Diamondbacks 2, Red Sox 1: Dan's the Man
Record: 40-37. Pace: 84-78. Change on last season: -4
There's a lot to be said for unbridled pessimism. After the dismal muggings we received in Minnesota, where the Twins snuck up on the Diamondbacks from behind, and whacked them over the head with an inning full of runs, I was entirely convinced that we were going to get our asses seriously kicked in Boston. After all, the Red Sox are only the reigning World Series champions and possessors of the best record in baseball this year. Plus, in Josh Beckett, they were sending to the mound, the only guy in the AL to win twenty games last season. What chance did the miserable Arizona CubicZirconiabacks have, having plated more than three runs just once in their past nine games?
Scoring. It's vastly over-rated. Because, for the third time in the last four victories, we needed two runs or less to take the win: a bit of a turnaround, given we managed it once in the first 36 W's. This was largely thanks to the heroic efforts of Dan Haren, who pitched seven shutout innings against a potent offense. While Webb has struggled in June, Haren has not, pitching 34 innings in five starts, all quality ones, and allowing six earned runs, for an ERA of 1.59. This was probably his best outing of the season, giving up only two hits and a walk, with one Red Sox advancing past first base until the seventh inning.
Said Haren, "Against a lineup like that, you can't fall behind. You can't walk guys. I was pretty aggressive with my fastballs. I probably threw more fastballs than I usually do. It's such a good lineup. I've faced them quite a bit. When I was ahead, I made sure I stayed ahead.," adding, "It really wasn’t the game plan coming in. I was just able to keep it down and away." Obviously, with the Red Sox rarely more than a swing away from going ahead, there was little room for error: "The adrenaline going in a nothing-nothing game. There is so much effort in every pitch. Here, every pitch meant so much, especially the last inning, being second and third, tying run at second. I'm letting pretty much every pitch go, and snapping every breaking ball as hard as I could. It was a max-effort 100 pitches." Well done, Dan: well done.
It was scoreless after six: the Diamondbacks had almost as much trouble solving Beckett, as the Red Sox did against Haren. However, it was the Boston pitcher who cracked first. Jackson walked to lead off the seventh, and Reynolds singled with one out. Young then doubled off the Green Monster to break the 0-0 tie. We then caught a potentially game-changing break: first-baseman Kevin Youkilis had departed, the Greek god of black-eyes, after getting hit under the right eye by a one-hopper from Mike Lowell during warmups before the fifth. With backup 1B Casey, suspended for his part in a brawl with Tampa, Boston had to use outfielder Brandon Moss at first. This proved critical, as he bobbled Snyder's grounder, allowing Reynolds to score from third, when there might have been a play at the plate.
Subsequent events made that run very, very important. After Tony Peña got the first batter in the eighth, a walk and two singles loaded the bases with one out, and put the tying run into scoring position. Stephen's big brother, J.D. Drew, then hit a sacrifice fly to make the score 2-1, and bring Manny Ramirez to the plate, in front of the baying Fenway faithful. He blistered a screaming line-drive towards the left side of the infield, and my unbridled pessimism looked to be entirely justified. However, somehow, Reynolds got his glove on the ball to end the threat. After that, Brandon Lyon retiring the Red Sox in order, on a mere five pitches in the ninth, proved something of an anti-climax, albeit an extremely welcome one.
Eric Byrnes was activated from the DL before the game, despite having gone an unimpressive 1-for-12 during his rehab stint with Visalia. "We look forward to having a healthy Eric Byrnes and hopefully he has all his weapons to go and he can run and do some of the things he wasn't able to do before he went on the DL," said Melvin. Insert obvious, snarky remark here, for Byrnes was immediately inserted into the leadoff spot...and immediately returned to his former results, going 0-for-5 with six men left on base. But, dammit all, with the team having gone 9-16 in his absence, he can go ohfer as many as he wants, just as long as we win the game. Alex Romero was optioned down to Tucson to make way for the return of our most highly-paid position player.

[Click to enlarge, in new window]
Master of his domain: Dan Haren, +44.8%
Honorable mentions: Young, +24.9%; Lyon, +20.9%
God-emperor of suck: Eric Byrnes, -18.5%. Welcome back, #22...
Very nice Gameday Thread, totaling over 860 posts at time of writing. Those present were: Zephon, kishi, seton hall snake pit, TwinnerA, DbacksSkins, 4 Corners Fan, LucaMaz3, soco, Wimb, snakecharmer, hotclaws, Muu, luckycc, dahlian, srdmad, emilylovesthedbacks, Counsellmember, Turambar, Diamondhacks, dbacksfan01, friendly visiting fan Allen Chace and unnamedDBacksfan. Just to echo something mentioned in the thread, please do try and refrain from the unnecessary use of F-bombs and similar words. While understandable under some circumstances, it does appear to have become more common of late, and I'd rather posters find alternative terms - or, indeed, languages! - to express their disappointment. I don't want to have to start rattling a virtual swear-box under your nose. :-) We appreciate your co-operation in this matter...
But this was one he...ck of a good win. It doesn't change anything though: indeed, I am now determined than ever to go through the rest of the road-trip, convinced that Arizona is going to lose each and every game. So, go on, D-backs - surprise me again tomorrow, why don't you? Final, upbeat note for the night: first-round pick Daniel Schlereth is healed, near deal with D'backs.
"Everything's fine. The Diamondbacks know what it is. It has not scared them away. It bothered them a little bit when they saw on TV that I was icing my elbow, but that was not the problem. We are in negotiations. It's going well. They came up with an offer and all we are looking for is a fair deal, and I'm sure we will get it done." [He] was originally thought to have a strained oblique muscle, according to UA coach Andy Lopez... Schlereth, a left-hander, said it was more of a minor triceps injury that started three days before the first game against Miami. "I knew I pulled something," he said. "I felt I would just throw through it, but couldn't. I felt it would go away, but when I started to warm up in the bullpen (during the first day) I just couldn't throw with it."
For more draft coverage, Nick Piecoro has a nice set of round-by-round capsules on the players we picked. This covers the first ten picks, and a couple of interesting selections beyond that. Didn't realize the Justin Parker we chose in the sixth round, was the older brother of last year's first-round pick, Jarrod Parker. Good stuff.
0 recs |
29
comments
Read Related
Comments
Final, upbeat note for the night: first-round pick Daniel Schlereth is healed, near deal with D’backs.
That giant sigh of relief you hear is dahlian.
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
by DbacksSkins on Jun 24, 2008 2:22 AM EDT 0 recs
I'm not sure how to take this post.
I agree it is nice to hear that he’s alright. It would also be cool if he had the stuff and composure to propel through the minors and possibly even take the Buckner/Pegeuro/Petit/Fruto/Whoever the hell is actually on the team right now-roster spot.
Of course, as we saw when Scherzer was up, having that fifth nails reliever to come in after an early starter (or defense) blow up is meaningless if the offense can’t make up a deficit. Against real teams, that is – not teams that use Damion Easley as a corner outfielder.
by dahlian on
Jun 24, 2008 4:45 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Don't be so serious all the time.
It was a reference to this.
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 24, 2008 5:31 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Why so serious?
Roads? Where we're going we don't need roads.
by soco on
Jun 24, 2008 9:23 AM EDT
up
0 recs
to make way for the return of our most highly-paid position player.
When I say "#### yourself", Mr. Moorad, will you put that down to drunkenness or a high estimate of your athleticism?
Yep. Still stings…
by dahlian on Jun 24, 2008 4:47 AM EDT 0 recs
Bisons Win, then D-Backs win
It’s all falling into place :)
Woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Sorry it’s been a while since i had a chance to celebrate a win as im usually in bed at the time we clinch a game :D
So...time for another drink then?
by Wimb on Jun 24, 2008 6:35 AM EDT 0 recs
This is true.
I think we can all celebrate both.
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 24, 2008 10:09 AM EDT
up
0 recs
About the f-bombs: I should say sorry again.
And as I said in the GDT, won’t do it again in english…
the bad news are: maybe the chances of some children from Japan, Italy, France, Germany, Spain and of course Brazil see bad words from me will increase a little bit… =X
- The Question is: What is manah-manah?
- The Question is: Who cares!?
by Muu on Jun 24, 2008 8:00 AM EDT 0 recs
Whoa...
I just noticed this from Saturday’s GDT blurb—Jim? They released The Wicker Man on DVD??
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
by DbacksSkins on Jun 24, 2008 10:52 AM EDT 0 recs
Oh, yes...
A couple of years ago, i think. They had a box-set, which included a reconstructed version of the film, as close as they could get to the original cut. But having seen an extended version on BBC TV a while back and having been not so impressed [it’s pretty sluggish], I was more than happy to stick with the short one for $5. :-)
by Jim McLennan on
Jun 24, 2008 11:21 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Why
was I never informed of this??
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 24, 2008 12:23 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Well, they conceal information like that in books.
:-)
by Jim McLennan on
Jun 24, 2008 1:29 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Damn.
I KNEW my illiteracy would end up getting in the way sometime.
Also, are you implying that the extended version features a giant alligator?
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 24, 2008 2:13 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Just to make sure
before I buy, does the short version still have the scene of Willow playing siren towards the erstwhile detective?
Willow’s Song is one of my favorite songs ever (especially when performed by Scottland’s own Rose McDowall). I don’t think the movie would have near the impact, for me at least, if it didn’t make the final cut.
by dahlian on
Jun 24, 2008 12:35 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Pretty sure it does
That was an, uh, “formative influence” on my teenage years. :-) I’ve seen the film a number of times, and it’s always been there. But if you can hang on for a few days, I’ll fast-track the DVD for viewing and give you a definite answer.
by Jim McLennan on
Jun 24, 2008 1:26 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Is it true
that part of the original film was used to build a road in England?
I vaguely remember hearing something about that…. that’s why they’ve lost much of the original cut.
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 24, 2008 2:17 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I can't imagine they would leave that out.
It’s fairly important to plot and character development.
::running off to Amazon to buy The Wicker Man::
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 24, 2008 2:15 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Byrnes
Can Melvin please recognize that Byrnes isn’t seeing pitches and put him in the 9 hole tonight? Was there a pitch that he didn’t swing at last night?
Bob Melvin Sucks
by nihil67 on Jun 24, 2008 11:06 AM EDT 0 recs
Let me help you.
Was there a pitch that he didn’t swing at last night?
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 24, 2008 11:11 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Great Win - Great Game
But this team has got serious problems - and a crappy NL West continues to mask that fact and has disillusioned players, media and us fans to think that all is well.
Unfortunately, we’re now going on almost 2 months of sucktitude - and it is becoming much more than a bad streak…...
The more this season drags on as such – the more I wonder if we’ve underestimated the loss of a clubhouse leader such as Tony Clark.
by dstorm on Jun 24, 2008 11:32 AM EDT 0 recs
'splode
Yeah, cause Tony Clark has got the Padres firing on all cylinders.
Bob Melvin Sucks
by nihil67 on
Jun 24, 2008 12:04 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Well, the Padres are going to have hitting issues regardless of clubhouse chemistry.
It’s also TC’s first year over there. While I wasn’t in favor of him taking more playing time from CoJack, I am wondering now whether he woulda been able to lay down the law here and get the guys more focused.
::shrug:: I dunno. I’m just looking for answers.
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 24, 2008 12:28 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Maybe the real sheriff was Tony Clark. Because he isn’t doing well for San Diego doesn’t mean he would have been the same here. Who knows. I didn’t mind at all having TC come in late to play 1st in close games and pinch hit and DH. I think this team misses him more than they’ll admit. With TC ending up making less playing for San Diego because he didn’t get back to the FO by some deadline he didn’t know existed is too bad. I wish he was still here.
by TwinnerA on
Jun 24, 2008 1:28 PM EDT
up
0 recs
First-base is the least of our problems here
Jackson leads the team in OPS+, at 127 – next best is Reynolds at 111. Clark, incidentally, is at 93. We’d be better off having Ojeda (OPS+ 97) DH than Clark. The only spot on the field where Clark would be any real boost to offensive production is in left. Can’t really see him playing there.
by Jim McLennan on
Jun 24, 2008 1:55 PM EDT
up
0 recs
The Difference in the Game
last night may’ve been that one starter let his mgr know when he was gassed and the other didnt. Beckett missed a bunch of spots in the seventh and we eked across a couple runs – coulda been more as we left the bases loaded.
For years I’ve heard what a great ump McClelland is and never honestly noticed, perhaps distracted by the botanical speed of some of his calls. But I thought he was fantastic on balls and strikes last night. Upton’s walk in the seventh was amazing, where Beckett threw four balls, none more than an inch or two off either side of the plate (in the mid nineties), and neither Upton nor McClelland flinched once.
With the Fenway faithful howling, I really believe that 90% of HP umps would’ve caved into Beckett at least once there, with a young batter at the plate. He gave each pitcher his due – and no more. This wasnt one of those predictable pitcher’s duels contrived by Angel Hernandez. Just two elite pitchers working the plate beautifully while throwing really, really hard. A pleasure to watch.
by Diamondhacks on Jun 24, 2008 2:40 PM EDT 0 recs
Another great observation Hacks
We have to stop doing this, people will get the wrong idea. :-)
McClelland had a GREAT game last night. I don’t think he missed a pitch all night.
by shoewizard on
Jun 24, 2008 4:47 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Errr.....
he remains on my hated/disliked ump list, (I’m stubborn like that) partially because he has such a tight strike zone, and for the way he calls strikes, but I can’t chastise him for inconsistency, that’s for sure.
By the way, Hacks, +1 for the potshot against Angel Hernandez.
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
by DbacksSkins on
Jun 24, 2008 5:27 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Funny little superstition
I have not shaved since June 1st when Haren got a convincing win over the Nationals. Now I was planning on growing a beard in the first place but it is funny how it sort of happened like that and how he has not lost since I started growing it. I know for a fact to that I had not shaved since then because the night I last shaved is when Webb had that great night against the Nats.
I will shave once Haren loses…
by dbacksfan01 on Jun 24, 2008 3:20 PM EDT 0 recs














