The Outfield Mess
Sparked by this article, I began thinking of the possibilities for the DBacks outfield next season.
Going into next season, the DBacks have a rather large logjam of players to play the three outfield positions. This logjam became exacerbated with Byrnes' injury, thus pressing younger players into service and requiring position switches. The beneficiaries of Byrnes' injury, CoJack and Romero, both played extremely well in light of the circumstances.
Depending on how the other positions shake out, specifically with regards to Dunn and Hudson, our outfield could get very crowded next season. The CoJack switch provided better dividends than I anticipated, and many players have play in the OF this season and acquitted themselves well. Among our possible returning outfielders (at least to this point) are; Byrnes, Young, Upton, Romero, CoJack, Salazar, Dunn, Burke, and possibly D'Antona.
OF those, Salazar and Burke are probably not in consideration for the starting spots and are hopelessly relegated to the spot-duty role which Salazar has done well with and Burke had his ups and downs with but possesses more versatility than Sally. D'Antona is being groomed for the infield, but could also be a spot-starter if need be.
I do not consider it a likely possibility that Dunn is resigned because our team has proven that they can draft well and the two picks we would get from not signing Dunn can help rebuild a rather well-mined farm system.
Young has a fairly good hold on CF because it is the hardest OF position to play and he has the most experience there. Thus, my lineup configurations will only focus on the corner OF positions.
Scenario 1:
Assuming the Position-Not-Lost-Due-To-Injury rule of thumb, the starting OF positions for next year would be:
LF: Byrnes
CF: Young
RF: Upton
This would assume that CoJack goes to 1B, Dunn is not resigned, and Tracy or Reynolds gets moved. If, however, Byrnes was moved instead, then we could keep Reynolds' power and pray pray pray that he cuts down on the K's.
Scenario 2:
Byrnes is moved, D'Antona/Tracy plays 1B, and Salazar/Burke remain our spot-starters.
LF: CoJack
CF: Young
RF: Upton
The advantage of this lineup is that it has the most consistency. CoJack is now acquainted with LF and can spend the entire off-season preparing for his new position. Upton, who has begun to really hit the ball well, gets to hopefully play his first full major league season at RF and get better at fielding the ball.
Scenario 3:
If Byrnes was traded, Dunn not resigned, the Tracy/Reynolds conflict resolved, and CoJack moved to 1B, then we would have a speedy, if inexperienced OF:
LF: Romero
CF: Young
RF: Upton
Unfortunately, this lineup does not have the hitting consistency to be much help to the team. CY and Upton at times can be pretty streaky hitters and Romero is still really young.
Scenario 4:
If D'Antona was put at 1B, the Tracy/Reynolds conflict resolved, then we keep CoJack's power in the OF and can move Salazar if we wish. However, this keeps either Upton or Byrnes out of the outfield, one who has tremendous potential and the other who is getting paid big money.
LF: Byrnes/CoJack
CF: Young
RF: Upton/CoJack
In any case, I think CoJack is too valuable to this team to move him and I doubt there would be many takers outside of the New York Knicks willing to take on Bynres' enormous contract.
I prefer an outfield of:
LF: CoJack
CF: Young
RF: Upton
with Byrnes moving elsewhere, but I do not consider it a likely scenario.
Thoughts? Questions? Comments? Concers? Lamentations?
1 recs |
76 comments
Comments
Here's an idea:
Re-sign Adam Dunn, so we actually have a legitimate non-Reynolds power threat.
The Zorn Star just got his first Cowboys victory for the "maroon and black".
by DbacksSkins on Sep 30, 2008 8:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Power threat
slash base-getter-onner.
The Zorn Star just got his first Cowboys victory for the "maroon and black".
by DbacksSkins on Sep 30, 2008 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can has funding?
Yes, it would be nice to re-sign him, and there’s no doubt that this would have a huge impact on the rest of the scenario. But where is the $15-20m per year that;ll take going to come from, given we will be paying an extra $11m to the members of the current roster, largely wiping out the savings from the departure of Russ Ortiz and a cheaper version of Randy J next year. Even if we move Reynolds to second and pay league minimum to someone at third-base, the money we’re saving on Hudson would fall far short of being enough to sign Dunn.
The only way I can see us re-signing Dunn is if we can convince someone to take Byrnes and his salary. That will then let us go with Jackson full time in LF, Dunn at 1st and perhaps a fully-healthy Tracy at 3rd next year.
by Jim McLennan on Sep 30, 2008 8:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm.....
how much does Jeff Moorad make? Maybe we can take part of Byrnes’ salary out of his paycheck.
The Zorn Star just got his first Cowboys victory for the "maroon and black".
by DbacksSkins on Sep 30, 2008 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Would you rather have
Dunn (and no draft picks) or Hudson + the 2 draft picks from Cincy?
I have an irrational mancrush on Stephen Drew.
by Snakebitten on Oct 1, 2008 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We're not re-signing Hudson.
He’s not worth it. I’d rather have Dunn and the 2 draft picks from Hudson.
The Zorn Star just got his first Cowboys victory for the "maroon and black".
by DbacksSkins on Oct 1, 2008 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think that
we get draft picks for not signing Hudson. Do we?
I have an irrational mancrush on Stephen Drew.
by Snakebitten on Oct 1, 2008 8:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Assuming we offer him arbitration
I think we would. I imagine he would be a Type A free agent, despite the injuries that have limited his playing time a bit.
by Jim McLennan on Oct 1, 2008 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess you guys haven't seen this
http://tigers-thoughts.blogspot.com/2008/08/projected-elias-rankings.html
He thinks he’s figured out the formula. Hudson would be an A if he’s right. As is Dunn.
As of 9/10, Cruz was an A and Lyon had just climbed back onto the bottom rung of B. (Rauch solidy in the A’s as well).
He’s starting the final rankings now. http://tigers-thoughts.blogspot.com/2008/10/final-elias-projections-nl-starting.html Randy just missed B.
Fire Bob Melvin
by nihil67 on Oct 2, 2008 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure
if the Elias rankings include defense, but offensively, he’s been easily one of the most consistent and most productive middle infielders in the league. 7th best OPS this year among 2Bs with 400 or more ABs.
The Zorn Star just got his first Cowboys victory for the "maroon and black".
by DbacksSkins on Oct 2, 2008 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eric says no way...
EB quotes from his radio interview last week:
“All right, here’s the deal. Conor’s playing LF right now, right? He’s doing a great job. Um, bottom line is this, in a matter of fact is this, I’m not going anywhere. Not for two years I’m not. I’m not… really there’s nothing they can do. For those that have a problem, who don’t know, and I’m not sure if they care or not, you guys are stuck with me. Okay, there’s this little thing I have in my contract that’s called a No Trade Clause. Okay, so… We’re getting, we’re getting to some really good stuff. So now you guys wanna ask me, Byrnsie, you got a No Trade Clause, what if they came to you and said we want Conor to play LF? You know, we wanna, we wanna, we wanna trade you somewhere during this offseason, you know, and we plan on this guy playin’ here and this guy playin’ here. Um… Hey, in all, in all honesty, I, I, I think that uh the answer would be no. I’d just say thank you, I appreciate you guys wantin’ to get rid of me. I think I’m, I think I’m gonna stick around for a little bit. So for everybody in Arizona who, who who, who’s sick of seeing me here, and who’ve said this offseason the Diamondbacks are going to so brilliantly ship me off, you guys better start thinkin’ again.”
“Eric Byrnes: No Trade Clause to any team. If you try to trade me, I have my middle finger up in the air so don’t even worry about it. Save the phone call.”
by TAP on Sep 30, 2008 8:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Is that for real?
The Zorn Star just got his first Cowboys victory for the "maroon and black".
by DbacksSkins on Sep 30, 2008 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
His fans
better hope this is another “Onion” interview. heck, we’d all better.
"So Long, and Thanks for all the Fish!"
by unnamedDBacksfan on Sep 30, 2008 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If so
Eric Byrnes, welcome to the bench. You are now the 25th man on the roster. Even Robby Hammock will see more playing time than you. Get comfortable: it’s going to be a long two years.
by Jim McLennan on Sep 30, 2008 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
::thinking angry thoughts::
The Zorn Star just got his first Cowboys victory for the "maroon and black".
by DbacksSkins on Sep 30, 2008 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sadly, it appears so
Hear it for yourself here. The comments are just after the eight-minute mark.
by Jim McLennan on Sep 30, 2008 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And it appears
That after they reconnected with EB – the first call got disconnected – his subsequent comments dissing Jackson also managed to peeve CoJack [That one is definitely worth a listen]. “Locker-room talk should stay in the locker-room,” according to Jackson. Byrnes was apparently shocked – shocked – that someone transcribed his on-air comments, without adding smilies… There goes TAP’s invite to the next EB barbecue. Especially since he is, according to Byrnes, “some blogger with the personality of a thumbtack.” :-)
by Jim McLennan on Sep 30, 2008 10:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Quentin and I....
both persona non grata at EB’s BBQs. How distressing is that?
by TAP on Sep 30, 2008 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Consider yourself
lucky then.
It’s nice to know Eric spells team with an “i”. What a jerk. Gosh, I wonder if it’s okay to boo him now?
Thanks for posting this TAP. Truth be told, I was never sold on his hype anyways and don’t really need another reason to dislike him.
"So Long, and Thanks for all the Fish!"
by unnamedDBacksfan on Sep 30, 2008 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's okay.
We’ll have our OWN parallel BBQ at the same time and we won’t invite EB. In fact, we’ll say mean things about him.
The Zorn Star just got his first Cowboys victory for the "maroon and black".
by DbacksSkins on Oct 1, 2008 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Much ado about nothing.
Listen to the interview. I sounded like Bam Bam was just messing around.
Let the drama queens play their little game by trying to spin this into some full blown club house issue that it is not.
Maybe they should start to follow the Yankees and Mets if they want to get into all that rumor and innuendo bs.
by foulpole on Sep 30, 2008 11:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's funny....
I was going to make a comment about the amount of time it was going to take you to defend Byrnes.
The Zorn Star just got his first Cowboys victory for the "maroon and black".
by DbacksSkins on Sep 30, 2008 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
thinking the same thing
"So Long, and Thanks for all the Fish!"
by unnamedDBacksfan on Sep 30, 2008 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOLZ
Levski at DBBP:
matt wrote:
That is so awesome TAP! You rule!I want to know who got the transcript to EB.
My guess is EB = foulpole :-D
The Zorn Star just got his first Cowboys victory for the "maroon and black".
by DbacksSkins on Oct 1, 2008 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is anyone here
surprised that foulpole would view this as ‘acceptable’? I mean, after all, EB22 is one of those ‘proven’ vets foulpole gets all in a tizzy for…
"So Long, and Thanks for all the Fish!"
by unnamedDBacksfan on Sep 30, 2008 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is not "rumor and innuendo", however
This is a player speaking publicly, for himself, on the radio. Where is the “rumor and innuendo” ? I’m really not bothered about the Jackson stuff; I agree that this is Byrnes messing around – Eric being Eric, as it were. However it’s the other part that bother me enormously. This is the ‘face of the franchise’ basically coming out and saying, explicitly, that he doesn’t give a damn about what might be best for the franchise. I don’t know about you, but that hardly sounds like the sort of ‘veteran presence’ Arizona needs in the clubhouse.
We saw in Boston how disruptive a player could be when he wants to leave. Listening to the interview – and like you, I listed to the whole thing – made me feel terribly like we’ll have the same situation, just in reverse, here with the D-backs for the next couple of years, with a player pitted irrevocably against management.
by Jim McLennan on Oct 1, 2008 1:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bam-Ram?
Manny wanted days off and various perks. Byrnes desperately wants to play. To compare their “demands”, or entrenched stances against management, is as silly as comparing their abilities.
This is the ‘face of the franchise’ basically coming out and saying, explicitly, that he doesn’t give a damn about what might be best for the franchise.
Gee, I missed that part. What I hear is a proud, frustrated athlete who’s a) convinced he’s the club’s best option in left field, b) gonna fight like hell to play and make good on his contract, and c) like most players, prefers not to be traded.
Eric’s problem is he’s got a big mouth, which is alternately endearing and problematic. The CoJack phone call reflects that and their close relationship. EB and Hudson have sparred publicly about their respective abilities for years, in a similarly jocular way.
I agree w/ foulpole, this particular incident isnt a big deal, but Eric’s mouth becomes more problematic when he rags on teammates competing for the same position(CJ), and/or when a player is genuinely struggling(Q). Then the “joke” isnt as funny. For example, would Eric take it in stride had a teammate ragged on his current performance? Veteran or not, Eric’s guilty of a double standard here – one he’ll be able to charm his way out of for only so long.
…a player pitted irrevocably against management
Your scenario of a healthy, expensive EB languishing on the bench is hardly in mgmt’s interests either, and I dont see that kind of war playing out. Eric will waive his NTC. As EB noted, he paid a price for it, and if the Dbacks dont want him to play (highly speculative at this point), the club will pay a price for him to waive it. Standard business.
by Diamondhacks on Oct 1, 2008 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gee, I missed that part. What I hear is a proud, frustrated athlete who’s a) convinced he’s the club’s best option in left field, b) gonna fight like hell to play and make good on his contract, and c) like most players, prefers not to be traded.
See, that may be what he means. But that’s not really how it came across to me. Where did he say he was going to fight for the job? His words say “Nope, you can’t start Conor out there, that’s my position, and if you want to trade me, screw you, I’m not going anywhere, no matter what.”
"Now, this is the dumbest thing I've ever heard [Hank Steinbrenner] say, and this is the third time I've said that this season."
by kishi on Oct 1, 2008 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I totally agree
he comes off as cocky, rude and self-interested. No doubt about it. I’m just less apt to take what he’s saying at face value.
This seems like a put-on in two respects. First, EB’s an over the top entertainer, more interested in shock value than the usual, pre-fab “Go Team” bromides and cliches. Especially on Bickley’s radio show. It’s basically trash talk. (And as I said above, that has consequences.)
Second, and more important, I think Eric is staking out a position to play regularly, somewhere, in 2009. This guy’s entire career reflects a passion to play. He’s heard the talk about being a fourth outfielder, and I imagine is pretty pisssd off about it. Right or wrong, the guy finished 3rd in 2007 NL West MVP voting (behind Holliday and Peavy), and as well as Conor filled in, I cant fault EB for expecting to get his job back. He may not be the best option, but I dont feel his is an unreasonable position.
If he publicly acquiesces to the idea of being a 4th OF, that might actually happen, and neither he nor the team really want that, imo. If he rescinds his NTC for nothing now, demanding a trade for example, that voluntary forfeiture might cost him millions of dollars ($ initially saved by the club in the extension). So, there’s a posturing element here.
Personally, I think the Dbacks are looking to trade him, may be closer to transacting a deal than most think, and that Byrnsie is basically OK with this. I believe he’d rather play fulltime somewhere else than sit on the bench here, and is basically setting a hardline tone for negotiating potential terms.
by Diamondhacks on Oct 1, 2008 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can understand this
as an “over the top entertainer.” As a team leader, it’s really disappointing. At best, he comes off as a boor: insult your teammates in public, make up with them in private. He can’t get away with that very often before he loses his credibility in the clubhouse.
I’m not privy to the FO’s thinking, but I suspect Eric Byrnes is supposed to be one of our team’s veteran leaders. With behavior like this, I’m not surprised that our young players are having trouble developing.
"We...probed them all the way through. They're completely meat." — Terry Bisson
by Scrbl on Oct 3, 2008 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cause and Effect
He can’t get away with that very often before he loses his credibility in the clubhouse.
Agree
With behavior like this, I’m not surprised that our young players are having trouble developing.
You blamin’ Byrnes’ radio schtick for Mark Reynolds’ or Chris Young’s "lack of development? If so, I categorically disagree.
If you’re saying Byrnes’ boorishness, loose lips, etc reflects (rather than causes) a somewhat lax or less than optimal organizational approach, then that’s more plausible, imo.
by Diamondhacks on Oct 3, 2008 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm more inclined
to blame Josh Byrnes for believing that Eric Byrnes is a capable leader for the team. These players need someone to help them figure out how to thrive in the major leagues, and Eric Byrnes has demonstrated that he’s not he’s not a capable mentor or leader. I would have hoped that the front office had spotted this sooner and tried to fill the void with someone other than Eric Byrnes.
"We...probed them all the way through. They're completely meat." — Terry Bisson
by Scrbl on Oct 3, 2008 8:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, it’s always pretty funny when someone says “Hey, you guys, I know that someone’s been doing pretty well in that position, but screw you all, it’s mine.”
"Now, this is the dumbest thing I've ever heard [Hank Steinbrenner] say, and this is the third time I've said that this season."
by kishi on Oct 1, 2008 1:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and this is
the player Soco gets all upset about when someone talks bad about him??
Good god almighty, you and the mrs sure can pick em
"So Long, and Thanks for all the Fish!"
by unnamedDBacksfan on Sep 30, 2008 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another possibility
LF. Jackson
CF. Byrnes
RF. Upton
Young’s .758 OPS last season – a few points below his 2007 figure – was distinctly unimpressive. While we may not see Byrnes v.2007 [OPS .813] ever again, even Byrnes’ career average .771 [and most of that in the hitter non-friendly confines of Oakland] would be an improvement over Young’s production the past couple of seasons.
by Jim McLennan on Sep 30, 2008 11:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
But I think
that Byrnes’ all-or-nothing attitude towards defense is better confined to the corners of the OF instead of the center, where it can really be a liability. I think Young’s arm is better from CF, but the best lineup based on arm strength might be
LF: CoJack
CF: Romero
RF: Upton
Romero has the speed to cover the larger area of center field and the arm to keep all but the fastest runners honest.
I have an irrational mancrush on Stephen Drew.
by Snakebitten on Oct 1, 2008 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't forget
that Byrnes played a fairly credible CF before Gonzo left.
The Zorn Star just got his first Cowboys victory for the "maroon and black".
by DbacksSkins on Oct 1, 2008 7:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
On the other hand
I’d have problems benching Chris Young, given that he’s played some great defense this year.
"Now, this is the dumbest thing I've ever heard [Hank Steinbrenner] say, and this is the third time I've said that this season."
by kishi on Oct 1, 2008 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True.
And also given that he’s still, as of this point, our CF of the future — Byrnes would only be stunting his growth.
The Zorn Star just got his first Cowboys victory for the "maroon and black".
by DbacksSkins on Oct 2, 2008 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
CJ in lf with 12 bombs and a below average d???
Is that what we really need?
by foulpole on Oct 2, 2008 1:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
His D is not below average.
Please stop spouting nonsense.
by Azreous on Oct 2, 2008 2:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fielding Bible +/-
MLB Left Field 2008
Rank Player +/-
1 Carl Crawford +23
2 Willie Harris +22
3 Conor Jackson +14
4 Luke Scott +12
5 Matt Holliday +11
by shoewizard on Oct 2, 2008 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow.....
3rd in the league?? I knew he was good, but…… damn. Do those numbers change if he plays there a full season?
The Zorn Star just got his first Cowboys victory for the "maroon and black".
by DbacksSkins on Oct 2, 2008 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes...I think they WOULD change
I don’t believe that CJ is the 3rd best LF in baseball. This is simply a snapshot in time. CJ played 659 innings in LF, which is roughly half a season. Think of it in terms of batting average. It’s certainly possible for a .270 hitter to hit .300 over the first half of the season, and then hit .240 over the second half. Given a full season in LF, I think you would certainly see a regression to the mean with CJ’s numbers in LF. They may not regress all the way back to league average within a single season, but over time, they probably would.
From WATCHING him, he clearly got more comfortable with playing time. He was getting good jumps and good reads on balls. He was doing a good job of going back on balls over his head. He wasn’t getting fooled by sinking liners and was taking the proper routes to cut balls off in the gaps.
The first couple of weeks his throwing looked suspect, and in fact I commented on that, but then with better footwork on his throws, that improved too. He ended up tied for second on the team with 5 OF Asst in just half a season of PT. (Upton had 6, Young had 5)
Byrnes is a better defensive outfielder when fully healthy. I don’t think anyone should dispute that. But he’s NOT fully healthy, and at age 33 with Hamstring history now, he’s not likely to ever be as good as his career year of 2007.
Meanwhile, his career OBP is .325 vs. CJ’s career OBP of .367
So there are no easy decisions here. Byrnes is the guy they paid, and he did have two pretty good seasons in 2006-2007, (although not as good as some might suggest. ;) . We’ll have to see what shakes out going forward. One thing we learned this year is you can’t have too much depth. All it took was one injury for Chris Burke to get regular playing time. A 3 way platoon between 1b-LF for Tracy/Jackson/Byrnes might be the best way to go for 2009, with Byrnes spelling Young and Upton as well.
by shoewizard on Oct 2, 2008 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
All it took was one injury for Chris Burke to get regular playing time.
Let’s never do this. Ever again.
Never.
Not even once.
"We...probed them all the way through. They're completely meat." — Terry Bisson
by Scrbl on Oct 3, 2008 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let’s never do this. Ever again.
Never.
Not even once.
I agree. Let’s never let our guys get injured.
"If the government's nuclear football ever were to fall into the wrong hands, Chris Horton would be called upon to intercept it on behalf of the Pentagon." -Kissing Suzy Kolber
by DbacksSkins on Oct 3, 2008 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That too
but I was thinking more along the lines of “let’s never let our only viable backup be Chris Burke.”
"We...probed them all the way through. They're completely meat." — Terry Bisson
by Scrbl on Oct 3, 2008 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They're both good plans
Let’s put both into effect.
"Now, this is the dumbest thing I've ever heard [Hank Steinbrenner] say, and this is the third time I've said that this season."
by kishi on Oct 3, 2008 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
IAWTC
"If the government's nuclear football ever were to fall into the wrong hands, Chris Horton would be called upon to intercept it on behalf of the Pentagon." -Kissing Suzy Kolber
by DbacksSkins on Oct 3, 2008 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Above average D. Far above average D.
And I’ll take a 26 yr old LF with a 2008 OPS of .823 over a 32 yr old LF with a 2008 OPS of .641 any day. They both have above average defense, but at least CoJack doesn’t flip everytime he gets the ball to the infield.
The Zorn Star just got his first Cowboys victory for the "maroon and black".
by DbacksSkins on Oct 2, 2008 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What WE need
is some honesty from you for a pleasant change. Try as you might to get some poo to stick, it ain’t working.
"So Long, and Thanks for all the Fish!"
by unnamedDBacksfan on Oct 2, 2008 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I still maintain
that Eric Byrnes should be moved to second base.
by Azreous on Oct 1, 2008 12:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I say
we trade Miggy for Dan Uggla, and then Eric Byrnes becomes the backup catcher.
The Zorn Star just got his first Cowboys victory for the "maroon and black".
by DbacksSkins on Oct 1, 2008 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Byrnes puts his middle finger away
Whether or not the Diamondbacks will actually try to trade him — and whether they can find a match with another team by either taking on someone else’s big contract or eating some of his salary — well, that remains to be seen. But Byrnes did seem to say that he wouldn’t just shoot it down without consideration.
"No one wants to be somewhere that they’re not wanted, so if it came down to that, sure," he said. "But I still have some value when I’m healthy and playing my game, which I believe I can do. I can never say never, but at the same time it would have to be some perfect situation for me.
"I signed to play here. I didn’t sign to play somewhere else. That’s a lot of the reason why even when I signed the deal and had the no-trade clause put in there it was such a big deal to me. Because I’ve been shipped off before, I’ve dealt with that, been traded twice in a year. That wasn’t necessarily an ideal situation for me then."
Byrnes has every right to veto a trade; that, of course, is why you negotiate for a no-trade clause in the first place. But if you’re him and you are looking at a situation where you might be a fourth outfielder, you’d have to think about it.
by Jim McLennan on Oct 1, 2008 11:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hmmmm.....
I think I’ll ask the driver to pull over and leave me on the side of the road. I’m officially off the Eric Byrnes bandwagon.
The Zorn Star just got his first Cowboys victory for the "maroon and black".
by DbacksSkins on Oct 2, 2008 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Derrick Hall chips in
MP3 audio of interview from this morning. Thanks to TAP for keeping us abreast of all this!
by Jim McLennan on Oct 2, 2008 2:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
For those of us at work,
what’s he basically say?
"If the government's nuclear football ever were to fall into the wrong hands Chris Horton would be called upon to intercept it on behalf of the Pentagon."
by DbacksSkins on Oct 2, 2008 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm at work too
So haven’t heard it myself, but per TAP on DBBP: “Derrick in a radio interview this morning stressed "depth” and “competition” regarding AZ’s 2009 OF situation. Derrick says this organization is willing to pay $11M annually for a 4th OFer if that’s what needs to happen. They’re not going to make decisions based on salaries."
by Jim McLennan on Oct 2, 2008 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Typing as I’m listening: The team wants to have depth, they consider it a positive sign that they consider CoJack an outfielder now, they want to have competition for the position, they’ll have Byrnes as the fourth outfielder unless he proves he should be out there, they want to put the best team on the field regardless of salary, CoJack likes being out in the outfield, and if they keep him out there, the team might keep Tracy at first, find someone in the trade, or they might try to sign Adam Dunn. Says Byrnes makes the team a better team, but if there’s a deal out there, they’ll consider it.
Other than that: He’s disappointed that they’re not in the playoffs, he’s happy with Qualls as the closer, and Lyon was obviously more comfortable as a set-up guy. Doesn’t blame Rick Schu for the Diamondbacks hitting struggles. The all-you-can-eat section of the stadium will be back. Says talking about Randy coming back will be one of the first things they deal with in the off-season, but didn’t really know about a dollar amount. The crowds were great this year.
"Now, this is the dumbest thing I've ever heard [Hank Steinbrenner] say, and this is the third time I've said that this season."
by kishi on Oct 2, 2008 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"The all-you-can-eat section of the stadium"
I would have expected that in Milwaukee or Cleveland, not in a city as fit as Phoenix.
"If the government's nuclear football ever were to fall into the wrong hands Chris Horton would be called upon to intercept it on behalf of the Pentagon."
by DbacksSkins on Oct 2, 2008 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know this is a complex issue
Doesn’t blame Rick Schu for the Diamondbacks hitting struggles.
But who bears the responsibility for the team’s poor situational hitting this year? It looked like they weren’t even trying to adapt (from pitch to pitch, or from at-bat to at-bat).
I said this before (mostly in anger) but it bears repeating. This is not the Kansas City Royals (for some reason, maybe because of Angel Berroa, I associate them with highly-touted young players who never develop). If we want our young players to develop, they need credible guidance. Leave them to figure it out on their own and, a few years from now when they’re playing for the Royals, they’re just gonna be “those guys who were supposed to be good.”
"We...probed them all the way through. They're completely meat." — Terry Bisson
by Scrbl on Oct 3, 2008 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
From what he said
It kind of seemed like he was putting the blame on the shoulders of the batters for not applying Schu’s instruction.
"Now, this is the dumbest thing I've ever heard [Hank Steinbrenner] say, and this is the third time I've said that this season."
by kishi on Oct 3, 2008 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How is this even an option
for developing young players? I would hope for a coaching staff which was forceful enough to make young players at least try some adjustments.
Here’s how we’ve done (in terms of OPS) since Schu joined the team in 2003:
2008 .742 (19th)
2007 .734 (26th)
2006 .755 (20th)
2005 .754 (13th)
2004 .703 (30th)
2003 .746 (18th)
Only once in his 6 years with the D-Backs have we even cracked the upper half of MLB. In his second season we even finished dead last. Why is this guy still working here?
I know that not every team can finish in the top half of MLB every year. But six years of below average performance should be incentive to make a change.
"We...probed them all the way through. They're completely meat." — Terry Bisson
by Scrbl on Oct 3, 2008 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rick Schu
was the minor league hitting coordinator before he was hitting coach. I’m not sure why you expected an improvement from 2003 to 2004.
"If the government's nuclear football ever were to fall into the wrong hands, Chris Horton would be called upon to intercept it on behalf of the Pentagon." -Kissing Suzy Kolber
by DbacksSkins on Oct 3, 2008 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm more concerned
with the consistent mediocrity from 2003 to 2008.
Didn’t know he was anything more than a hitting coach. Here’s what the D-Back’s website says about him:
Rick Schu joined the D-backs as hitting coach in 2003, after serving as a hitting coach for three of the Diamondbacks’ farm clubs. Coaching Career: Spent five seasons as a coach in the Diamondbacks’ organization … served as hitting coach in 1998 at South Bend (A), followed by three seasons (1999-2001) as hitting coach for the Class A California League … spent the 2002 season as hitting coach at Class AAA Tucson. Playing Career: Played 17 seasons in professional baseball, primarily as a third baseman … made his Major League debut in 1984 with Philadelphia … also played with Baltimore, California, Detroit and Montreal … played professionally in Japan in 1993 and 1994 … owns a career Major League bating average of .246 over 580 games.
"We...probed them all the way through. They're completely meat." — Terry Bisson
by Scrbl on Oct 3, 2008 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just a thought on this
I wonder if part of the issue is that the bulk of the team’s investments have gone into the pitching side over the past few years. We’ve acquired the likes of Randy Johnson, Dan Haren and Doug Davis – Hudson is likely the only position player I can think of who has been traded for, and he was acquired as much for his defense as his offense. It seems that the philosophy has been that good pitching will beat good hitting, and the resources have gone towards that end. It’s not really Rick Schu’s fault that he has had to deal with a lot of young, inexperienced players over the past five years or so.
That said, the lack of progress shown by Reynolds and Young ths year was certainly disappointing. However, Drew and Jackson did make big steps forward, so it’s hard to see a consistent pattern of fail.
by Jim McLennan on Oct 3, 2008 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's true
I was really happy with CoJack’s improvement. And I was shocked (shocked!) and ecstatic over Stephen Drew’s. They were huge bright spots in the 2008 season.
"We...probed them all the way through. They're completely meat." — Terry Bisson
by Scrbl on Oct 3, 2008 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are Fan Expectations Realistic For These Players?
…the team’s poor situational hitting this year
I understand what you’re saying, anecdotally. But look at our team OPS rankings in this year’s NL:
Overall – 9th
With Runners On – 8th
With RISP – 5th
With RISP, two outs – 4th
At least on a seasonal basis, the more critical the situation became, the better we hit, relative to the league! Imagine where we’d be if we weren’t so clutch ;-)
If you want to point to a reason why we dont score runs, it’s this. When one considers our park environment, we are very poor at getting on base.
Overall. Not with “the game on the line”, or any of that stuff.
And we are very, very, very poor at getting on base (and hitting generally) against right handed pitchers. If we hit righties anywhere near as well as we hit lefties, for example, we’d still be playing.
So, why dont we hit righties better? You seem inclined to question Rick Schu or Bob Melvin or Eric Byrnes’ radio show. Here’s who I’d question.
Ask Chris Young, who hasnt hit .280 since high school, why he doesnt hit righties better. Ask the youngest position player in the National League, whose OPS climbed 170 points from his rookie season. Ask Conor Jackson, Stephen Drew and and Chris Snyder, all of whom enjoyed career years. Ask Chris Burke, who filled in for Eric Byrnes (who never hit RHP in his bubbly, blonde life). Ask Jeff Salazar and Alex Romero and Tony Clark and Augie Ojeda. Ask Orlando Hudson, having yet another career year before his injury.
Better yet, ask the architects responsible for funding and fielding a team comprised of these players. In the spring of 2007, Josh Byrnes publicly likened his troops to the 1965 Orioles, and the young Indians of the early ‘90s, potential-packed squads a year removed from realizing greatness. I’m not ruling out that this could still happen, but one thing’s for sure regarding the offense: Mr J Byrnes and his employers are at least a couple years behind his advertised expectations.
by Diamondhacks on Oct 3, 2008 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You seem inclined to question Rick Schu or Bob Melvin or Eric Byrnes’ radio show. Here’s who I’d question.
I think we’re getting close to the reason why I’m reluctant to discuss things with you. If you insist on glibly dismissing opposing viewpoints, then we won’t have many more discussions. Which’d be a shame. You have a lot of interesting things to say, but you cheapen your responses when you assume that disagreement equals stupidity.
"We...probed them all the way through. They're completely meat." — Terry Bisson
by Scrbl on Oct 3, 2008 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dont believe I did a disservice to you or your positions
in the leaston this thread. Wasnt going for glib at all.
From my perspective, the most glib thing on this thread is the way you’ve gone on at some length ( with remarkably feeble evidence), scapegoating two people (Schu, Eric Byrnes), for what I think we both agree is a fairly complex problem.
I’ll leave it at that.
by Diamondhacks on Oct 4, 2008 12:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we’re back to saying, “I’m not going to argue with you Diamondhacks.”
For a poster with a reputation for abusive behavior, you are remarkably eager for other posters to give you the benefit of the doubt. For now at least, it’s not worth it for me to respond to your posts.
"We...probed them all the way through. They're completely meat." — Terry Bisson
by Scrbl on Oct 4, 2008 1:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Acknowledgements
I’ll make a deal with you, scrbi. I’ll take back my remarks about “remarkably feeble evidence” and scapegoating, if you reconsider upthread charges of me ‘gliby dismissing’ your position, and equating disagreement with stupidity.
Because, in my view, that’s exactly where this discussion deteriorated, when you decided to take such umbrage over this:
You seem inclined to question Rick Schu or Bob Melvin or Eric Byrnes’ radio show. Here’s who I’d question.
That got under your skin sufficiently to quell discussion?! LOL. It took all my god given self restraint to type “You seem inclined…” instead of a more colorful alternative :-)
Anyway, it’s curious to me how I can bother writing several paragraphs of direct and indirect counterpoint and then, instead of being engaged on any of that substance, be smacked down for ‘glib dismissal’ and be accused of equating disagreement with ‘stupidity’. Who are you trying to kid? Not me, I hope.
I’m sorry you dont like my tone. At times, I dont care for yours either. You’ve been lobbing grenades at the coaching staff for more than a month now, and while I actually share many of your visceral frustrations, and am sure your positions are sincere, your encompassing and rather tenacious tone of blame is not real instructive, imo.
In terms of substance, one thing that might help forward discussion is some mutual acknowledgements. For my part, I’ve let myself get trapped in a somewhat reactive mode and havent adequately acknowledged concerns I actually have about the staff. I dont think Melvin’s staff is optimal, or even best in the majors. I think the team would be better if someone like LaRussa was mgr and there’s definitely room for improvement. I just sense that ‘room’ is smaller than you repeatedly seem to imply and that Larussa wasnt available.
For your part, I’d like you to acknowledge, or at least entertain, that maybe our young studs are a) developing at a reasonable rate and/or b) arent as innately ready to dominate MLB as we were led on, quite apart from coaching concerns.
Maybe you’ve acknowledged this in the past and I missed it – if so, I apologize. ( I do see where you acknowledged the emergence of Drew, CoJack in reponse to Jim’s rebuttal). I just feel you’re very reluctant to come to grips with this larger disconnect of expectations , again, quite apart from coaching or ‘credible mentors’. And that frustrates me, because most of JB’s biggest supporters from 2006-2007 (like Jim, shoe,et al) have tempered their earlier (and loftier) expectations in myriad and responsible ways, based on the evidence.
So, yes, the coaching could be better, but join the club already :-)
by Diamondhacks on Oct 4, 2008 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
At this point
I’m not going make a deal with you. Diamondhacks. My own direct encounters with you, and the behavior I’ve seen when you interact with other posters leads me to believe that our conversations just won’t be worth the frustration. Find yourself another foil, I’m finished.
"We...probed them all the way through. They're completely meat." — Terry Bisson
by Scrbl on Oct 4, 2008 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I will respect your wish
not to be engaged directly, personally. I reserve the right, however, to be intrigued, confused or mortified by any of your public musings.
If that’s alright with you ;-)
Regards and goodbye
by Diamondhacks on Oct 5, 2008 2:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Dunn is resigned
then I want Jackson in left or right, if not, then I guess you put Brynes in left, unless you think Tracy can be more productive(that’s with Jackson in outfield and Tracy at first).
I witness.
by damdrs1717 on Oct 4, 2008 12:50 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs






















