Diamondbacks 2, Brewers 9: Los Dbacks or Lost Dbacks?
Record: 62-81. Pace: 70-92. Change on last season: -9.
The ongoing series of open tryouts for the fourth and fifth spot in the Diamondbacks' rotation continued today, as we saw prospective candidates Kevin Mulvey, Bryan Augestein and Daniel Cabrera. However, going by the overall results tonight, one wonders whether their best bet for 2010 might be a new reality show on Fox Sports Arizona, entitled America's Got Pitching Talent. Eric Byrnes could host it, from shopping malls all across the United States: a man, a radar-gun and a contract.
Hey, it worked in India. More PitchingFAIL can be found after the jump. I blame Wailord:
Anyone
excited to see how Mulvey will do in his debut today? I’m feeling a perfect game with 22K’s.
However, the three runs allowed by Bryan Augenstein next inning kinda destroyed any illusion of competency there. Indeed, the only one to come out with any credibility was Daniel Cabrera - yes, he of the infamous "0 IP, 5 ER" debut for the Diamondbacks. This time, he was better, albeit in mop-up work, with three scoreless innings, on two hits and a wild-pitch - reducing his ERA with us from infinity to just 15.00. With the game not televised here in Arizona (frankly, this probably prevented a number of calls to 911, from fans who had jabbed red-hot objects into their eyes), hard to say if he was doing anything different, or the Brewers' hitters were just tired from running the bases.
Similarly, hard to say much about Mulvey's starting debut: according to ol Pete in the comments, "A lot of soft stuff - loved the 2 seamer that broke in on RHers. Could be a bottom of the rotation guy with a bit more control and just a better night." The box-score, however, is not one Mrs. Mulvey will cut out, place in an attractive frame, and hang over the fire-place. Before this weekend, Arizona starters had allowed 11+ hits over four or less innings, three times in franchise history [Omar Daal in 1998, Robert Ellis in 2001 and Livan Hernandez in 2007]. But it's now happened twice in a row; Milwaukee went 11-for-23 off Mulvey, with six earned runs in four IP tonight.
The offense didn't make any real effort to dig the team out of the hole in which Mulvey and Augenstein had placed them. The Diamondbacks came within one out of going another game hitless with runners in scoring position, before Chris Young singled home Luke Carlin in the bottom of the ninth. That was one of two hits for Young, who could quite conceivably be the best player in the National League over the past week, having gone 8-for-21 with five home-runs. It also gets his season average up to .202 - it's been any higher after only six games since April.
Stephen Drew and Miguel Montero also had a pair of hits each, the former finally getting Arizona on the scoreboard in the sixth inning. He got his tenth triple of the year, and is the only player in the majors to reach double-figures there in both of the past two years [Carl Crawford and Curtis Granderson need three more triples to join Drew]. Montero's two hits raised his 2009 average to .306, which is the best on the Diamondbacks - something I think I can safely say no-one saw coming. He's the sole catcher in the NL with 400+ PAs who's hitting above .300. Slim comfort on a day like today, yet you take it where you can.

[Click to enlarge, in new window]
Master of his domain: Chris Young, +2.7%
God-emperor of suck: Kevin Mulvey, -31.1%
That graph looks distressingly similar to last night's, with the flat-line in bold for added emphasis. It's perhaps the closest I've seen to no Diamondback being in positive territory - the only other one save Young was Cabrera, at a monstrous +0.2%. However, oddly - or perhaps not - this did not stop a lively and varied Gameday Thread, where the game was more one of the side features, again, not helped by its unavailability to anyone in Arizona.
Post-game chatter took us over 600, though I am tempted to discount all comments referring to college football ['charmer, can you automate that in some way?]. 'Skins went into three figures, but six other people cracked forty, led by soco's 89. Also taking part: Azreous, ol Pete, ZonaBacks10, hotclaws, paqs, kishi, emilylovesthedbacks, Fiona, snakecharmer, AcucracK, NASCARbernet, piratedan7, katers, Counsellmember, eel, Wailord, GuruB and venomfan.
Finally, a random aside. While looking up a link, I found this paragraph from the New York Times of October 1905: "Ostensibly because the grounds were wet, but in reality because the gate receipts did not look large enough to the contending baseball players, the third contest of the world's championship series between the Giants and the Athletics, which was to have been decided in Philadelphia to-day, was postponed until to-morrow." Wow. And we accuse moden players of being mercenary...
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Shucks
I consistently find new ways to get slapped with losses.
Warning: the above represents the thoughts and opinions of a 15-year-old.
Don't worry
you’ll find your stride.
Unless your stride is being blamed for losses, then congrats!
You know how you get to Carnegie Hall, doncha? Practice.
This would have to be
the third or fourth time. Lemme Google it…
Warning: the above represents the thoughts and opinions of a 15-year-old.
For those who want to know...
Just found out on twitter that Tucson Toros is now 2009 GBL South Division Champions.
we're like a borg ship; resistance is futile-- soco via twitter.
Well, yeah.
They won the division when they beat up on St. George.
Posting 65 comments/day since June '07.
by DbacksSkins on Sep 13, 2009 12:02 AM EDT up reply actions
Technically,
they were the 2nd half champions, and St. George were the 1st half champions.
Posting 65 comments/day since June '07.
by DbacksSkins on Sep 13, 2009 12:05 AM EDT up reply actions
JK i looked it up..
They lost… More astonishing, they lost in football scoring fashion..
18-10. Good season fellas.
by ZonaBacks10 on Sep 13, 2009 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions
The Rockies just came back against Heath Bell AGAIN
to tie the game at 2-2 in the 9th.
(Dodgers won, so COL needs to keep pace.)
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
LOL.
Dodgers fans must want to kill Bell..
That is amusing.
by ZonaBacks10 on Sep 13, 2009 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions
Especially
when we all know they should be turning their considerable wrath against one Manny. . .
by NASCARbernet on Sep 13, 2009 1:14 AM EDT up reply actions
However, Padres pulled it out in the tenth.
But it’s just like 2007, when the San Diego closer – at that point. Hoffman – couldn’t close out a game down the stretch, and allowed Colorado into the post-season…
"Win, or die" -- Marquise de Merteuil
by Jim McLennan on Sep 13, 2009 2:43 AM EDT up reply actions
If you were in the GDT
As promised, we just watched Lexx – Eating Pattern, with Rutger Hauer. Every bit as weird as we remember it…
"Win, or die" -- Marquise de Merteuil
Hey...
…make some room.
We’re coming down for a visit.
162 games is more than enough , let’s not get carried away.
/gets carried away
Ya know...ignorance really IS bliss.
Well - I do , anyway.
by victor frankenstein on Sep 13, 2009 3:07 AM EDT reply actions
Oh
to whoever (I think emily) it was that asked for an iTunes replacement and got me thinking about my old coding, thanks- I revisited Cocoa and I have a much better grasp on it. I whipped this up in about 30 minutes. Woohoo!

Sure, it’s useless, but it was still fun to make… the diff. in the PythWL is that I round down for simplicity’s sake.
Warning: the above represents the thoughts and opinions of a 15-year-old.
Do we actually get
a televised game today?
by emilylovesthedbacks on Sep 13, 2009 2:53 PM EDT reply actions
I believe so
They rarely skip a Sunday. Mind you, after the past couple of days, I wouldn’t blame them if Fox Sports Arizona decide to show college beer pong instead.
"Win, or die" -- Marquise de Merteuil
by Jim McLennan on Sep 13, 2009 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions
I'd rather see beer pong
"Win, or die" -- Marquise de Merteuil
by Jim McLennan on Sep 13, 2009 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions
You would have liked the party
I was at, near ASU last night then. It was a hoot. I came in 3rd
"If there's nothing wrong with me, maybe there's something wrong with the universe!"
by unnamedDBacksfan on Sep 13, 2009 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions
WTF is Beer pong , anyway?
Ya know...ignorance really IS bliss.
Well - I do , anyway.
by victor frankenstein on Sep 13, 2009 9:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Victor, victor, victor.....
Beer Pong Rules
Welcome to our Beer Pong Rules page! Beer Pong is so popular that it has managed to evolve and change from house party to house party. Every beer pong game uses a basic rule set but it is very flexible and allows for some variety. This is one of the things that makes it such a fun game :)
In order to play a standard 2 on 2 game of beer pong you need 22 16 oz solo cups, 2-4 ping pong balls, beer, friends and a flat playing surface. 20 of the cups are used for beer and the other 2 are to be used as “water cups” for you to dunk the ball in after each shot.
To setup, each team takes a side of the table and arranges their 10 cups in a triangle formation then fills the cups 1/4 filled with beer. This usually ends up being about 2 beer per team per game. Now both teams take turns throwing a ping pong ball into their opponent’s cups. When a cup is sunk it must be taken off the table and drank. The first team to take out all of their opponents cups are the winners!
more rules and extra tidbits here…..
http://www.beer-pong-game.com/beerpongrules.htm
"If there's nothing wrong with me, maybe there's something wrong with the universe!"
by unnamedDBacksfan on Sep 13, 2009 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions

by 















