the Snakepit etiquette piece I’ve been working on.
Life is not a flower.
Good idea
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Apr 25, 2010 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions
And, ten times worse
They can replace the image at any time and really screw you up. I have done this in the past when people have ignored polite requests to stop. It wasn’t pretty. For them.
"We defy augury" -- Hamlet
by Jim McLennan on Apr 26, 2010 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions
Nobody's bad
I should’ve specified that although you can take the image from any site, you shouldn’t.
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Apr 26, 2010 12:44 AM EDT up reply actions
I've used Tinypix and Imageshack successfully
as well as Photobucket and Flickr
Hey, Vasquez,have you ever been mistaken for a man ?
No, have you?
I dunno
if it requires editorial powers or just authors’ powers, but yeah, I don’t think normal posters have access to Snakepit Assets.
I keep trying to reset my password to "penis", but it keeps telling me "too short".
by DbacksSkins on Apr 26, 2010 12:46 AM EDT up reply actions
I've
been an author here long enough that I’ve never thought about it. Plus I try to host everything on a third-party site.
Life is not a flower.
As do I.
Although I’ll occasionally host the FanGraph in the Assets.
I keep trying to reset my password to "penis", but it keeps telling me "too short".
by DbacksSkins on Apr 26, 2010 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions
"We writers"
We, being an inclusive term dependent on the second, writers being people that write stories for Snakepit, the group that she feels inclusive towards.
Life is not a flower.
Hey, you still on here?
Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin.
by unnamedDBacksfan on Apr 25, 2010 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions
can you delete?
Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin.
by unnamedDBacksfan on Apr 25, 2010 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions
No only mods.
I hear voices in my head They council me They understand They talk to me.
by BattleMoses on Apr 25, 2010 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions
Whoops didn't see that you were promoted
sorry Soco.
I hear voices in my head They council me They understand They talk to me.
by BattleMoses on Apr 25, 2010 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Heh, do you want the animation deleted?
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Apr 25, 2010 11:43 PM EDT up reply actions
YES!
THe one below though. Check your email!
Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin.
by unnamedDBacksfan on Apr 25, 2010 11:44 PM EDT up reply actions
I hid it
so it can come back if Jim decrees it. I don’t think it’s that bad, but it takes a lot to shock me.
Life is not a flower.
Good thinking
I was thinking the same thing. It doesn’t look too bad but… :)
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Apr 25, 2010 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions
Wasn't the picture itself
but the address of where it came originally was on the lower corner. THAT is what i was worried about. I should have checked. The site I got it linked from is benign, but where it was first made is NSFW.
Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin.
by unnamedDBacksfan on Apr 25, 2010 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks!
not gonna do that again without checking everything
Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin.
by unnamedDBacksfan on Apr 25, 2010 11:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Content wise
Not an issue, but at 2 Mb, it is probably a bit large. In a recap thread like this, it might not cause any issues, but animated gifs of that size could be troublesome in GDTs.
Don’t forget, you can always just post a link to the content.
"We defy augury" -- Hamlet
by Jim McLennan on Apr 26, 2010 12:44 AM EDT up reply actions
see above please
Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin.
by unnamedDBacksfan on Apr 25, 2010 11:47 PM EDT up reply actions
not sure I like 50% of our runs coming via the longball though
that screams power outage in a crucial series
insert signature here
Yeah, I agree
Mark Grace and Sutton were talking about that during the game.
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Apr 25, 2010 9:13 PM EDT up reply actions
I'd say that I'd much prefer the Dodgers approach
but then again that approach has them last place in the NL West so………………..
:-)
insert signature here
Kishi
You’re welcome for the Upton Update…which reminds me. On the Diamond Talk show after the game, Dave Burns gave another update on Upton’s injury: he has a contusion on his left foot and will be day to day
"AUGIE AUGIE AUGIE...OY OY OY!"
Reynolds wraps it up. Ouch.
Just showed the picture and caption to BigPapaKishi; and after his groan at your “lame pun” said, “The boy’s got talent.” Nice wrapup. I had to go to a meeting and was pleased to see that the DBacks were able to get the win.
If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant's life, she will choose to save the infant's life without even considering if there are men on base. ~Dave Barry
Yay BigPapaKishi!
I keep trying to reset my password to "penis", but it keeps telling me "too short".
by DbacksSkins on Apr 26, 2010 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Well, that was fun
Ok: probably a better win to look back on then experience at the time. The 8th and 9th Phillies innings were insanely tense. Great job by Rosales to get out of the jam in the eighth [though boo to him for getting into it to begin with], and lovely to see a Qualls 1-2-3 ninth, leaving Howard in the on-deck circle rather than bringing him up as the tying run.
But what was up with Bo Porter? Waving Drew around to die at the plate, rather than stopping him at third, and giving us second and third with no outs? I was very upset at that one: it didn’t even take a perfect throw to get Drew: yes, that’s what the Phillies got, but the ball was waiting for him at the plate. Luckily Reynolds and Young picked the team up.
"We defy augury" -- Hamlet
Bo Porter
I was also a bit miffed at him for NOT sending the runner home from third (I think it was LaRoche) earlier in the game with 2 outs and the pitcher coming up next.
I keep trying to reset my password to "penis", but it keeps telling me "too short".
by DbacksSkins on Apr 26, 2010 12:52 AM EDT up reply actions
yeah...i was thinking about those moves too
i’m actually okay with not sending laroche home with two outs on the single. bo porter was probably thinking better to let the bases left loaded with no runs and turn over the order, than to let laroche get gunned down at home and rodrigo leadoff the next inning….at least i think it was reasonable to hold laroche, because the chances of him getting gunned down seemed pretty high to me when i watched
waving drew home was a bit weird. i think bo porter got too excited because it was a double ripped to the corner, and he figured ibanez and his terrible arm would never get it home. to be fair, i think drew could have slid in to home better. however, i agree, probably not the best decision, since the safe thing to do is have runners on 2nd and 3rd with no outs
by blue bulldog on Apr 26, 2010 1:03 AM EDT up reply actions
I didn't think it was a bad play
At the time, I was yelling for Porter to send Drew home. To be fair to Porter (and me!), it was a perfect throw to both the cutoff man and home plate. In retrospect I questioned sending him home (I wasn’t watching the game that closely and didn’t realize there were no outs at the time). So I think the situation probably called for Porter to hold Drew at third, but in a different situation, I think it would be well worth the chance for Drew to make it home.
by Craig from Az on Apr 26, 2010 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Something tells me
That this messed up call influenced the Drew messed-up call.
http://xkcd.com/290/ (caution: profane)
by Dan Strittmatter on Apr 26, 2010 10:41 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Close
Reynolds Raps is the name of one of my fantasy teams.
by underxthebridge on Apr 25, 2010 10:36 PM EDT reply actions
This is how we SHOULD and COULD be playing all the time
which is why I keep hope alive.
Hey, Vasquez,have you ever been mistaken for a man ?
No, have you?
This forthcoming road trip
will make or break the season. They could continue to improve their record, or fall ten games under .500 real fast.
Eels are the carry-on luggage of the SnakePit. . .
by NASCARbernet on Apr 26, 2010 2:58 AM EDT up reply actions
Nothing that happens in April and May
Makes or breaks a season. Could it be hard to come back from? Of course. But make or break is too definitive at this point.
http://xkcd.com/290/ (caution: profane)
by Dan Strittmatter on Apr 26, 2010 10:43 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Just look at
the Rockies’ 2009 season.
I keep trying to reset my password to "penis", but it keeps telling me "too short".
by DbacksSkins on Apr 26, 2010 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions
+1
In a big way.
http://xkcd.com/290/ (caution: profane)
by Dan Strittmatter on Apr 26, 2010 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions
It's rather unfair
That Gillespie gets a -8.3% when he whacked a double that could have scored a run if Drew was faster or could have put us in an awesome position if Bo Porter was smarter.
http://xkcd.com/290/ (caution: profane)
by Dan Strittmatter on Apr 26, 2010 12:12 PM EDT reply actions
Probably
But that was only -2.1%. The majority of Gillespie’s penalty is from his first at-bat in the sixth, when he came up with a runner on second and one out, and grounded out without advancing the runner. Sure, we won, but at the time that could have been a pretty major mistake.
"I'm always insistent, Wodehouse. But I'm not to be trusted, am I?"

by 





















