Diamondbacks 4, Red Sox 5 - Told you so...
And it almost worked. Unbridled Pessimism day at the Pit nearly pulled off a stunning upset, with the Diamondbacks leading the Red Sox by two runs, with just four outs left to get. But, inevitably, the lead was coughed up by Chad 'Inherited Runners' Qualls and we snatched disaster from the jaws of triumph. If only we had maintained a united front of gloom and doom in the Gameday Thread. But nooooo: someone decided they were "all about positivity." "I'm not going to join in," said the Cheerful Charlie. "Deal with it." It only takes one to spoil the barrel of vinegar, and as a result, I refer you to my post of 5:30 pm:
You'll be sorry when the inevitable implosion comes, and the rest of us say, "Told you so…"
All together now: told you so.
Let's not be selfish, since there's plenty of blame to go around. Start with our hitters, for failing to capitalize on a host of opportunities during the early frames. After six innings, we had seven hits and four walks - enough to have buried the Red Sox totally. However, all we had to show for it was Tracy's three-run homer and an RBI single, also by Chad. Chris Young grounded into a double-play to end the fifth, and the chances dried up: from that point on, we went 1-for-14, and didn't get another man into scoring position. Even allowing for our deep disdain for all things positive, a three-run lead just never felt like it was going to be enough, even though Davis was pitching well.
He'd allowed five hits and a walk through the front seven, with the only damage a one-out homer by Pedroia in the first inning. Beyond that, he was great at throwing the Red Sox hitters curves when they were expecting cutters, and vice-versa. From the second through the seventh innings, Boston only had one at-bat with a runner in scoring position. His final line was seven innings, seven hits, one walk, six K's and three earned runs: another very solid outing, another no-decision. It leaves the unfortunate Davis still winless in over a month, even though four of those six appearances have been quality starts.
Way to go, Melvin: leave your starter in too long, bring in the wrong reliever, and then leave him out there until the game is lost. You must get up very early. With Haren publicly saying last night, how he was done after 98 pitches, what made you think Davis was still fresh after 94? And how many times has Davis got any outs in the eighth inning for AZ? Exactly once in 41 starts. Lo, the Red Sox got two hard-hit singles, and the tying run was suddenly at the plate, with the big guns in their order coming up, in the shape of Pedroia, Drew and Ramirez. Time to go to the bullpen, for sure - even if Melvin was late to get anyone warming up there. So who does our manager pluck out of the pen, with men in scoring position? Chad Qualls, who has shown a horrible fondness for botching situations like that this season.
Here are Qualls' splits for the year, coming into today's game:
Bases empty: .176/.263/.250
Men on base: .242/.310/.355
Runners in scoring position: .333/.404/.487
The last figure will now look even worse, as Boston went 3-for-5 tonight there against Qualls - a quick bit of button-pushing reveals opponents are now batting .364 against him with RISP. I know Melvin was aiming for the twin killing, but Qualls has just one double-play since April 24, covering 33 at-bats with someone on first. Give him an empty inning, and he is fine; bring him in with the bases clogged, and this is why Qualls leads the majors in losses by a reliever, with a 1-6 record. You'd think lessons might have been learned after Saturday in Minnesota, where he retired just one of six hitters he faced with men in scoring position.
That's the third defeat in a row where we had the lead, and couldn't hang on to it. Only three outs left, so we didn't have much hope of pulling this out of the fire: especially facing Papelbon, who has a 1.52 ERA post-2005, the lowest in the majors of any pitcher with 100+ innings. A one-out walk by Byrnes gave fractional cause for hope: might he steal second, and put us just a bloop away from tying the game? In a word, no. He almost got picked off once, and after that, he never looked like he was even going to try. Drew fanned, and Hudson grounded harmlessly out, to end the game.
Positives, outside of Doug Davis? Well, the Dodgers lost. Tracy looked good, driving in all four runs with two hits, and also getting a walk. Jackson also reached safely three times, on a hit and two walks, while Hudson chipped in with a couple of hits. But Young continues to free-fall going 0-for-4, and one wonders why Reynolds and Upton were both benched for the night; replacements Ojeda and Salazar were 0-for-7. Beyond that, I can offer nothing better than Dbackskins' fabulous visual aid:

[Click to enlarge, in new windowII]
Master of his domain: Chad Tracy, +34.9%
Honorable mention: Doug Davis, +13.3%
God-emperor of suck: Chad Qualls, -62.7%
Dishonorable mentions: Drew -16.4%, Snyder -11.3%
Another monstrous Gameday Thread, almost necessitating a double-overspill, and ending at 928 posts for the night. Present were 4 Corners Fan, DbacksSkins, Muu, dbacksfan01, Zephon, hotclaws, TwinnerA, soco, dahlian, kishi, luckycc, emilylovesthedbacks, Augie's Army, seton hall snake pit, Counsellmember, likeavirgin, mrssoco, Wimb, Diamondhacks, dstorm, srdmad, unnamedDBacksfan and ChandlerDad. Thanks to them for their presence, and a brave but futile pursuit of Unbridled Pessimism day: I don't think we'll be trying that again in a hurry. Still, we regroup and get ready to come back strong tomorrow, when we will be formally auditioning a new potential saint for the Diamondbacks pantheon. So that'll be nice...
0 recs |
26
comments
Read Related
Comments
-62.7% for Qualls!??
But -100.0% for BoMel.
‘nuff said.
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
by DbacksSkins on Jun 25, 2008 12:39 AM EDT 0 recs
you mean -infinity%
Two days later, Eric Byrnes missed three games for excessive crying, and started listening to emo. At the same time, Emily changed her name to emilylovesthedbacksexceptthatloserericbyrnes.
by emilylovesthedbacks on
Jun 25, 2008 1:42 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I’ll take some of the blame, too- In the top of the eighth inning, I came very close to saying that Davis had pitched a great game. I was doing so in the assumption that he was done for the night, and I even had it typed out before I thought better of it and deleted it. But I fear the damage was still done….
Interestingly, Qualls’s problems with runners on is a new twist this year. Last year’s numbers:
Bases empty: .292/.339/.435
Runners on: .252/.311/.368
RISP: .224/.317/.368
That may explain some of Melvin’s desire to bring Q in in situations like this.
Currently blaming the D-backs struggles on: the Diamondbacks scoring fewer runs than the other team. Well, I was bound to get it right eventually.
by kishi on Jun 25, 2008 12:44 AM EDT 0 recs
At least I won't take joy
from the loss.
Roads? Where we're going we don't need roads.
by soco on Jun 25, 2008 12:45 AM EDT 0 recs
Unbridled pessimism day can be fun,
but when the pessimists start to turn on those who who would prefer not to partake, it starts to get old quickly.
So yeah, that sucked. I won’t bother beating my dead horse from the Gameday thread, but the biggest gut punch for me comes from the fact that we face Tim Wakefield tomorrow and I have no faith in the ability of this team to hit a knuckler. Hell, I wonder how many players on this team have even faced a knuckler in a game-situation before. Byrnes and Hudson, I’m sure have. Snyder and Tracy are a maybe and everyone else is extremely doubtful.
by dahlian on Jun 25, 2008 1:40 AM EDT 0 recs
Our only hope
might be if Wakefield can’t control it tomorrow. If they can be patient (ha ha, I know), it could get interesting. On the other hand, Randy needs to be on his game, because if he thinks the Twins were tough….
Roads? Where we're going we don't need roads.
by soco on
Jun 25, 2008 1:49 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Wakefield’s record is no better than Randy’s overall this year so far, but Randy’s 4 losses in June looks pretty ugly going into tomorrow’s game. Hopefully Randy will look good, Wakefield can control that knuckleball and our defense doesn’t go south and we get some hitting. I am going all-out on the optimism for tomorrow!
I just finished watching I Am Legend with Will Smith. I liked it it alot and then found the original ending online that totally changed the ending!
by TwinnerA on
Jun 25, 2008 4:15 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Darn it. Meant to say hopefully Tim W. cannot control the knuckleball.
by TwinnerA on
Jun 25, 2008 4:17 AM EDT
up
0 recs
LOL
Figured as much…
If Wakefield shuts down our feeble offense today, I’m going to be particularly upset that Candiotti gave him some tips last year during the series in Phoenix. (When he wasn’t scheduled to face us)
Fortunately, Candiotti is helping OUR guys this time. The question is, will it have any effect?
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 25, 2008 10:22 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I hope (and would expect) that Soco knew we were kidding!
It's like living with a six-year old.
by 4 Corners Fan on
Jun 25, 2008 11:59 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I know you guys were
I won’t let you get me down!
Roads? Where we're going we don't need roads.
by soco on
Jun 25, 2008 2:39 PM EDT
up
0 recs
D'oh
Falling asleep at 4-1 and waking up to this is NOT my idea of fun :(
Still, we scored more then 3 runs? that’s got to be good right? :)
So...time for another drink then?
by Wimb on Jun 25, 2008 3:55 AM EDT 0 recs
By the way,
somewhat hard to believe that this is our first ever loss at Fenway.
Seriously. We’re now 4-1 there all time.
Ironically, if 4-1 had held up last night, we’d now be 5-0. :-(
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
by DbacksSkins on Jun 25, 2008 10:59 AM EDT 0 recs
Jim,
it would seem that editors can’t modify widgets. Can you add luckycc’s blog to our Dbacks link list? It’s a combined Dbacks/Red Sux blog.
http://chicksandsticks.blogspot.com/
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
by DbacksSkins on Jun 25, 2008 11:21 AM EDT 0 recs
Duly added
Hey, I have to keep some powers for myself, y’know. :-) Duly added: I also updated the link to Diamondhacks’ site, since that was pointing to his old, dead, mlblog.
by Jim McLennan on
Jun 25, 2008 12:03 PM EDT
up
0 recs
No, I'm not opposed to that at all.
It’d be like giving the keys to a corvette to a 16 year old. :-P Although I WAS wondering what the difference is between managers and editors.
I maintain that instead of “Manager”, your office should be “Flying Spaghetti Jim”

On another note, ‘Hacks seems to be coming around more often these days, and in better spirits, too.
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 25, 2008 12:14 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Hey Jim (as well)
I’m not going to be around for the Game Day Thread, but I did put up links yesterday to Rachel Nichols in case you want to run experiments. I am not responsible, though, for any outcome of the game.
Roads? Where we're going we don't need roads.
by soco on Jun 25, 2008 11:29 AM EDT 0 recs
Waaay to shirk your responsibility.
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 25, 2008 11:54 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I know, I know
the whole making money thing.
Roads? Where we're going we don't need roads.
by soco on
Jun 25, 2008 2:40 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Did we decide which pic to use?
I think the consensus was #2?
by Jim McLennan on
Jun 25, 2008 11:57 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I liked
any pic from 2, 3, and 4. 2 & 4 were best, I think.
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 25, 2008 12:06 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I found a few more
Looking a bit scared
Not great quality
I like this one, but some creepy dude was in the background so I smudged him out
Roads? Where we're going we don't need roads.
by soco on
Jun 25, 2008 3:04 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Just noticed that
Dan Haren leads all NL starters in WHIP with a minuscule 0.965, while his H/9 innings are a little high at 7.20 his BB/9 is tremendous at 1.48.
A little off-topic but I just thought I would share with you all how awesome Dan Haren has been. This sort of goes against the pessimistic theme though.
by dbacksfan01 on Jun 25, 2008 1:22 PM EDT 0 recs
Haren
has consistently been in the top 5 in the NL in WHIP all season.
Hasn’t gotten the same run support as Webby, though. Plus, it always seems like he matches up against other teams’ aces—Santana twice, Beckett, etc.
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 25, 2008 1:33 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Yeah
If you go look at it, he’s basically replicated his first half of ‘07. Now we just need him to go ahead and not replicate the second half.
Bob Melvin Sucks
by nihil67 on
Jun 25, 2008 1:38 PM EDT
up
0 recs


















