Diamondbacks 12, Cubs 3: Can we play Chicago every day?
Record: 69-91. Pace: 70-92. Change on last season: -11.
This was a game full of surprises. Not the least of which being that it was a Friday day-game, which therefore managed to get underway before any of us had noticed. I could grumble about the unnaturalness of it all, and how unfair it was for Arizona to have to play a day-game immediately after flying in from San Francisco, etc. But going by the results today, maybe we should do it more often. For the Diamondbacks' pounded out their highest number of runs on the road since June 18th, highlighted by - and you may want to sit down for this - four-hit games from Eric Byrnes (season OPS+ 57) and Chris Young (76). They combined for three homers and seventeen total bases.
Yeah, "surprising" may not quite cut it. Been a while since I've had to look that one up in the SnakePit thesaurus, but follow me after the jump for details of the arresting, distinguished, exceptional, extraordinary, impressive, noteworthy, noticeable, outstanding, phenomenal, preeminent, singular, smashing, solid, striking, super, uncommon, uncustomary, unusual, unwonted, weighty and wonderful victory.
Seems the Cubs are even keener than us for 2009 to end. The announced figure was the second-smallest crowd of the year at Wrigley - trailing only the game on Wednesday night -and BCB's Al estimated the actual number present as only 15,000. Though who can blame them, with a game-time temperature in the forties, and a firm breeze? [Yes, folks: now is the time when it's pleasant to live in our state. We finally get our reward for enduring the hell of the past four months] But it wasn't just the fans: if Arizona have mailed in performances of late, then as mentioned in the GDT, the Cubs today appeared to be using a network of bonfires, semaphore flags and galleys, having been outscored 24-5 over the past three games, all losses against the mighty powers of Arizona and Pittsburgh.
At one point, it looked like we might be on our way to the first double-digit shutout inflicted on the Cubs at Wrigley since May 2003. That wasn't to be - in part because of what can only be described as Zavada interference - but the nine runs by which we won was a margin not surpassed there since the Diamondbacks clubbed six homers during a 15-4 win in July 2006. We scored three runs before anyone even noticed - certainly, before I noticed there was a game on - thanks to a Stephen Drew single, Mark Reynolds sacrifice fly and Young solo homer. We then piled on four more in the third, Rusty Ryal unclogging the bases with a double, and scoring on a Byrnes hit.
As a general rule of thumb, I don't mind games where our Win Probability is north of 95% by the middle of the third inning, and it helped that Billy Buckner was delivering another solid outing. Through six innings, he had allowed three hits - all singles - and three walks, displaying probably the best form of the season. He tired in the seventh, giving up three straight hits including an unusual ground-rule double. While I didn't see it myself, it appears Clay Zavada was protecting a colleague as he warmed in the visitors' bullpen [which at Wrigley, is open to play, in foul territory]. A fair ball hit down the line headed towards them, and Zavada reflexively grabbed it. Two bases for everyone.
A walk to load the bases with one out signalled the end of Buckner, and it was still a quality start, even though his replacement Blaine Boyer gave up an RBI single and RBI groundout. Buckner's final line was a credible 6.1 innings of work, resulting in three earned runs on six hits and four walks, with five K's. Behind him, Boyer, Scott Schoeneweis and Zavada - pitching in front of a number of family and friends - retired the final eight batters they faced, throwing only 29 pitches. The Cubs players were clearly in no mood to hang around: hard to say which was chillier, the weather or the reception from their fans.
Meanwhile, the Diamondbacks had continued to add on. Byrnes homered in the sixth. Ryal had a sacrifice fly in the seventh and, later that same inning, Byrnes singled in another run, making the score 10-0 at that point. Finally, with two ours in the ninth, Young singled - he needed a triple for the cycle - and Byrnes completed the rout of Chicago with another home-run. It's been a long time since Eric has his last multihomer game: the best part of three seasons, in fact, since his last came on May 30th, 2007, against Philadelphia.
Chris Young continues to smack the ball about, with four hits and a walk today. In the past month, with over 100 PA's, his line is now .299/.382/.567, with seven home-runs. That's a good month by anyone's standards, and if the tail-end of the season has had any bright-spots, today was a showcase for them. We've seen the possible resurrection of Young, and the potential conversion of Buckner into a credible member of the 2010 rotation [if he can just stretch out his stamina a little further....] Drew, returned to the two-hole, responded with three hits, and lead-off man Ryan Roberts had a couple as well.
All told, a fine performance, even against a Cubs line-up missing most of its biggest stars for one reason or another e.g. Soriano and Lee. It's been a while since the Diamondbacks have managed such a convincing victory. Indeed, the last time we won by more than three runs was SnakePitFest, thirty games ago on August 29th! Even exclusing the 2007 post-season sweep, it runs Arizona's franchise record against the Cubs since 2004 to 22-13- the best we have against any NL side. We're also the only visiting NL team with a winning record at Wrigley, having gone 22-20 lifetime there.

[Click to enlarge, at fangraphs.com]
Master of his domain: Billy Buckner, +13.5%
Honorable mentions: Ryal, +12.1%; Young, +10.2%
God-emperor of suck: John Hester, -1.3%
Curiously, despite a four-hit, two-homer, five RBI day, Eric Byrnes' contribution was only worth 1.8% to our Win Probability. That's because he made an out his first time up - by the time he got a hit, we were already six runs up, and there was only about 5% of Win Probability left to be earned over the entire rest of the game. Seemed to be some technical difficulties in the GDT: it never auto-refreshed for me at all. This and the unexpectedly early start may help explain the low turnout: 177 comments, among 15 people. I pipped pygalgia, and we were the only people to pass twenty. Also present, however: kishi, snakecharmer, GuruB, piratedan7, older fart, Turambar, 4 Corners Fan, AJforAZ, hotclaws, soco, emilylovesthedbacks, asteroid and Wailord.
Think I just might watch the replay of this one tonight, and amaze Mrs. SnakePit with my astute predictions of good games for Byrnes and Young... Right up until she starts to wonder why it's still daylight in Chicago!
0 recs |
32 comments
|
Comments
It seems
that every game we play against Chicago is a high-scoring affair for at least one of the sides. Maybe it’s just like that at Chase, but I know a large majority of the games I’ve been to have been slugfests… except when both pitchers were carrying deep no-hitters…
Anyway, this just popped into my head, so here’s some nostalgia: anyone remember earlier in the season against Seattle when we were about to play some free baseball and DFA dropped the ball to end the inning? Good times.
Warning: the above represents the thoughts and opinions of a 15-year-old.
by Wailord on Oct 2, 2009 7:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That was the game
Where Hinch sent Buckner out for the seventh after he squeaked out of a bases-loaded jam in the sixth and was clearly gassed. Buckner didn’t get an out and got shelled, and Zavada gave up like three or four inherited runs. Good times.
Most Depressing Math Question Ever courtesy of Probability class: "Clark and Anthony are two old friends. Let A be the event that Clark will attend Anthony's funeral. Let B be the event that Anthony will attend Clark's funeral. Are A and B independent? Why or why not?"
by IHateSouthBend on Oct 3, 2009 2:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Upton hits for the Cycle!
admitted, it was BJ.
Key to the game: Score More
by pygalgia on Oct 2, 2009 10:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This was a game full of surprises. Not the least of which being that it was a Friday day-game, which therefore managed to get underway before any of us had noticed. I could grumble about the unnaturalness of it all…
It has been a while since I logged on to this site but it appears as though the better than “casual fans” are still being misinformed by someone that professes to being “a true/informed fan.”
I admit that as far as I read this article was the above text. I feared that the rest may be just as “informative.”
First of all, A “true fan” should know if his/her team is playing a day game so if the game “managed to get underway before any of us had noticed” then maybe a new definition of true/informed fandom should be addressed.
Secondly,
Not the least of which being that it was a Friday day-game… I could grumble about the unnaturalness of it all…
Wrigley Field was built in 1914 and was the last park to install lights ( about a decade ago) and still hosts about 20 to 30 more day games than any other park every year. BTW, the last three games at Wrigley this year are all day games. I really don’t see how a Friday day game at Wrigley can create a situation where it would be the most surprising issue or “unnatural.”
Carry on…
by foulpole on Oct 3, 2009 1:50 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe through the thick layer of pretentious
That constantly surrounds you, you neglected the fact that we have lives to live. Friday is a work day. We have class and/or work to attend. It’s the end of the season and we’re playing horrendously and waiting for this treachery to be concluded. Pardon us for being surprised by an unusual game scheduling for our team.
Further, regardless of what the case is for the Cubs, perhaps it’s maybe because, as Diamondbacks fans, we’re used to the Diamondbacks’ schedule, for which this was unusual. A novel idea, I know, but perhaps it has some validity to it.
Most Depressing Math Question Ever courtesy of Probability class: "Clark and Anthony are two old friends. Let A be the event that Clark will attend Anthony's funeral. Let B be the event that Anthony will attend Clark's funeral. Are A and B independent? Why or why not?"
by IHateSouthBend on Oct 3, 2009 2:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh so true, IHateSouthBend. . .
but remember that foulpole is probably living in Chicago, and from what I can tell, nobody there actually works, or if they do, it’s something like “Community Organizing,” or the like.
by NASCARbernet on Oct 3, 2009 3:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not on the north shore,
but ChiSox fans are all blue collar.
Insert Lee Elia rant.
Posting 65 comments/day since June '07.
by DbacksSkins on Oct 7, 2009 2:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So THIS
is the foulpole that I’ve been hearing about…
Warning: the above represents the thoughts and opinions of a 15-year-old.
by Wailord on Oct 3, 2009 2:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The one and only
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Oct 3, 2009 2:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
…missed you so, foulpole. unbelievable.
"Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good too. " ~Greg, age 8
by njjohn on Oct 3, 2009 7:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And also
I knew it was on and I watched it from the beginning. But there are only a few people who can do the GDT, and they didn’t get it up exactly in time for the game. Big deal.
So good to hear from you again, tho.
Nobody on the road Nobody on the beach
I feel it in the air The summer's out of reach
by 4 Corners Fan on Oct 3, 2009 2:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've no shame in admitting
I didn’t wake up until 11. :D
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Oct 3, 2009 2:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And this is the first time I can EVER think of
that we’ve missed a GDT, considering I’m always the anal-retentive one poking Jim to hurry up. ;)
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Oct 3, 2009 2:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
First time this season, at least
There were a few times last year, but we’ve been much more prompt this season.
"I can't accept and won't concede that this is who we are..."
by kishi on Oct 3, 2009 2:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True. This year SBN has a scheduling feature
so we can write the threads the night before. Which I’d bet big $$ Jim is doing as I type, or has already finished doing so. ;)
Things ’Skins has in common with foulpole for 400, please. -- soco
by snakecharmer on Oct 3, 2009 2:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Er...
Yep. Am right on that. As we speak. No, really.
"Win, or die" -- Marquise de Merteuil
by Jim McLennan on Oct 3, 2009 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ahhh, for pre-SBN2.0 GDTs.
IIRC, that’s how soco, kishi and I becamse admins.
Posting 65 comments/day since June '07.
by DbacksSkins on Oct 7, 2009 2:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
*became
Posting 65 comments/day since June '07.
by DbacksSkins on Oct 7, 2009 2:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also.
Don’t quote the same thing twice. And have you ever heard of humor?
Nobody on the road Nobody on the beach
I feel it in the air The summer's out of reach
by 4 Corners Fan on Oct 3, 2009 2:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
G-d forbid
some of us have work or school.
I’ve tried to defend you in the past, but you’re going to be on your own with this kind of ill-informed posting.
I am Shiva the Destroyer, your harbinger of doom this evening.
by soco on Oct 3, 2009 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Welcome back
Please check the Diamondbacks schedule and tell me how many day games you can find that are the first in a series, and don’t fall on a holiday. The answer should hopefully explain why the early start caught us by surprise.
I cheerfully admit that I’m an amateur. Things like having to pay the bills take priority over outdated scheduling decisions.
Thanks for stopping by.
"Win, or die" -- Marquise de Merteuil
by Jim McLennan on Oct 3, 2009 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also,
Wrigley Field installed lights more than two decades ago. But hey.
by Azreous on Oct 3, 2009 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice to hear from you again, too.
Posting 65 comments/day since June '07.
by DbacksSkins on Oct 5, 2009 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Incidentally....
I admit that as far as I read this article was the above text. I feared that the rest may be just as "informative."
Was anyone surprised that foulpole actually didn’t read something??
Posting 65 comments/day since June '07.
by DbacksSkins on Oct 7, 2009 2:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
2 HRs for Byrnsie - I say that calls for beers for bears!

by ol Pete on Oct 3, 2009 10:45 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Awesome....
Posting 65 comments/day since June '07.
by DbacksSkins on Oct 5, 2009 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So...
what’s the deal with the Fanposts being missing on the sidebar?
I am Shiva the Destroyer, your harbinger of doom this evening.
by soco on Oct 3, 2009 12:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 























