I just realized
The Diamondbacks are 5 games over .500. So much for my overreaction Tuesday night, while in the process of bashing the D'backs offense, Glaus promtly rockets one out. I think I'm focusing too much on pythagorean records, what baseball prospectus says, and what writers(in particular Dayn Perry from foxsports.com) write. What I'm trying to say is, yeah, the Diamondbacks are probably overacheiving. But I bet we all agree, overacheiving is better than acheiving nothing at all.
0 recs |
4 comments
Comments
Differential schmifferential!
Have we over-achieved? Probably. But that's in the past; what we need to do now is ride our good luck, and start playing like we mean it. And what better occasion than a four-game series at Coors Field to waken our slumbering lumber?
by Jim McLennan on May 12, 2005 2:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Like they say...
by William K on May 12, 2005 8:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Weekly Rankings
No matter what formula you use to predict/justify the rankings, there will be some disgruntled homey fans, me included ;), who will be unhappy with it.
by William K on May 12, 2005 8:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Power Rankings
But as William says, you could come up with a stat that "proves" any team is superior to any other team. Baseball is the most number oriented game around, which may not always be helpful!
by Jim McLennan on May 14, 2005 3:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 



















