Diamondbacks 1, Albert Pujols 6 - 'Nuff said
Record: 38-52. Pace: 68-94. Change on last season: -7.
I waited five days for this? Weak offense. Failure to make the most of opportunities. Brain farts. Decent outing by the starter, followed by ineffective work from the bullpen. In other words - pretty much the same, disappointing Arizona Diamondbacks' performance with which we became all too familiar in the first half.
One at-bat in the sixth sums it up nicely. Mark Reynolds had singled, putting our lead-off man on base for the fourth time already this evening. However, while Miguel Montero was at the plate, Reynolds was found dawdling too far off first-base, and a snap throw down by [insert first name here] Molina saw Special K picked off. Montero then went around on a full-count - the ball got past Molina, but Montero thought he'd walked and began meandering down to first. By the time he realized it was actually a dropped third strike, Molina had plenty of time to recover the ball and throw the ball up the line to beat our catcher there.
Details after the jump.
Albert Pujols. Wow. Dan Patrick's phrase, "You can't stop [blank], you can only hope to contain him," has become a massive cliché through overuse. However, when it comes to Pujols, it's really the only applicable phrase. Two more home-runs gave him 34 for the season already, putting him on pace for sixty. That'd be a number not seen legitimately i.e. not by Bonds*, McGwire or Sosa since the days of Roger Maris. It is somewhat curious. While a great pure hitter - his lowest BA for a season is .314 - Pujols' homer totals for the past couple of seasons are 'only' 32 and 37. So the former is already eclipsed with seventy games left, and the latter will be matched by about next weekend, at the current pace.
Still, it goes to show what a truly great hitter will do in a line-up. He changes the dynamics of the game in a way only Bonds* did at the height of his power [Pujols is projected for 58 intentional walks, more than anyone ever save Bonds* from 2002-04]. He drove in and scored the first two Cardinals' runs, long balls off Jon Garland which led off the fourth and sixth inning respectively, and was intentionally walked with two men on in the seventh, giving the batter behind him the chance to cash in with a two-run single that basically ended the game from Arizona's point of view.
Jon Garland was otherwise fine - those two blasts to Albert were the only damage allowed. He scattered seven hits and a walk over six innings, so that was another quality start, reducing his season ERA to 4.45. However, his cause was not helped by the bullpen allowing four runs in two frames: Scott Schoeneweis loaded the bases in the seventh before being replaced by Esmerling Vazquez who then allowed the two-run single mentioned above. Clay Zavada then gave up a two-run homer in the eighth to "Nick Stavinoha". I use quotes because I suspect that it was probably Pujols in disguise. Oh, that Tony La Russa...
Arizona had some chances - as noted, we had little difficulty getting the leadoff man on. The best chance was probably when the game was still scoreless in the third. Garland and Felipe Lopez singled to lead things off, but Stephen Drew couldn't get the bunt down [I don't know why he is asked to do that so often, because he seems to have major problems handling the bat effectively]. Justin Upton struck out - he was 0-for-4 with three strikeouts, and Mark Reynolds grounded out, ending the third.
We didn't have an at-bat with runners in scoring position thereafter. Lopez did have two hits and a walk on the night, while Reynolds and Montero each had a pair of hits. The last-named finally broke up the shutout with one out in the ninth, going deep the opposite way, for his sixth of the year. That was more of a sympathy run than anything else, and was the last spasm of the Diamondbacks' corpse before the rigor of defeat set in [sorry, Mrs. SnakePit has been watching a lot of CSI, and it has rubbed off]. That nice winning streak we put together before the All-Star break seems a very long time ago now.

[Click to enlarge at fangraphs.com]
Master of his domain: Felipe Lopez, +11.7%
God-emperor of suck: Stephen Drew, -14.0%
Dishonorable mentions: Parra, -13.4%; Upton, -11.4%
Seems like everyone was still on the All-Star break: 89 comments, the first time we've failed to reach at least three figures in a very long time. What are we, the Marlins? :-( Maybe we should pretend the game never happened, and petition Bud Selig for a do-over. unnamedDBacksfan led the way, so credit there. Contributions were also to be found from 4 Corners Fan, TwinnerA, hotclaws, katers, Muu, kishi, emilylovesthedbacks and jazzbo13. Here's to better things tomorrow.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
What is this?
What is this?
Bad Diamondbacks! No treat for you!
I was so lucky getting mono. That was like the best diet ever.
Byrnes for Lugo trade talk reigniting?
ST. LOUIS – There was speculation in the off-season about the Diamondbacks and Red Sox exchanging the bad contracts of outfielder Eric Byrnes and infielder Julio Lugo.
Lugo was designated for assignment Friday, giving the Red Sox 10 days to trade or release him.
A team source indicated that the Diamondbacks could revisit the idea of a Byrnes-Lugo deal.
Lugo, signed through 2010, still is owed about $13 million.
Byrnes, on the disabled list because of a broken hand, is owed about $15 million in 2010, the final year of a three-year, $30 million contract.
http://www.azcentral.com/sports/diamondbacks/articles/2009/07/17/20090717dbtrade-CR.html
oy vey
Have we sent the "Don't shoot, we're pathetic" transmission yet?
by unnamedDBacksfan on Jul 18, 2009 2:37 AM EDT reply actions
Well... +1
I FULLY support this. Lugo’s at least hitting .270ish, and while having no power to speak of, would be moving to the easier league, and makes $2M less. There’s no way the Sox would really want Byrnes though… Really Epstein? C’mon… The roster spot could be used for something more practical.
Someone pay Eric Byrnes $500,000 to be extreme and base jump into the Grand Canyon. Then screw with his equipment. Please.
by Dan Strittmatter on Jul 18, 2009 4:49 AM EDT up reply actions
By the way I am sure others have talked about this but is there any way of taking control of the pen away from this manager. That pick in the 7th was well past insane and he does not even know why. Maybe in a few years but how many games get lost along the way.
All he needs to do
Is learn the definition of a LOOGY. And he’ll be fine. I have no real problems putting in the craptastic two (Gutierrez, Vasquez) in a game we’re losing in with no signs of recovery.
Someone pay Eric Byrnes $500,000 to be extreme and base jump into the Grand Canyon. Then screw with his equipment. Please.
by Dan Strittmatter on Jul 18, 2009 4:50 AM EDT up reply actions
One oversight
Arizona’s offense was limited further by the pitching of Chris Carpenter, one of the best in the game when healthy (yet who goes unmentioned in this blog post).
He wasn't actually that good
He was majorly helped by Arizona’s failings i.e. Drew’s inability to put down a sacrifice bunt, Reynolds falling asleep at first. When you allow the leadoff man aboard more often than not, you don’t post a shutout very often. Oh, Carpenter has been good this year – though as noted in the Gameday Thread, seems to have been helped by BABIP – but I wasn’t impressed by him last night. He didn’t beat Arizona, as much as Arizona beat Arizona.
"Win, or die" -- Marquise de Merteuil
by Jim McLennan on Jul 18, 2009 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions
^^^^whoopsie
another unhappy foreign fan
Have we sent the "Don't shoot, we're pathetic" transmission yet?
by unnamedDBacksfan on Jul 18, 2009 10:15 AM EDT reply actions
Live in Arizona. Do not buy the idea it did not matter. Down 2 runs with 3 innings and an absolutely rested pen via the break it was simply crazy no matter where you live. meanwhile
if dan loses today and they sweep us with no Max HOW FUNNY WILL YOU FIND IT. REALITY WAKEUP CALL.
Rather see Petit pitching in St. Louis than Colorado
"Win, or die" -- Marquise de Merteuil
by Jim McLennan on Jul 18, 2009 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions
Petit has pitched 3 times against Colorado. 2 were good and the bad one he won in Colorado. Very interesting input at this site.
Er...
One of those appearances was facing three batters in blowout relief, the eighth inning when we were 12-4 up. The other was back in 2007. A total of six inning in those “good outings”.
Petit gives up home-runs at a higher rate than any pitcher in the history of baseball. For obvious reasons, Coors is the last place you’d want him to pitch.
"Win, or die" -- Marquise de Merteuil
by Jim McLennan on Jul 18, 2009 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions
Please do.
A total of six inning in those "good outings".
Sept 30, 2007: 5 IP, 0 R
Sept 21, 2008: 1 IP, 0 R
I think your idea of ‘good’ is either radically different, or you are including outings not at Coors.
"Win, or die" -- Marquise de Merteuil
by Jim McLennan on Jul 18, 2009 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions
09/30/2007@ Colorado 5 innings 0 earned runs
04/21/2009 5 innings at home 2 earned runs
totaling 10 innings and 2 runs
Sportsbettingstats database
still interested in info on the game
And the relevance of a Chase start
To whether he should pitch in Coors or Busch would be…?
Gameday Thread now up for you.
"Win, or die" -- Marquise de Merteuil
by Jim McLennan on Jul 18, 2009 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Just saw your error, clearly my inital remark showed the 10 innings were not in Colorado but did show some ability against the team. accept your apology
I'm sorry for your confusion :-)
“Rather see Petit pitching in St. Louis than Colorado.” was my original remark. The numbers you quoted included outings in neither location.
"Win, or die" -- Marquise de Merteuil
by Jim McLennan on Jul 18, 2009 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions
SERIOUSLY DO NOT SEE YOUR POINT. IT IS RELEVANT TO KNOW HE HAS PITCHED WELL AGAINST MEMBERS OF THE COLORADO TEAMS REGARDLESS OF WHERE. SIMPLE FACT.
LOL
Have we sent the "Don't shoot, we're pathetic" transmission yet?
by unnamedDBacksfan on Jul 18, 2009 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions
1) In how many innings? Even ten innings is a tiny sample size.
2) In which ballparks? That is a VERY significant factor
3) Against who, exactly? If he struck out Matt Holliday five times, it wouldn’t help his chances against the current Rockies team.
4) When? His most recent outing against them was awful. Surely that means more than an outing multiple seasons ago?
"Win, or die" -- Marquise de Merteuil
by Jim McLennan on Jul 18, 2009 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Pitching is a mental sport. What a pitcher takes from the past is the confidence he earned by pitching well against a team in the past or the reverse. a feeling that that team just has his number. petit will not feel beaten from the start against either team. as to the sample size——i really wonder what an impartial study would show as to the required sample size needed to add predictability to ones capping. i understand the terms used are vague. not sure anyone has done the work but your saying the sample size here is too small is far from a conclusive statement.. This is not a court of law. its an attempt to gain an advantage in guessing.
I see where you're coming from
But 10 innings is barely a game’s worth. Would you project, with any confidence, the performance of the Diamondbacks tomorrow, based entirely on their performance today? That’s really what you’re trying to do with Petit – and half your sample size comes, not from today, but almost two yesrs ago.
"Win, or die" -- Marquise de Merteuil
by Jim McLennan on Jul 18, 2009 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions

by 





















