On Arizona fandom
Congratulations to the Arizona Cardinals, who crushed Carolina 33-13 yesterday, to advance to the NFC Championship game. They've won two playoff contests in a season, for the first time in franchise history - see our sister blog, Revenge of the Birds, for more coverage of this stunning achievement. But what it brings home to me are some very telling points about the apparent nature of sports-fandom in Arizona: basically, we are a state of front-runners and bandwagon jumpers. Even as the regular season ended, and the Cardinals were crowned division champions, the team were booed off the field at half-time, and these were some of the comments posted on AZ Central:
- Cardinals are a bunch of losers... They have always been losers and always will be!!
- I hate to say the season will end next weekend
- The team has gone from losers to mediocre. If they weren't in the worst division in football their season would be over, and next weekend it will be anyways.
- They didn't show me anything other than what they have all year... The Cards have talent, but they lack discipline, focus, and have shown an inability to beat good teams.
- Haven't the Cardinals been down this road before? Beat some weak sister like the Rams or Seahawks and suddenly the team is reborn... If they'd checked in rather than out for one, just one, of the three good teams they played of late...then one might hope for more in the playoffs.
I could go on with these, but I trust the point is clear. Opinion in the valley was so bad before the team's first playoff game, that the team required multiple extensions from the NFL to sell out their ticket allocation and avoid a TV blackout. But now? I've seen more red shirts in the past week than, probably, in the eight years since I moved out here. All of a sudden, everyone is a Cardinals fan; a thousand people even turned up at the airport to cheer the team as they left for Carolina, something probably unprecedented over the team's two decades in the valley. The last time there was such a resurrection, a cross was involved.
The main reason for this astonishingly fickle nature is probably the one which has been well-discussed: many people in Arizona are born somewhere else and bring their loyalties with them when they move here. While they may feel some fondness for their new home town, it's a casual attraction, one which is a result of geography and nothing more. But what I didn't realize is the scale of that. In 2004, only 41% of those people who lived in the state of Arizona, was actually born here, and I suspect that's a figure which would drop significantly, if it were limited to adults.
It compares to a national average of 63.5%, and ranks us 50th out of the 51 states + DC - ahead only of Nevada, which doesn't have any major pro sports teams. For many of the states usually regarded as being sports powerhouse - New York, Michigan, Illinois and Pennsylvania - the same figure is above 75%. This unquestionably helps to breed die-hards. Without a subscription to expensive cable or satellite packages, you don't get to see any non-local teams, and if you haven't lived in any other states, the odds of you deciding to support one of their franchises have to be slim.
The Cardinals do, at least, have age on their side, having been here twice as long as the Diamondbacks. Ten years is just not sufficient time to build a fan-base: that kind of thing takes a generation or more, until you get people who were born [or, at least, very young] at or after the point the team was established, and have grown up knowing no other franchise. At the moment, such people for the Diamondbacks are in high-school at best, and so not likely to have much disposable income of their own. In a Sep. 2007 poll on the 'Pit, 68% of the 155 respondents said they were under the age of 30. Now, that may well skew low, based on the Internet medium, etc. but anecdotal evidence also suggests that young people are more likely to be devoted fans of the Diamondbacks.
If you compare Arizona to similar states, the Diamondbacks are not doing at all badly, in raw attendance. Florida would be the most obvious yardstick, with an in-state born rate of 41.2%, only fractionally different from Arizona. Their population, at sixteen million, is more than twice Arizona's six million - then again, they also have two baseball teams, both started in the past couple of decades. The Rays were established the same year as Arizona and also play in a domed stadium. But, even with their stellar season, their average attendance in 2008 was 22,259, far less than the Diamondbacks (30,986). The Marlins, meanwhile, were dead last at 16,688, over three thousand less than the next-best team. This isn't new or related to Arizona's division title: we've beaten the Rays by at least 2,500/game, and the Marlins by more than eight thousand, ever year since the Diamondbacks started.
[I'd like to compare TV ratings, too, but that just proved impossible to do. It seems like the Rays did better this year, with a top figure in the regular season of 9.1 when they faced the Red Sox, compared to Arizona's 6.2 for the Cubs on July 23. But there are just too many variables in that equation to draw any conclusions. While both teams showed their games on the local Fox Sports affiliate, I've got no information on, for example, the degree of penetration each has in the local sports market.]
I do have to wonder if the 2001 World Series victory perhaps "spoiled" local fans, by making them expect success too easily and quickly. Having seen the team go from 97 losses to winning it all in just three years, it may have set unrealistic expectations, especially for a team with this budget. While you can argue revenue should be larger in the Phoenix market, the reality appears to be that the current payroll appears to be close to all we can sustain, with the Forbes' survey giving the team an operating income of only about $6m this year and last, before interest, taxes, etc. Here are the payrolls of the 11 World Series winners since the franchise started, their ranking and percentage of the Diamondbacks' salary bill [Figures from the USA Today salary database]
| Salary (m) | Rank | % of AZ | |
| 2008 - Phillies | $98.3 | 12th | 148.5% |
| 2007 - Red Sox | $143.0 | 2nd | 274.7% |
| 2006 - Cardinals | $88.9 | 11th | 148.9% |
| 2005 - White Sox | $75.2 | 13th | 120.6% |
| 2004 - Red Sox | $127.3 | 2nd | 182.4% |
| 2003 - Marlins | $48.8 | 25th | 60.4% |
| 2002 - Angels | $61.7 | 15th | 60.0% |
| 2001 - D'backs | $85.2 | 8th | 100.0% |
| 2000 - Yankees | $92.9 | 1st | 117.3% |
| 1999 - Yankees | $88.1 | 1st | 125.2% |
| 1998 - Yankees | $63.2 | 2nd | 218.2% |
Over the past eleven years, that's an average rank of just below eighth - last year, that would be about $115m - outspending the Diamondbacks by 41.5%. We may remember the Marlins, but without a payroll in the top half of the league, it's difficult to win the World Series. Ten of the 11 above were so ranked; last season, even this would mean $81m or more, so Arizona's budget for the coming years only just qualifies. In 2008, our payroll put us between the Orioles and the Royals - neither of which franchises, have even reached the post-season since before Arizona came into existence. Realistically, and with our resources, we probably should not be expecting to compete regularly.
The 2001 World Series win imprinted itself on fans, in a way that has proven difficult to shake off, especially with regard to veterans from that team. Witness the furore when Luis Gonzalez was allowed to depart. Similarly, while there were many good reasons to want to retain Randy Johnson, I sense a sizable number of those condemning his release were doing so for nostalgic reasons, related to 2001 and his prime, more than anything. I certainly doubt we'd have seen the same fuss over any other 45-year old pitcher with a doubtful back and an 11-10 record. There are probably some out there, wondering why we didn't sign that nice Craig Counsell to play second.
Painful though it is to admit it, the World Series was 'bought' for Arizona, in almost exactly the same way for which we condemn the Yankees - juicy free agent contracts to most of our infield [Grace, Bell, Counsell and Williams], as well as Finlay, Sanders, and Johnson, Indeed, our behavior was arguably worse, because at least the Yankees have the revenue stream to support their spending. We could only do it by living beyond our means, a flock of chickens which came home to roost over the following years. While I wouldn't trade that season for anything, I suspect it was like an ugly guy getting to sleep with the Prom Queen. Even if she was drunk, it still causes unfounded optimism for years to come...
You won't hear much from me over the next couple of nights, not with 24 finally starting up properly, with two hours this evening and two more tomorrow. How I have missed Jack Bauer...
Comments
World Champs
Jim —
Didn’t the Phillies win the World Series last year?
by Lightning Rod on
Jan 11, 2009 9:06 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
How soon we forget...
Well, me, anyway! Duly corrected, with the numbers fixed too. Oops!
by Jim McLennan on
Jan 11, 2009 9:36 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm not
going to argue that Arizona has a lot or is mainly composed of frontrunners, but some the examples aren’t very good evidence. First of all, the TV black-out rules in the NFL are ridiculous, and even some teams with long-standing fanbases have had trouble avoiding the black-out in the regular season and the playoffs. I’ve heard a lot of noise about Arizona’s trouble this postseason, but virtually none about the Vikings’ hardship to sellout. Of course, a large part of that is I live in Arizona, so the former is more relevant to me. The fact of the matter is that even well-supported teams can find themselves in a situation where they can’t sellout, especially in these economic times.
About suddenly seeing Cardinals shirts, I’d first counter that I’ve seen a ton of people wearing them the past few years and found that odd considering that the Cardinals have never been that popular. Discounting that anecdotal piece, though, part of is going to be two-fold. First, since you’re not an American football fan, you may have seen Cardinals shirts and not thought it distinctive. Now that they are winning and you hear about them constantly, the merchandise has more meaning so your brain picks it up and you remember it. It’s similar to how people think that there is a connection to them having a bad premonition and then something bad happening. That person generally gets many “false” bad premonitions, but only remembers the ones lucky enough to happen near an actual event. The other thing about sporting merchandise is that of course people are more likely to bust it out when a team is winning, and especially right after a big game. It’s not that these people never wear the shirts before (though many probably don’t), it’s just that a specific event has convinced multitudes of people to all wear their “favorite” team’s gear immediately afterwards as a way to celebrate and broadcast that they support the team.
Now the truth of the matter is that fans in Arizona are for the most part not Arizona fans, across nearly every sport line. There’s no reason even for someone of my age to support the Cardinals, even though we can’t remember or just barely remember a time when Phoenix didn’t have the team. Add to that years and years of terrible play, most people my age that grew in Arizona are going to follow another team, especially since there are so many teams in the region that have had success while we grew up: the Broncos, the Cowboys, the Raiders (well, depending on how old you are), the 49ers. So not only do the older non-native Arizonans follow other teams, but so do their children.
This season isn’t going to change things as much people might hope, though, unless it ends in either a Super Bowl, or is the start of a prolonging run to the playoffs every year. We’ve seen the Cardinals make it to the playoffs a year and never show up again; to keep some of these frontrunners the Cardinals will need to find even more success.
And for the record I’m a Bills fan, so really all I care about is that the Cardinals winning is good for the city. Other than that it’s just another lonely offseason for me.
Also, Jim, I know you wrote about a lot of other subject, but I’m about to leave for the airport and I’ll read the rest when I get home.
Please, say that you care, or say that you think that I'm... beautiful.
by soco on
Jan 12, 2009 8:07 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Just a quick point
More later, but…
The fact of the matter is that even well-supported teams can find themselves in a situation where they can’t sellout, especially in these economic times.
First-round playoff game: Requires multiple extensions to avoid a TV blackout.
Championship game: These much more expensive tickets sell out completely, in six minutes.
Still think the fanbase isn’t completely fickle?
by Jim McLennan on
Jan 12, 2009 1:46 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Did we sell out
the first game faster than the Vikings? Or was it a draw?
No, fickled and filled with front runeritis and bandwagon jumpers is correct. You do see the same thing in other markets, but it does seem epidemic here in the valley
If you make every game a life-and-death thing, you're going to have problems. You'll be dead a lot.
by unnamedDBacksfan on
Jan 12, 2009 1:50 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think
We beat them, but probably only because Leslie’s Pool Supplies bought a large block of tickets. You could get two tickets at their store by purchasing $100 worth of pool supplies…
by Jim McLennan on
Jan 12, 2009 1:58 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Also
There was a note in the paper on the day of the game that, despite the sell-out, there were still tickets available at the box office. Which means the NFL and I have differing opinions on the meaning of the word “sell-out”…
"That's a cop-out, and you know it, and it breaks my heart into a thousand pieces that we ain't gonna save America with your blog today."
by kishi on
Jan 12, 2009 2:00 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Club level: most expensive
are NOT included in figuring if A game is sold out, plus tickets returned from the visiting team do not count. The stadium looked very full compared to other regular season sell outs.
If you make every game a life-and-death thing, you're going to have problems. You'll be dead a lot.
by unnamedDBacksfan on
Jan 12, 2009 2:01 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Every fanbase is full of bandwagon fans
There’s just some that have a larger base of devoted fans. Just look at nearly any successful team and how their fanbase temporarily explodes after a championship. It’s not like the Red Sox or Patriots had nearly this many fans outside the northeast five years ago.
"That's a cop-out, and you know it, and it breaks my heart into a thousand pieces that we ain't gonna save America with your blog today."
by kishi on
Jan 12, 2009 2:02 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I understand and
acknowledged that fact too.
What’s your feeling on that part of the fanbase? I tend to hold them in disdain, after all, they were not there for all the pain and let downs, why should they reap only the good times?
If you make every game a life-and-death thing, you're going to have problems. You'll be dead a lot.
by unnamedDBacksfan on
Jan 12, 2009 2:05 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't mind fair weather fans
I suspect they’re actually more discerning than I am. If they don’t want to watch lousy football, baseball, basketball (or whatever) then I applaud them for their good judgment. That said, the newly minted die-hard fans, with the licensed apparel, the face paint and the excessive shouting, are kinda creepy.
"We...probed them all the way through. They're completely meat." — Terry Bisson
by Scrbl on
Jan 12, 2009 3:47 PM EST
up
reply
actions
1 recs
+1
Thank you for letting me talk
by Diamondhacks on
Jan 12, 2009 4:43 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Some fairweather team fans are simply casual sports fans
I spent most of my morning Sunday scouring the internet for news on the Cardinals’ win over the Panthers. I’ve never gone out of my way to follow the Cardinals – football’s not really my game. It’s fun to watch socially or for special events (I’ve been to college football games) but I don’t know if I could obsess over the Cardinals the way I do the Diamondbacks since football doesn’t strike that chord with me.
But I am a devoted Arizona sports fan (well, maybe not the Sundevils…). Baseball, football, hockey, I want to see the local teams succeed. I’m happy for the Cardinals. I want them to go forth and conquer. I want them to win because I want all the local teams to win. If I could get tickets to the playoff game I would, because that would be something special. Something to see. I’ll be following the game Sunday and I hope the Cards kick ass.
I get off easy because my heart won’t be broken by this team, and it’s never been broken before. But I want all AZ teams to win. Successful teams like this one give people who may not already be involved in the team a reason to start watching. Nothing wrong with that.
And in the end, I figure the more Phoenix becomes known as a successful sports town, the better it will be for all the franchises here.
If complete and utter chaos was lightning, he'd be the sort to stand on a hilltop in a thunderstorm wearing wet copper armour and shouting 'All gods are bastards'.
by luckycc on
Jan 12, 2009 6:36 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's not as black and white
as i thought then.
I use to think civic pride and die hard passion went hand in hand, but soco’s comment and yours are making me rethink that.
good post.
If you make every game a life-and-death thing, you're going to have problems. You'll be dead a lot.
by unnamedDBacksfan on
Jan 12, 2009 6:50 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A conference championship game
and a wild-card round game aren’t the same. I haven’t researched the Cardinals’ prices because I don’t care enough to know, but from what I remember during the last time the Diamondbacks were in the playoffs, the price went up every round of playoffs. There’s simply more demand for the higher level playoff games because they mean more, and you can probably add the fact that there are quite a few Eagles fans in the Valley, and probably considerably less Falcons fans.
And I completely acknowledged that Arizona’s various fanbases are fickle nearly across the board for every sport and market. The only two teams that get the closest to constant support is the Suns and the UofA men’s basketball team. Both have been around for quite a long time and both have had sustained success, neither of which the Cardinals, Diamondbacks, or Coyotes can make claims.
So my issue wasn’t that Arizona is full of fickle frontrunners; it’s undeniable that the state is full of this type of “fan.” My issue was that the first two reasons are hardly the best or top reasons to make a citation on the Cardinals for. If anything, they become evidence of bandwagon fans only after looking at all the other details.
Please, say that you care, or say that you think that I'm... beautiful.
by soco on
Jan 12, 2009 8:41 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
“The last time there was such a resurrection, a cross was involved.”
Whoa, whoa. Too soon, man. Too soon.
by Azreous on
Jan 12, 2009 10:48 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
The bandwagon runneth over, even on sites
that should know better. Phoney allegiances are the worst.
I’m happiest for the long time fans that have been there from day one. All those games at Sun Devil Stadium in September where that bacon frying sound was from the fans on metal benches, this year is for you! Enjoy it to the MAX!!
Nice piece Jim.
I’ve seen a lot more Cardinal gear around town the last five years than I did the first 15 years the franchise was here. We have a generation now that has grown up with the Cards as the local team as it was mainly the young crowd I saw with the Cards gear. I’ve always thought this was a football town more so than a baseball one. And maybe the DBacks have turned the corner too though as I was at the last weekend series. Bigger crowds than I would have expected and the reaction during the whole game made it seem like we were still playing for something. We’ve still got a few years to go before that first generation is old enough (or ‘rich’ enough) to attend games on their own, but I can still see a solid fanbase developing for us. I think we’ll know we’re there when those Monday thru Thursday games start drawing more than 20,000 regularly.
The worst ‘visiting’ fans to sit by are the ones from their old city but have lived here for a number of years. They feel like to show they are still loyal to that old town team, they must be a complete asshole about the local team. Fans that actually come out from Chicago, NewYork, Boston, ectera are generally pretty cool to be around.
If you make every game a life-and-death thing, you're going to have problems. You'll be dead a lot.
by unnamedDBacksfan on
Jan 12, 2009 11:28 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Here's something to think about too:
For the first time in modern history, Phoenix’s population could be shrinking.
It’s an idea that would have been unimaginable just a few years ago, when Phoenix was surging up the list of the nation’s most populous cities. Now, a variety of indicators suggest that fewer people are living here than a year ago.
No one knows for sure exactly how many people have moved in or out. But with the 2010 census about to get under way, some indicators suggest Phoenix’s population may be smaller than the projected 1,636,170 people.
Full story is on the front page of azcentral.com.
Are people returning to where they came from? I wonder if things stay as bad as it is now or get worse, just how this market will change?
If you make every game a life-and-death thing, you're going to have problems. You'll be dead a lot.
by unnamedDBacksfan on
Jan 12, 2009 2:03 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Rickey Henderson and Jim Rice elected to HOF.
Big Mac receives only 21% — down from the 25% he received last year.
Ceci n'est pas une signature.
by DbacksSkins on
Jan 12, 2009 2:39 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
And Andre Dawson inches closer...
67% this time. Next year, maybe…
"That's a cop-out, and you know it, and it breaks my heart into a thousand pieces that we ain't gonna save America with your blog today."
by kishi on
Jan 12, 2009 4:06 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's a problem with my soccer team as well...
We (São Paulo FC) have the third largest fanbase in the country, only behind Corinthians and Flamengo, and despite being the winningest team over the last 20 years (list of titles to follow in the end) we still have trouble selling out games at home and are called “torcida modinha”, what can translate to “bandwagon fans”.
Last December we won the Campeonato Brasileiro for the 3rd time in a row, and 6th time overall (only team to do both feats), and still weren’t able to sellout until the last 5 home games.
That’s interesting when you compare it with our attendance for the home games of Libertadores da America, the most important Club championship (on wich we are on the top as well, with 3 titles) behind the UEFA Champions League. We’ve played the last 7 editions of it, and sellout almost every single game.
Still, we are not considered a “passionate” fanbase like Corinthians, Flamengo and others. And the media loves it. In 2007, when we got our 2nd Brasileiro in a row and Corinthians finished almost dead last and were sent to the 2nd divison of it, the media didn’t care about São Paulo winning one of the most important national championship of the world, they did care about the team who’s believed got the most diehard fanbase in the country and was sent to a secundary division (it’s a national shame over here…)
So the thing is, over the last 3 decades, the title that everybody wants to grab is the Libertadores, and after taking it to the house 3 times, our fanbase looks a little allienated, and even other teams fanbase care more about their team playing the libertadores than winning the Campeonato Brasileiro, the most important national championship.
We cannot compare it to the major league, since it’s the only thing the DBacks play, but the expectations look similar.
Notes:
- We are compared to the Yankees over here… Other fanbases cry about how we are the only team that can make big trades, or have the biggest TV contracts… and that’s not true. The truth is, we are the only team who takes its busines like a real pro-sports team, being compared to teams like Milan, Manchester, Barcelona, Real… and what a coincidence all those teams are always on the top of their leagues, uh? As for the TV contracts, it’s shared equally between the Clube dos 13, a “coallition” formed by the 13 biggest teams in the country…
- Our stadium was the biggest one owned by a club for a long time, with attendances around 120k ppl, for some games in the past… Now it’s down to around 70k seats, and that’s still a tough number to sellout, in a country that dont have a big percapita.
- There’s a growing sentiment of hatred (?) against our team over the other fanbases, all of a sudden teams like Corinthians and Palmeiras, that have a long history of rivalty between, just have “promoted” Sao Paulo as their biggest threat, and other clubs are doing the same, and that explains an interesting fact: over the last 3 years, almost every Sao Paulo game on the road was a sellout. We are the most important game the other teams play, lol.
As I said, here’s the list of what we won (the most important) over the last 20 years, and what the other teams did:
São Paulo FC: 3 Libertadores da America, 2 Recopa, 4 Campeonato Brasileiro, 3 Mundial Interclubes, 6 Paulista (State championship)
SC Corinthians: 3 Campeonato Brasileiro, 1 Copa do Brasil, 1 Mundial, 6 Paulista
SE Palmeiras: 2 Campeonato Brasileiro, 1 Libertadores, 4 Paulista
CR Flamengo: 1 Campeonato Brasileiro, 1 Copa do Brasil
CR Vasco da Gama: 1 Campeonato Brasileiro, 1 Libertadores
Santos: 2 Campeonato Brasileiro
Gremio: 1 Campeonato Brasileiro
Wikipedia is accurate. (citation needed)
by Muu on
Jan 12, 2009 4:11 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
forgot our last World Champion..
Internacional de Porto Alegre: 1 Libertadores, 1 Mundial Interclubes, 1Copa Sulamericana
Wikipedia is accurate. (citation needed)
by Muu on
Jan 12, 2009 4:17 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Compared to the Yankees?
Wow. You have my sympathy. :-) But much of what you say also rings true of the Yankees, like them being a big draw on the road, other teams uniting in a dislike of the team, etc. It must suck to be a genuine, loyalist, informed fan of the Yankees – and they do exist – because you get tarred with the same brush, as bandwagon fans, who leaped on board from the late nineties or only wear a Yankees cap because their favorite rappers do.
You reduced your stadium capacity to 70K? Wow again! I’m pretty sure only Old Trafford is the only club stadium in Britain with anything approaching that capacity. [Yep: confirmed. Only Arsenal, Rangers, Celtic and Newcastle are also over 50K] But I guess it also depends on the fanbase: Sao Paolo has 11 million people and I’m guessing no other major sports teams? In contrast, London has less people and a quarter of the 20 Premier League teams this year.
On the topic of competition for the sports dollar, I found this interesting article, listing the cities which have all four major sports: based on the numbers in that, Phoenix is larger only than Minneapolis and Denver among members of the four-team club.
Anyway, back to 24.
by Jim McLennan on
Jan 12, 2009 11:37 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Estimated fanbase numbers over the country:
Flamengo: 30 million
Corinthians: 20 million
São Paulo: 15 million
Palmeiras: 10 million
Note that São Paulo, Corinthians and Palmeiras are from SP-SP. The city has aprox 12 million ppl and the 3 teams togheter have around 50. If I’m not wrong, thats twice the population of the entire State.
So, I was talking in a national scale. But yes, a 70k stadium looks ok for a team from SP.
Wikipedia is accurate. (citation needed)
by Muu on
Jan 13, 2009 7:45 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
On Fandom
I’ve seen more red shirts in the past week than, probably, in the eight years since I moved out here.
And more red shirts, I’d venture, than we saw around town in 2007 when the chromatically confused Dbacks reached their final four. It’s not just the branding, altho I think that’s part of it. This is also a football town, Card’s longer PHX tenure, Cards’ losing history, etc.
All of a sudden, everyone is a Cardinals fan;
Yes and no. I’m on yesterday’s bandwagon, but they’ve also enjoyed a resurgence since the new stadium, ratcheted up another notch with Whisenhunt.
The main reason for this astonishingly fickle nature is probably the one which has been well-discussed: many people in Arizona are born somewhere else and bring their loyalties with them when they move here.
No. As soco says, this “fickleness” you observe primarily stems from the Cards’ utterly dubious history, not the birth certificates of Arizonans you’re trying to conflate here into the root cause of sudden ticket sales. What’s perceived as astonishing, not only here but across the entire country, isn’t the fickleness of Arizona fans (and all that implies about being a difficult sports market to penetrate), but a comically archetype “loser” franchise improbably surpassing expectations. That’s the story – and it would be in virtually any American city with a team rewriting this kind of embarrassing history.
While they may feel some fondness for their new home town, it’s a casual attraction, one which is a result of geography and nothing more.
There’s some truth in this, moreso than a generation ago, before cable and online enabled migrating fans to cling to their out of market favorites – but I’d still argue that geographic ties are very strong, even in a place like Arizona. Lots of people come here to resurrect their lives, for a fresh start. I had East Coast allegiances, but immediately supported all four of the Valley’s pro teams. I realize not everyone is like that, but I’ve met alot of people who are eager to identify with teams hailing from the city where they’ve bought a home and where they’ve staked their future.
Ten years is just not sufficient time to build a fan-base: that kind of thing takes a generation or more
Really? Do the Carolina Panthers or Tennessee Titans ring a bell? New Orleans Hornets? The Colorado Rockies built (“tapped into” might be more accurate) a very nice fan base, drawing approx 40K into their eighth and ninth years of numbing futility, before attendance fell sharply.
Locally? The Suns almost tripled their fan base in their first decade, from barely 4K to 11K, and then almost doubled that with the new arena. The early raw numbers are certainly low by today’s standards, but Jerry built them into a very “popular” team – relative to contemporaries – in less than a decade – without the benefit of “buying a ring”. ASU football drew a dedicated fan base right away, with the original Sun Devil Stadium in 1958, and had to more than double capacity to accomodate interest and the Valley’s explosive growth. Kush had excellent teams, but they were drawing well before the undefeated ’75 season and didnt go to a Rose Bowl until ’87. You dont need to be a champion for Valley fans to show up – just field solid, competitive teams and dont overcharge too much for your product – something the Cardinals and Coyotes (and to a lesser extent the dbacks v.2) failed at.
The point is, there are plenty of examples, locally and beyond, of various franchises quickly establishing significant fan bases. PIR has long been one of NASCAR’s most well attended stops, and as soon as our PGA date moved to a bigger venue, it became the highest attended golf tournament in the free world. None of this took “a generation” – it took sports owners and marketers who created real fan utility (instead of mostly talking about it), and who let actual demand (instead of contrived business school projections) drive prices.
In 2008, our payroll put us between the Orioles and the Royals
…and our RPI (essentially W/L weighted by schedule strength) was lower than either of them, between the dying Cincinnati and Pittsburgh markets, if you must know.
Realistically, and with our resources, we probably should not be expecting to compete regularly.
Blech. May the ghost of Susan Sarandon visit your bedside! We…
probably should not be expecting to compete regularly
in baseball’s worst division? Do you realize what a gift it is to not have to play sixty games a year against the Red Sox, Yankees and Rays? To not have to look up every year at the Angels? Or the Twins? Or the Cubs? Or the Mets? Or the Phillies? Or half a dozen other teams (CLE,CHW,STL, DET, FLA, HOU) that intermittently crank out championship caliber squads? Do you realize the historic nature of the gift bestowed upon the Rockies and us by Ned Coletti and the McCourts, Sabean’s reduction of the post Bonds G-Men to a shell of a lineup whose best hitter last year was Bengie Molina! Not to mention San Diego’s utter collapse. We will never see the likes of this 2005-2008 window ever again, my low expectations managing friend.
Ever!
The 2001 World Series win imprinted itself on fans, in a way that has proven difficult to shake off…
Shake it off? Like an irritant or an insult? Wow. There’s a latch on my front door that’s broken. It’s been broken since 10:50PM on November 4th, 2001, when I burst out the door too fast, to yell praise to the heavens, and dance. Unseen voices echoed our howls in the dark, across the neighborhood, like distant coyotes. Children saw joy reflected in fathers’ eyes and learned what it is to be a shallow American sports fan. Feuding neighbors exchanged high fives. Strangers hugged. Cats and dogs kissed. Men proposed marriage and women accepted. I’m not fixing that latch :-)
Painful though it is to admit it, the World Series was ‘bought’ for Arizona
It’s likely we wouldnt have a title without the spending, but the notion of “buying a title” is misleading, in that $ in no way guarantees a ring; there’s no strict exchange, as in buying a suit or a bar of soap. Jerry gambled on a ring and won, but what he actually bought, inefficiently and unsustainably, was something less tangible. For a new franchise, without an established farm to tap, he went out and bought potential playoff access. Competitiveness. Attitude. He bought a feeling, more than anything, that win or lose, we werent gonna be consistently pushed around by LA & SF bullies – who were quite a bit stronger than their 2005-2008 counterparts.
While I wouldn’t trade that season, 2001, for anything…
You keep saying that, but it rings hollow to me. It sounds to me like you would trade it, in retrospect. For something more financially prudent, sustainable, less sucessful on the field. Maybe an uninterrupted string of responsible, expansion-ish third and fourth place finishes in 1999-2004 – with a balanced, ever increasing budget. Think of all the fiscally prudent glory we’d be rolling in by NOW!!!! I dont wanna start the New Year by shoving words in your mouth, but it just seems this ubiquitous clause belies the tone of the preponderance of what you tend to argue. Maybe there’s a middle ground here we can agree on, and I respect the fact the title meant something to you, but I’m sorry, I just “hear” you wanting to undo it, wishing our history was different in such fundamental ways, without, imo, fully acknowledging that ultimate tradeoff.
I dont want to get in fight. Yours was a very good entry with a ton of stuff in it. I mostly wanted to flesh out a few thoughts and move on.
Cheers
Thank you for letting me talk
by Diamondhacks on
Jan 12, 2009 5:21 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks for your detailed response
I’ve pretty much said all I intend to, but to correct a couple of points, and provide a bit more explanation:
The Colorado Rockies built ("tapped into" might be more accurate) a very nice fan base, drawing approx 40K into their eighth and ninth years of numbing futility, before attendance fell sharply
Actually, attendance had already fallen sharply: it was above 55,000 their first two seasons. Even after that, from 1996 [their second year in Coors and the one after they won the Wild Card] through 2005, the Rockies were fifty fans away from seeing their average crowd drop for nine consecutive seasons, with 2005 numbers less than half those of 1996. To me, the pattern looks almost exactly the same as that of the Diamondbacks, just coming down from a higher initial value.
I must also point out that the Vet, where the Suns used to play, could never come close to holding 20,000, so the “doubling” you mention is no indication of any increase in local interest, just of availability of seats,
[ in baseball’s worst division? ]
Last season or in 2005, probably. But in 2007, not at all: the West were 23 games above .500 against the East and were 19 above against the Central. Only ONE of the eleven teams outside the West [the Braves] had a winning record against the “worst division in baseball”, with each playing 32 or more games against us. Similarly, in 2006, the West went 106-92 against the Central, and were basically at .500 vs. teams outside the division or in the AL.
[ You keep saying that, but it rings hollow to me. It sounds to me like you would trade it, in retrospect. ]
Would I rather the World Series had been won without $250m in debt? Would I rather it had been won without leading directly to the 111 losses of 2004? Sure. But that doesn’t mean I didn’t want it to happen, any more than hangovers have stopped me from wanting to drink. But nor does it mean we should ignore the negative repercussions – which, in this case, was specifically in the very narrow area of fan expectations. Winning a World Series is a very hard thing to do. I don’t think the majority of casual fans quite appreciate how difficult it is, especially for a team with limited resources.
by Jim McLennan on
Jan 12, 2009 6:48 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Also on the Suns
They lost about 15% of attendance in just two seasons, from 1999-2000 to 2001-02, and then stayed around the lower level for three seasons. It’s no coincidence that this was when the team was finishing from 15-27 games back in the division. The scope of the drop is probably even greater than these numbers suggest, because the Suns were selling out America West before and after that point, and no doubt could have sold more than 20,000 tickets per game.
That’s really what I mean by a ‘’fairweather" fanbase – one where interest (and attendance) is strongly correlated to success. You also can’t really compare something like NASCAR or golf, because for events like that, there is basically little or no concept of local favoritism.
by Jim McLennan on
Jan 12, 2009 7:39 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
In a Sep. 2007 poll on the ’Pit, 68% of the 155 respondents said they were under the age of 30. Now, that may well skew low, based on the Internet medium, etc. but anecdotal evidence also suggests that young people are more likely to be devoted fans of the Diamondbacks.
I’ve been thinking, Jim…. it might be interesting to conduct this poll again, this time well-separated from the playoff/division title bandwagon excitement of the 2007 season.
"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski
by DbacksSkins on
Jan 12, 2009 7:26 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
But, even with [the Rays’] stellar season, their average attendance in 2008 was 22,259, far less than the Diamondbacks (30,986).
Evidence in our own history suggests that a boost in attendance wouldn’t necessarily be expected for the Rays until this season.
"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski
by DbacksSkins on
Jan 12, 2009 7:28 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
You stay classy bandwagon fans:
Pathetic, once again.
Football fans shut out by the rapid-fire pace that tickets for Sunday’s Cardinals-Eagles game sold still have hope on the secondary market.
Thousands of tickets are available at online resale sites such as StubHub and RazorGator.
At StubHub, a record was set Monday, with more tickets sold for the Arizona-Philadelphia match-up than any other NFC Championship in the company’s history.
The 6,000 or so tickets sold on StubHub as of Monday afternoon apparently speak to tough economic times as fans weigh attending Sunday’s game against making a tidy profit.
The sales volume also might say something about the loyalty of Arizona ticket holders.
Few Green Bay Packers fans are ever willing to part with their tickets, StubHub spokesman Sean Pate said. As a result, StubHub’s average price to last year’s NFC Championship between Green Bay and the New York Giants was $710.
This year’s average resale price on StubHub is about $320, lower in part because so many tickets are available on the secondary market. In fact, the game is the lowest priced championship that Pate has seen in years and less than the AFC Championship between Pittsburgh and Baltimore, where ticket resales are averaging $380.
RazorGator reported prices for the Cards game ranging from $297 to $1,995.
Hundreds more tickets were available at places such as craigslist, where season ticket holders, who got first dibs on playoff tickets, were putting them on the block.
“The first one to contact me with cash gets the tickets,” said one craigslist poster from Surprise.
Some fans are critical of Arizona ticket-holders selling to the highest bidder. The franchise opted to only sell admission to Arizona residents, in part to build the home field advantage.
StubHub reported that ticket buyers have hailed from 42 states, with 56 percent from Arizona and 8 percent from Pennsylvania.
While Cards loyalists condemned reselling of tickets, others criticized the team’s decision to only sell tickets directly to those who could prove Arizona residency. The team intended to open it up this week nationally, but the tickets sold out before that could happen.
If you make every game a life-and-death thing, you're going to have problems. You'll be dead a lot.
by unnamedDBacksfan on
Jan 13, 2009 11:04 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I have two reasons for watching...
1. New TV
2. NAU is promising free breakfast burritos.
(When do the Diamondbacks start again?)
It would be poetic if it didn't suck so much (RIP Pushing Daisies...)
by emilylovesthedbacks on
Jan 14, 2009 12:33 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Hmmm
I wonder if they’ll let me in for the burritos if I bring my old NAU ID.
Please, say that you care, or say that you think that I'm... beautiful.
by soco on
Jan 14, 2009 7:58 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I wonder if they'll let me in for the burritos
if I dress up like a hobo.
"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski
by DbacksSkins on
Jan 14, 2009 9:46 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hmm...
Nah. I can get a burrito without driving to Flagstaff, so probably not worth the trip.
"That's a cop-out, and you know it, and it breaks my heart into a thousand pieces that we ain't gonna save America with your blog today."
by kishi on
Jan 14, 2009 10:45 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But
free NAU breakfast burritos?
"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski
by DbacksSkins on
Jan 14, 2009 11:09 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hmm, a valid point
When are these burritos being offered? Somewhere, I’ve still got my NAU ID proclaiming my name to be Mr. Lucky.
"That's a cop-out, and you know it, and it breaks my heart into a thousand pieces that we ain't gonna save America with your blog today."
by kishi on
Jan 14, 2009 12:41 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Really?
I would give you my free breakfast burrito just to see an NAU ID card with Mr Lucky on it. :-P
It’s in the new expansion in the union…they put a bunch of huge flat screens in over break, and they’re just asking you show ID…
It would be poetic if it didn't suck so much (RIP Pushing Daisies...)
by emilylovesthedbacks on
Jan 14, 2009 1:06 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My NAU ID
says my name is McLovin….
"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski
by DbacksSkins on
Jan 14, 2009 4:02 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Incidentally?
24? Totally disappointing. Not enough torture.
"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski
by DbacksSkins on
Jan 14, 2009 11:36 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
















