The Trading Block
I’d like to get the ball rolling on trade talk, because I think that’s where a lot of interest is going to lie in the next few weeks, and besides, we have to be psychologically prepared for at least the possibility of some major moves.
Rather than explain my personal vision of where I think this team ought to be going, which would be my natural starting point, I think instead I’m just going to throw a couple of names out there to see where that leads, even if it means being savaged by the wolves.
When it comes to trading, I think it’s important not to be too reactive, which is something the Diamondbacks organization has perhaps been guilty of recently.
That is to say, they reacted to Byrnes having a career year, even though most people recognize that he’s a pretty average player. They reacted to Carlos Quentin’s mediocre performance, even though many observers felt that this guy’s a beast, ready to break out at any moment. They assumed Young would continue an uninterrupted curve of success, and that Upton would come into his own. They seem not to have anticipated anything other than what their five senses told them.
One key to making a good trade is using the other team’s shortsightedness against them, so that doesn’t bode well for us.
In any event, here goes. I think our most tradable commodity right now is Doug Davis. And I think the position player you could shop him around with is Chad Tracy. Both those guys have American League written all over them – Tigers, Yankees, etc – which is where we’re going to come up with some hitting, power, and outfield depth.
I realize Davis has looked exceptional of late…that’s the point. He’s done well against the American league, has decent stuff, a great understanding of the game, and is probably going to have his career year sometime soon. He’d beef up a so-so rotation big time, and could be a phenomenal 2 or 3 on a team that scores runs.
But the reality is he’s an above average pitcher – no more – who could bring us proportionately much more in the hitting department. The sky’s the limit as to what some of those high-powered AL teams desperate for a starter might give up for him. Then you throw in Tracy (who is I think a more obvious name) because another team might be able to bring him along better in an offense-oriented environment, and will want to have something else to show for the all-star they give us for Davis.
So my top two tradables are Davis and Tracy, but there are very few untouchables, either. Actually, there’s no such thing as an untouchable, but the closest we come is Webb, followed by our minor league pitchers who are close, along with the core of young players with whom we identify the team…Jackson, Reynolds, Upton, and Young. Drew and Hudson are not on that list, but middle infield isn’t exactly the easiest place to shore up while also concentrating on your hitting. Drew seems to be one of the Dback victims of bad coaching, with a different approach every time up, so he could still come along; Hudson’s having a good year, but is soon on his way out regardless. I’m going to say our top two untouchables are Webb and…hmm, still gotta go with Upton as a 5-tool guy with all-planet potential.
Anyway, I could make this a very long post, but I’d rather leave it up to others to name their top two tradable players and top two untouchables.
Andy
0 recs |
50
comments
Comments
Top two tradables
ODawg because of his good hitting as a second baseman. I wonder if that is why Bonifacio was brought up. Is the FO preparing for something big? My other top tradable would be Tracy as well. I wish we could find a place for him but I don’t think it will happen.
Two untouchables? I believe there are several, but if I just had to pick two, I’d go Webb and Upton as well.
Baseball season, when everything becomes right in the world.
by seton hall snake pit on Jul 6, 2008 10:55 AM EDT 0 recs
O Dawg is a type A Free Agent
If the team trades Hudson, they have to get MORE value in return than the two type A draft compensation pics
by shoewizard on
Jul 6, 2008 4:06 PM EDT
up
0 recs
two untouchables in my book
are Webb and Haren. I think we can all agree our starting pitching in not an issue.
Top tradeable that I would structure any type of deal with is Upton. We all know he is so out of here as soon as he is eligible, why wait?
"It's like deja vu all over again."
by unnamedDBacksfan on Jul 6, 2008 10:57 AM EDT 0 recs
other one I’d shop around would be Drew.
"It's like deja vu all over again."
by unnamedDBacksfan on
Jul 6, 2008 10:59 AM EDT
up
0 recs
If we're to do that
They BETTER pull something big, no average major league ready talent. It would have to be a Hamilton-Vasquez type of deal.
Baseball season, when everything becomes right in the world.
by seton hall snake pit on
Jul 6, 2008 11:07 AM EDT
up
0 recs
We might as well
get the most we can for him now while others still see his potential. I don’t have faith we can tap into that. And yeah, as long as nothing else changes in the organization, it had better be for someone already major league ready.
"It's like deja vu all over again."
by unnamedDBacksfan on
Jul 6, 2008 11:19 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Vasquez?
Volquez?
Mark Reynolds: Turning me gay since '07
by DbacksSkins on
Jul 6, 2008 3:28 PM EDT
up
0 recs
yeah sorry noticed that when I hit send
was hoping no one would notice
Baseball season, when everything becomes right in the world.
by seton hall snake pit on
Jul 6, 2008 8:41 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Leave it to me.
;-)
Mark Reynolds: Turning me gay since '07
by DbacksSkins on
Jul 6, 2008 8:50 PM EDT
up
0 recs
As soon as we trade Upton...
He’ll start raking. There’s no talent out there that’s better than Upton. In the short term, you can find a guy. Why trade away upton, when you can acquire a guy, then send upton down to the minors until the new guy leaves, or when upton has worked on his swing.
by Zephon on
Jul 6, 2008 7:53 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I'd like to believe
that CoJack is untoucable, but that’s probably not the case. Webb most likely is, and Upton of course.
If we were to make a trade, you’d think we’d want to trade from our strength in pitching, but who can we afford to let go? Davis? Okay, who can we get for him, and then where does that leave our rotation? The first half good, the last part pretty scary.
On the other hand, in a vacuum we wouldn’t want to trade our two best offensive pieces, Hudson or Jackson, but we may have to move one of them to get a high quality outfielder. Hudson would be better between the two, though that will put us in a position where we’re not sure who our successor is at second base.
I think it was ‘Hacks who said a day ago or so that the FO has invested in starting pitching, so the results are largely evident. On the other hand, they haven’t made much investment in the offensive side, so we’re now paying the price.
By all means hit at a glacial pace. You know how that thrills me.
by soco on Jul 6, 2008 11:31 AM EDT 0 recs
We need to package....
O-Dog, and Tracy for a slugger. Byrnes is probably out the entire season at this point so were gonna see a lot of Co-Jack in the out field so a first baseman would be nice. Augie can share time with bonificio most of the season and tracy wont exactly have a spot if we get a legit slugger. Even thought he’s not exact a slugger it would be nice to trade tracy for brian giles who tears it up anywhere but petco. If we can get him for cheap, Marcus Thames is my ideal player.
"Yes I know what your wondering....Brandon Webb is my running mate. And Sir Charles Barkley is my Financial Advisor."
by Elway4Prez on Jul 6, 2008 4:00 PM EDT 0 recs
O-Dawg is one of our best hitters
That being said, I think we could get someone decent by trading him. He will be gone after this season so we might as well get someone in exchange for him.
I also think Tracy is the other guy we should trade. We have CoJack and Reynolds holding down 1B and 3B for the next couple of years.
What we need out of a trade is a LF and another 2B unless we are placing Bonoficio there now.
by DiamondbacksWIn on Jul 6, 2008 4:01 PM EDT 0 recs
The untouchable in my opinion are Webb, Upton, Haren, Reynolds, Young, Jackson, And Drew. In terms of prospects, It’s Parker and Sherzer. Parra would be tradeable only if we’re acquiring a long term addition to our outfield.
We need to find a right handed hitter to platoon with Tracy, or a good left handed outfield who can get on base and has power. The problem with this team is just doesn’t have enough patience.
by Zephon on Jul 6, 2008 7:51 PM EDT 0 recs
Sticking to the current roster
I would call Upton, Webb, Haren, Young and maybe Jackson untouchable, in that order. (Of course by untouchable, I mean it would take an incredible deal to trade them – for example, if St Louis offered Pujols, I’m dealing. . . .)
I like the thinking on Davis though – he might have some trade value out there and I am also not overly impressed with him. Tracy does have AL written all over him but I wonder how much value he has. I think they have plenty of starting pitching to fill in with next year – Petit, Scherzer and a few more a year further out than that. (Keeping in mind that RJ will be back for 300 next year provided he doesn’t completely fall of a cliff). But are Davis & Tracy really enough to get back the big bat the Dbacks need?
by golfmanthee on Jul 7, 2008 12:35 AM EDT 0 recs
I dunno -
I just have a hunch a lot of teams are ready to pull the trigger right now. Cleveland seems to be in a pretty good mood, maybe they’d like to give us Sizemore. It seems to me a lot of teams had much higher expectations for this year, and there are also some teams that maybe don’t quite believe in their own success, which often translates into, We’re just one starter away.
Trades seem to have a lot to do with luck, timing, and other considerations (salaries, soon-to-be free agents, bad fits for the team, holes to fill, excess of riches, etc.) than with logical bartering.
I can see a trade with Detroit, Cleveland, Philadelphia, Colorado, and a host of other teams for different reasons. I’d put the Yankees on that list, but they pay their players too damned much – kinda shoot themselves in the foot that way don’t they…well, maybe a 3-way deal with them. We could package several players and go for one premium hitter/OF. I like Qualls more than a lot of people, but you could throw him in the mix – maybe he still hasn’t quite found the right fit here in AZ.
I do know one thing – the first question anyone asks when they come calling is – what would it take to get Haren?
By the way, I think RJ already fell off a cliff; he just landed on a ledge for now. And 300 will have nothing to do with the FO decision-making, at least one would hope.
What will tomorrow bring?
by aricat on
Jul 7, 2008 4:02 AM EDT
up
0 recs
i
am dying to find out what you think the diamondbacks could trade to cleveland for grady sizemore, while keeping the core group of young guys together.
i would love to have him, of course, but there is no way shapiro is sending him off for a return of davis/tracy/o-dawg/jackson or any combination of the four. sizemore is an amazing player, and our outfield would be borderline unfair once young and upton turn into the type of career players we hope they’ll be, but i have a hard time believing that we have the goods.
and that’s assuming cleveland would trade him anyway!
by leemellon on
Jul 7, 2008 4:43 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Sizemore
I can’t see the Indians moving him for anything short of… well… a CC Sabathia. His contract is ultra team friendly.
Fire Bob Melvin. Free Jamie D'Antona. Eric Byrnes Sucks.
by nihil67 on
Jul 7, 2008 6:51 PM EDT
up
0 recs
what if
we stuffed a pillow into doug davis’ shirt, think they’d fall for it?
by leemellon on
Jul 8, 2008 5:25 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Hmm...
No.
And I don’t think I even made a good comparison with Sabathia. Evan Longoria… Hanley Ramirez… Brandon Webb…
Sizemore isn’t getting traded.
Fire Bob Melvin. Free Jamie D'Antona. Eric Byrnes Sucks.
by nihil67 on
Jul 8, 2008 5:38 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Actually, I was being facetious about that...
My point was that the big names aren’t as invulnerable to trade as we assume. Nothing wrong with setting our sights high, though. I wouldn’t be surprised if Cleveland is still dealing, but I don’t expect to see the franchise guy leaving anytime soon. I’m more inclined to think the next shoe to drop will be in Detroit, lots of big names, not much to show for them.
by aricat on Jul 7, 2008 6:17 PM EDT 0 recs
Repost from another website:
I’m not sure what kind of move would help this offense unless it’s something along of the lines of getting Bill Hall to replace Chris Burke.The biggest problem with the current (sans Byrnes) lineup is that it’s full of players that, independently, you wouldn’t mind having as a role player on a playoff contender. The only way to get measurable improvement would be to trade for a guaranteed all star caliber hitter, but then you run the risk of harming the long-term development of the kids that still have legitimate upside. Even getting a replacement left fielder wouldn’t be that much improvement since the CJ experiment seems to be working. There’s only one glaring hole (that isn’t occupied by a kid) and that is a right-handed 1B/LF to platoon Tracy with.
At this point, I’m content with the knowledge that the lineup is what it is. For this year and next I think the team has to stick with the kids they have and hope that eventually enough of them take the next step towards solidly above-average hitting and even, in at least one case, superstardom. It may turn out great or it may fail horribly, but it’s the lot that this team has chosen for itself. To make a last-minute plan change will most likely only do more harm than good – unless it entails opening up the checkbook for a star-caliber player in their prime.
What I don’t think people here are quite grasping is that the teams that have sluggers they’re willing to deal aren’t the same teams that are looking to acquire non-prospects like Hudson, Tracy or Davis.
The only “slugger” out there to acquire that would constitute a meaningful upgrade would be Teixeira, but that would only be a half-season rental and would require us to gut what’s left of our farm system. Even if the team followed up that trade with a long-term extension for Teixeira it would have to be followed by either making CJ the permanent starting left fielder (which the front office will never do) or dumping CJ altogether which would be a rather lousy appropriation of resources since Conor would be at least $15M dollars cheaper.
by dahlian on Jul 8, 2008 5:49 AM EDT 0 recs
One need is a platoon mate for Tracy
Tracy really shouldn’t be facing LHP. His career line against LHP is 220/268/336 as opposed to his 307/369/505 line against RHP.
It doesn’t really matter if his platoon mate is a first basemen or a left fielder – you can move Conor back to first when we’re facing a LHP. In my opinion, finding a right handed part of a platoon shouldn’t be too difficult. All though probably not the answer, Jamie D’antona and Rusty Ryal have done much better against lefties than Tracy has over the course of their careers. All though both are not that great defensively, I’m pretty sure both could handle left field easily.
The one player in the minors I’ve found that’s actually a first basemen and handles LHP decently is AA first basemen Bryan Byrne. Of course, there is one problem that he doesn’t have as much power against LHP. He could be an improvement over Tracy against LHP though.
by Zephon on Jul 8, 2008 3:10 PM EDT 0 recs
I have the answer
The White Sox just DFA’d Pablo Ozuna. You could put him in left when Tracy sits against LHP.
Fire Bob Melvin. Free Jamie D'Antona. Eric Byrnes Sucks.
by nihil67 on
Jul 8, 2008 3:48 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Do the D'Backs dare to "counter" the deals of CC and Harden?
The dynasty that should be the Arizona Diamondbacks.
by srdmad on Jul 8, 2008 9:30 PM EDT 0 recs
Who the hell would they counter with?
Please platoon Chad Tracy with someone other than Chris Burke!
by Zephon on
Jul 8, 2008 11:32 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Eric Bedard?
Please platoon Chad Tracy with someone other than Chris Burke!
by Zephon on
Jul 8, 2008 11:45 PM EDT
up
0 recs
My sister (the Mariners fan) would probably take this opportunity to laugh bitterly about Erik Bedard.
"Evil lurks everywhere, often in plain sight... Can you lurk in plain sight? Or is that just walking?"
by kishi on
Jul 9, 2008 2:33 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I put counter in quotes, because I didn't want to make it seem like I wanted to make a big deal.
I was thinking a smaller move, like Nady.
The dynasty that should be the Arizona Diamondbacks.
by srdmad on
Jul 9, 2008 6:05 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Sorry
I didn’t really get that’s what you meant. I would be all for acquiring Nady though. I think he’d be useful addition to the team.
Please platoon Chad Tracy with someone other than Chris Burke!
by Zephon on
Jul 9, 2008 9:45 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Waaay ahead of ya.
We traded for a dude named Danny Haren.
Mark Reynolds: Turning me gay since '07
by DbacksSkins on
Jul 9, 2008 4:45 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Looking at the other threads -
...acquiring Tony Clark, finding someone to platoon with Tracy, finding anyone better than Burke…
Sorry, this is all just nickel and dime stuff. I think that when you start looking at trade possibilities, you have to think outside the box, set your sights as high as possible, and be willing to give up something.
My impression is that a lot of people think we’re just sort of locked into a limited set of options.
We can’t trade away our nucleus of young talent. We can’t trade away our top prospects. Our hands are pretty much tied at middle infield. We’ll never get the likes of so-and-so…etc. etc. I disagree.
We don’t mortgage our future, but that doesn’t mean we don’t trade one promising young player or one top prospect under any circumstances.
We’re a pitching rich team in a league filled with good hitting teams dying for some pitching. We would be one of the first places a lot of teams would be looking – they see us struggling, they know we need offense, and they want a pitcher. They’ll be asking for
Haren first, but Davis would be a big acquisition for a lot of teams, packaged with an up-and-comer – he could step right into the Phillies’ rotation and make it better. I’m sure the Rockies could use him, or the Tigers. Our ok pitchers are still pretty damn good.
We become so loyal to our players – much more loyal than they are to us, or management is to them – that we sometimes forget that everyone is replacable. And maybe we even over-estimate our talent. Without batting an eyelash, a Dbacks fan will tell you the Rockies overachieved last year, and simply got hot at the right time, but would they ever make a similar assessment about our team, that maybe we pulled out a lot of wins through timely clutch hitting that you can’t always rely on?
There are a lot of patient teams out there who never seem to have what they desperately need when they need it most. The Dbacks have a lot of talent, and a lot of potential, but they also have a lot of success in a short franchise history due to some front office
urgency over the years. Right now, they’re a middle-of-the-road .500 team, that needs to be shaken up.
Sutton said today he would be “shocked” if the Dbacks don’t make some moves prior to the deadline, and I don’t think he meant picking up a .250 part-time player to fill in for Burke.
Do I think the Dbacks are a much better team than what they’re showing right now? Of course. Is there a single player, or a single prospect, I’d like to see traded? Not really, not even Qualls, who’s been an ok pitcher number wise in his career, maybe still looking for the right fit. But the reality and a diehard fan’s perception don’t always coincide.
by aricat on Jul 9, 2008 4:46 AM EDT 0 recs
Ok, I'll bite
Who do you trade Davis to the Phillies for? Or the Rockies or the Tigers?
Fire Bob Melvin. Free Jamie D'Antona. Eric Byrnes Sucks.
by nihil67 on
Jul 9, 2008 11:44 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Are you biting, or throwing out the bait
I’ll have to give some thought to a specific deal – there are so many variables, including what prospects other teams hope to be bringing along in the coming months, that I’d know nothing about. There are better baseball minds than mine around here, though – I’d just like to see some names thrown around that can make more of an impact. Actually, we’re starting to see a few better names crop up. Of the 4 Grace mentioned after tonight’s broadcast (Catalanotto, Dunn, Ibanez, and Nady), I like Ibanez. He’s the kind of guy who could make a difference, who you might package some combination of a prospect, Davis, and/or Tracy (they could then trade Beltre to the Twins for more prospects, that’s been talked about).
by aricat on
Jul 9, 2008 10:38 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Haren for Holliday
One-for-one, straight up, our all-star for yours. You’re guaranteed a win every four starts, we’re guaranteed one of the game’s best hitters.
by aricat on
Jul 9, 2008 11:00 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I'll pass
There’s no way I’d give up the same 6 players we gave up for haren that I would for holliday. So why would i give up haren for holliday? Haren is worth more than holliday, anyway.
Please platoon Chad Tracy with someone other than Chris Burke!
by Zephon on
Jul 9, 2008 11:50 PM EDT
up
0 recs
You'd give up Haren for Holliday because of your needs and assets.
You need an offense. Clearly if anyone can jumpstart and sustain an offense, Holliday can. If even a couple of our players get it going, combining a surging Young, Upton or Reynolds with Holliday might even make us kind of scary. What an outfield!
Our asset is pitching. Without Haren, particularly if the nearly-ready pitchers come into their own (see the Minnesota Twins), you can still assemble a great pitching staff led by one of the best aces in the game.
For the Rockies, the opposite is true. Haren becomes their ace, and they’ve got enough other offensive tools to retain a formidable lineup.
The value of a player is relative to a team’s needs. In a vaccuum, Papelbon is worth a lot. But we have Lyon, so his value would be minimal to us.
To me the main problem is we’re in the same division.
by aricat on
Jul 10, 2008 12:30 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Holliday is a Coors baby
Outside of there, he’s hit just .277 with a 790 OPS – he’s just not that good a hitter. I’d trade him for Davis, not Haren, in part because that’s also matching contracts: both are under contract through the end of 2009.
by Jim McLennan on
Jul 10, 2008 1:36 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Thank you! Glad you have common sense Jim.
Trading haren for matt holliday is laughable. It’s just downright stupid. Davis for Holliday is a little more closer to reality
Please platoon Chad Tracy with someone other than Chris Burke!
by Zephon on
Jul 10, 2008 1:46 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Davis for Holliday -
Hey I’d go for that. Dunno if the Rockies would. I’m sure one could shoot down just about any trade suggestion, and I don’t have the statistical knowledge, contract awareness, or insight into other teams’ farm clubs to take a very good stab at this (proposing a trade out of the almost infinite possibilities that exist). What I am trying to suggest is that this forum is a bit conservative when it comes to anticipating what the Dbacks might do, and it might be interesting to explore the more extraordinary measures the Dbacks might take, based on the basic premise that we have depth in pitching, are dying offensively, live in an age of offense, and are coming perilously close to tanking it the rest of this season. I haven’t seen much suggestion that we give up anything. Even the mention of Davis seems to have some people squirming. Are we that good, really? Potential doesn’t win games. Let me put the ball in the other court. Can anyone think of a significant trade, one that might actually require a bit of risk-taking and sacrifice on the part of the Dbacks, that you think might dramatically improve the club?
by aricat on
Jul 10, 2008 3:11 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Dude... breath in.. breath out...
I think perhaps you should take a deep breath here and step back and look at the bigger picture.
Who says we need to win this year? We’ve got a whole team full of pretty good players that are really, really young and need time to develop.
There’s no reason to trade Davis because he’s effective and is relatively cheap. There’s especially no reason to trade him for Holliday unless you’re somehow going to package Byrnes in that deal. What would happen next season when you don’t have Davis, but you have Holliday, Byrnes, Young, AND Upton, AND Tracy, AND Jackson. What a mess. Then, we go look at the rotation… Webb, Haren, Owings, Scherzer… uh… Petit? This is all on top of the fact that the Rockies aren’t going to trade Holliday inside the division and definitely, without a doubt, not going to trade him to he Diamondbacks for anything short of a king’s ransom.
The question is not mortgaging your future, which means not trading your integral parts, while still maybe finding a guy that can get you there this year for the cost of what amounts to nothing. I’m not so much convinced that we don’t have the parts to trade as the parts aren’t out there to trade for.
As I said in the post below. Trading just to trade always makes a bad trade.
Fire Bob Melvin. Free Jamie D'Antona. Eric Byrnes Sucks.
by nihil67 on
Jul 10, 2008 10:08 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Yeah.....
but Doug Davis for Matt Holliday? Normally I wouldn’t waste my time with Holliday, but THAT seems like a no-brainer. I’d DEFINITELY make that trade.
Mark Reynolds: Turning me gay since '07
by DbacksSkins on
Jul 10, 2008 10:31 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Fuck that deal.
The dynasty that should be the Arizona Diamondbacks.
by srdmad on
Jul 10, 2008 3:36 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Just kidding.
The dynasty that should be the Arizona Diamondbacks.
by srdmad on
Jul 10, 2008 3:36 PM EDT
up
0 recs
A bit unnecessary to use the F-bomb,
don’t you think?
DFA Chris Burke. Sign Barry Bonds.
by DbacksSkins on
Jul 10, 2008 3:48 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Actually it was supposed to go under the Haren for Holliday deal,
but it didn’t post in the right spot, so instead of explaining I just figured to add just kidding underneath.
The dynasty that should be the Arizona Diamondbacks.
by srdmad on
Jul 10, 2008 3:58 PM EDT
up
0 recs
No, it's still under the Haren for Holliday post.
Check it: click on “up”.
DFA Chris Burke. Sign Barry Bonds.
by DbacksSkins on
Jul 10, 2008 4:14 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Bait
I was trying to politely point out that, while it may be fun to rant for 10 paragraphs, I don’t see you coming up with any better ideas. You aren’t seeing names thrown around that will make an impact because 1) who are you willing to part with to make those deals and 2) there really aren’t that many impact players available on the trade market right now.
Tossing out that Davis would be a catch for all these teams doesn’t really mean much if there’s nobody there for the Diamondbacks to take in return.
Raul Ibanez is Luis Gonzalez re-incarnate (he’s still due $5.5M through the end of the season). Why would you trade Davis, a cheap and effective pitcher AND Tracy, a cheap and effective 1st baseman, AND a prospect for a 36 year old, half-season rental? If you’re going to go get a half-season rental left-fielder that can’t field, why not go sign Bonds, Lofton, or Klesko for the cost of only money and nearly replicate, if not best, that production?
It seems to me that you want to trade just to trade because you’re pissed they’re loosing. Only bad trades come from that mindset.
Fire Bob Melvin. Free Jamie D'Antona. Eric Byrnes Sucks.
by nihil67 on
Jul 10, 2008 9:55 AM EDT
up
0 recs
A wonderful illustration
Here’s a similar discussion over at Viva El Birdos.
They do mention Milton Bradley, but then follow that saying “if they can get him for something along the lines of reyes and duncan (and maybe that’s wishful thinking), he’d make the team better.” Do they Diamondbacks have a Reyes and a Duncan to just toss out there? Petit may sorta line up to Reyes… but I don’t see an offensive player similar to Duncan. Bradley hasn’t been the picture of health this season anyway… in fact I believe that he’s been locked into DHing for the rest of the season due to a bad knee.
Otherwise… it’s basically the same go-round of names we’re tossing out here.
Fire Bob Melvin. Free Jamie D'Antona. Eric Byrnes Sucks.
by nihil67 on Jul 10, 2008 11:11 AM EDT 0 recs

















