Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Bracketology 2012: Duke Finally Steps Up To The No. 1 Line

10 Least Significant All-Time Diamondbacks: Updated

[2011 update] Prodded into updating this by AZDBACKR, who was helping me update the sidebar, and pointed out this hadn't been updated for the best part of four years. Not actually too much movement to be added since then: most of the players who have appeared for the team in that time, did have at least semi-respectable careers. There's only one sure-fire addition, and another who, while having impeccable credentials right now, may find himself disqualified down the line, since he is still with the franchise in the minors.

[2007 update] The startling news of the passing-away of Joe Kennedy, who pitched for Arizona briefly last year, has sparked me into updating the list of least significant franchise players. These are the players whose appearances in D'backs uniforms were like meteors, flashing across the heavens at BOB or Chase before vanishing into darkness. Or, perhaps more often, damp squibs that sputter momentarily, before fizzling out completely... The list and stats below are now updated to include those who appeared in the 2007 season.

Star-divide

Honorable mention #1. Bryan Corey. We'll start with this eminently forgettable line: four innings, six hits, two walks, four earned runs. The weird thing is, four years after pitching for us, he pops up on the major-league radar again in 2002, throws a single perfect inning for the Dodgers, before vanishing once more. And then, four more years later, in 2006, he gets a career-high 39 innings in Texas and Boston. Guess he's scheduled to re-appear in 2010: keep an eye open... [He showed up in 2008 instead, getting 46 games with Boston and San Diego. Not seen since][

Honorable mention #2. Dan Carlson. I guess Carlson deserves praise for even reaching the majors, after being picked in the 33rd round of the draft. Tampa Bay then snared him with their 28th pick in the expansion draft, but they released him in 1998. After matching Corey, with four innings and four earned runs, we gained a full understanding of why Devil Rays' cast-offs are likely not worth signing.

Honorable mention #3. Jack Cust. Or "Cust the Bust" as he might disparagingly be called - a chilling reminder that not all first-round picks deliver (are you listening, Messrs. Drew and Upton?). Our opening pick in the 1997 draft, big things were expected as an Arizona prospect: does a single hit count? That he was dumped on the Rockies in 2003 as part of the Mike Myers deal, gives you some idea how far his stock had fallen. He then bounced around through the Orioles, A's and Padres, before ending up back at the A's, and finally stuck in the majors at age 28, hitting 26 homers in 124 games.

Honorable mention #4. Joe Kennedy. The pitching waiver-wire has been productive for Arizona in the past: Claudio Vargas, for example. However, 2007 was perhaps less so: Byung-Hung Kim allowed eleven hits in 2.2 innings, and Joe Kennedy was little better. After two games, things didn't look bad, with one run in 2.1 innings, on one hit. But his third was disastrous: three hit batters, two wild pitches and and two walks led to six runs, all earned, while retiring one hitter. He and Kim were both gone the next day. Joe was the first pitcher to hit three batters in less than an inning of work, since Dock Ellis faced four, hit three, and walked the fourth back in 1974, when starting a game for the Pirates.

Honorable mention #5. Dennys Reyes. Normally, striking out five in 2 1/3 innings of work would be a good day's effort - but when it's your entire output in a Diamondbacks uniform, colour me less impressed. Especially when sandwiched around five hits, including a home-run, and a walk. In ten years, Reyes has played on nine different teams: for just three has he pitched as many as sixty innings. But for AZ, Reyes does have more K's per nine innings than the Big Unit.

Honorable mention #6. Shane Reynolds. Our sole starter here, Reynolds made his only appearance on 6/28/04, after missing three months because of inflammation in his right rotator cuff. He allowed six runs on six hits and two walks in two innings, but thanks to an error by Olson, only one run was earned. Reynolds was back on the DL two days later, undergoing surgery on his right knee, and hasn't been seen since. We paid him $20,000 per pitch for his efforts.

10. Juan Sosa. No apparent relation to Sammy - not in his time with AZ (two games, one at-bat, one strikeout), or his entire major-league career (ten at-bats, two singles). His solitary at bat came in a 7-1 victory over the Padres on May 25, 2001: he pinch-ran for starter Robert Ellis in the third. But Sosa also ended the inning by fanning after we scored six unearned runs, and was then replaced himself by a new pitcher.

9. Ricky Bottalico. Not the sole D'back with a 1.000 winning percentage, but the only such to have just two games and thrown 1.2 innings. [Jason Bulger, 1-0 in 9 games and 10 IP, is next best] While his career began in 1994, and lasted through 2005, he was the lucky recipient of a win on June 23rd, 2003 at BOB - beating Brad Lidge, no less. He pitched a scoreless eighth, then got the win when we scored five in the ninth and scratched out a 7-6 victory.

8. Ryan Cook. His major-league debut in July 2011 resulted in three ER without retiring a batter - the only other NL debutant since 1984 with such a line was Vincente Padilla, also for Arizona. Cook did get three more outings before being sent back to the minors, but he's currently the closer in Reno, so we may yet see him again.

7. Tom Gordon. Stephen King's favorite reliever signed an incentive-laded contract with AZ, due to injury concerns. Score one for foresight. He started 2009 on the DL rehabbing from an elbow issue, but then blew out his hamstring during a game in Milwaukee. He was released after his Reno rehab led to 10 earned runs in less than seven IP.

6. Mike Schultz. He got a cup of coffee in April 2007; we needed a starter for Sunday but called him up as a bullpen arm for a couple of days. He faced the minimum three batters, with the help of a double-play, in a 4-2 loss against the Giants, and was sent down to Tucson the next day. Played pro ball in Japan for Hiroshima from 2008-2010.

5. Jeff Fassero. Fassero is the least-significant D'back in percentage terms: to date, he's thrown 2033.2 innings in the big leagues, but more than 99.95% of those have not been for Arizona. He threw one entirely-competent - indeed, perfect - innings in September 2004 against the Brewers, but was released within a month, meaning his career here lasted just 14 pitches. He was actually the winning pitcher for the Cardinals when they beat AZ in the 2002 playoffs.

4. Jeff Bajenaru. Acquired in the trade for Alex Cintron, Bajenaru got to spend three days in the big league during 2006, throwing only one inning and 20 pitches. He allowed four hits - but three of them left the park, though he did manage to retire Barry Bonds. One game for AZ; one loss; 36.00 ERA. Well done: you must get up very early... Like Schultz, he became a free agent at the end of 2007. He's also a member of SABR.

3. Ken Huckaby. The only position player whose career with Arizona was limited to a single appearance, his debut and finale was an October 6th game during 2001 [wonder if he got a ring?] - again, versus the Brewers - in the penultimate contest of the year. He replaced Barajas as catcher in the 6th, and struck out against Dejean to end the eighth. That was it. He has gone on to play 160 games for Toronto, Baltimore, Texas and Boston since though.

2. Ricky Pickett. Taste the meaty goodness of this line:
0.2 IP, 3 H, 4 BB, 6 ER, 2 K, 81.00 ERA
Pickett debuted on April 28th, 1998, facing six hitters and retiring one, allowing three hits, two walks and a wild pitch in the ninth innings. A week later in New York, he fared slightly better, facing only five hitters while retiring one, on two hits and two more walks. That was it - not only in Arizona, but for his career in the majors as a whole. Remarkably though, both hitters he got out were on strikeouts, giving him a perfect K/9 rate of 27.00.

1. J.D. Durbin. Straight in at #1, with a bullet - much like the one he got after his performance on April 4th, 2007. Let's just review, shall we?

  • Bottom of the 8th, Rockies Batting, Ahead 4-2,
    J.D. Durbin replaces Juan Cruz pitching and batting 9th
  • S Finley - Groundout: 1B-P
  • J Carroll - Single to LF (Line Drive)
  • G Atkins - Walk
  • T Helton - Double to LF (Carroll Scores)
  • M Holliday - Single to LF (Atkins Scores; Helton Scores)
  • B Hawpe - Double to RF (Holliday Scores)
  • T Tulowitzki - Strikeout Swinging
  • Y Torrealba - Single to LF (Hawpe Scores)
  • J Baker (PH) - Double to LF (Torrealba Scores)
  • S Finley - Single to RF (Baker Scores)
    Brandon Medders replaces J.D. Durbin pitching and batting 9th

Ten batters faced: seven hits, one walk, seven runs, all earned, for two outs. A career ERA of 94.50 for the Diamondbacks. Ouch. Remarkably, after being unceremoniously dumped immediately by AZ, he bounced back in Philadelphia, making ten starts and posting a 5.15 ERA there, including a complete-game shutout of the Padres: given we won the division by a single game, that was likely his most worthwhile contribution to the D-backs.

The Hall of Anonymity

Player          W L   ERA  G GS GF  IP  H  R ER HR BB SO
J.D.Durbin 0 0 94.50 1 0 0 0.2 7 7 7 0 1 1
Ricky Pickett 0 0 81.00 2 0 0 0.2 3 6 6 0 4 2
Jeff Bajenaru 0 1 36.00 1 0 0 1.0 4 4 4 3 0 0
Jeff Fassero 0 0 0.00 1 0 0 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Mike Schultz 0 0 0.00 1 0 0 1.0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Tom Gordon 0 1 21.60 3 0 0 1.2 3 4 4 0 3 0
Ryan Cook 0 1 21.60 4 0 0 1.2 7 4 4 0 3 1
Ricky Bottalico 1 0 5.40 2 0 0 1.2 3 1 1 0 2 2
Shane Reynolds 0 1 4.50 1 1 0 2.0 6 6 1 0 2 0
Dennys Reyes 0 0 11.57 3 0 0 2.1 5 3 3 1 1 5
Joe Kennedy 0 0 20.25 3 0 0 2.2 4 7 6 0 2 1
Bryan Corey 0 0 9.00 3 0 2 4.0 6 4 4 1 2 1
Dan Carlson 0 0 9.00 2 0 1 4.0 5 4 4 0 0 3

Player G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG
Ken Huckaby 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 .000 .000 .000
Juan Sosa 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 .000 .000 .000
Jack Cust 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 .500 .667 .500

Comment 23 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Frank Thomas and Billy Beane
In a thread a while ago there was this ongoing banter about MoneyBall.  The one who was defending MoneyBall (Stephen maybe?) basically said that the point of MoneyBall is to go after undervalued players.  
Interesting perspective.
If so, I wonder if one can read into Beane's maneuvers this winter as him reading the market that character and leadership are overvalued and the so called "clubhouse cancers" were undervalued.
Perhaps this can explain Milton Bradley and Frank Thomas.  Either way, it should make for some nice drama.

by johngordonma on Jan 25, 2006 6:25 PM EST reply actions  

Interesting thought...
The only problem would be, I don't know if anyone has established a way to actually "measure" clubhouse leadership. Not least because it'd likely depend on who is in the clubhouse: a team of veterans would likely need less management (or, at least, different management) from rookies. But yes, the A's have the feel of a powder-keg, ready to explode: that might be good or bad, we just have to wait and see!

by Jim McLennan on Jan 25, 2006 6:40 PM EST up reply actions  

you're kidding
Sabremetrics doesn't have a way to measure this?!?  There's no runs allowed due to bafoonery over replacement... RADBOR...

by nihil67 on Jan 25, 2006 6:47 PM EST up reply actions  

great topic
Edwin Diaz and Bobby Estalella would have been others to consider.

Diaz had 12 ABs, 2 hits (both doubles!?), and an RBI in 2 seasons (98 and 99).  Has since disappeared I think.

Estalella had 14 ABs in 04, 2 hits (both homers!?!?) before getting tossed on the 'designated for assignment' pile.

Perhaps both are more funny then insignificant.

by nihil67 on Jan 25, 2006 6:32 PM EST reply actions  

Estallella
One of his homers came in the same game as one of my all-time favourite D'back moments: Sexson's walk-off come-from-behind, extra-innings homer against Colorado, and was called beforehand by my wife. If Toronto hadn't picked him up, he'd have been one answer to a great trivia question: who had a year where every hit was a home-run?

by Jim McLennan on Jan 25, 2006 6:37 PM EST reply actions  

Psychology in the workplace
[ and this b.s. about clubhouse chemistry is basically the way for a bunch of radio and tv talking monkeys to come up with unassailable reasons why some teams fail and others succeed. you can find tons of teams with great chemistry and sucky records. you can find tons of teams with players who hated each other and won a shitload of games and championships. ]

Hmmm...just as the old school of baseball thought (like Joe Morgan) fear sabermetrics, because they don't understand it, it seems that the new school of baseball thought fear "clubhouse chemistry", because it can't be measured to two decimal places. :-)

But seriously, I think you do underestimate the psychological aspects of the game. Any employer will tell you that productivity can be greatly affected by the relationships - good or bad - among the workforce, and I see no reason why this would not be the case for baseball. It may not be predictable, or measurable, but I think you'd be foolish to ignore it entirely as a factor, and potentially a significant one.

As for Cust vs. Upton and Drew, yes, I appreciate they're not the same (not least because Cust was a #30 pick, not a #1). But I'll be a lot happier once Upton shows he can hit pitchers who've started shaving, and don't need to be accompanied by their parents to R-rated movies...

by Jim McLennan on Jan 26, 2006 2:11 AM EST reply actions  

uoh nuo
dunt quiston da logick. Wee cont hoap two undurstand teh hier plain of logick thut hie axistses un.  You're numburs con't possabley bee wurthy uf cunsiduratun.

Wie most al gaep un ahe uf hies intulleckt.

by nihil67 on Jan 26, 2006 10:59 AM EST reply actions  

Chemistry Set
[ No one is trying to measure (or unmeasure) clubhouse chemistry; the reason no one is trying to measure it? because it doesn't really matter... ]

So, are you saying that baseball is in some way totally unique, in that the personal relationships among the workforce have no significant impact on productivity? If that's the case, why is it immune to these factors?

Of course, admitting otherwise would undermine some of the basic foundations of sabermetrics, that everything important in baseball can be "number-crunched" objectively - implying that there are no such thing as intangibles. Of course, sabermetrics would also deny the existence of great art and true love. :-)

It seems to me that "clubhouse chemistry" is an asset, just like any other - and like, say, OBP, can be over- or under-valued at any given time. It may not be as quantifiable as OBP, but that doesn't make it worthless. I do agree that it is used as a crutch by some commentators, as a magic wand with which to wave away random variance, but such abuse doesn't invalidate any genuine effect that may be present.

[ once you add contacts to the equation, hudson is by far the more valuable player of the two. ]

It was only on my third read through the sentence that I realised this was a typo, and you were not talking about some hitherto-unannounced opthalmic issue with Hudson. :-)

On the win shares front, it would be the case that AZ's over-performance last year [compared to their run-differential] would seem to cause there to be more win shares to go around (including to Glaus) than would be expected by their actual performance. From what I've read, they're probably a better measure of player "value", than as a predictor of future player ability.

However, VORP also puts Glaus at 45.4, and Hudson down at 17.4; RCAA had Glaus at +25, Hudson at -5. Now, those don't take defense into effect, but even allowing for that, "Hudson is so much the better player of the two that it's not even fair to put them in the same sentence" seems like hyperbole, at the very least.

by Jim McLennan on Jan 26, 2006 4:34 PM EST reply actions  

Chemistry
This chemistry question is a good one.  These final three slots on the all-time list (Schill, Gonzo, Johnson) got me thinking about this chemistry question and how it relates to the D-Backs.  My hunch is that the chemistry on that 2001 team would not rank in the top 3 or 4 clubhouses in D-Backs history.  I mean we all know what a great guy Gonzo is, but that 01 clubhouse had several guys who could be called cancers: Schill, Johnson, Durazo, and even Batista.  Of course they also had Grace, Bell, and Gonzo.  And many have asserted that the shift from uptight Showalter to BB helped the team.
Either way, my bet is that chemistry does count, but not nearly to the degree it does in the other two major sports: basketball and football.  Additionally, chemistry is a really tricky thing to measure, because my bet is that winning makes a much bigger difference on chemistry than personalities.  Just look at the perception of Ozzie Guillen this year.  When they were losing, he was considered a tampering micromanager, when they started winning all of the sudden he was a quirky genius.
All in all I think that Beane has been pretty smart this off-season.  I do think that these "cancer" types get undervalued.  Just look at Kent.  All the guy does is win.  Who cares if you wouldn't want the guy to be your daughter's godfather.  He can pound the ball and he has won everywhere he has gone (alright, not in LA, but that was just one year).  Back to the A's: the Milton Bradley deal was a much bigger risk because they had to give up some pretty good prospects, but I think it was a pretty decent move considering.  But Frank Thomas for a max contract of $3 mill?  That's freaking brilliant.

by johngordonma on Jan 27, 2006 8:44 AM EST reply actions  

typo...
I meant "Bautista" not "Batista"

by johngordonma on Jan 27, 2006 8:45 AM EST reply actions  

Batista was no charmer either
throwing the ball at a charging Tino Martinez comes to mind

by andrewinnewyork on Jan 30, 2006 3:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes we know what we're talking about
Once again, can we not toss insults (particularly off-topic ones, like about spelling in lighthearted posts) to each other here? Particularly when anonymous? It puts kind of a damper on the tone, given that we all root for the same team.

One poster has adequately responded to your flighty comment about Hudson and Glaus; let me answer your rating of Frank Thomas.

While "a full season of a healthy Frank Thomas" is indeed "worth a lot more than $3million," Frank Thomas played 74 games in 2004 and 34 in 2005; that is not a trend that tends to suddenly reverse itself in 37-year-old sluggers (unless he goes on the Juice, which would not be a wise career move given how much it would tarnish what he's done in the past). This looks a lot like the Dbacks signing Clemente for $500,000 in order to tell people there's an HOF player on the infield, never mind the crutches. I like Billy Beane as much as the next guy, but Thomas is just plain old and hurt.

Incidentally and back to my first point, calling other people "monkeys" and peppering your comment with faux-cursings (wtf, bs) does not make you look any more insightful than the next guy.

by andrewinnewyork on Jan 30, 2006 3:14 PM EST reply actions  

I thought
I thought our resident nihilist was pretty clever, since the actual charge against him was that he was dumb for making a typo spelling "buffoon," which is not, that I can think of, a baseball critique. See my post above about treating each other with dignity. By insulting people you just get them to insult you back, and then we are all on the playground.

by andrewinnewyork on Jan 30, 2006 3:19 PM EST reply actions  

Hudson in the clubhouse
Everyone I've read says Hudson is great in the clubhouse. The last stat I found was that his CORP (Clubhouse over Replacement player) was +7.843, compared to Glaus's CORP at -1.118. So that's real improvement!

by andrewinnewyork on Jan 30, 2006 3:23 PM EST reply actions  

CORP
It's about time somebody brought up the CORP.  Great system.  Let's see.  How does that formula go again?
(Pats on the butt + Nicknames made up + Interviews for MLB.com)/('Calling out a teammate' + cursing at a coach on TV + demanding a trade) x Winning %

by johngordonma on Jan 30, 2006 10:05 PM EST reply actions  

I didn't mean. .
he lacked "chemistry" just that he was a bit of a loose cannon. His poems are good though, and apparently he read Marx in the clubhouse, which always helps you bond with guys making $6.5 million a year.

by andrewinnewyork on Feb 2, 2006 7:21 PM EST reply actions  

Additional nominees
There are a few other names I would throw into the hat for nomination:  
Brent Brede starting left fielder in 1998 who was so bad the Diamondbacks traded for Bernard Gilkey who was nearly blind and left the team to Lasik surgery during the season
Dante Powell centerfielder of the future in 1999 - the future lasted almost a whole month
Mike DiFelice received in the Albie Lopez trade from Tampa Bay in 2001 who went 1-21 and ended his stay with the Diamondbacks by trying to light a woman's butt on fire in a bar fight
Bobby Chouinard that awesome specimen and relief pitcher who lost game a play-off game for the Diamondbacks in 1999 then beat his wife and held a gun to her head during the Christmas holidays.  He at least needs to get an honorable mention or a humanitarian award of some kind.

Jeff

by AZJazzyJ on Oct 17, 2006 10:36 PM EDT reply actions  

I guess Levski was right
Frank Thomas for one year 500K plus incentives was a brilliant move for Billy Beane in 06

And Hudson WAS better than Glaus.

by shoewizard on Nov 23, 2007 4:35 PM EST reply actions  

Very sad news
Joe Kennedy died today :(

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7480612

Terrible tragedy and to happen over the holidays to a player of such a young age.

by Wimb on Nov 24, 2007 12:21 AM EST reply actions  

That discussion
was impossible to read, I'd like to point out.

On thing people need to remember about BB and the A's going after undervalued players: that's simply because that's what they can handle.  If they could have significantly larger payroll, I'd doubt they'd worry so much about looking for the best value.  <u>Moneyball</u> is a book about applying economic and financial ideas to baseball, and for the A's that means finding players that are undervalued but still have a value to them.  They're not trying to put together a rec-league softball team.

Stay grindy, my friends.

by soco on Nov 24, 2007 12:21 AM EST reply actions  

I've just seen
that it's in the header :S opps!

by Wimb on Nov 24, 2007 12:22 AM EST reply actions  

Joe Kennedy
His death is a bad news. I am sorry to hear that! He is such a good pitcher.

by worlzkyin663 on Nov 25, 2007 11:57 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the AZ SnakePit, the SB Nation blog about the Arizona Diamondbacks. "When you think about the past all the time, when you get to the present day you are thinking about the past so it becomes your future again." -- Kirk Gibson.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Hl_small
New Primary Logo in 2012
Small
Free D-backs autograph session this Friday
Tmottbg_small
Exclusive Behind the Scene Tour of CHASE
Tmottbg_small
March 10 Spring Training Opportunity
Syd-barrett_small
Diamondbacks Claim Craig Tatum Off Waivers; 40 man roster full
Shoewizard-baby-72x72_small
Whats the deal with Josh Collmenter ?
Ryro_hangten_small
A Sad Day In The World Of Scrappy-ness: David Eckstein Retires
Ryro_hangten_small
Former Diamondback Craig Counsell Retires
Small
DBacks Fantasy Camp Autographs
Small
Salary Cap Dynasty League Openings

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

Lucha_small Jim McLennan

Bench coaches

Madmen_icon_small snakecharmer

My-little-pony-friendship-is-magic-brony-not-the-element-of-efficiency_small kishi

Scarlett_small soco

Us1jack_small DbacksSkins

Players

Wailord_by_xous54_small Wailord

Hl_small Marc Fournier

Golden_dome_small Dan Strittmatter

Avogadro_small Zavada's Moustache

Small blue bulldog