Diamondbacks 1, Rangers 2: They're No Rangers to Love
Record: 30-42. Pace: 68-94. Change on last season: -9. Change on 2004: +3.
Dan Haren took the mound for the Diamondbacks tonight against the Rangers, looking to get the D-backs their third winning streak of the month. Yes, the previous streaks were just two games apiece; it sounds much better this way. Despite Haren's miniscule ERA and WHIP, he found himself stuck with a 6-4 record going into tonight's matchup, which if nothing else is a testament to how worthless wins and losses are as a measure of a pitcher's value. Consider this very recent example:
Pitcher A: 9-0, 2.56 ERA, 0.99 WHIP, 17 BB, 49 K
Pitcher B: 3-4, 2.57 ERA, 0.92 WHIP, 9 BB, 63 K
Those are the numbers through the first nine starts of the season. Brandon Webb (A, 2008) certainly pitched very well to start the year and was deserving of his wins (and yes, Webb's inclination to pitch to contact means Haren's K/BB ratio will be better), but Haren (B, 2009) had no business being stuck with a losing record to that point. Or any point.
"But Chris!" you say. "This was Haren's 15th start of the season! Why bring this up now!" I'm glad you asked, Slappy. One, I forgot about a more in-depth analysis a month ago when this was more timely, and two, it's kinda like a microcosm for tonight's results, where Dan Haren was once again stuck with a loss he didn't deserve. When your pitcher runs out another ho-hum 7 IP, 4 H, 2 ER, 1 BB, 8 K line and gets pushed back to just one game over .500, there's a problem.
Let's work our way there, shall we? Haren was dealing in the first, setting down the side in order, but he ran into a bit of trouble in the second. Uncharacteristically, he plunked Marlon Byrd with a pitch and then walked Hank Blalock, putting the first two men aboard with nobody out. Even Danny boy couldn't wiggle his way out of that one, as a Taylor Teagarden double plated the first run of the game. Still, he got out of a second-and-third-with-one-out jam and limited the damage to just that one run.
Meanwhile, the Arizona offense was up to its usual anemic tricks. Felipe Lopez started the first with a single, but Stephen Drew flied out and Justin Upton grounded into a double play. In the second, Mark Reynolds reached on an error, and Gerardo Parra promptly grounded into a double play. Haren tried to help his cause with a double to right in the third, but after a Lopez walk, Drew couldn't extend the inning. Upton led off the fourth with a hit, but three groundouts put any thoughts of a run to rest.
Haren still didn't seem quite settled in when the top of the third came around. Ian Kinsler started things off with a little flare into center field, stole second, and scored on a David Murphy base hit to make it 2-0. Byrd reached with one out to put runners at the corners, but again Haren got out of the inning without putting a crooked number on the scoreboard. From that point on, he was completely locked in, facing only one hitter above the minimum for the next four innings (and that was on a Reynolds error).
Arizona did manage to get a run back in the fifth thanks to some old-school NL ball. Miguel Montero reached on a knock to start the inning, and Haren bunted him over on a 1-2 count to get him in scoring position (it could be argued that he should be swinging, given the ineptitude of this lineup, but that's another topic for another day). Lopez capitalized by slapping a ball into center field to score Montero to cut the lead in half. But Haren had already thrown 95 pitches through five, so time was of the essence.
In the sixth, Haren retired the side quickly on just 10 pitches, keeping his pitch count somewhat respectable. Parra did his best in the bottom half to get Haren off the hook for the decision, smacking a triple with one out. But who was due up for the Diamondbacks? Why, the twin-headed infinite swirling vortex of grotesque suckitude known as Tony Clark and Eric Byrnes, of course! Clark struck out for something like the 48th time in 49 at-bats this season (okay, the percentage isn't THAT high), and Byrnes hit a little 36-hop dribbler to second and the threat was over. One could imagine Haren in the dugout sharpening the edges of one of his bats out of frustration.
Sitting at 105 pitches, Danny lumbered back out for the seventh inning and went through the 8-9-1 spots almost as efficiently as the inning before. Parra made a nice play on a sharply hit ball by Kinsler to end it. Augie Ojeda pinch hit for Haren in the bottom half, but the offense could do absolutely nothing, so once again Haren was in line for a no-decision at best and a loss at worst.
Unfortunately, there's not a lot of good stuff to talk about from that point on. Jon Rauch and Chad Qualls were good out of the pen to keep it a one-run game -- Rauch worked around a leadoff walk with a double play and a strikeout, and Qualls had his good hard fastball working, inducing three groundouts in the ninth. You'd think asking the offense to get two measly runs would be reasonable, but such was not the case. Drew doubled to lead off the eighth, yet the middle of the order could do nothing to bring him home. And with the game on the line in the ninth, who'd we have due up? The indomitable law firm of Clark, Byrnes and Young! No bonus points for guessing the level of ineptitude displayed by THAT trio in a clutch situation.
Master of his Lousy Domain: Dan Haren, +13.4%
Honorable Mention: Felipe Lopez, +12.9%
God-Emperor of Suck: Eric Byrnes, -21.7%
Dishonorable Mention: Tony Clark, -19.2%; Justin Upton, -15.6%; Mark Reynolds, -14.4%
Can we please get Tony Clark the hell out of the starting lineup, if not the roster completely? I don't doubt he's a nice guy, but at this point I'm kinda rooting for someone to push him down the dugout stairs so he's mildly injured for another 15 days. There is no reason a team with the second-worst record in baseball should be playing an aging veteran ahead of a youngster (well, relatively) who was showing signs of coming around in his second stint with the big league club. At least with Byrnes we were somewhat convinced he could play baseball sometime in the past two years.
Who showed up for the Diamondbacks today? Well, the pitchers certainly did. Lopez reached base three times, and Parra had an RBI. But that's it. Nobody else reached base more than once. Of course, our arms shut down the Rangers lineup; only David Murphy reached base twice (H/BB), because the team had a total of four hits and two walks. And still we lost this game. Credit goes to Vicente Padilla, who managed to win a start without run support for once by matching Haren pitch for pitch (7 IP, 6 H, 1 ER, 2 BB, 3 K).
A much quieter GameDay Thread today, although who could be blamed for staying away from this train wreck? Skins led with 77 posts, and there were just over 200 total. Present: snakecharmer, kishi, DbacksSkins, hotclaws, pygalgia, 4 Corners Fan, emilylovesthedbacks, Fiona, venomfan, unnamedDBacksfan, Azreous, soco and jonny-yuma.
Still a chance to win the series tomorrow, but it's Jon Garland at home, which is kinda like having your lineup card look like this: 1) Byrnes, 2) Clark, 3) Byrnes, 4) Clark, 5) Byrnes, 6) Clark, 7) Byrnes, 8) Clark, 9) Stephen Hawking.
Needless to say, I'm excited about our chances.
0 recs |
30 comments
|
Comments
Hawking
great at bats from what i hear… gotta be better than the other two in the line up
"Without change something sleeps inside us and seldom awakens. The sleeper must awaken."
by unnamedDBacksfan on Jun 25, 2009 3:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice job, Chris.
This entire recap had me in stitches, especially that “lineup card” at the end.
The Arizona Diamondbacks: Invincible in 18 innings since '01
by DbacksSkins on Jun 25, 2009 6:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
By the way,
I really liked the move Ron Washington made in bringing in his closer in the 8th inning to face Drew, Upton, Reynolds and Parra. Excellent call there. Candiotti was remarking about how here’s a manager who’s “trying to win games, rather than get someone a save”.
The Arizona Diamondbacks: Invincible in 18 innings since '01
by DbacksSkins on Jun 25, 2009 7:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
why
isn’t hawking batting clean-up?
"Score some damn runs, or the baby pandas die"
by sergey606 on Jun 25, 2009 11:57 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not enough power.
Good OBP, but only because he has such a small strike zone. He should probably be leading off.
by Azreous on Jun 25, 2009 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great recap, Chris.
Parra did his best in the bottom half to get Haren off the hook for the decision, smacking a triple with one out. But who was due up for the Diamondbacks? Why, the twin-headed infinite swirling vortex of grotesque suckitude known as Tony Clark and Eric Byrnes, of course!
That sums up my thoughts on this season. ::sigh::
by emilylovesthedbacks on Jun 25, 2009 12:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I swear
everyone here is obsessed about them.
Funny, Brown doesn't offer a degree in slut!
by soco on Jun 25, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Only for the short term.
A few days ago, it was the bullpen. (Well, okay, it’s been the bullpen for most of the season) Before that, it was Chris Young. Before that, it was Justin Upton needs to go to AAA, etc.
You know how we roll, soco.
The Arizona Diamondbacks: Invincible in 18 innings since '01
by DbacksSkins on Jun 25, 2009 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know
you’re big on spreading fault around equally, but some folks just don’t operate that way.
Me, I like kicking people when they’re down. And they’ve been waaaaay down this year. Sure, the rest of the order (save Lopez) was also deserving of blame for last night’s result, and maybe Haren could take a little heat for not pitching another shutout. But Byrnes will continue to be a Lightning Rod of Hate as long as he has the big contract and TV show, fair or not.
by Azreous on Jun 25, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're
tacky and I hate you.
Funny, Brown doesn't offer a degree in slut!
by soco on Jun 25, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That hurts every millimeter of my heart.
by Azreous on Jun 25, 2009 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cubic millimeter?
Or just the surface?
The Arizona Diamondbacks: Invincible in 18 innings since '01
by DbacksSkins on Jun 25, 2009 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
in all fairness to Byrnes
his TV show has lasted longer than Chevy Chase’s.
"Have a take and do not suck or you will get run." - Jim Rome
by jonny-yuma on Jun 25, 2009 3:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What
happened to Chevy Chase, anyways? That guy needs a career revitalization like Bill Murray, STAT.
Funny, Brown doesn't offer a degree in slut!
by soco on Jun 25, 2009 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Farrah Fawcett
passed on today… :-(
totally unrelated to your post, but Hollywood related
"Without change something sleeps inside us and seldom awakens. The sleeper must awaken."
by unnamedDBacksfan on Jun 25, 2009 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Indeed. :-(
In her honor I will watch Cannonball Run this weekend, as it’s the only Farrah Fawcett movie I own.
For a second I thought she might have been in Chinatown, but unfortunately, that was Faye Dunaway.
The Arizona Diamondbacks: Invincible in 18 innings since '01
by DbacksSkins on Jun 25, 2009 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
She was in
the sci-fi movie, “Logan’s Run” as Holly, the ditzy nurse at the New You shop.
This was the first sci-fi movie I ever saw and fell in love with the genre.
"Without change something sleeps inside us and seldom awakens. The sleeper must awaken."
by unnamedDBacksfan on Jun 25, 2009 6:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I know,
but I don’t have Logan’s Run. Plus, I’d rather watch Cannonball Run and not fall asleep.
The Arizona Diamondbacks: Invincible in 18 innings since '01
by DbacksSkins on Jun 25, 2009 11:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And apparently
so did Michael Jackson.
Which is just bizarre to me.
by Azreous on Jun 25, 2009 6:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just heard that too.
wow
"Without change something sleeps inside us and seldom awakens. The sleeper must awaken."
by unnamedDBacksfan on Jun 25, 2009 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oddly enough,
I read somebody make a comment online, went something like, “Wow, Ed McMahon yesterday, Farrah Fawcett today, I wonder who’ll be the 3rd shoe to drop?”
The Arizona Diamondbacks: Invincible in 18 innings since '01
by DbacksSkins on Jun 25, 2009 11:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he let his ego
get in the way of a possible career revitalization via Fletch Won (aka Fletch 3) with Kevin Smith involved. That was probably as close to a shot as he was going to get as nowdays it seems, any role he’s offered, he counters with “I’ll do it.”
"Have a take and do not suck or you will get run." - Jim Rome
by jonny-yuma on Jun 25, 2009 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chris,
quick question.
Did you just rickroll the entire snakepit?
If so, I bow to you. Awesome.
by emilylovesthedbacks on Jun 25, 2009 9:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nonononono
rickrolling is definitely not awesome.
Funny, Brown doesn't offer a degree in slut!
by soco on Jun 25, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't mean
the rickrolling itself was awesome.
Just the very subtle way he did it. Case in point—can you find it?
by emilylovesthedbacks on Jun 25, 2009 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No no.
No no no.
That died when Rick himself did it at the Macy’s parade. Got millions of people.
Mine was a coincidence. Yep.
by Azreous on Jun 25, 2009 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That was pretty impressive
The effort to do it to all of Shea Stadium was also pretty good.
"Scott, if your life had a face, I would punch it. I would punch your life in the face."
by kishi on Jun 25, 2009 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's
not a rickroll.
A rickroll is when you tell someone on the Internet, “hey check out this ”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yu_moia-oVI">linke" where the anticipation is that the link provided is relevant to the discussion at hands. As a clever twist, though, the link is not relevant to the discussion at hand but instead the music video for “Never Going To Give You Up.”
Merely playing “Never Going To Give You Up” is not a rickroll.
Funny, Brown doesn't offer a degree in slut!
by soco on Jun 27, 2009 12:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















