Kelly Johnson to Arizona
With a thousand apologies to Rockstarr, a friend of mine who says he "know[s] some people around the Valley" has told me that the Kelly Johnson to Arizona deal is completed, a one-year $2M deal, with the D-Backs having arbitration control of Johnson for 2011 as well. An official announcement to come soon. Not sure if I should technically be putting this out there since it has yet to be announced, but all indications from him are that this is done, and since we're not the organization (last time I checked), I decided to go for it. :-) There's certainly some lineup and position shuffling to be done now, but most projection systems show Johnson at $2M to be a bargain.
[Update by Jim] The signing is now largely confirmed by Steve Gilbert and Nick Piecoro. Gilbert says "There are still some final details to be worked out, and a physical to be taken", with the deal for one year at a little more than $2 million. Piecoro also agrees that "If the deal goes through, the Diamondbacks would control his rights as an arbitration-eligible player for 2011 as well," effectively giving the team an option for that season as well. More analysis and thoughts on the new arrival after the jump.
[Updated update] The deal has been closed, with a one-year, $2.35m contract for Johnson.
Johnson was a supplemental first-round draft pick in 2000 by Atlanta, going overall at #38. In parts of four seasons with the Braves, he has a line of .264/.346/.430, for an overall OPS+ of 103. However, 2009 was a greatly disappointing year for Johnson: his line dropped to .224/.303/.389, though this was somewhat propelled by a BABIP of .247, compared to a career figure of .313. Still, it was enough, combined with the rise of Martin Prado, to cause the Braves to non-tender an offer to the 27-year old. This allowed him to enter the free-agent marketplace, and Arizona rapidly tendered their offer.
There's a good article on what caused Johnson to struggle in 2009. Brief summary:
What is really interesting is that while KJ cut down his swing to make more contact, he also wayyyyyy expanded his strike zone -- swinging at far more pitches outside the zone. So what happens if you cut down your swing to be sure you make contact, and then start swinging at pitchers' pitches? Well, you're going to roll over a lot of grounders to the shortstop and second baseman. KJ doesn't have the speed to slap the ball around. He's going to run a lousy BABIP when he's arm-swinging at pitchers' pitches.
The writer concludes, "KJ looks like a pretty serious reclamation project to me... The ideal diagnosis would be, KJ (1) opened up his strike zone, swinging at sucker pitches, and THEN (2) cut down his swing in self-defense, following the lousy results. If so, then simply getting him to cut down the strike zone, could naturally restore his aggressiveness." Will Arizona be able to do that? I guess we'll see in the coming season.
The signing would create a log-jam on the roster with regard to the infield, with Johnson now joing Tony Abreu, Ryan Roberts, Augie Ojeda and Rusty Ryal as players who could conceivably play second-base. It certainly yanks the carpet out from under Roberts, who performed very well at the position after the trade of Felipe Lopez last season. He may shift into more of a utility role, though it's hard to see how there could be enough at-bats for both him and Abreu, even if Roberts gets some time in the outfield.
The odd man out, however, appears to be the recently-signed Augie Ojeda. Though Gilbert holds out some hope for Rockkstarr12, saying, "The D-backs could also elect to keep Ojeda initially and give Abreu more seasoning at the Triple-A level." However, it seems more likely that, if the right offer comes along - and there has already apparently been interest in Ojeda, with Texas making inquiries during the winter meetings - that the Littlest Ballplayer's time in Arizona is coming towards its end.
Taking a look at the various projections to date, we have the ever-optimistic Bill James at .274/.354/.445 (.799 OPS_ and Chone coming in at .262 /.338/.428 (.766 OPS), wuth the fan projection over at fangraphs.com came in at .270/.344/.421 (also a .766 OPS). None of these projections take into account park factors at this point, but last year, Roberts' .783 was an OPS+ of 100, so it seems fair to say that the projections, after park adjustment. likely expect Johnson to be at league average or somewhat better.
However, between Felipe Lopez and Roberts, the overall OPS we got from the position was .820 - it was a position of some strength offensively for Arizona - so current expectations seem somewhat below that. Johnson's glove isn't anything much to write home about either, by most reports. In his career, he has a UZR/150 rating of -7.4. Despite this, fangraphs.com fan projections still currently have Johnson valued at 1.9 Wins Above Replacement. If he can perform up to that level, it would be a solid performance from a two million dollar player. As you imagine, the word "if" is the operative one.
65 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
A collective 'meh' ensues
I have nothing against KJ and even probably like him a bit better than most… and obviously the money isn’t a big deal… but I just don’t get it. Maybe there’s something about Ryal/Roberts that Byrnes really didn’t like, but I certainly was a fan of what I saw last season and at 27 and 29 (when the season starts) more time in the minors will merely stunt their growth. With 5 middle infielders now on the roster, I hope a trade is forthcoming.
"Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good too. " ~Greg, age 8
There's got to be a trade coming.
There was interest in Augie Ojeda earlier in the offseason, so i wouldn’t be surprised to see him moved. I really like this move for Arizona though. I was much more worried about second base than I am about first. I think Allen will be fine if given a fair shake. Plus there’s plenty of platoon options between Snyder and Cojack for first base.
by C. Wesley Baier on Dec 29, 2009 6:20 PM EST up reply actions
It would
only make sense, anyway, especially if we’re still thinking AT ALL about the future.
"The existence of flamethrowers is proof that someone, somewhere, said to himself, 'I want to set those people over there on fire, but I don't feel like walking over there to do it.'"
I'm not quite sure
That we really are anymore. :-/
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Jan 1, 2010 7:42 PM EST up reply actions
Actually 6….
"Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good too. " ~Greg, age 8
Nick Piecoro says it’s close, too.
"I can just see it: Post 'Intervention? Why would I need an intervention?' And then he'd +1 himself."
Looks like the question mark is gone, now.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Dec 29, 2009 6:34 PM EST up reply actions
Here's my possible piecing-together
1B: Conor Jackson (Chris Snyder if Jackson gets hurt, with a call-up to Hester)
2B: Kelly Johnson
SS: Drew
3B: Reynolds
IF Backups: Ojeda, Abreu
LF: Parra/ Roberts or Ryal platoon
CF: CY
RF: Upton
5th OF: Byrnes or Gillespie
C: Montero and Snyder
That’s 13 men, and only whoever loses out in the Roberts/Ryal competition has to be somehow moved. It could work. That leaves a Haren/Webb/Jackson/Kennedy/Buckner (assuming it’s Buckner) rotation and a Qualls/Howry CL/SU with Zavada/Gutierrez/Vasquez/Boyer/Kroenke middle relievers. 25 men (let me know if I forgot anybody).
Lineup goes something like Jackson/Johnson/Upton/Montero/Reynolds/Drew/platoon/CY/pitcher? Or however you choose.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Dec 29, 2009 6:33 PM EST reply actions
I really think Allen deserves a shot to play first everyday.
And i think he’ll win that opportunity in spring training.
by C. Wesley Baier on Dec 29, 2009 6:35 PM EST up reply actions
This
Could throw everything into chaos. Depends on if he’s got the polish.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Dec 29, 2009 6:42 PM EST up reply actions
Big Ol Nevermind Here
I did forget someone. Heilman. Looks like we go with 4 OF or one backup IF. Who knows.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Dec 29, 2009 6:45 PM EST up reply actions
Or..
We drop one of Gutierrez, Vazquez, and/or Kroenke and eventually eject Boyer(who isn’t all that good to begin with). I think our pen is solid with Qualls, Howry, Heilman, Zavada, Boyer, Vazquez, Guiterrez, and/or Kroenke(who might not latch on)
by C. Wesley Baier on Dec 29, 2009 6:53 PM EST up reply actions
I think the biggest possibility
Is Kroenke not sticking, but then we definitely need another lefty bullpen arm… I hate to put all of that onus on poor Clay Zavada. Trade Boyer instead? Put Vasquez in the rotation (or in AAA to re-develop him as a starter and get the innings count up again)? Geez this is a bit of a mess.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Dec 29, 2009 6:57 PM EST up reply actions
I was obviously just spitballing before
But I’d rather us not try to put Vasquez back in the rotation. He’s already had a torn labrum, and he’s been great out of the ’pen. Too risky for me.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Dec 29, 2009 6:59 PM EST up reply actions
Well, the thing is.
Out of all those guys, only Zavada, Gutierrez, and Vasquez have options. I’d rather see Vasquez in AAA just in case Boyer or kroenke suck.
by C. Wesley Baier on Dec 29, 2009 7:02 PM EST up reply actions
Also, we really really really really need to get rid of Eric Byrnes.
by C. Wesley Baier on Dec 29, 2009 7:03 PM EST up reply actions
Aaaaaaaaaaaa-men
But Vasquez is probably one of our best MRs. Same with Zavada and Gutierrez. Boyer, while effective, was a mop-up guy to an extent. Really, the Howry deal makes it seem like we ought to at least try Heilman in the rotation…
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Dec 29, 2009 7:15 PM EST up reply actions
Heilman in rotation
I would definately like to see this, at least in Spring Training.
Guy has been saying for 5 years he wants to be a starter. And his numbers appear to have been good back when he was given the chance. Why not throw him into the battle for #4 and 5 and see what he can do?
by Counsellmember on Dec 29, 2009 8:18 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, i'd like to see heilman given a shot int he rotation
It would at least make the competition for the 5th spot at least a little competitive…
by C. Wesley Baier on Dec 29, 2009 8:35 PM EST up reply actions
Gutierrez
does NOT have options. That’s part of the problem with him.
"The existence of flamethrowers is proof that someone, somewhere, said to himself, 'I want to set those people over there on fire, but I don't feel like walking over there to do it.'"
Was actually working on a post about our 2010 roster
This afternoon. Guess I can plug in a couple more definites now. :-)
"Win, or die" -- Marquise de Merteuil
by Jim McLennan on Dec 29, 2009 7:45 PM EST up reply actions
Oh, Zephon and IHSB
Should I be expecting a prospects article from one/both of you tomorrow? Or do I need to find something else?
"Win, or die" -- Marquise de Merteuil
by Jim McLennan on Dec 29, 2009 7:48 PM EST up reply actions
Nope
At least not from me, maybe Wes has something up his sleeve. But I’m on a mini-haitus from my life being completely absorbed by the D-Backs. ;-)
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Dec 29, 2009 8:26 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah....
I’m on hiatus for awhile too. I have a few articles planned, but no where close to done. Emily wants me back from being completely dbacks obsessed for at least a few weeks this offseason. :P
by C. Wesley Baier on Dec 29, 2009 8:32 PM EST up reply actions
I'm not even going to tell you who you forgot
It’s someone we don’t need and yet signed to a $2M contract :)
Here's my take...
So for the infield we have a normal staring five of montero, reynolds, drew, johnson, and allen. backups right now are Snyder, Abreu, Roberts, Ryal, Ojeda. In the outfield, we have CoJack, Young, Upton, with the backups/extra peices being Parra, Roberts/Ryal, Gillespie.. and :::spits:: Eric Byrnes. So by math, out of those we need to get rid of one or two infielders(ojeda and/or ryal look like the odd men out), one outfielder(Eric Byrnes), and maybe snyder(who I’d rather keep). It’s a tight squeeze in the 25 man roster, once you factor in the pitching staff.
by C. Wesley Baier on Dec 29, 2009 6:34 PM EST reply actions
What I like
About the last two signings is the focus on value. Also, both Johnson and Howry spoke of AZ as a place they wanted to play for. Other team are able to use their geogrpahical advantages (like CA “coastal” teams and NY “glitzy” teams and FL “you can swim to Cuba from here” teams) and it is nice to see AZ try and take advantage of the Valley being home to more than a few big leaguers.
+1
With our budget, I’d say we did well and made out like bandits.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Dec 29, 2009 6:58 PM EST up reply actions
AZ = cheap cost of living, low taxes, plenty of golf year round,
nice winter weather, low taxes, a rapidly growing market, decent schools, did I mention low taxes?
"The existence of flamethrowers is proof that someone, somewhere, said to himself, 'I want to set those people over there on fire, but I don't feel like walking over there to do it.'"
Is it possible that KJ will bat leadoff for us? I feel that an OBP of .303 last yr was really good considering he was batting only .224
If his BABIP regresses such that his batting average gets up to around .275 then that would translate to an OBP of .350
Our lineup could then probably something like KJ, Cojack, Upton, Reynolds, Montero (though there would be three right handers in the middle…)
I'd put KJ behind CoJack
Because CoJack’s OBP is a bit better, even with that .350 regressed number. But that looks about right. He’s up near the top of the order, for sure.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Dec 29, 2009 7:16 PM EST up reply actions
I'm
okay with dis.
Unless he sucks this year.
THEN I HATE ITTTTTTTTTT
An early departure? What are the chances of that? If this was a movie, there wouldn't be an early departure.
I agree.
"The existence of flamethrowers is proof that someone, somewhere, said to himself, 'I want to set those people over there on fire, but I don't feel like walking over there to do it.'"
According to..
Steve gilbert via twitter: “Final details being worked out, physical needs to be taken but K. Johnson to dbacks. 1 year, little more than $2 million.”
by C. Wesley Baier on Dec 29, 2009 9:35 PM EST reply actions
As History Repeats
A veteran 2nd baseman for one year….haven’t I heard this before?
Oh, wait….
this one isn’t a switch-hitter, and he’s never won a gold glove.
Color me unimpressed.
Key to the game: Score More
Hardly a veteran
27 at the time of writing. Interesting stat
Johnson OPS+ to age 27: 103
Hudson OPS+ to age 27: 93
"Win, or die" -- Marquise de Merteuil
by Jim McLennan on Dec 29, 2009 10:33 PM EST up reply actions
And he's also under
Our control for 2011.
"Win, or die" -- Marquise de Merteuil
by Jim McLennan on Dec 30, 2009 1:39 AM EST up reply actions
Flip Lopez
has never won a Gold Glove, either.
"The existence of flamethrowers is proof that someone, somewhere, said to himself, 'I want to set those people over there on fire, but I don't feel like walking over there to do it.'"
To Love or Hate
I feel strongly good about this signing and strongly pissed about it at the same time.
what I like Arbitration eligible! Love it. One year with a complete team option for 2M? Yeah, I’ll take that deal for just about anybody.
what I dont like Upgrade over our existing options at 2nd is minimal, at best. I believe it is, in fact, going to result in less production and worse defense. I would much rather spend every last dollar we had on the best 1st baseman we could aquire. That produces the greatest upgrade to our team, IMO.
In the end I can only hope for Johnson to kick some serious tail as our new second baseman. Go get’m K-J!
by Counsellmember on Dec 30, 2009 12:29 AM EST reply actions
Agreed
I was meh until I heard the details about length and team options. I think what happens is that at this price the Backs can see if KJ can return to the form of a few years ago (which without looking up and based on memory was pretty darn impressive).
If it doesn’t work out then we have other players that can step in and take their hacks at becoming consistent. In that case, all we do is decline the option and turn that money into a 1st baseman we need. By nest season, we will have a more clear vision of the needs at 1st base as the production of Co-Jax and/or Allen/Synder will sort itself out. Give Co-Jax his chance.
I know he doesn’t hit for power at a position that power is coveted and that the Valley Fever may still be lingering but he is basically a “free” player. Meaning we added him for nothing after his lost year. Weird logic I know but it makes me feel better…
Pedro Cerrano: Jesus, I like him very much, but he no help with curveball.
Eddie Harris: You trying to say Jesus Christ can't hit a curveball?
Just to clarify
I wouldn’t mind Delgado at first.
Pedro Cerrano: Jesus, I like him very much, but he no help with curveball.
Eddie Harris: You trying to say Jesus Christ can't hit a curveball?
Yeah
And I wouldn’t mind Jackson at first, either. I’d rather have him in LF, but as long as he’s in the lineup I’ll be happy. I think most of us are pretty high on him right now, despite the lost year. Between him and Upton and Reynolds there are some bats I’m excited to see this season.
by Counsellmember on Dec 30, 2009 3:27 AM EST up reply actions
i see a pattern forming.
what if the dbacks are just going to buy 2nd basemen, have them hit well at chase field then trade them away at the all-star break and get something out of it? then we plug roberts at 2nd and the next offseason we sign mark ellis or kaz matsui…
Unless we're competing, of course
But if not, sure, get something for a cheap starting 2B, especially if he’s bouncing back. Other teams will be all over him. Win-win.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Dec 30, 2009 1:11 AM EST up reply actions
About the article explaining his struggles
The thing is, he changed the approach 2 years ago. Look at these numbers:
2005: BB – 12.1 , O-Swing 13.9
2007: BB – 13.2 , O-Swing 18.4
2007 was his best season and he batted .276/.375/.457
Then in 2008: BB – 8.7%, O-Swing 25.6%
So in one year he went from a patient hitter to a hacker. Mind, the results were still good in 2008: .287/.349 /.446
In 2009 he improved on it a little: BB – 9.6%, O-Swing 23.8% but he suffered a 100 point drop in BABIP and hit nothing.
Also, what the article says about groundballs is also wrong. His problem last year was too many balls in the air.
As for his defense, while UZR hates it, Rally’s TotalZone has him at about average, and while I don’t have the Dewan numbers, a commenter at Fangraphs said Dewan likes him more than UZR.
Dewan's Plus-Minus
Dewan’s Plus-Minus has Kelly Johnson at -3 Runs Saved at 2B for each of the last two years, which ranks him around #20 in the Majors. He was rated above average in LF.
It's pretty cool
How many options we have around the diamond. We have five to six potential outfielders, a handful of first basemen, plenty of middle infielders, and a few third basemen to choose from. Not to mention the raging battle that we’ll have for the fourth and fifth spots in the rotation along with a couple of question areas in the bullpen.
It’s fun to watch.
Wear your own fur.
I think the fourth rotation spot
Is pretty much decided. Kennedy made it pretty clear in his press conference that he’d been told it’s already his spot. The fifth, however, gets more and more complicated with each acquisition.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Dec 30, 2009 4:43 PM EST up reply actions
I don't see much merit
In guaranteeing a fourth rotation spot to an (arguably) unproven, out of the organization, prospect. I would wait for spring training before giving him credit. For example, if Mulvey, Lopez, or even Augenstein outperform Kennedy then I see no reason not to start one of them instead.
Wear your own fur.
by Marc Fournier on Dec 30, 2009 5:14 PM EST up reply actions
"Outperforming" in spring training
Is what got us Chris “.194” Burke for 2008. :-(
"Win, or die" -- Marquise de Merteuil
by Jim McLennan on Dec 30, 2009 5:25 PM EST up reply actions
Watching the DBacks handle Burke in 2008 might have been one of the most baffling things I’ve ever watched. I mean, he just kept getting trot out there, night after night… how in the world did he play in over half of our games and get well over 150 ABs. That was so bizarre.
"Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good too. " ~Greg, age 8
Because
He dramatically out-performed any of the guys in our system last year, and has had some successes at the major-league level before? I have no problem with it really. That trade only makes sense if he’s our fourth, so give him a chance to be that guy.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Dec 30, 2009 11:44 PM EST up reply actions
Yes, but
just because the trade doesn’t make sense if Kennedy isn’t our #4 next year doesn’t necessarily mean that that’s the best decision. Our #4 starter should be our fourth best pitcher.
"The existence of flamethrowers is proof that someone, somewhere, said to himself, 'I want to set those people over there on fire, but I don't feel like walking over there to do it.'"
I'd say
That his production last year demonstrated that is. I wouldn’t keep him out of the rotation because of Spring Training when he’s demonstrated his superior ability in the past, i.e. last year.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Jan 1, 2010 7:44 PM EST up reply actions
Kennedy
Pitched 50 innings last year.
Before that, 120 IP in ’08.
Don’t you think it’s a stretch to expect him to make 30 starts?
He did throw 165 innings in 2007 in 28 starts
So he is capable of it. That injuries have hampered him since is a separate issue – his arm should be capable of it, when healthy.
"Win, or die" -- Marquise de Merteuil
by Jim McLennan on Dec 31, 2009 10:33 AM EST up reply actions
We've discussed this
Aneurism isn’t a baseball injury. It’s a life injury. You don’t expect that to happen again.
"I've had Bailey's out of a shoe, though."
by Dan Strittmatter on Dec 31, 2009 4:28 PM EST up reply actions

by 



















