Diamondbacks 3, Brewers 4: Thrown Away
Record: 32-26. Pace: 89-73. Change on last season: -2
Ooh, look at the Diamondbacks queuing up for the all-you-can-eat Blame Buffet this evening. There's Mark Reynolds, piling his plate high. Chad Qualls looks particularly hungry too. Doug 'Batting Practice' Slaten is forming an orderly line, right in front of Augie 'Mini EB' Ojeda. I see Chris Snyder, letting Prince Fielder steal in, right before his eyes. And Bob Melvin is coming back for a second helping, while we try to work out the logic behind his baffling managerial choices. Even Doug Davis is nibbling on an appetizer, since Fielder's theft of third-base was likely as much on his head as Snyder's.
Otherwise, though, up until the seventh inning, Davis was pretty much everything you could want, with just one run on five hits and a walk. Sure, the Brewers had runners in scoring position with no outs in the first and second inning, and two outs in the third, but the only damage after six frames was Fielder's manufactured run: single, wild-pitch, steal, sacrifice fly. I was more than a little surprised - and said so at the time - that he was allowed to bat for himself in the sixth, then go back to the mound for the seventh. With a fully-rested bullpen [only two innings over Saturday and Sunday], it seemed to be pushing our luck somewhat, especially as we only had a two-run lead.
And events proved these fears entirely justified. Another infield single [one of five on the night, which seems like an awful lot], Drew's off-line throw pulling Tracy off the bag, and then a walk, marked the end of Doug's night, but was only a warm-up for the atrocity exhibition to come. Chad Qualls came in, and Kendall tried to sacrifice - Qualls, with plenty of time to get the runner, threw wildly and again pulled the fielder covering first away from the base. That meant everyone was safe, with the bases now loaded with Brewers, and still no-one was out. Worse was to follow: Qualls then coaxed a ground-ball to Reynolds, who fired the ball home. Or, more accurately, fired the ball about five yards to Snyder's right, allowing two runs to score and tying the game.
Remarkably, Qualls then managed to escape the second and third, nobody out jam without further damage, on a strikeout, a walk and a double-play - let's just review the Win Probability as the inning unfolded:
Milwaukee Win Probabilty - 22.3%
B Hall Single - 29.3%
J Hardy Walk - 39.7%
C Qualls relieved D Davis
J Kendall SacBunt+Err - 53.0%
G Kapler FC+Err - 82.3%
R Weeks Strikeout - 73.5%
M Cameron Walk - 73.5%
R Braun Ground DP - 50.0%
"Ok, we somehow got out with the score still tied. We just need our bullpen to..." Barely had that thought crossed my mind, when Doug Slaten served up a fatty to a fatty, and Prince Fielder promptly crushed the ball to deep center. It may not have landed yet - the results of that pitching change made the NL Manager of the Year look a bit crap, didn't it? In the ninth, some luck finally broke Arizona's way: back-to-back errors by the Brewers allowed Reynolds and Upton to reach. With the tying run on second, we were back in the game; a sacrifice bunt by Snyder [and, for once, this actually increased our Win Probability, albeit by a massive one-half of one percent] brought the tying run to third with one out. Even a sacrifice fly would do.
But there then followed a pair of mystifying decisions by Melvin. Firstly, letting Burke - about the worst hitter on the roster - hit for himself. Somehow he managed to work a walk, loading the bases for a pinch-hitter. Who do you think Melvin sent up? Miguel Montero? Jeff Salazar? Even, perhaps, the injured Conor Jackson, for some Kirk Gibsonesque heroics? No: try Augie Ojeda, a man who has been in the majors since 2000, has amassed eight sacrifice flies in that time and was getting his first at-bat since May 25. Really: much as I love the littlest ballplayer, he's not who I wanted to see at the plate. I have a better chance of driving the ball to the outfield than Ojeda. He immediately fell behind 0-2, just got a piece of a couple of pitches that were miles outside the zone, then popped up weakly on the infield. Drew got screwed by the umpire for strike three, though the way we played over those final innings, we can hardly complain - we don't deserve to win a game for the rest of the season.
The bullpen picked up its tenth loss of the season, against only three wins, wasting another quality start. The Diamondbacks' rotation has now gone 29-16, the most victories in the majors - even including the AL, where starters go deeper and so have more chance of a decision. In comparison, last year, our relievers didn't pick up their tenth defeat for another entire month, until July 4. It's turning into a real Achilles heel for the team: Qualls and Slaten have combined to go 0-7, in just 43.2 innings of work. I know wins and losses are not the most reliable method of judging performance - especially for relievers - but a 3-10 record would seem to provide credible cause for concern.
The offense sputtered, coughed, and fell back into the trough from whence they came, going 1-for-7 with runners in scoring position. And even that hit resulted in an out: Reynolds singled to the infield, scoring Drew from third - but Chris Young motored around too, trying to score from second and was thrown out at the plate. That run would have been very nice to have later on, shall we say. Reynolds and Snyder has a pair of hits apiece, with Snyder adding his fifth homer of the year. Burke had a hit and two walks, while Drew reached twice, on a hit and a walk - he was caught stealing on a strikeout/thrown-out double play. That's the first time he's been nailed in the majors, after 13 successful attempts.
[Click to enlarge, in new window]
Master of his domain: Chris Snyder, +22.5%
Honorary mention: Mark Reynolds, +21.1% No, I'm calling that null and void
God-emperor of suck: oh, where to start? Deep breath...
Augie Ojeda, -22.4%
Stephen Drew, -23.3%
Doug Slaten, -25.5%
Tonight's fangraph looks like the overnight pulse-rate of a man whose bedroom was visited at 4am by Al Qaeda, 5am by Jenna Jameson, and finally, at 6am by the Grim Reaper. Not one for the ages, shall we say. I did still mostly enjoy the Gameday Thread, so thanks to the contributors: DbacksSkins, Azreous, kishi, dahlian, foulpole, mr.tunes [welcome!], hotclaws, soco, luckycc, DiamondbacksWIn, Wimb, RAMJB, LucaMaz3, njjohn, Zephon, 4 Corners Fan, Goose, TwinnerA, unnamedDBacksfan, mrssoco and shoewizard.
No-one seems to know how long Jackson will be out. He took batting practice today and is scheduled to run some agility drills tomorrow, which will hopefully answer some questions there. The MRI he received on Saturday showed a small tear in his quadriceps, and Melvin said yesterday that "We're going to try to shut him down for potentially three or four days and see where we're at. If he's back in the lineup a couple days after that, it's kind of what we're hoping for." Seems like it might be the middle of the Pittsburgh series before we get him back fulltime, at best. The latter story does say Jackson might be available as a pinch-hitter, and Melvin describes him as "usable, but not my first option." Which makes his absence in the ninth today all the more puzzling.
The Dodgers, to no-one's great surprise, closed the gap to 3.5 by beating the Rockies, who dropped their eighth game in a row. If Colorado keep this up, they are going to end up right alongside the 1998 fire-sale Marlins, for the biggest implosions in baseball history: Florida went from 92 wins and World Series champions, to just 54 the next year; the Rockies have now lost 16 of their last 21 games, and are on pace to go from the World Series to a 56-106 season. More importantly, we can't expect them to take the next two games from Los Angeles, and so winning tomorrow and Wednesday become doubly-important.
0 recs |
25 comments
Comments
This one hurt big time
one decision makes no sense to me the more I think about it. With the game tied 3-3 after the horrid 7th inning, why bring in Slaten? are you kidding me?
There has been some bantor back and forth here about when is the true “save” situation in a game. Well, in this case, I agree that you at least need one of your top 3 relievers to come in and shut things down in the 8th to give your team a chance to win. Doug Slaten? I groaned out loud when he came into the game… what does that say about BoMel’s confidence in our offense?
I also struggle to understand Burke and Ojeda batting in the 9th. What makes the Ojeda decision even stranger is the fact that you have Snyder BUNT the runners into scoring position…. I’m OK with that move, but then you have to bring in somebody who can at least get the run home from third with 1 out.
ARGH – Very frustrating loss. Worst of the season so far, I think.
by dstorm on
Jun 3, 2008 1:56 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I can't take issue with bringing in Slaten to face Fielder.
He comes into the situation with an ERA below 3 (I have no idea what it is now) and he’s been pretty solid for us this year.
The decision to bat Burke and Ojeda with the game on the line was, frankly, inexcusable, even if Drew hadn’t gotten that lousy call on strike 3 and had somehow tied the game or taken the lead.
Max Scherzer is all out of bubblegum.
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 3, 2008 10:49 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Reading post game comments
and thinking about this a little more it makes a bit more sense. If the idea was that Slaten was put in specifically to face Fielder – I’m OK with that – just a really bad pitch by Slaten.
by dstorm on
Jun 3, 2008 1:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The mad scientist has no clothes?
This could probably merit a fanpost, but I find it too depressing to force myself to go in depth. Needless to say, all the hallmarks of last year’s team, the things that analysts called “luck” and that we as fans desperately tried to explain away, have gone the way of regression to the mean. The one-run wins, gone. The ability to win low-scoring games, gone. The non-choking defense, gone.
Of course, the mad scientist hallmark has also vanished – the ability to work the bench, especially with his pinch hitters. Last year, our pinch hitters hit .243/.305/.477 for an OPS 10% better than team average. This year they’re hitting .233/.348/.329 – good for an OPS 22% lower than team average.
It’s going to take a dramatic change of fortune before I’m ever able to cease rolling my eyes to this appellation again.
by dahlian on
Jun 3, 2008 4:42 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
No Tony Clark on the bench?
Max Scherzer is all out of bubblegum.
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 3, 2008 10:50 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"Luck" doesn't really come into it.
We’re only two games behind our Pythagorean projection, so it’s hardly karmic payback for the overkill last year. Here’s perhaps the more significant factor. Last year, when we were leading after six innings, we went 65-8. This season, we’re 29-7. Barely a third of the way through the season and we’ve blown almost as many leads in the final three innings. Basically, it’s the bullpen that’s to blame. The offense has been streaky, but the starting pitching has been good enough to keep us in almost all the games, even when we’ve not been hitting. The relievers, however… The bench failings also play into this, since we can’t score a run when we need to, something last year’s pinch-hitters were a good deal more adept at.
by Jim McLennan on
Jun 3, 2008 11:18 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I would be curious to know
of the 7 losses, how many could be attritubed to “pitching” and how many to “fielding” blunders. Last night’s loss falls squarely into the “fielding” category in my view, with Drew, Qualls and Reynolds making bad fielding plays in the bottom of the 7th – that allowed the save situation to escape.
by dstorm on
Jun 3, 2008 1:29 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Something close
It’d be a lot of work to locate those seven games and see what the cause was. However, I do have this list, of the ten games where our relievers have been tagged with the loss. You can click on the date to see the box-score. From what I can see, four of the ten were due to fielding errors of some kind:
June 2 vs. MIL – enough said
May 7 vs. PHI – dropped third strike, Jackson/Victorino collision
May 4 vs. NYM – E3 brings home go-ahead run
April 14 vs. SFG – E6 allows Winn to reach, tying run to third. Both men score.
by Jim McLennan on
Jun 3, 2008 2:14 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
interesting - thx Jim
I distinctly remember the April 14th game as well – there have probably been other times where a great fielding play has bailed out a reliever -
Maybe a better statistic would be comparing how many game winning home-runs or extra base hits a reliever gives up per some factor of innings pitched—but then maybe we’re getting back to ERA….. wish there was a way to distinguish the damaging, game changing earned runs from the others.
by dstorm on
Jun 3, 2008 2:30 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well, the point of basic ERA
is to average out runs given up, so that giving up runs that blow a save or lead to a loss are NOT counted separately from giving up runs that do not affect the outcome, since all research seems to suggest that the vast majority of relievers pitch the same, on average, in a pressure situation.
Max Scherzer is all out of bubblegum.
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 3, 2008 2:34 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I have a hard time believing
that “the vast majority of relievers pitch the same in a pressure situation”
Isn’t that why your best relievers are typically saved to close out the game in the 9th during a close game?
by dstorm on
Jun 3, 2008 3:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes,
but I think you misinterpreted me. What I was saying was that they, generally, pitch the same in a pressure situation as they do in a non-pressure situation. Better overall relievers are always going to pitch better, that’s why they’re used in the pressure spots.
What I’m saying is, Brandon Lyon is just as likely to give up a run (or not, in his case) pitching in the 6th inning as pitching in the 9th inning, but since he doesn’t give up a whole lot of runs either way, he’s our closer.
Max Scherzer is all out of bubblegum.
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 3, 2008 3:31 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Dangit
Im serious, us losing makes me hate coming into work as I know I’ll avoid baseball websites for the day :(
So...time for another drink then?
by Wimb on
Jun 3, 2008 6:49 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Me too. After stupid losses like yesterday the only place I can stomach coming is here. After last night’s loss I didn’t even care if the Dodgers won or not. Maybe that is what this team needs is for L.A. to pass them in the standings as the D-Backs seem to have gotten fat and happy off their early season success.
by TwinnerA on
Jun 3, 2008 12:25 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I've been saying this for a little while, too.
The team was never focused enough to keep up April’s pace and win the division by 15 games or whatnot. They’ve just not got that fire in their bellies these days. They’re complacent, and probably will still be so long as they’re in first, even with the Dodgers in striking distance.
Max Scherzer is all out of bubblegum.
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 3, 2008 12:52 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Get me Jesse Orosco STAT
Tough loss, the kind that drives you crazy. Just gave it away. A couple of quick thoughts:
1) I’m getting to the point where I’d like to see Cruz or Mad Max start getting a couple chances in what has been Qualls country to date. Trying to get the biggest outs in the 7th & 8th innings.
2) I am not sure Slaten is the LH Specialist we hoped he would be. His numbers were good last year but MRP are so flakey. See Hickey, Kevin; Villareal, Oscar; Prinz, Bret. If Orosco is dead let’s go get Kent Mercker. I am probably overeacting.
3) Augie, caused the entire Army to fall on our collective sword last night.
by Augie's Army on
Jun 3, 2008 11:52 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Stop me if you've heard this one
Bob Melvin sucks.
Hard to argue too much with bringing Slaten in, but every other move of the night (including Melvin starting Burke) was poor.
Similarly, I’d like to point out how much Burke sucks. Surely there’s another player capable of performing better? Is it time to start the Free Jamie D’Antona movement?
Bob Melvin Sucks
by nihil67 on
Jun 3, 2008 1:37 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Liberation of Trot Nixon Project
Free Jamie D’Antona Movement
Anyone else want to throw their D-Backs political agenda out to the masses?
by Augie's Army on
Jun 3, 2008 1:40 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Relocate to the UK Movement ;)
So...time for another drink then?
by Wimb on
Jun 3, 2008 1:52 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Correct me if I'm wrong,
but isn’t Burke out of options?
Max Scherzer is all out of bubblegum.
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 3, 2008 2:37 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Stop.
I’ve heard this one.
;-)
Max Scherzer is all out of bubblegum.
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 3, 2008 2:28 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Just because Burke can play all positions except pitcher and catcher, does not mean he is our best option.
Salazar is our best outfield option, Tracy at third and first, and Augie at second and short.
I do what I can, sometimes more, depends on the situation.
by srdmad on
Jun 3, 2008 4:57 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm not necessarily against keeping Burke,
because he DOES give us that kind of flexibility.
What bothers me is the WAY he’s being used. Corner OF is NOT one of our positions of need. Why the hell is Burke starting over Salazar?? Even if Sally only hit .200 against lefties, that would STILL be better than Burke…...
Max Scherzer is all out of bubblegum.
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 3, 2008 6:43 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I didn't say I wouldn't want him, I said he's not the best bench option.
I do what I can, sometimes more, depends on the situation.
by srdmad on
Jun 4, 2008 6:43 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs

















