AZ Snakepit: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Mariners lose on Ichiro misplay Bar-right-arrows



Diamondbacks 10, Rockies 9 - Back to the Future?

It would have been nice if Randy Johnson had received this level of run support last season: we scored as many runs today as in any two of his games last year, put together. Bit of a wild one down in Tucson. 30 hits, nineteen runs, four errors and each side blowing two leads, with the Diamondbacks scoring three times in the top of the ninth to snatch an improbable victory. If that's any kind of indicator as to what we can expect once the season starts, it's gonna be a wild 2008.

The first inning went very smoothly: 16 pitches, one hit and ended with the strike-out of Matt Holliday. No problems there. The second inning...not so much: the first four batters all reached, including a three-run homer on a 3-0 pitch to Chris Iannetta. 33 pitches there, and Johnson was yanked, having reached the scheduled 50-pitch mark a little earlier than he and Bob Melvin would probably have liked. As with all Spring Training games, the results are probably not as important as the execution, so let's turn to Johnson for his comments after the game, courtesy of Nick Piecoro:

Obviously the results weren't great but even in years past I'm not looking too much at results, I'm looking to gain some endurance and stamina and work on my location while monitoring my back at the same time. Minus the results today there were a lot of positive things but as competitive as I am I'm still disappointed I would pitch like that... I've got a long ways to go but I'm just happy I was able to get out there and feel pain-free... Tomorrow will be a big day as well. I'm not walking on eggshells. I've had six months to heal. It's like night and day compared to how I felt last year at this time when I only had about three and a half months. Time makes all the difference.

Emphasis added, but assuming Johnson is not just saying what he thinks we wnat to hear, that seems like good news. His next scheduled start will indeed be on Saturday in Tempe, so you'll be getting an eye-witness report from that one. Despite that three-run second inning, Arizona still had the lead, having leapt out to a four-run lead in the top of the first, with a two-run homer by Stephen Drew the most productive blow. However, the Rockies continued to come back, getting to Tony Peña and Max Scherzer to build a 6-4 lead by the end of the fourth.

Arizona scored three times in the sixth, including a solo homer by Chris Burke [another two hits today, to bring him up to .400 on the season], but Fruto couldn't hold the 7-6 lead and the Rockies plated two on three hits to retake the lead once more. Things loooked bleak for the Diamondbacks as they trailed 9-7 in the ninth, but we clawed our way back once more, with our third inning of the afternoon scoring three runs or more, to make a winner of Billy Buckner, and Robertson duly vacuumed up the save. The offense pounded out a total of 16 hits, with two apiece for Young, Kelly, Nixon, Burke and Salazar, with Jackson reaching safely twice, on a hit and a walk.

In the light of Johnson's start, good bit in the San-Diego Union Tribune focusing on Randy Johnson and his back. He is particularly frank about the 2007 success, and how their success has left him with a burning desire to be a bigger part of it this year. I think we'll leave the final words after today's step on the road to recovery, to the man himself:

I was happy that the team did so well, but personally, it was very, frustrating. For one thing, to put all the time and effort into coming back, then have it happen again was difficult. And then to not be able to help out in what was going on, that was really hard. I was still coming to the ballpark, dressing out, watching and talking up the guys. What they were doing was unbelievable. The way they were winning was unbelievable. I couldn't have been prouder of them, especially since they were so young. It just made me feel like I could've been helping, but I couldn't. We did something that wasn't supposed to happen. Maybe this year we can make it happen because it's supposed to happen. I know one thing. I wouldn't be here today if I didn't think I could still pitch. I may not throw as hard as I did before, but if I'm healthy, I can pitch. And I can help.

It's not often Gaslamp Ball and AZ SnakePit have much in common, but I think we were both equally shocked - shocked! - albeit in different directions, by the news that Eric Byrnes' wife, Tarah, used to be one of the Pad Squad, the San Diego equivalents of the Rally Backs. Really. I share your sense of betrayal at the news that Arizona "fan favorite" Byrnes is, literally, sleeping with the enemy. And a Padre at that: surely he could have found someone nice in Denver, if he wanted to play away from home? There's probably now a plush rainbow unicorn sitting on the dresser by the bed, and he's likely also being forced to set up a MySpace profile as we speak. "Say it ain't so, Jo...er, Eric." :-)

Fun story in the Republic, about signing day down at TEP on Friday. That's where the players come in and get to put their names on all the balls, bats, jersey and sundry memorabilia that the club will use for charitable purposes in the coming year. So if you were at Friday's game, and the players seemed a little bit reluctant to sign your baseball cards... The reason would be because they'd already signed a grand total of 7,525 items that day! Though the workload was far from equitably split: prospect Wes Roemer, for example, had only six balls to sign, probably less than a minute's work.

At the other end, poor Justin Upton had 288 baseballs, 61 bats, 120 photos and 39 jerseys: including team items, that's 508 pieces, most on the team, so it's clear they expect him to reach superstar status in 2008. Webb would likely have come top, except they only got him to sign six bats - and I have to say, an autographed Webb bat would be an unusual thing to have hanging on your wall! He was top in balls (312) and jerseys (50). Oddly, Micah Owings only had to sign 15 bats; I'd have had that down as a more highly-coveted item for fans. Here's the overall top ten in items signed:

  1. Justin Upton: 508
  2. Eric Byrnes: 496
  3. Brandon Webb: 488
  4. Chris Young: 487
  5. Orlando Hudson: 458
  6. Stephen Drew: 451
  7. Conor Jackson: 401
  8. Mark Reynolds: 395
  9. Randy Johnson: 375
  10. Micah Owings: 371

Today's comment starter. Over at Royals Review, they've come up with a list of seven rule changes they want to see [link opens in convenient new window]. Which ones do you agree with and/or are there any others you would choose to impose?

0 recs | Comment 7 comments

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

Instant Replay
Scanned quickly over that RR article to make sure the one change I'd really like to see was there; some form of instant replay.  The way they describe it, being used simply for close, disputed HR calls, is exactly what I want to see (for now).  It can be excruciating to watch the replay in super slow-mo HD from multiple angles on TV while the game bogs down for several minutes with the umps "discussing" it and manager(s) arguing it, when they could easily (and just as quickly, maybe faster) be walking to a nearby monitor and seeing the same thing we are, almost always getting a definitive and correct call.
A bigger replay related change, but one we aren't likely to see any time remotely soon, would be having an extra official at a monitor at all times to review all close HRs, fair/foul calls and baserunning plays (and I'm sure there are others I'm forgetting).  My guess is we'll only see that if they eventually have electronic ball/strike calls and have a dedicated official to watch that system for egregious errors [I don't really know the workings of this theoretical system but it seems someone would have to be watching the computer]

by manphibian on Mar 11, 2008 4:09 AM EDT   0 recs

Oh also...
Determining home field for the World Series based on the All-Star game is the stupidest gimmick I've ever heard of in pro sports.  I have no idea who thought this was a good idea.  Just give it to the team with the better record as the article suggests.

I'm not a fan of the DH either, but I don't see them ever doing away with it.  Seems a better chance the NL would adopt it than the AL drop it (though neither is likely).

by manphibian on Mar 11, 2008 4:39 AM EDT   0 recs

Totally agree with this
Seriously, you play all season long and have home field in the sport's most important championship determined by a meaningless mid-season exhibition.

This is one of the worst decisions of the many decisions the Commish and MLB have bungled up over the years.

The solution to this is very simple and straight forward.  Team with the best record starts at home in a 2-3-2.

by dstorm on Mar 12, 2008 3:34 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

rule changes
Great article.  Only three I'd like to see:
  1. get rid of the DH
  2. limited (HR only) instant replay
  3. some version of an electronic ball/strike eye.  I think manphibian's idea is a good one.  if the system was set up with a perimeter of 3" out and 3" in I'd be happy.  That is, any pitch 3+" outside the strike zone that is called a ball would be reversed.  Conversely, any pitch 3+" inside the zone called a ball would be reversed.
A few other comments:
  1. WS home team: I know the AS game rule is dumb, but for some reason it doesn't bother me that much.  I'd keep it as is, especially since the variation of SOS from team to team (wouldn't exactly be fair if the Cubbies won homefield coming out of the pathetic NL Central).
  2. Doctoring balls: ya kiddin' me?  The last thing the game needs is MORE cheating.
  3. Raised pitching mounds: no thanks.  Being a KC fan myself (projected rotation: Meche, Bannister (yup, he's their #2), Greinke, Davies, and De La Rosa) I understand why you'd want the mound raised.  Heck, I understand why you'd want the mound set at the Little League distance of 45'... but I don't think it'd be good for the game.  At all.
  4. More interleague play: I actually like interleague play and disagree with the traditionalists who'd rather see it disappear.  However, I think there's a good balance right now of getting a taste of the other league without completely losing the identity of the leagues and the divisions.
By the way, GREAT to see the Unit back on the hill.

by johngordonma on Mar 11, 2008 8:05 AM EDT   0 recs

re. rule changes
My two cents:

1. Electronic ball and strike calls:

No way. If they want to grade the umps and be sure that they are being consistent then I'm OK with it in that capacity. Part of the fun in watching a game is seeing how the pitchers and hitters adjust to different home plate umps.

As long as they are consistent with their personal strike zone then I'm OK with different ones from ump to ump.

2. No Designated Hitter:

Lose it ASAP. If a player can't make up for his defensive weaknesses enough at the plate then he shouldn't be playing. It also messes up the situational substitutions. Go back to real baseball.

3. Very limited instant replay:

Maybe, only for HR calls.

4. Home field advantage for the World Series determined by record:

One of the dumbest things to happen in MLB for years. It's a stinking exhibition game for crying out loud. Dump it. It should go back to alternating years. It's the only fair way to do it, especially if one league has that silly DH rule.

5. A little ball doctoring:

No way.

6. Raise the pitching mound:

This wouldn't bother me too much and would be a lot better way to speed up games then all these weird band aids that MLB is throwing around to help speed up the games ( although i'm OK with long games ).

7. More interleague games:

No, thanks. I feel that we may have a few to many as it is right now. When Division Titles are determined by a game or two why would we want to have competing rivals playing different teams?

If anything, pull a few interleague games off
 the table and have divisions play the same teams.

by foulpole on Mar 12, 2008 8:56 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

umping
"As long as they are consistent with their personal strike zone then I'm OK with different ones from ump to ump."

That sentiment drives me crazy.  The strike zone is prescribed specifically by the MLB.  It is NOT open to interpretation:

"Rule 2.00 - The Strike Zone
The Strike Zone is defined as that area over homeplate the upper limit of which is a horizontal line at the midpoint between the top of the shoulders and the top of the uniform pants, and the lower level is a line at the hollow beneath the kneecap. The Strike Zone shall be determined from the batter's stance as the batter is prepared to swing at a pitched ball."

by johngordonma on Mar 12, 2008 10:55 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

re: umping

"...a horizontal line at the midpoint between the top of the shoulders and the top of the uniform pants,..."

It's pretty rare that I see this zone called but I still think that it's kinda cool to see the players battle with different strike zones. Believe it or not, umps are people too. ;-) and are going to have different points of view. The high strike is very rarely called.

It was even more of an issue when some of the blues used to wear those big ol' chest protectors while others didn't.

It's kinda cool to me to see the pitchers and hitters evolve during the game after they have seen what kind of zone the blue has during the first couple/few innings.

by foulpole on Mar 12, 2008 11:43 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the AZ SnakePit, the SB Nation blog about the Arizona Diamondbacks. Summer in Phoenix: "Would you like to sit on the porch? Or would you rather live?" -- Eddie Izzard.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Twinsfix2_small
Minor League Report 7/26
Dude-vinci_small
24 Hours of Trades
Rfc_small
Mark Teixeira trade rumors
Rfc_small
Thames Valley Bisons Baseball 2008
Hpim2931_small
I need sign ideas for Mark Reynolds' bday...help?
Mrsnakepit_small
Top 10 Moments in Diamondbacks History
Samarmstrong_small
Final Call for Reynold's Birthday
Sundevil_small
Emilio Bonifacio traded for relief arm Jon Rauch
Small
We Need Your Help!
Small
When Will They Wake Up??

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Manager

Mrsnakepit_small Jim McLennan

Editor

Me_-_sp_studio_small snakecharmer

Napoleon3_small DbacksSkins

Author

300_small kishi

Meow2_small Azreous

Samarmstrong_small soco

Wesnewhat2_small Zephon

Mlp_small dahlian

ad

Site Meter