Diamondbacks 2, Twins 7: The E-Backs Strike Back
Who you calling scruffy looking?
And scruffy the Diamondbacks looked tonight, every inch the half-witted nerf herder. It took only one inning for the Twins to do their damage, but it was more than enough. Six runs were scored in the bottom of the third, with assistance of some dodgy plays by Mark Reynolds and Miguel Montero. It all started with a Reynold’s throw that tagged Delmon Young like he was trying out for a local YMCA dodge ball team, with a curious scoring of an infield hit. Brendan Harris doubled, and then both were scored by Mat Macri’s single.
The fun for the Twins wouldn’t end there, as Alexi Casilla reached on a bunt and Macri advanced to third after Montero attempted to airmail his throw to right field. Mauer hits a sacrifice fly, making the game three to nil with Casilla on second. Mourneau added to the deficit with a single, scoring his comrade Cosilla. With Mourneau standing on second after advancing with a throw to the plate, Craig Monroe stepped up to take his turn. One quick crack of the bat, and the leather ball was hurtling deep into center field. Home run, Twins 6, Diamondbacks 0.
In the subsequent inning the Twins tacked on with Brendon Harris off a Carlos Gomez double. This would be all the Twins would get, but it would prove to be more than enough off another listless night for the Diamondbacks’ offense.
Arizona would end up with eight hits, only two less than Minnesota, but the visitor’s attempts would be scattered throughout the game with no sense of rhythm. The first real threat would be in the top of the second off a Chris Young double. Montero would strikeout, however, and Upton would join him back in the dugout after a fly out that advanced Young to third. Salazar dug in, and scrapped out a walk, but the opportunity was wasted with a Drew weak pop out just beyond the grass lip between first and second.
The Diamondbacks would get a run in the top of the sixth with Mark Reynold’s sixteenth home run of the year to left field. Of course, his teammates couldn’t be bothered to join in the festivities, instead sitting down meekly with a groundout, fly out, and strikeout.
No other D’back would reach base until the top of the eighth, game nearly in hand for the home team, when Hudson ran out an infield single. He then advanced to second off a Twin throwing error, who must have drank the same flavor of Kool-Aid before the game. He would get a chance to click cleats with the home plate after being advanced to third by Tracy and then home by Reynold’s groundout, making the game 7-2.
Although the game ended poorly for the Diamondbacks, Randy Johnson did go the distance, saving a bullpen that most likely will be need in the coming days. One can’t help but think back to the Maddux debacle earlier in the year when he allowed six runs in the first to the then charging Diamondbacks, and then completed the game to save his poor battle tested relief corps.
Emperor of His Domain: Chris Young 4.7%
God Emperor of Suck: Randy Johnson 29.2%
Oh, you want to know who was maeking poast tonight, hmmm? Well, we have DbacksSkins, me, kishi, hotclaws, emilylovesthedbacks, Jim, DiamondbacksWIn, Elway4Prez, 4 Corners Fan, TwinnerA, unnamedDBacksfan, luckycc, Muu, snakecharmer, dahlian, SongBird, srdmad, Wimb, Red Reign, and Diamondhacks.
Needless to say this one was largely over by the end of the third inning and the Game Thread reflected this, with conversation drifting to movies, pizza toppings, what my children will look like, and the most important of events: free Jack in the Box tacos.
At the end of the game, I asked for movie recommendations before I went off to my local, and terribly stocked, video store. The promise was the winner would receive an ice cream sammich at SnakepitFest later this year, and though all the entries were solid and things I definitely will check out soon, there can be only one winner: Jim. I narrowed down everyone's picks to one each, dependent on what was available to rent, and then called my wife and had her blind pick the winner. So tonight, after Ghostbusters will be The Nest.
For the other contestants, well, thanks for playing, and maybe we'll play this again sometime in the next month to give other people a chance at other wonderful prizes.
Tomorrow the game is at 7:10 EST, so don't be L7 and get caught somewhere else.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Ulp
This is where I back-track furiously, and say something like, “Well, I enjoyed The Nest...” :-S
Thanks for the recap and I look forward to hearing your opinion in due course.
Yeah, I think that all promises of ice cream sandwiches should be held until soco views said film.
And then I’ll claim this whole thing was rigged!
Currently blaming the D-backs struggles on: the Diamondbacks scoring fewer runs than the other team. Well, I was bound to get it right eventually.
You can blame the Mrs.
I staged the question to her without telling her the titles and she went with Jim’s. Oddly enough, they had the Nest but not Boondock Saints.
Roads? Where we're going we don't need roads.
The Nest was okay
it was essentially a zombie movie without the zombies. I had some minor problems with it, like how there were long gaps where the invaders are seemingly sitting around waiting to kick the doors in. It was made well, though, and the tension was built nicely, I thought. Another minor thing was at the end fight, the film is sped up ever so slightly, like when you accidently hit the slowest fast forward on a DVD player. I know sometimes lower budget films will use that technique for complex shots, but it was a little disorienting to see it in use for so long. It’s the same with slo-mo to me; great in certain areas but can be overused very quickly.
Overall I enjoyed it, and don’t regret that I saw it, but I would be hesitant to recommend it to someone unless I knew they liked zombie movies, or these type of action movies. With the first 30 minutes or so just building with even hardly any dialogue, I would think someone used to only modern American action would grow quickly bored.
Roads? Where we're going we don't need roads.
What? No roll call?
How am I supposed to know who the hell I was talking to!??
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
I’m sure we can figure out a way to reconstruct it ourselves. Let’s see. I was there…. Did you show up? And maybe…. No, wait, there was-
Damn it, soco!
Currently blaming the D-backs struggles on: the Diamondbacks scoring fewer runs than the other team. Well, I was bound to get it right eventually.
Pretty slick.
But why does the roll call suddenly appear between the FanGraph and the paragraph talking about the FanGraph?
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
None of the paragraphs talk about the Fan Graph
It went from the Fan Graph photo to talking about what we talked about in the Game Thread. As a matter of fact, the words “Fan Graph” aren’t even mentioned in my recap. And I’m hoping that the people that read it in the morning won’t notice, but you had to go and ruin the game.
Roads? Where we're going we don't need roads.
Alright, I admit it.
I’m just bitter that I didn’t win the ice cream sandwich.
Have the Dodgers lost yet?
Well, it's not like you don't have one coming your way
for the free tacos and for suggesting Once Upon a Time in America. You just didn’t win THIS contest.
Roads? Where we're going we don't need roads.

by 



















