Rauch
His name has a sound of where he should stay. The Diamondbacks cannot afford another person who blows the leads or the games. 6'10" or not, let him put on the clown suitfor another team along with a couple of others on the team. BRING BACK GONZO. Gonzo would be more of an asset to the team than an overgrown clown that even Washington (as bad as they are) didn't want. Bring up the young kids who seemed to be better than him.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
And where shall Gonzo play?
We already have a logjam in the OF. What exactly does he bring to the table?
I love the smell of commerce in the morning
Gonzo
I believe he would be an asset (my opinion). He could help with the younger players working the outfield as a coach/player when needed. He could help as a left handed batter that is so desperately needed or what ever other capacity they need him in.
Gonzo
I believe he would play where ever they asked him to. He couls also help coach the youger outfielders and be a lefthanded bat they so desperately need.
Not a big fan of this idea.
It’s the same mentality that is being shown in Seattle toward bringing back Griffey, i.e., nobody wants a washed up vet whose best memories reside within their primes.
Gonzo
I believe he would be an asset (my opinion). He could help with the younger players working the outfield as a coach/player when needed. He could help as a left handed batter that is so desperately needed or what ever other capacity they need him in.
Rauch fills a need. Gonzo doesn't.
That’s the reality of it. Rauch was actually pretty good for Washington, with ERA+ figures of 113, 127, 117 and 147 in the three and two-third seasons he played for them. I will certainly admit, he stank atrociously during his time here, but I am not prepared to write him off on the basis of those 23.1 innings. It may have been something as simple as arm fatigue that made him ineffective here, and if so, and he rebounds back to his regular form in 2009, he’ll be a very useful part of the bullpen.
I would, however, rather have been able to wait a bit before invoking his option, but that wasn’t possible. Here’s a thought, though I’ve got no evidence to back it up, and am simply thinking aloud. Perhaps Rauch didn’t want us to invoke the option, preferring free-agency, and so tanked on purpose after the trade? If so, we can perhaps expect a return to form, since he knows the only way he’s getting out of Arizona before the end 2010 is if he makes himself attractive enough to be trade-bait.
However, the alternative, and even worse possibility, is that he continues to blow chunks in the hope of pulling an Ortiz and getting his unconditional release. Ugh. We’ll see, I guess.
If for whatever reason that were true...
That would be incredibly silly, considering the team he was playing on before coming to a playoff contender.
Terrell Owens
will see you now.
"If the government's nuclear football ever were to fall into the wrong hands, Chris Horton would be called upon to intercept it on behalf of the Pentagon." -Kissing Suzy Kolber
by DbacksSkins on Nov 18, 2008 11:17 AM EST up reply actions
Rauch
I don’t believe he fills a need when he blows games like he did at the end.As for Washington, if he were as good as you stated, why did they let him go? They may have seen this coming. Also, we were desperate for pitchers and thought he may help, I guess Byrnes was wrong in that department.
Washington traded him because they're Washington.
What good does it do them to have a good closer NOW when they need to build for the future?
Don’t believe me? This should convince you.
Yes, they’re even 100 points behind the Pirates.
"If the government's nuclear football ever were to fall into the wrong hands, Chris Horton would be called upon to intercept it on behalf of the Pentagon." -Kissing Suzy Kolber
by DbacksSkins on Nov 18, 2008 11:14 AM EST up reply actions
Rauch
I agree with your very last statement, that is what I see happening.
The problem, of course,
with tanking to leave, is always that bad performance hurts your value in free agency.
I can’t recall — does ERA+ account for park factors, Jim? Because RFK was one of the most pitcher-friendly parks, IIRC.
"If the government's nuclear football ever were to fall into the wrong hands, Chris Horton would be called upon to intercept it on behalf of the Pentagon." -Kissing Suzy Kolber
by DbacksSkins on Nov 18, 2008 11:18 AM EST up reply actions
Washington traded him
That may be true, but would it not be easier to build around a proven winner. This he was not. He did the same thing in Washington, was good for a while then went bad.
A closer isn't really a necessity for a team with so many holes.
A closer is an overrated luxury. Remember that to get “saves”, you first have to have “save situations”.
"If the government's nuclear football ever were to fall into the wrong hands, Chris Horton would be called upon to intercept it on behalf of the Pentagon." -Kissing Suzy Kolber
True
It is not a necessity in a sense, but is good to have when needed. At this point I don’t see the D-Backs with a possitive closer that could be considered a luxury. They do need help in this area. The one they should not have let go was PaPa-Grande. Whatever idiosincreces he had, worked for him.
Papa Grande
was only signed for 1 more year, and was arbitration eligible and due for a big raise. They flipped him right after the best full season of his career, in the midst of a ton of hype about “leading the majors in saves”. It was the right move, and Papa regressed some last year, as well. Chad Qualls’ ERA was over a half-point better than Joe Greenvalley’s, even though Qualls was pitching in a more hitter-friendly park.
"If the government's nuclear football ever were to fall into the wrong hands, Chris Horton would be called upon to intercept it on behalf of the Pentagon." -Kissing Suzy Kolber
The Problem of course
While you are correct that RFK was one of the most pitcher friendly parks, then it goes to prove he wasn’t one the the better pitchers Washington had. Results = dump him.
Terrell Owens
While I don’t feel that the Cowboys are America’s team, I do feel that Terrell Owens is in fact America’s A__ H___.
Hmmm..... TO. Now HE'S an interesting cat.
I’ve never hated TO, even though he plays for the Cowgirls now. Is he selfish, self-absorbed, and aloof? Yes. Is he a self-promoting me-first prima donna, and a lousy teammate? Yes, but I also think he’s funny, and unlike many players, he’s never been involved in legal trouble off the field. I kinda see him and Chad Ocho Cinco in the same way. TO also has a really interesting life story — in that he was always kind of a loner, a quiet social outcast. He was raised by his mom and grandma; played football, basketball and ran track for a small state school; had a chance to play pro ball with his idol, Jerry Rice; and was never the TO he is now until he became a star after a few years in the NFL.
Does he do awesome stuff with the ball? Yes. Does that mean I’d want him to play for the Redskins? No.
OTOH, I have to give him mad props for ruining the Eagles’ 2005 season. :-P
"If the government's nuclear football ever were to fall into the wrong hands, Chris Horton would be called upon to intercept it on behalf of the Pentagon." -Kissing Suzy Kolber
Being
A Giant fan (go ahead, make fun) since 1962, I enjoy watching the cowboys try to catch up. TO is good on the field, but his antics take away from his ability.
Not much to make fun of
when you’re the defending Super Bowl winners. I’m not looking forward to playing you again this Sunday, even in Landover.
I don’t quite hate the Giants. I dislike them. Same with the Iggles.
But I DO hate the Cowboys.
"If the government's nuclear football ever were to fall into the wrong hands, Chris Horton would be called upon to intercept it on behalf of the Pentagon." -Kissing Suzy Kolber

by 





















