Randy Johnson
I thought I'd try my hand at writing something a bit more in depth, I realise I might not have the level of statistical knowledge needed for these type of posts but thought I'd take a stab :)
So far the Big Unit has had mixed results on the mound this season going 38.2 Innings in 7 starts this season for a 4-1 record on the back of a 4.42 ERA. Some starts such as this weekend against the Tigers he's looked great but othertimes against the Padres at Chase, the Astros and Rockies he's looked very much the 44 year old coming off of 2 back surgeries
In fact you can split him up so far this year into dominating and very very average. If you combine his trip to *insert random telecoms company here* on April 14th,San Diego on April 25th, and at home to the Tigers on Sunday his line looks as follows.
2-1 18 IP 12H 4R 1ER 7BB 19SO 0.56 ERA
But if you take his other 4 starts
2-0 20.2 IP 30H 20R 18ER 5BB 18SO 7.84 ERA
Even whilst appreciating the small sample size and also acknowledging that it is early in the season and he's still working up to full fitness, it's looking like Randy is going to be hit and miss both in terms of innings worked and effectiveness throughout this season.
Despite his rollercoaster so far, if the guy stays healthy and if he continues at this pace throughout the season the Big Unit should in theory make the remaining 12 wins he needs and just about scrape 300 wins whilst providing us with around 150-160 innings of work.
The point is that Randy's contract with us ends at the end of this year and it's looking for now as if management sees Max Scherzer in future as a starting pitcher. With that in mind we have a projected rotation of Webb, Haren, Davis, Owings and Sherzer and presumably people like Jared Parker maybe even able to step in during September 2009, not to mention people like Gonzalez, Buckner and Petit still around the organisation.
With this is mind where do you see Randy next season? In my eyes if he is shy of 300 but healthy he comes back for one more dance BUT only with the Diamondbacks. I can't see him playing again in the AL given his age and condition and a move to a team further north where colder conditions prevail in the early weeks doesn't seem wise given his back troubles. Moreover I don't see him going somewhere that isn't going to contend and really the only team I could see making overtures towards the guy might be Houston as he's a former player.
Sentiment aside, even if he falls short on around 295 would Randy be an asset to us next season? In my eyes based on what I've seen so far, yes. Having him around for another year helps keep the pressure away from Scherzer and Parker and also helps keep a popular face with the team. The guy is well respected in the clubhouse and is popular with the fans and whilst that fact might not justify giving the old man $10 million I think a reasonable one year deal at 4 or 5 million would be a decent investment. Furthermore it has been mentioned before but seeing Johnson in the pen at some point would be a great asset to a team that could well lose the likes of Brandon Lyon and Juan Cruz in the offseason and if he was agreeable, Johnson could fill the void left by Cruz brilliantly. However sadly I don't see him wanting a bullpen assignment unless perhaps it was as a closer and even that is a longshot for both player and organisation to agree too.
So therefore 2 questions I wanted to ask you all.
A) What do you do if you're Randy Johnson at the end of the season?
B) What do you do if you're the Diamondbacks and Randy wants to play next season. Do you offer him a new deal? offer him a deal based on certain conditions i.e on accepting a bullpen assignment, or say thank you very much for your time here but we're moving on?
I know alot of this is very hypothetical and it all depends on if he stays healthy etc but I just wanted to throw this out there!
22 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
my buddy and I were just discussing this
It will be interesting to see if Randy can make it through this season, let alone next season, but it is an interesting question…what happens if the man is 5 wins or so away from 300?
I am not going to touch the idea of the Dbacks wanting him as a starter because I do not see this happening, so I am looking at this as more of a BP role for him as a Dback.
I think it is an interesting idea to send him to the pen, but the argument for this is supposedly longevity of his career. So, if that is the pro, then A)will it really work better for his back to be in the pen vs. starting and B) will he get the wins in a BP role?
So, will his back be better in a BP role? I have heard some people say that it might, but others say that the problem with his back is how long it takes to recover. I am not sure if that is a big deal if he only throws 15 pitches or if the recovery is simply because of 100 pitches, but I am just not sure a BP role will better suit him if he needs a few days in between each outing.
Lets assume he can pitch in 60 games as a reliever next year. Does this help him? He will already be #2 in strikeouts, has a ring and really the only thing he would be looking for is those elusive few wins (again going with 5 as the magic number). Does a BP role give him a chance to get those 5 wins? Probably not likely.
I am hoping he can continue to stockpile wins even when he pitches badly (all old school Dback fans know that he deserves them…..see his run support in some games in 99, 00 and 2001….ugh) and can ride off in the sunset.
One last note I have is this….does 300 really matter? If Randy gets 295 will that hurt his legacy more than if he had 305? Anyone that has seen Randy pitch can testify that his dominance is more than a number of 300 (see strikeouts/9 Innings vs. his BB in comparison to Clemens and others in his era)
covered by Steve G over at official site
This was briefly covered in his mailbag on official site. Doesn’t have a lot to say, but I figured I would pass it along.
What about moving Randy Johnson to the bullpen? He’s struggled to go more than five innings in his starts and could be dominating as a closer. Your thoughts?
—Robert S., Tempe, Ariz.
I understand the concern about how Johnson has not pitched deep into games so far this year, but I don’t see a move to the bullpen or closer’s role in his future. Given his history of back problems, I don’t think it would be a good idea to ask Johnson to get ready on short notice in the bullpen or pitch on consecutive days. Even more so now as he gets up there in age and with the back situation, he needs to pitch on a regular schedule that allows him to give his body the rest it needs and to get his between-starts work in as well.
Not related, but ....
I will be going to Atlanta this Saturday to watch Randy pitch against the Braves. It is a trip that Myself, my boys and a friend from Arizona do every year when the Dbacks come to Atlanta! I have always wanted to see him pitch in person. I hope he does as well as Micah did last year when i went but I don’t expect Randy to hit 2 HR’s.
by DiamondbacksWIn on May 20, 2008 3:41 PM EDT reply actions
Whoa whoa whoa...
...it’s unrealistic for you to expect a Pwnings-like performance out of Randy at the Braves. Lower your expectations, and look for something more Randy-like.
Like a perfect game.
Hmmm…. our pitchers DO have some career nights vs. Atlanta, don’t we??
Max Scherzer is all out of bubblegum.
Good stuff, Wimb. Thanks.
I don’t think there’s really any chance Randy gets to 300 this year, so I think your speculation here is well founded. I think that he can be an asset to the team next year. Randy will likely not want anything more than a one year contract and will almost certainly be willing to give us a hometown discount. I think one year, $4M is a very reasonable offer for both sides. He would provide us with the ability to let some of our younger guys mature on their own time table and we would provide him the opportunity to get the 300 W mark (by the way, peeklay, I think that 300 means a great deal to Randy, and although it shouldn’t affect the way he is viewed in posterity, it, in reality, will).
"There are only two seasons: winter and baseball"
-- Bill Veeck
Generally,
I agree with dahlian’s repeated assertion that, “You pay someone for how you think they’ll do, not how they did”, but I think RJ might be a very important exception to this rule. The guy will be our first HOFer, (hopefully not our last!) and we basically built the success of this franchise on his back, so he gets a LOT of leeway.
As for next year, well, I’ve said all along that I didn’t think RJ would be able to reach 300 Ws this year, and I thought it’d take another season, but it would seem that if he could stay healthy for this entire year, he has a decent shot at it. Many things will need to repeatedly break in his favor, of course - he’ll have to stay in games long enough to be eligible and see us get the lead for him, he’ll have to stay healthy, (most importantly) he’ll have to not watch the BP blow games for him, etc. I think if RJ gets to 300 this year, he absolutely retires at the end. Is 300 important? Well, only psychologically; his career is equally as impressive by the raw #s if he wins 299 games or 300, and he’s a HOFer either way. Still, it’s clear that 300 is very important to HIM, especially since there’s a very good chance that he’ll be the last 300 game winner ever. (IIRC, Mussina is close too, but I don’t see him getting it) Pitchers just don’t win games the way they used to; they don’t stay in for enough innings, etc. If RJ doesn’t win 300 by the end of this season, I think he’ll want to try coming back next year - with the glaring exception that I think if we were to win the WS again this year, I think he’d retire—go out on top, and all that.
So if he doesn’t make it this year, do we resign him next year? Well, obviously not if it’s going to be $10-12 million, but for half that, I think Randy would much rather stay here than play for $10 million somewhere else. I’d like having him around in the locker room, especially with Scherzer around and Parker coming through the system, (dunno whether Parker will be up by next year…. maybe not) and I could definitely see hanging on to him as perhaps a 5th starter. I don’t see him coming out of the bullpen, and if he somehow turns just TERRIBLE for the rest of the season, or tweaks his back again, I think both sides might agree that it’s time for him to retire. But if we think we can get league average pitching out of him next year, I’d rather do that for $5 million than, say, Kip Wells or Josh Fogg, even at 2 years for $3 million, or something like that.
If we resign him for next year, would he stay the full season, or retire midseason after 300? I don’t know. He’s talked this year about how frustrating it is for him to not be able to do the things he used to be able to do, pitchingwise, but I think he’d probably stick around as long as the team asked him to. However, if Randy DOES comes back next year, as far as I’m concerned, he can retire whenever he wants. He’s earned that, at least.
Summa summarum, if he can keep on pitching the way he has so far, (inconsistent, but on the balance, about average; according to Baseball Reference, his ERA+ this season is 101, and he was at 123 last year) and he doesn’t make 300 Ws and wants to return, and will give us a reasonable rate, we ABSOLUTELY resign him, knowing full well that he may not last the entire season.
Besides—you KNOW how J.Mo likes marketing tools. Randy chasing his 300th? Putting more distance between himself and that asshole Clemens on the career K list? (Hopefully) Great for pr, even if he’s no longer the FOTF.
Max Scherzer is all out of bubblegum.
The rotation is set for next year.
Webb, Haren, Owings, Scherzer, Davis. At least, that’s what I would do. And I certainly don’t want his production for the money we are paying him.
Brandon Webb, do I need to say more?
If Randy takes a paycut then I'm fine with it,
but that still leaves us with 6 starters.
Brandon Webb, do I need to say more?
Let him pitch
I’d rather pay him 5-6kk than pay the same amount for another back of rotation starter…
I mean, bar his back problems Randy could easy pitch until he’s 50 y/o
teh velocity is there (find another 44yo guy throwing 94 mph IN THE WORLD)
his slider still breaks and he’s pitching some sinkers and splitters, and that’s the diference that makes him a HOFer, his ability to change his game plan…
Let Randy pitch until his 50’s =X
o/
- The Question is: What is manah-manah?
- The Question is: Who cares!?
He could,
but why bother?
A competitive team does not put a 90 pitch pitcher in the rotation if they don’t have to. I love Scherzer as much as the next fan, but having in the rotation full time will really tax the bullpen. I’d much prefer him to either be the bullpen reinforcements or be back in AAA working on his off speed stuff. I trust the front office to make the best decision.
You telling me that Scherzer can't give us more than 90 pitches next season?
Brandon Webb, do I need to say more?
You telling me that Scherzer can't give us 90+ pitches next year?
Brandon Webb, do I need to say more?
I'm not talking about next year,
I’m talking about this year.
Scherzer doesn’t yet have the arm strength or control to be anything more than a 4-6 inning pitcher. To keep him in the rotation now would have a negative cascade effect and increase the odds of wearing out our bullpen.
Can we say
Brad Lincoln?
Max Scherzer is all out of bubblegum.
by DbacksSkins on May 22, 2008 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions
RJ Next Season?
Assuming:
- he stays healthy this year
- provides average pitching
- is amenable to a home town discount
I would sign him for one more year. That let’s Sherzer start out in the pen, then move into the starting rotation later in the year, if necessary, without burning up his arm with too many innings.

by 
























